User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2016/Q4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace of Fine Arts San Francisco January 2014 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liggett Hall New York September 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The right side is leaning in, perspective need to be fixed IMO --Christian Ferrer 05:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --King of Hearts 05:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC) Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 18:19, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Governors Island New York September 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 08:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:18, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:02, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace of Fine Arts San Francisco January 2014 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:15, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 05:57, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Governors Island New York September 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:47, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manhattan Bridge June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You can't get rid of the cars. In view of that, I think you did about as well as one could, and this is a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carya cathayensis nuts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - Very high quality to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 03:29, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Williams New York September 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Jay New York September 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:29, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI--ArildV 07:34, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI--ArildV 07:34, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Governors Island New York September 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:28, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Governors Island New York September 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower Bridge London June 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liggett Hall New York September 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK. --C messier 11:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Governors Island New York September 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 01:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very sharp photo, good focus to main object but very dark. Sunlight and shadows is/are very strong, so a week support --Michielverbeek 05:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford University Main Quad May 2011 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Washburn Point Yosemite August 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:06, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:21, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 07:20, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie September 2016 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:21, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glacier Point Yosemite August 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - Hazy light, but perfectly OK for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 08:07, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liggett Hall New York September 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Picture Nomination[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Palace of Fine Arts San Francisco January 2014 001.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Code (talk) 05:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midtown Manhattan from Queens May 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice atmposphere --Pudelek 11:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mono Lake Old Marina August 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mono Lake South Tufa August 2013 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Palace of Fine Arts San Francisco January 2014 003.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palace of Fine Arts San Francisco January 2014 003.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Jay New York September 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 15:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liggett Hall New York September 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but please use a tighter crop - there is too much empty foreground --Uoaei1 04:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --King of Hearts 00:32, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:13, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Palace of Fine Arts San Francisco January 2014 001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palace of Fine Arts San Francisco January 2014 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Code (talk) 06:35, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - Good enough quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:09, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pity the deep shadows, but for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 03:47, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:07, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FDR Four Freedoms Park New York October 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:50, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bodie September 2016 016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bodie September 2016 016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FDR Four Freedoms Park New York October 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York October 2016 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 06:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Untitled)[edit]

Simone Biles voting : Hi King, i am preparing my statement in Block PetarM. But i need to know what was your statement here, which was erased by INeverCry ? --Mile (talk) 16:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was about the incorrect filename, which is still on the page. It has nothing to do with the case. -- King of 00:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, King of Hearts,[edit]

The line is exactly vertical. See note.
Sincerely,--Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening King of Hearts,[edit]

I would like to change, but do not know what you mean presies.
I master the English language and no translation with Google Translate. Do you think the picture is tilted?
Sincerely, --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
PS: the line of the wall is slightly crooked, but that's my view. it is an old house in poor condition.

The line that you annotated as "The line is exactly vertical" is not exactly vertical. It leans to the left. -- King of 00:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your clear explanations. performed correction.
Sincerely,--Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CA[edit]

I am a master at Premiere, or at least that is what my staff tells me, but Photoshop is like a accessories to be honest with you. I use it in titles but I admit that I just have not spent the type of time I have in dealing with it that I really should. Many of my photos are in fact production stills, camera establishing shots and often storyboard photos from production work. As far as FP current noms, the only 2 should be the Laguna duo. I will resubmit the Florida shot another time, sorry I was unaware of the 2 photo limit. As far as adjusting the CA, is that a specific filter, or one of the automated tone/contrast/color filters? Thanks, Don. --WPPilot (talk) 05:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you shoot in RAW or JPEG? The workflow for them in Photoshop is different, so I need to know which one you use to know what to recommend. -- King of 05:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Laguna Aerial was in JPEG only.. --WPPilot (talk) 20:24, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Go to Filter -> Lens Correction... and there should be a tab that allows you to correct various things like distortion, perspective, and chromatic aberration. -- King of 00:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! East 51st Street Pedestrian Crossing New York October 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The railing and the lamps are a bit noisy, think you can fix that? W.carter 21:27, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Do note that some of the grain is not noise but natural dirt that has accumulated on the railing. --King of Hearts 02:44, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I saw that. :) The paint job is also very structured so I checked at relatively smooth vertical sections. All good now though. QI. --W.carter 08:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roosevelt Island and Queens from Manhattan New York October 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:10, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roosevelt Island and Queens from Manhattan New York October 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 07:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BAM Peter Jay Sharp Building, Howard Gilman Opera House, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Queensboro Bridge New York October 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boston skyline from Cambridge November 2015 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boston skyline from Cambridge November 2015 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 05:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:30th Street Station Philadelphia July 2016 002 edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:30th Street Station Philadelphia July 2016 002.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Solvay conference 1927 Version2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Solvay conference 1927.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States – Results![edit]

