User talk:Kazimier Lachnovič/Talk archive 1

English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kazimier Lachnovič!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--Legobot^Operator_talk 22:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Menskaja voblasc na mapie.svg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 23:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Kazimier Lachnovič!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sciah sviatoha Jura.svg is uncategorized since 7 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:City Hall of Mаhiloŭ 1.JPG is uncategorized since 3 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Former Cloister of Holy Trinity, Minsk-1.JPG is uncategorized since 5 April 2009.
Image:Traeсkaje suburb.JPG is uncategorized since 5 April 2009.
Image:Coat of Arms of Janavičy.gif is uncategorized since 8 April 2009.
Image:Pcič river.jpg is uncategorized since 5 June 2009.
Image:Laher-Smalenskaj-Šlachty.jpg is uncategorized since 25 July 2009.
Image:Stańkаŭ, Napaleon Orda.jpg was uncategorized on 7 September 2009.
Image:Catholic church of SS. Peter and Paul in Vialiž.jpg was uncategorized on 10 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ihnat Damiejka (silver coin, revers).png was uncategorized on 26 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated License[edit]

It has been found that Image:Catholic Church in Białyničy, Napaleon Orda.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 16:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of Arms of Bierascie Voivodeship.svg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Church_of_Saint_Casimir,_Mаhiloŭ.JPG[edit]

File:Church_of_Saint_Casimir,_Mаhiloŭ.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernardin Cloister in Ušačy.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Беларусы._Biełarusy._Belarusians.png[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Беларусы._Biełarusy._Belarusians.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Justass (talk) 22:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Трэба дадаць спасылкі на файлы, зь якіх створаны каляж. Wizardist (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Дзякуй! Зараз як раз іх зьбіраю. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for providing the source for images you used in collage. But some of them are nor {{PD-old}} nor covered by {{PD-BY-exempt}}. http://www.belarus.by/rel_image/1098 is from belarus.by website where all content is marked as copyrighted. http://vsu.by:8081/web_index/news/yakub_kolas/index.html is from the middle of last century and come from the website marked as © 2007 Бiблiятэка ВДУ. Файл:Olga-Korbut.jpg is uploaded to ru wiki under fair use rationale, Commons does allow fair use. Please replace or remove them. Thank you --Justass (talk) 22:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explanation, I replaced all questionable files. Is everything ok now? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you --Justass (talk) 22:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Map Of Menskaja Voblasc.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Map Of Menskaja Voblasc.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Map Of Menskaja Voblasc.svg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Cholo Aleman (talk) 21:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Moscow Patriarchate churches in Miensk 1.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:58, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Street_in_Masty.JPG[edit]

File:Street_in_Masty.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Rubin16 (talk) 13:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Church of the Saviour in Połacak.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Leŭ Sapieha. Леў Сапега.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mikałaj_III_Radzivił._Мікалай_III_Радзівіл.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mikałaj_III_Radzivił._Мікалай_III_Радзівіл.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mikałaj_III_Radzivił._Мікалай_III_Радзівіл.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Evalowyn (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This engraving was created by unknown author in 17th century. It's obvious {{PD-old}}. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just give the URL of the source. It would be enough. No one wants this image to be deleted as well. Wizardist (talk) 00:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

На жаль, яно перастала працаваць. Калі выдаляць - нічога страшнага, усё адно я імя трохі пераблытаў (гэта насамрэч Войцех-Адальбэрт Радзівіл). Як сайт той запрацуе - загружу пад новым імём або папрашу перанесьці існую выяву. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 00:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Выяву можаш і сам перанесьці. :) Wizardist (talk) 01:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Здаецца, усё ж не магу сам (прынамсі такога пунтка ў мэню ня бачна), звычайна зьвяртаюся па гэта да EugeneZelenko. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 01:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Пасьля зоркі ідзе стрэлка, наводзіш на яе і там выкідное мэню. Voila. Wizardist (talk) 20:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Для выяваў (File:) у маім мэню толькі пункты: Global usage - Find categories - Log - Purge - en. Мабыць, у цябе больш правоў. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Józef Sapieha[edit]

To oczywisty błąd w Wilanowie. To dziecinny portret Józefa Sapiehy (1737-1792). Zofia Zielińska w haśle w Polskim Słowniku Biograficznym pisze o dziecinnych portretach pędzla Mirysa. pozdrawiam Mathiasrex (talk) 08:01, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polacak,_1579.jpg[edit]

This file is being used in w:Livonian War, which is up for featured article nomination. The reviewers require a thorough source for images - to prevent copyright problems and the like - and I was wondering if you could provide this on the file page? Things like where the information came from and the map data; if these aren't in the public domain or under a suitable licence then this could be problematic. What does "NN" mean? Thanks. Grandiose (talk) 16:23, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added more precisely file description and suppose that now all should be correct. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 21:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kamianiec Litoŭski. Камянец Літоўскі (1930).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Напалеон Орда[edit]

Вітаю. Заўважыў, што вы пэрманэнтна дадаеце новыя файлы ў катэгорыю. Выдатна, але я тут зь нядаўняе пары вырашыў разгрэсьці завалы, у якіх усё адно патрэбны файл знайсьці было немагчыма, ды пачаў разносіць малюнкі ў падкатэгорыі паводле населеных пунктаў. Дык было б добра, каб вы правяралі, ці ня створаная ўжо катэгорыя па тым населеным пункце, малюнкі якога вы зьбіраецеся запампаваць, і калі так, то дадаваць файлы менавіта ў тую падкатэгорыю. Да таго ж можа стацца, што такі файл тамака ўжо існуе. :)

Ну а па-другое, якім чынам вы пераймяноўваеце файлы, цікава? ;) --Renessaince (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаньне і дзякуй за ўпарадкаваньне катэгорыяў, бо ў асноўнай, сапраўды, назіраецца пэўная перагружанасьць. Буду надалей імкнуцца да больш дэталёвай катэгарызацыі. Што датычыцца зьмяненьня назваў файлаў, то існуе адмысловая старонка Commons:Requests for rights#Filemover, дзе трэба зьмясьціць запыт (можна паводле аналёгіі зь іншымі) на правы Filemover'а. Здаецца, у вас ужо дастаткова рэдагаваньняў. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 14:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Выдатна, калі дапаможаце ва ўпарадкаваньні. А ў такім разе як лічыце, ці варта яшчэ стварыць катэгорыі-пасярэднікі (паміж асноўнай і катэгорыямі паводле н. п.) для малюнкаў Орды паводле краінаў? То бок усе сучасныя беларускія населеныя пункты дадаць у катэгорыю Category:Paintings of Belarus by Napoleon Orda‎ і да т. п.? Таму што ўжо цяпер падкатэгорыяў 69, і гэта яшчэ далёка не мяжа. --Renessaince (talk) 14:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

