User talk:Kallerna/2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanghai Maglev 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waibaidu Bridge Shanghai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Kuva

Hei! Olen nähnyt teidän kuvia ja haluaisin kysyä jos kenties onko teillä Saimmaannorpan kuva että voisitte julkaista Saimmaannorpasta artikkeli espanjaksi (Foca Anillada de Saimaa) Kiitos!! Terveisiä Argentiinasta, Orvokki.

Orvoki (talk) 14:08, 25 January 2020 (UTC).

Hei Orvokki! Valitettavasti en muista ottaneeni saimaannorpasta kuvaa, mutta josko joku tämän luokan kuvista kelpaa. —kallerna (talk) 05:21, 27 January 2020

Kiitos vastauksesta :)--Orvoki (talk) 15:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Tallinn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:48, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parks and Recreation People's Square Shanghai 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagan 2019 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:39, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain People's Square Shanghai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagan 2019 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagan 2019 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 13:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagan 2019 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagan 2019 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagan 2019 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alanya from sea panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Almost entirely gone now. Good quality. --Cayambe 09:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagan 2019 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagan 2019 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks ucw tilted, or is that for real? --Poco a poco 11:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Fixed. --Kallerna 08:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagan 2019 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagan 2019 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
tilted clockwise --MB-one 21:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Fixed. --Kallerna 16:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality now --MB-one 19:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagan 2019 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Goelocation would be useful --Podzemnik 01:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Added. --Kallerna 09:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Good now --PantheraLeo1359531 09:54, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alanyaa mereltä.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective --Basile Morin 07:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Fixed. --Kallerna 09:59, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 13:24, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sule Pagoda Yangoon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thanlwin Bridge Hpa-An 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwegabin Monastery view to Hpa An 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yuyuan Garden 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:49, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nanpu Bridge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jin Mao Tower 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jing'an Temple Shanghai 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jing'an Temple Shanghai 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yuyuan Garden 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traffic near Nanpu Bridge Shanghai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Residential buildings Shanghai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I assume that there is much dust in the air. --Aristeas 14:46, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kyauk Ka Lat Pagoda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Left side looks like it's leaning left. Can you add a geolocation? --Podzemnik 18:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, new version uploaded, hopefully it's better. Geolocation will be added later, when I upload the other images from Hpa an. --Kallerna 19:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 Support Not perfect but better. For next time I'd recommend to add GEO location before you nominate your pictures --Podzemnik 21:19, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nanpu Bridge 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 18:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yuyuan Garden 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thanlwin Bridge seen from Bat Cave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Myaing Ka Lay panorama from Kaw Gon Cave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bang Bao pier 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bang Bao pier 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanoi panoramic view from Lotte 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shwedagon Zedi Daw Yangon 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shwedagon Zedi Daw Yangon 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quite beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 04:17, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangkok sunset from The Speakeasy 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Zwegabin 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwe Ka Bin Pagoda 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very striking light. -- Ikan Kekek 06:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lumbine buddha Garden 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:44, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lumbine buddha Garden 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:44, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bang Bao pier 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. (Slight overexposure of sky in upper left part still OK given the light conditions.) --Johannes Robalotoff 15:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangkok sunset from The Speakeasy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality. Please fix the very little stitching error, see note. Regarding the title. I don't see really a sunset. --Milseburg 17:30, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, I did not notice that error! --Kallerna 19:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwegabin monkeys 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 Question - Does the species or at least genus have to be identified for QI? -- Ikan Kekek 06:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linno Gu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality considering the conditions --Podzemnik 05:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hpa An rice fields 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Small island next to Ko Rang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 05:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sule Pagoda Yangoon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:13, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 05:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! U Bein Bridge Mandalay 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shakyamuni Jing'an Temple Shanghai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mahar Sadan Cave 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:58, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mahar Sadan Cave 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Really interesting motif, and I think it's good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 08:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mahar Sadan Cave 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwe Ka Bin Pagoda 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anawrahta road traffic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Can't help but notice

That you seem to oppose everything at FPC other than your own images. I see nobody else doing this. Is it intentional? I'm leaving this message just in case nobody has brought it up with you before. Update: in looking at the past several months of FPC votes, I stand corrected. There is a single instance of supporting someone else's nomination.