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2016}} to your userpage!

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States during the month of October! The United States contest saw over 1,700 people contribute over 11,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States and its territories. In addition to National Register of Historic Places sites, we welcomed uploads of sites designated by state- and local-level historical institutions and societies. Hundreds of these photos are already being used to illustrate Wikipedia articles!

We're excited to announce that our national judging process has concluded, and that we have selected the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States! We were amazed by all of the uploads, and regret having to narrow it down to just 10. That being said – congratulations to our national winners and their amazing shots! Our 10 winners will be sent to the international Wiki Loves Monuments jury, who will then select the winners of the international contest. If you're interested in seeing the winners of the other various national contests as they are announced, you may do so at Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 winners.

Finally, we have also created a feedback form for all participants in the United States to fill out. The survey is optional and anonymous, and only takes a minute or two – we hope to use the feedback to organize better events in the future!

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, and we hope to see you again for future Commons photography events! ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 06:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Graduated ND[edit]

That is a great idea, this house is 5 min from me, so its easy to retake the shot. Setting up the FX with the same prime on my rig & stix with the MattBox and will take the set of Panavision Tiffen Schneider 4x5.65 Neutral Density Filters to see what that does. Perfect still shot to use them on. In terms of Graduated ND I have a .3 ND, & blue, might try both. Thanks for your input. --WPPilot (talk) 04:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, as I added a alt does this fill my 2 photo quota for the week? --Don (talk) 04:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is limited to 2 nomination pages. That's how you can have sets of 5 images being nominated, which caused people to abuse this by looping together a bunch of marginally related photos to get around the restriction, which caused sets to be temporarily banned, and finally reinstated with very stringent criteria on what qualifies as a set. -- King of 00:41, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Boston skyline from Cambridge November 2015 panorama 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boston skyline from Cambridge November 2015 panorama 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Newark October 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 03:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Newark October 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Newark October 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 06:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Columbia University New York November 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:36, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! General Grant National Memorial New York November 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Columbia University New York November 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City College of New York November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! General Grant National Memorial New York November 2016 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Newark October 2016 panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Newark October 2016 panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:General Grant National Memorial New York November 2016 003.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:General Grant National Memorial New York November 2016 003.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer[edit]

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chicago from Field Museum June 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chicago from Shedd Aquarium June 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 23:46, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South Loop Chicago June 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:0000140 Wat Arun 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:0000140 Wat Arun 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Eilean Donan at Dusk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eilean Donan at Dusk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:South Loop Chicago June 2015 001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:South Loop Chicago June 2015 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chimney Rock Trail Point Reyes December 2016 panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Francis Scott Key Monument San Francisco December 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good sharpness! By the way, the lens in EXIF is 0mm f/0, was is a vintage lens? Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some holiday joy[edit]

Since 1959, it is a Swedish tradition to (at 3 pm) watch Donald Duck and other Disney cartoons on TV. The most appreciated part is about Donald as bird photographer in Clown of the Jungle. I think most users at FPC can relate to the frustrated Donald (especially the parrot scene), which is why I'm sharing it with you. Happy Holiday! --cart-Talk 15:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)[edit]

* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 18:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)   [reply]