На маю думку, шмат падкатэгорыяў - гэта ня так страшна, як шмат выяваў :) Усё ж, дзякуючы ўпарадкаванасьці назваў, арыентавацца ў такім выпадку значна прасьцей. Таму глядзіце самі, ці варта ствараць катэгорыі-пасярэднікі для краінаў. Засмучвае хіба той факт, што ў часы стварэньня работаў сучасных граніцаў не існавала. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:14, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Кайзэраўскія фота беларускіх мястэчак[edit]

Не жадаеце заняцца запампоўкай? Мяне пакуль хапіла толькі на Пружану, і толькі на першую старонку. --Renessaince (talk) 07:46, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Дзякуй за спасылку. У мяне тут такая пазыцыя: запампоўка гэта, вядома, добра, аднак яшчэ лепей, каб запампаванае адразу ж ішло ў артыкулы, бо з уласнага назіраньня - рэдкі паспаліты чытач ідзе у commons па дадатковыя файлы. Дарэчы, на наступных старонках памянёнага рэсурсу шмат якія паштоўкі зь першай паўтараюцца, таму ў будучыні можна будзе ўсё хуценька загрузіць. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Так, гэта ўсё зразумела. Адно толькі блага, што гэта онлайн-аўкцыён, а яны, як вядома, маюць асаблівасьць сканчацца ці быць выкупленыя… --Renessaince (talk) 06:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Як варыянт, найбольш цікавыя паштоўкі можна сьцягнуць сабе на дыск. Але мне падалося, што менавіта на тым аўкцыёне, у адрозьненьні ад allegro.pl, яны захоўваюцца даволі працяглы час. У кожным разе, я імкнуся ставіцца да ўсяго гэтага па-філязофскі: не пасьпеў - значыць, іншым разам пашчасьціць :) --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 13:28, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alaksandar Zasłaŭski. Аляксандар Заслаўскі.jpg[edit]

Мої шанування! Завантажений вами файл насправді є портретом данціґського міщанина з відомого сайту. --Bulka UA (talk) 22:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю! Шкода, але це дійсно не Заславський. Виправив назву файлу, опис та посилання. Дякую, що написали. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 23:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Padśville. Падсьвільле (XX).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Padśville. Падсьвільле (XX).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 23:35, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sievierščyna._Севершчына_(1676).jpg[edit]

File:Sievierščyna._Севершчына_(1676).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

80.94.166.169 12:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated License[edit]

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Biahomiel. Бягомель (10.07.2009).jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 13:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan Kazimier. Ян Казімер (1651).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Color and brightness correction[edit]

И верно, цвет портретов изменился, но перемены связаны не с тем, что позировали покойники, а с тем, что белый цвет стал белым вместо желтого, увы, но это общее свойство старых картин (они желтеют, и чем старше - тем желтее), кроме того большинство сканирующих систем искажают цвета, что тоже следует учитывать. "Естественный" загар не изображался на картинах - персонажей писали с выбеленными, т.е. красивыми лицами. Корректура цвета производилась типовая (без обрезания гистограммы, что не приводило к потере графической информации) в результате которой выравнивался черный цвет (он утрачивал оттенки и становился черным), а также белый цвет, который утрачивал желтизну (т.е. дефицит синего и частично зеленого цвета), см. File:Hanna Prušynskaja (Kamaroŭskaja). Ганна Прушынская (Камароўская).jpg, File:Stanisłaŭ Prušynski. Станіслаў Прушынскі (XVIII).jpg. Но это исторические портреты. Но есть исторические марины и пейзажи, см. File:Trafalgar1.jpg, File:Santodomingo.jpg, на которых (если Вы посмотрите их прежние неисправленные версии) тоже все было желтым, лазурное море и синее небо были бурыми. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 17:01, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Разумеется, что Ваши дополнительные усилия по коррекции цветовой гаммы я могу только приветствовать. Что касается "омолаживания" - прежняя, неомоложенная версия продолжает оставаться доступной в истории файла. Естественно, что некоторые цветовые эффекты могут и должны быть, увы, результатом разности настоек мониторов. Но, подчеркиваю, я гистограмму не обрезал, потому ни один оттенок не был потерян, а потому всегда возможна дальнейшая коррекция. А вот вопрос о том, на сколько корректно улучшать цифровое изображение - это серьезный вопрос. Для себя я решил его так: изображения лучшего качества имеют большую познавательную, иллюстративную и потому энциклопедическую ценность. Ведь посмотрите, сколько цифровых преобразований было произведено над File:Miensk. Менск (XIX, II).jpg? Я вот со своей стороны попытался решить непростую задачку устранения муара - и, честно говоря, принял решение оставить этот муар на своем месте (преобразовав, естественно, из цветного в grayscale). Но существующий вариант также приемлем. Кстати, только сейчас вспомнил, что недели две назад в качестве избранного на Коммонз было номинировано изображение Джоконды, с которого были убраны все трещинки (что, согласитесь, еще большее "омоложение", не так ли?). Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:02, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Да, и еще вопрос: есть вот такое изображение 1700x2961 pix есть ли смысл грузить его как альтернативу File:Janusz Radziwiłł (1612–1655).jpg? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:40, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Да, я не мог не заметить то, что недостатки письма стали заметнее, но (если следовать этой логике), то чем хуже качество файла, то тем меньше заметны дефекты картины (трещины, засветы, тени, недостатки художественного письма). И о гамма-коррекции: разумеется ее приходится делать для каждой спектральной полосы отдельно, но уже после отсечения пустых участков гистограммы (слева и справа). Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Да я тоже предполагал, что многопиксельная версия хуже той, что была Вами загружена как ее альтернатива. Но я хотел, чтобы Вы подтвердили мое мнение - я попытался что-то сделать с многопиксельной версией и пришел к выводу, что вариант без изначального муара (продукта сканирования полиграфической репродукции) все же предпочтительнее.
  - Что касается [1] - то это не "удачная цветокоррекция", а полное ее отсутствие. Изображение темное, тени не читаются. И оно, естественно, "желтое". Понимаю, что гепатитные лица, руки, воротники, платки, документы, паруса, облака и пр. являются привычными, однако такая цветовая гамма, увы, не позволяет судить о том, каков был цвет одеяний, драпировок и пр. Именно информативность таких изображений минимальна, как мне думается. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Да нет же никакого "эталона белизны лиц": просто расширяется гистограмма на весь диапазон - и только-то. То есть максимальные значения гистограммы устанавливаются на 255, а минимальные на 0 в каждой спектральной полосе. В результате белесый цвет лиц проявляется сам (как облаков на пейзажах). Тут не ставится задача "выбелить лица" - результат в свое время меня самого удивил, хотя в ряде случаев лица все равно не белые. Гамма-коррекция производилась для того, чтобы повысить яркость теней, проявить детали в тенях изображения. Но делалось это осторожно, так как усиление яркости могло бы спровоцировать исчезновение деталей в светлой части гистограммы.
    - Что касается недавно отреставрированного портрета, пример которого Вы приводите. Белыми на нем являются лебедь в гербе, а не лицо. Но лицо розовато-телесного цвета, а не желтое. Только не следует путать гистограммные преобразования с реставрацией, не стоит обижать художников-реставраторов и сравнивать их с ремесленниками от гистограмм. Если же все же говорить о гистограмме - то там максимальные значения приходятся на самые яркие части картины, но это не лицо, а герб. Только эти самые яркие части и могут быть белыми, не так ли? Теперь о том цвете, который Вы считаете белым на исходнике File:Kryštap Radzivił. Крыштап Радзівіл.jpg - увы, но это обман тренированного мозга, это не белый, а желтый цвет (посмотрите в любом графическом редакторе, который позволяет читать спектральные коды пикселей), но который мозг велит воспринимать как "практически белый" только потому, что мозг ожидает для этой детали изображения именно белого цвета (я о плюмаже, естественно). Но еще раз повторю - настройки монитора могут тут влиять на восприятие. Единственное, что скажу, это то, что т.н. скорректрованный вариант не менее белый, чем исходный. А по мне так и более белый. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - Я пользуюсь программой IRas/C, но это сугубо профессиональная американская программа у меня с работы. В обыденной жизни ее не встретить.
      - Что касается Фотошопа - при обрезании гистограммы правильнее всего отдельно собрать гистограмму с самого темного участка изображения (пусть и не очень большого) и обрезать до самого темного, также поступить и с белым - надо выбирать самый яркий участок картинки. При этом следует учитывать, что, скажем, ярко красное епископское одеяние или какой-нибудь бант в своей спектральной зоне может быть самым ярким. На одном из изображений я собирал гистограмму с ярких рефлексов на декорации булавы. При этом всегда надо проверять по лицу - чтобы не появились монотонные участки на лице - это делает его неинформативным и плоским. Вообще появление монотонных участков на изображении должно настораживать - значит что-то не то было сделано.
      - Теперь о Вашем первом опыте - "разумеется, что Ваши дополнительные усилия по коррекции цветовой гаммы я могу только приветствовать", я уже Вам об этом говорил. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        Вернулся с дачи весь в аллергии. Я не в Фотошопе работаю, потому по фотошопу я не спец. Но в тех программах, в которых я работаю, есть возможность получить гистограмму произвольной области изображения (как обойти это ограничение в Фотошопе - может надо тщательнее его изучить, а может достаточно скопировать интересующий участок в отдельный слой и взять гистограмму для него, а по ней определить точные границы динамического диапазона для основного изображения).
        
        Относительно "потери информации" - потеря (разрушение) информации происходит при неверном обрезании гистограммы (выборе динамического диапазона таким, что часть оттенков в самой яркой части и в самой темной части изображения утрачиваются и заменяются соответственно 255 или 0). Изменение "среднего" значения, которое и задает кривизну передаточной функции (а по умолчанию она просто линейная) - процесс более творческий и как следствие - не всегда объективный (в частности из-за свойств конкретного монитора, на котором Вы или я наблюдаем результат), но по настоящему следует признать, что творческая процедура восстановления колорита без нелинейных преобразований обойтись не может. Но возьмете ли Вы на себя такую смелость? Вам решать.
        
        Я уже вполне ясно выразил свое отношение - если Вами созданный вариант лучше, то, естественно, его и следует загрузить. Мы же для людей стараемся, а не для удовлетворения каких-то личных амбиций. Я (да и все мы) моue только приветствовать конструктивную помощь. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        Sure. Мне на днях даже приходилось ревертировать чрезмерные цветокоррекции. Вы, естественно, в полном праве поступать аналогичным образом, либо предлагать собственные цветокоррекции взамен сделанных мною. Вы сами, полагаю, решите то, где следует ревертировать, где улучшить. (Вот одна из последних моих загрузок File:Eldar Gasimov 2011 cropped.jpg - цветокоррекция была совершенно необходима. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 14:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Гарадзец[edit]

Усё-ткі не даюць мне спакою вось гэтыя выявы: File:Haradziec-pałac.jpg і File:Haradziec. Гарадзец (J. I. Krašeŭski, XIX).jpg пяра, так бы мовіць, «рыцара пяра». Ці вы ўпэўненыя на ўсе 100%, што на іх сапраўды выяўлены палац у вёсцы Кобрынскага раёну? Ня ведаю, ці бываў там Крашэўскі… А вось у вёсцы на Валыні ён некалькі рокаў мешкаў у гасьцёх і тамака ж вянчаўся. Не памятаю дзе, але пры жаданьні можна адшукаць у інтэрнэце згадкі, што гэтыя выявы ўсё ж напісаныя з палацу ва ўкраінскай вёсцы. А яшчэ раней сустракаў, здаецца, нават іхнюю атрыбуцыю да маёнтку Крашэўскага ў Гарадку, але тады адкінуў быў гэтую вэрсію як памылковую. Цяпер жа ўжо перакананасьці наконт Кобрыншчыны паменшала. --Renessaince (talk) 16:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Цяпер ня ўпэўнены. Увогуле, зьвесткі пра тое, што гэта наш палескі Гарадзец я ад пачатку ўзяў адсюль і адсюль. Трэба высьвятляць. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juzefa Łapacinskaja (Ahinskaja). Юзэфа Лапацінская (Агінская).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Источник[edit]

Здесь явно много того, что может Вас заинтересовать. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:38, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, действительно очень хороший источник. Пользовался, пока было время. Сейчас там вроде технические работы — может, после их завершения еще что-нибудь интересное выложат... --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 14:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vilnia. Вільня (1581).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Vilnia. Вільня (1599).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Vilnia. Вільня (Ch. Barousse, XVII).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Vilnia. Вільня (XVII).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Vilnia. Вільня (1604).jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vilnia. Вільня (1604).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Фото каплицы, подписанное как "Лахва", скорее всего, изображает каплицу в Кожан-Городке[edit]

Фото каплицы, подписанное как "Лахва", скорее всего, изображает каплицу в Кожан-Городке.

Старое фото каплицы в "Википедии": http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C5%81achva._%D0%9B%D0%B0%D1%85%D0%B2%D0%B0_(S._Bochnig,_XX).jpg

Фото 2007 г. на "Глобусе Беларуси": http://globus.tut.by/kozhan-gor/roadch_gallery.htm (Если внешние ссылки запрещены местными правилами, зайдите, пожалуйста, на сайт "Глобус Беларуси", в разделе "Брестская область" выберите "Кожан-Горожок", пролистайте соотв. страницу до "часовня придорожная" и нажмите на ссылку "Фотогалерея".)

Вероятно, то же самое относится и ко второй каплице: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C5%81achva._%D0%9B%D0%B0%D1%85%D0%B2%D0%B0_(S._Bochnig,_1929).jpg На "Глобусе Беларуси" см. в Кожан-Городке "часовня правосл. св. Симеона Столпника".

Действительно, первая часовня очень похожа. Но привязку к Лахве дает сама Fototeka Instytutu Historii Sztuki UJ (http://www.fototeka.ihs.uj.edu.pl/navigart/navigart/select?id=search&content=%C5%81achwa). В любом случае, спасибо за информацию. Было бы неплохо проработать вопрос и наверняка определить локализацию снимков. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 19:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trocki zamak. Троцкі замак (J. Marszewski, 1866).jpg[edit]

Hi, can you please explain why are you uploading files from different sources in some strange names? It would be fair to use English version if not the original (as named in the webpage), e.g. why a painting of a Lithuanian Castle from Polish website should be named in be-tarask? BurgererSF (talk) 16:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Belarusian is one of the Wikipedia's languages and Troki castle (which wasn't "Trakai castle" in 19th century, at least in official) is an important part of Belarusian history. So, there is nothing strange in usage this language. And Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages. In addition there are no mentions about any desirable connection between file name and current file source, which could be changed in future. So, please, stop changing the language of the file names and deleting its titles in Belarusian. By the way you could upload another version of the file under the name chosen by yourself. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 19:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klecak, Vilenskaja. Клецак, Віленская (1930).jpg[edit]

File:Klecak, Vilenskaja. Клецак, Віленская (1930).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Voŭpa-synagoga (1930).jpg[edit]

File:Voŭpa-synagoga (1930).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Navahradak. Наваградак (1792).jpg[edit]

File:Navahradak. Наваградак (1792).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michał Hieranim Radzivił. Міхал Геранім Радзівіл.jpg[edit]

File:Michał Hieranim Radzivił. Міхал Геранім Радзівіл.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vert (talk) 15:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014[edit]

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Catholic Church in Masty.JPG[edit]

File:Catholic Church in Masty.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jarash (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Horadnia, BNR.jpg[edit]

File:Horadnia, BNR.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

217.21.43.22 17:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Свято-Георгієвська церква Любомль Волинь.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Свято-Георгієвська церква Любомль Волинь.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Свято-Георгієвська церква Любомль Волинь.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Anatoliy (talk) 11:46, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument of Prince Barys.gif[edit]

File:Monument of Prince Barys.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

195.50.31.213 16:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belarusian national White-red-white flag, government of Belarusian Democratic Republic (Miensk, 1918).jpeg[edit]

File:Belarusian national White-red-white flag, government of Belarusian Democratic Republic (Miensk, 1918).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

217.21.43.22 06:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for your uploads[edit]

Thanks for your uploading. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of these files because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file descriptions with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded multiple files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you.

--217.21.43.64 16:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barysaŭski zamak. Барысаўскі замак (XX).jpg[edit]

File:Barysaŭski zamak. Барысаўскі замак (XX).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

195.50.31.213 17:55, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there is no sound prove that this image is copyvio, so usage of quick deletion template is incorrect. The author of www.rpp.nm.ru places own watermark on every image, even obvious PD-old-100 (i.e. here). --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:21, 7 March 2015 (UTC)--Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:21, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Łyntupy, Rynak. Лынтупы, Рынак (24.04.1921).jpg[edit]

File:Łyntupy, Rynak. Лынтупы, Рынак (24.04.1921).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.17.84.30 13:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Łyntupy, Rynak. Лынтупы, Рынак (1916).jpg[edit]

File:Łyntupy, Rynak. Лынтупы, Рынак (1916).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.17.84.30 13:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Łyntupy, Rynak. Лынтупы, Рынак (1916) .jpg[edit]

File:Łyntupy, Rynak. Лынтупы, Рынак (1916) .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.17.84.30 13:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Łyntupy, Bišeŭski. Лынтупы, Бішэўскі (1916).jpg[edit]

File:Łyntupy, Bišeŭski. Лынтупы, Бішэўскі (1916).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.17.84.30 13:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Łyntupy, Rynak-Śviancianskaja. Лынтупы, Рынак-Сьвянцянская (1917).jpg[edit]

File:Łyntupy, Rynak-Śviancianskaja. Лынтупы, Рынак-Сьвянцянская (1917).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.17.84.30 13:52, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Łyntupy, Rynak. Лынтупы, Рынак (1917 )..jpg[edit]

File:Łyntupy, Rynak. Лынтупы, Рынак (1917 )..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.17.84.30 13:52, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Łyntupy. Лынтупы (1916)..jpg[edit]

File:Łyntupy. Лынтупы (1916)..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.17.84.30 13:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Łyntupy, Bišeŭski. Лынтупы, Бішэўскі (1917)..jpg[edit]

File:Łyntupy, Bišeŭski. Лынтупы, Бішэўскі (1917)..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.17.84.30 13:54, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Žodziški. Жодзішкі (1917).jpg[edit]

File:Žodziški. Жодзішкі (1917).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jacek Szulski (talk) 14:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vidzy, Rynak-Tatarskaja. Відзы, Рынак-Татарская (1915).jpg[edit]

File:Vidzy, Rynak-Tatarskaja. Відзы, Рынак-Татарская (1915).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

83.17.84.30 08:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vidzy, Rynak-Dynaburskaja. Відзы, Рынак-Дынабурская (1915).jpg[edit]

File:Vidzy, Rynak-Dynaburskaja. Відзы, Рынак-Дынабурская (1915).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vidzy, Rynak-Vilenskaja. Відзы, Рынак-Віленская (1915).jpg[edit]

File:Vidzy, Rynak-Vilenskaja. Відзы, Рынак-Віленская (1915).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kabylnik, Vilenskaja. Кабыльнік, Віленская (1917) .jpg[edit]

File:Kabylnik, Vilenskaja. Кабыльнік, Віленская (1917) .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kabylnik, Vilenskaja. Кабыльнік, Віленская (1916 )..jpg[edit]

File:Kabylnik, Vilenskaja. Кабыльнік, Віленская (1916 )..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kabylnik, Šemietaŭskaja. Кабыльнік, Шэметаўская (1916) .jpg[edit]

File:Kabylnik, Šemietaŭskaja. Кабыльнік, Шэметаўская (1916) .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Śvir, Rynak. Сьвір, Рынак (1916).jpg[edit]

File:Śvir, Rynak. Сьвір, Рынак (1916).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kamaji. Камаі (1915).jpg[edit]

File:Kamaji. Камаі (1915).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:26, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kamaji. Камаі (1917).jpg[edit]

File:Kamaji. Камаі (1917).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jacek Szulski (talk) 09:27, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:History_of_Vitebsk[edit]

History of Vitebsk has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

37.17.4.31 07:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Абраз Маці Божай Барунскай[edit]

У Маці Божай Барунскай Дзіця павінна быць на левай руцэ. --JerzyKundrat (talk) 10:21, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Паправіў. Дзякую за ўдакладненьне. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:12, 28 June 2015 (UTC)--Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:12, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Autor zdjęć// аператар[edit]

Добры дзень

Ён выкарыстоўваецца мілорд фатаграфіі з блога http://zadarnowo.blogspot.com Гэта фота: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kobry%C5%84,_Bazylanskaja._%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D1%8B%D0%BD%D1%8C,_%D0%91%D0%B0%D0%B7%D1%8B%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kobry%C5%84,_Zamkavy._%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D1%8B%D0%BD%D1%8C,_%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%8B_%281935%29.jpg

блог http://zadarnowo.blogspot.com/2012/03/zdjecia-sprzed-ii-wojny-swiatowej.html

1) Гэта прыватныя фота. Я не памятаю, што ён прасіў Госпада, ці могуць яны быць даступныя пад вольнай ліцэнзіяй на Wikimedia Common.

2) Ён даў Госпаду свой адрас блога ў якасці крыніцы малюнкаў. Але ён пісаў, што аператар невядомы. Гэтыя фатаграфіі зрабіў мой дзед Іосіф Zadarnowski. У кожнай фатаграфіі надпіс.

Калі ласка, запоўніце дадзеныя выявы аб імя аўтара - Іосіфа Zadarnowskiego, нарадзіўся ў 1914 годзе. Калі ласка, папытаеце дазволу, калі вы хочаце падзяліцца сваімі фатаграфіямі ў Вікіпедыі. Я магу зрабіць гэта ў адзіночку.

шчыра

Магдалена Вазняк - аўтар блога

w_magda@hotmail.com

Dzień Dobry. Czy Pani mógłbym pisać w języku polskim? Niestety automatyczne tłumacz znacznie zmienił sens. Rozumiem polsku znacznie lepiej niż piszę w nim. Przede wszystkim chciałbym przeprosić za załadowanie tych zdjęć. Wygląda na to, że Pani ma wszystkie prawa autorskie do nich. Dodałem informacje o autorze zdjęć i blogu. Teraz, jeśli Pani chce, mógłbym prosić o usunięcie tych zdjęć lub jeśli Pani zgadza się, że jest możliwe, aby zmienić licencję na jeden z pl:Licencje Creative Commons.

Just in case in English. Could you please write in Polish? Unfortunately automatic translator changed the meaning significantly. I understand Polish much better than I write in it. First of all I would like to apologize for uploading these photos. It looks like you have all copyright on them. I added information about author of photos and your blog. Now if you wish I could ask for removing of these photos or if you agree it is possible to change the license on any of pl:Licencje Creative Commons.

Pozdrawiam, Kazimier Lachnovič.

Copyright status: File:Astašyn. Асташын (J. Bułhak, 1905).jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Astašyn. Асташын (J. Bułhak, 1905).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

I removed {{PD-old-70}}, {{PD-old}} or similar templates from the files whose authors who died less then 70 years ago. Now the files have no license and unless it is fixed will be deleted in a week. If you know of other reason why those files are in public domain please feel free to add a new license template and alert me and I will remove {{No license}} tag. If you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Рагачоўскі замак[edit]

Вітаю. Калі be:Замак каралевы Боны≠be:Рагачоўскі замак, тады варта разьдзяліць і катэгорыю ВікіСховішча? --Renessaince (talk) 19:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю. У Архітэктура Беларусі: Энцыклапедычны даведнік. — Менск: БелЭн, 1993. — 620 с.: іл. — ISBN 5-85700-078-5., сапраўды, два асобныя артыкулы: Рагачоўскі замак і Рагачоўскі палац. Аднак у ЭВКЛ перадрукавалі толькі артыкул Рагачоўскі замак. Таксама мяне трохі засмучвае, што паводле артыкула, пасярод Рагачоўскага замка стаяў мураваны палац. Думаю, можна падзяліць катэгорыі, прынамсі пакуль ня знойдуцца крыніцы, якія б аспрэчвалі такі падзел. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 12:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Hłybokaje, Bieraźviečča. Глыбокае, Беразьвечча (1930) .jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hłybokaje, Bieraźviečča. Глыбокае, Беразьвечча (1930) .jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Horadnia. Горадня (1882).jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Horadnia. Горадня (1882).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 01:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catholic Church Of St. Anthony in Słucak.jpg[edit]

File:Catholic Church Of St. Anthony in Słucak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dogad75 (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Источник файла File:Navahradak, Vilenskaja. Наваградак, Віленская (J. Bułhak, 1910).jpg[edit]

Пожалуйста, уточните источник файла File:Navahradak, Vilenskaja. Наваградак, Віленская (J. Bułhak, 1910).jpg. Сейчас там указано чьё-то имя ("Michał Rumiancaŭ"), что в качестве источника выглядит не вполне корректным. Насколько я знаю, это фото взято вот из этого издания, а значит автор и датировка требуют уточнения. --Kaganer (talk) 22:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Брал фотографию из блога данного человека. Теперь данный блог, по-видимому, не существует. В любом случае уточнил источники текущей и предыдущей версии файла. Что касается приведенного немецкого издания, то в нем присутсвует много фотографий, взятых из открытых к тому времени (опубликованных) источников. В том числе и авторства Яна Булгака. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Не вопрос. Когда берем из блога, нужно указывать ссылку, просто имени недостаточно. Что до немецкого издания - опять же, не спорю, но это конкретное фото взято именно из этого издания (и именно из этой оцифровки, судя по совпадению мелких дефектов). Я увидел вторую ссылку (спасибо за уточнение!) но там про датировку сказано "не позднее 1939 г.", а у Вас в названии фото "1910", а в карточке - "ранее 1911" ? Но этого быть не может никак, так как, насколько я понимаю, все видовые фото Булгака сделаны уж никак не ранее 1911 года (а скорее всего даже и позднее).--Kaganer (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Вот еще более надежный источник [2], где указано, что фото сделано до 1911 г. (сразу не вспомнил, т.к. дело было 4 года назад). По поводу ссылок на блоги: иногда просто не успеваю их проставлять, да и живут многие ссылки не больше года. Поэтому иногда указание названия проекта или архива (коллекции) какого-либо конкретного человека может быть ничем не хуже для того, кто хочет докопаться до оригинала файла. В любом случае согласен, что чем больше информации в описании - тем лучше. Но к сожалению, у меня на такую детализацию не всегда хватает времени. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Про ссылки на блоги - я даже не про доступ к оригиналу (хоть я и за, всеми руками). Просто за точность атрибуции - если блог, так и нужно написать "блог такого-то". Потому что просто имя с фамилией могут означать самые разные вещи. --Kaganer (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Про источник датировки обсуждаемого фото - ну да, так лучше. Я сначала смотрел только в русскую версию биографии, и из нее понял так, что он начал заниматься фотографией чуть ли не в 1911 году. А на самом деле, конечно, раньше. А вот кстати - то, что одна из фотографий отзеркалена, нас совсем не смущает? --Kaganer (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Два снимка с похожего ракурса: File:Navahradak, Vilenskaja. Наваградак, Віленская (1905).jpg и File:Navahradak, Vilenskaja. Наваградак, Віленская (T. Boretti, 1900).jpg (кстати говоря, тот самый случай, когда привязка названий файлов к улице помогает легко найти похожие ракурсы). А вот "увеличение" левого фрагмента с замком: File:Navahradzki zamak. Наваградзкі замак (1920).jpg. На переднем плане (правее) - башня Щитовка, далее (левее) - башня Костельная. Они хорошо различимы и на отзеркаленном фото. Таким образом, в книге ошибка. К сожалению, таких ошибок немало даже в авторитетных источниках, в том числе и с датировкой, и с подписями. Порой приходится целые "расследования" проводить, чтобы более-менее докопаться до истины. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:03, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Это был намек на то, что и на указания по датировке в этой книге тоже опираться если и можно, то с какими-то оговорками. --Kaganer (talk) 22:05, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Про названия файлов[edit]

Пожалуйста, никогда не делайте таким вот образом:

То есть не следует делать настолько похожие имена файлов, добавляя бессмысленные точки и пробелы. Обычно можно дать уникальное описательное название, но даже если это серия, относящяяся к одному объекту, то всегда можно это явно обозначить, дав в явном виде нумерацию:

Здесь есть ещё один момент. Если датировка файла неизвестна, то неправильно указывать в названии конкретный год. Это путает тех, кто ленится заглядывать в описание или вообще не знает, как это сделать.--Kaganer (talk) 23:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Не против нумерации и развернутой датировки (где это смотрится гармонично, как в приведенном примере), хоть на мой вгляд, и существующий вариант не противоречит текущим правилам. Однако по возможности постараюсь учесть данную рекомендацию при загрузке новых файлов. Также не буду против исправления точек и пробелов на номера в уже существующих файлах. К сожалению, по моим подсчетам количество таких файлов уже перевалило за тысячу. Только при этом прошу оставлять основное название без изменения: привязка к названиям улиц, местности и прочим урбанонимам (т.е. фактически адресная привязка) вполне имеет право на существование и не подпадает под действующие критерии. Благодарю за упорядочение категории с историческими изображениями Новогрудка. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Если на фото явно выделяется один основной объект, имеющий общеупотребительное название (как дом воеводы), то разумно и уместно указывать именно его, а не абстрактный перекресток. Вообще, названия файлов (где изображен конкретный дом) в виде указания только улиц (да еще с повтором на нескольких языках) крайне неудобны для дальнейшего использования. Я не буду за это биться, но лично я считаю их не отвечающими рекомендации давать файлам "описательное" название. Само дублирование на нескольких языках также считаю излишним (почему на этих, а не на других?). Всё это должно быть в карточке описания и в категориях. Совершенно нормально именовать файлы максимально лаконично - в данном примере, достаточно было бы "File:Наваградак, Кляштар дамініканак (Ян Булгак, 1930-39)", или то-же самое по-польски, если так удобнее.--Kaganer (talk) 13:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

А вот выносить в название фотографий названия улиц (если только на фото не общий вид данной улицы или перекрестка) - совершенно не нужно и ничем не оправдано. Привязка к улицам (даже упраздненным) должна идти через категории.--Kaganer (talk) 13:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

В любом названии есть нюансы: например, объект может за довольно короткий промежуток времени неоднократно менять свое предназначение. Вообще, указание адреса (пусть даже в виде перекрестка или улицы) вполне имеет право на существование, т.к. тоже описывает изображение. А вот уже какой вариант лучше/нейтральнее, то POV в Commons не действует, видимо, как раз таки чтобы избегать "битв" с переносами файлов. Что касается языка, то он в моих названиях на самом деле один - белорусский, что также вполне имеет право на существование, т.к. изображения относятся к Беларуси, истории Беларуси, этнической территории белорусов и т.п. Просто в белорусском языке (как и, к примеру, в сербском) есть две графические системы - латиница и кириллица. Использование обеих систем как минимум упрощает поиск изображений на белорусском языке (особенно через поисковые системы) и также не противоречит ограничениям (название занимает не более 240 бит). Продвижение белорусского языка в том числе и таким образом мотивирует меня загружать больше файлов, что способствует развитию проекта в целом. На мой вгляд, все вполне гармонично и не противоречит правилам проекта. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:01, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Я же написал, что не буду за это бороться (только лишние точки и пробелы уберу) ;)

Но хочу всё-таки заметить вот что. Названия файлов - это всегда результат некоторого технического соглашения: главное, чтобы название достаточно точно отвечало объекту, оно не должно быть всеобъемлющим. Для удобства дальнейшего использования в статьях, названия должны быть максимально короткими, не теряя при этом описательности. А всю красивую многоязычность и/или сочетание различных систем письма, и/или богатую историю объекта можно и нужно помещать в многоязычное описание (файлов и категорий), что для задач поиска подходит ничем не хуже (ибо описания отлично индексируются). Но когда множество файлов названы практически одинаково, а по факту изображены на них совершенно разные объекты - это неудобно. Это я как пользователь пишу. Давайте представим, что такие файлы собраны в галерею в какой-то статье, и вот мы смотрим на этот код в режиме редактирования, и пытаемся понять, где там что. Да, это не фатально, можно пережить - но ради чего? Наверняка еще кому-то это покажется неудобным, и он тоже решит переименовать что-то, увидит всю серию и придёт сюда в обсуждение с теми же вопросами ;). И так раз за разом... --Kaganer (talk) 16:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Вот и хорошо, что борьбы не будет. Лучше больше потрачу времени на загрузку и поиск "новых" старых изображений. Думаю проект от этого только выиграет.

Возможно, но пока что за 8 лет такой вопрос возник впервые. Именование изображений - это на самом деле нетривиальная задача. Нюансов достаточно много и каждый конкретный случай следует рассматривать индивидуально. В конце концов любое название всегда можно просто скопировать в статью. Те же китайские иероглифы, арабская вязь или какой-либо другой экзотический для Европы алфавит даже в случае передачи довольно лаконичного имени совершенно неинформативен для европейского пользователя. Те же названия на кириллице - не понятны и даже более того - не различимы, к примеру, для англоязычного пользователя. Таким образом, удаление из имени латиницы снижает различимость для пользователей языками с латинским алфавитом, удаление кириллицы - ухудшает эффективность поиска на широко распространенной кириллице (проверено опытным путем, что названия файлов индексируется поисковиками лучше, чем описания - результаты выводятся выше). Вот если длина имени превышает допустимую - тогда да, следует чем-то жертвовать. В общем, ни в коем случае не претендую на абсолютную истину, но мне кажется, что сообщество не зря ограничилось довольно небольших набором критериев для переименования файлов. И если имя напрямую не подпадает под эти критерии, то на мой взгляд, лучше потратить время на улучшение тех же описаний, категоризацию или просто загрузку новых файлов под более красивыми и лаконичными именами. Сейчас количество изображений одного и того же объекта стремится к бесконечности, поэтому обойтись без нумерации в скобках все равно не удастся) --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Я для себя когда-то решил вопрос уникальности имён файлов следующим образом - я считаю, что в названии должен быть отражён "хронотоп" ("что-где-когда") и атрибуция (авторство). Обычно этого достаточно в большинстве случаев для достижения уникальности имён файлов с изображением одного и того же объекта (что-нибудь из вышеперечисленного да отличается). --Kaganer (talk) 22:03, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello[edit]

こんにちわ。意味ですかご説明お願いします。この学校の投稿は出典追加にした方が追加しました！この日を２回もよろしいでしょうかご説明いたします後直ぐに飛ぶようになったため日本語を消去を使ってみないと思うのですかご説明お願いします後直ぐについてしまった呪文がいいでしょうか？と思われるかもしれませんが追加してもよろしいでしょうか？--60.139.47.212 14:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to File:Barysaŭ, Biarezina. Барысаў, Бярэзіна (S. Prokudin-Gorsky, 1911).jpg[edit]

Hello,

Thank you for uploading File:Barysaŭ, Biarezina. Барысаў, Бярэзіна (S. Prokudin-Gorsky, 1911).jpg.

I notice there are two versions with some differences. Obviously, the second version is a higher resolution scan. (Hence the upload summary that says "quality"?)

But there are other changes. The first upload shows colour artifacts where things moved between the three colour exposures. (e.g. the leaves on the trees)

The second image does not have these artifacts. Does this mean it has been retouched or edited?

Thanks,

Ubcule (talk) 19:16, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are right. The current version is restorated original photo. All colour artifacts were removed during digital restoration. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info.

Did you make the changes yourself, or did someone else?

The colour artifacts were an integral part of the original image. So although the changes are an improvement aesthetically, it should still be marked as a modified or retouched version.

I think it makes sense to have both the original version and the retouched version available under different filenames.

All the best,

Ubcule (talk) 20:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was Ходаковский Константин and Ходаковский Владимир (from file description). It makes sense. So I uploaded the original version under another name. But I don't know an appropriate template to mark modified version. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 20:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can use the {{Modified}} template to show an image has been modified. The only problem is that it doesn't appear to support more than one language...(?)

I renamed the images to make clearer which one's the original, but I'd guess that's enough. I don't have a problem with the modified version now that it's clearly marked.

Thanks for the uploads! Ubcule (talk) 22:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit; I wasn't clear above, but I already added {{Modified}} to the modified version. Ubcule (talk) 23:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 08:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair approach[edit]

Hello, I am finding your activities here harmful and unfair in some aspects. Despite being active in international environment (Commons), you are uploading files from Polish, Lithuanian and other websites under Belarusian filename and Belarussian description ‘’’only’’’. Of course I can understand that those files are connected to Belarus in some way, however it would be fair to copy original description and file source. It would be great if you could revise your approach. EhhhhhAGAGJKYJ (talk) 09:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EhhhhhAGAGJKYJ. First, "harmful" is not relevant to what Commons really is. You have no rights to call my contribution harmful. Moreover I upload files not only under Belarusian names (i.e. [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] etc.). Second, in my opinion "unfair" is to ignore Belarusian language uploading files relevant to Belarus, its people and history. But I don't call other uploaders contribution "hamrful". Anyway, I'll consider your asking in my new uploads or updating existing. But unfortunately I don't have much time to revise my existing contribution. So everybody could add any description or other details in any language. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 12:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Bahdanaŭ. Багданаў (1919-39).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bahdanaŭ. Багданаў (1919-39).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bahdanaŭ. Багданаў (1919-39).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Leyo 15:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Mirski zamak. Мірскі замак (1918-25).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mirski zamak. Мірскі замак (1918-30).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mirski zamak. Мірскі замак (1918-39) (2).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Voŭčyn. Воўчын (1901-39) (2).jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mierač, Uładzisłaŭ Vaza. Мерач, Уладзіслаў Ваза (1901).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:37, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vorša, Paštovaja. Ворша, Паштовая (1913).jpg[edit]

#invoke:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Supraśla. Супрасьля (1882).jpg[edit]

Template:Please tag images/layout

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miensk, Zybickaja. Менск, Зыбіцкая (1912).jpg[edit]

Template:Please tag images/layout

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:03, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Navahradak, Čyhunačnaja. Наваградак, Чыгуначная (1930).jpg[edit]

Template:Please tag images/layout

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:01, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rahačoŭ, Bychaŭskaja. Рагачоў, Быхаўская (1901-18) (5).jpg[edit]

Template:Please tag images/layout

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:33, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinsk, Daminikanskaja. Пінск, Дамініканская (1930).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miensk, Staražoŭka. Менск, Старажоўка (1941-44).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miensk, Katedra. Менск, Катэдра (1941-43).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vilnia. Вільня (1576, 1581).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jeromi Mikhael ([[User talk:Jeromi Mikhael|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Padśville, Kamienny Voz. Падсьвільле, Каменны Воз[edit]

(1921-39) - dlaczego taka data? To wprowadza w błąd. Ona NIC nie znaczy--keriM ([[User talk:Kerim44|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taka data potrzebna żeby pokazać, co to zdjęcie datuje się na czas II RP. A jaka data będzie słusznej? --Kazimier Lachnovič ([[User talk:Kazimier Lachnovič#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:32, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

II RP powstała w 1918 i trwała do 1939. Data powstania koszar to czas na pewno PO 1924. W 1924 powstał Korpus Ochrony Pogranicza. Koszary mogły powstać w 1925? 1926? Nie wiem dokładnie--keriM ([[User talk:Kerim44|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moze napisz w nawiasie właśnie (II RP)--keriM ([[User talk:Kerim44|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:14, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dziękuję za dokładniejszy rok. Lata to lepsza informacja do wskazania. --Kazimier Lachnovič ([[User talk:Kazimier Lachnovič#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)--Kazimier Lachnovič ([[User talk:Kazimier Lachnovič#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mačul. Мачуль (S. Bochnig, 1929).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:52, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Słonim, Albertyn. Слонім, Альбэртын (1916).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:02, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azaryčy. Азарычы (1901-39).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:02, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azaryčy. Азарычы (1901-39) (7).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:34, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azaryčy. Азарычы (1901-39) (6).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:34, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azaryčy. Азарычы (1901-39) (5).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:34, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zaleśsie, Čyhunačnaja. Залесьсе, Чыгуначная (V. Chernov, 1915-16).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karal Stanisłaŭ Radzivił Panie Kachanku. Караль Станіслаў Радзівіл Пане Каханку (H. Lajbovič, 1758).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...[edit]

... for all those great uploads of old postcards. I really enjoy to watch them. While going through i enrich them with transcriptions of the contained German texts. Hope that i will be able to watch them all. ;-) Just wanted to ask for a little improvement. Could you please either use a separate section for the license using == {{int:license-header}} == or to move it like here. Thank you again, --Arnd ([[User talk:Aschroet|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! It will be easier for me to copy == {{int:license-header}} == in the uploading form, so from now I will use a separate section for all my new uploads. Thank you for your contribution and good luck ;). --Kazimier Lachnovič ([[User talk:Kazimier Lachnovič#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File page blankings[edit]

Hi, please use regular DRs unless there is a copyright violation. Also do not blank the image description page. Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

kvr.kpd.lt[edit]

Можа ведаеце, але на сайце kvr.kpd.lt ёсць планы розных віленскіх будынкаў 19 ст., напрыклад, Rūmų kompleksas, vad. Chodkevičių --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў ([[User talk:Чаховіч Уладзіслаў|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:24, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Дзякую за інфармацыю. Раней на пляны неяк не зьвярнуў увагі. --Kazimier Lachnovič ([[User talk:Kazimier Lachnovič#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Tekla Hanna Radzivił (Vałovič). Тэкля Ганна Радзівіл (Валовіч) (H. Lajbovič, 1758).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miensk, Dom aficeraŭ. Менск, Дом афіцэраў (1938).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate PereslavlFoto ([[User talk:PereslavlFoto|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:16, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miensk, Staražoŭka. Менск, Старажоўка (1941-44).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate PereslavlFoto ([[User talk:PereslavlFoto|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:19, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PAGENAME,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with SITENAME and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PAGENAME,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Słonim, Bernardynskaja. Слонім, Бэрнардынская (1941).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:02, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PAGENAME,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Miensk, Vysoki Rynak. Менск, Высокі Рынак (04.1918) (3).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping All listed files have the corresponding license tag {{PD-old-70}}, so I really don't see any allowed reason in {{No license}} and going to remove it. --Kazimier Lachnovič ([[User talk:Kazimier Lachnovič#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Sometimes the software lists files as unlicensed even when they are not. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. No problem. --Kazimier Lachnovič ([[User talk:Kazimier Lachnovič#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:44, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viciebsk, Zadźvińnie-Illinskaja. Віцебск, Задзьвіньне-Ільлінская (I. Trutnev, 1866) (2).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Kreŭski zamak. Крэўскі замак (1930).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:31, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Pahonia. Пагоня (1742).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Vilnia. Вільня (1803).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]