This note isn't because of the snow goose FPC btw (like I said in the nomination, I've gone back and forth on that one, so am not surprised that someone opposed) -- it just triggered my memory from noticing your votes before. — Rhododendrites talk17:12, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

There is a lot of people who support just about everything on FPC. I do not vote on every candidate, there is enough supporters. I want to cherish the quality of FPs - the quality of the images passing at FPC has decreased. Featured Pictures should be about quality not quantity. —kallerna (talk) 17:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yangon Pansodan overpass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kandawgyi Natural Garden Yangon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 18:29, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shwedagon Zedi Daw Yangon 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:53, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotte Hanoi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:00, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thanlwin Bridge 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted to teh right --Podzemnik 06:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 15:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 Support Thanks. It's a really nice picture actually --Podzemnik 03:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thanlwin Bridge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Also looks tilted, see the pylons --Podzemnik 05:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 16:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 Support Thank you! --Podzemnik 03:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mahar Sadan Cave 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Is the stupa tilted in real life too? --Podzemnik 05:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Really hard to say if the photo tilted or not, the stupa seems to be tilted also. --Kallerna 05:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Could be tilted but look at the barrel on the left, light on the right, bell columns, table... everything is leaning right --Podzemnik 06:32, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
You're right. I uploaded a new version. --Kallerna 15:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 Support Thanks, better --Podzemnik 03:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Please do not feed monkeys Koh Chang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koh Chang sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 09:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! U Bein Bridge Mandalay 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and good composition -- Spurzem 09:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Myingyan Railway Station 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 11:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lujiazui from The Bund.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, just leaning a bit to the right (see verticals of buildings). Could you fix that? --Aristeas 09:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, fixed. --Kallerna 19:16, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 Support Thank you! I think it’s OK now. --Aristeas 13:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jing'an Temple Shanghai 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chinlone Kandawgyi park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangkok Skytrain BTS 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Some more categories would be useful. --Ermell 07:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangkok traffic 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bangkok traffic 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:59, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monkey Kai Bae.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwegabin monkeys 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
What species is that? --Ermell 07:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
It's a macaque monkey. --Kallerna 06:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Should be categorised --Ermell 22:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Added. --~~~~
 Support Thanks --Ermell 13:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the Rocks Cape Town 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 12:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shwedagon Zedi Daw Yangon 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-105.90 edit.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tropical Islands Halbe 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberbaumbrücke Berlin 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tropical Islands Halbe 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Index finger amputation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Reichstag dome interior 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reichstag dome interior 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:13, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tapiola metro station 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Merituulentie bus terminal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ainoa shopping centre interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tropical Islands Halbe 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hpa An rice fields 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hpa An rice fields 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Reichstag dome interior 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reichstag dome interior 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forchem Rauma 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:20, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lensunkallio 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:14, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frozen Salkolanjärvi in spring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narvijärvi 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Categorization could be better. --XRay 08:00, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moro Narvijärvi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kauklaistenjärvi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lensunkallio 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 21:58, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forchem Rauma 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narvijärvi ripples.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siperianmaksaruoho.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:24, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rauma panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alppiasteri 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Is localization possible? --MB-one 08:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpine ibex Cima di Terrarossa 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:41, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shwedagon Zedi Daw Yangon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:45, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passo Cibiana 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tie Kirjurin ravintolaan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Lama glama Laguna Colorada 2.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horse fur & mane hair texture 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graffiti wind wind power station Reposaari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rauma railways 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Picea abies Ahlainen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VT1 Turusta Helsinkiin 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:34, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aviapolis railway station 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 13:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruoholahden metroasema.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ikituuri view 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 Comment Very unfortunate light. Is this photo really a QI? -- Spurzem 11:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joutsijärven kierros 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isojärvi sunrise 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauttasaaren metroasema 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VT1 Turusta Helsinkiin 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK for me. The left part is a bit soft, the centre good and the right even better. I hope I am wrong, but this looks as if the lens was somewhat decentered (or the sensor/mount are not aligned properly). I would suggest to check this. No offence, I just want to help. --Aristeas 09:43, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The photo was taken from a moving car through a window, so that's the reason for the problems. --Kallerna 05:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bufo bufo Joutsijärvi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 20:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurajoki Turku panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Syväraumanlahden pienvenesatama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:56, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noormarkun ruukki 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noormarkun ruukki 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palatsinraitti Bridge Tammerkoski view 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Satakunnansilta Bridge Tammerkoski view 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosendahlin ranta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Geotag would b euseful --Podzemnik 21:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pispala timber rafting tunnel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, and I quite like it. -- Ikan Kekek 11:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noormarkun ruukki 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pedro J Pacheco 19:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tammerkosken väliaikainen kävelysilta 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noormarkun ruukki 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rauhanniemen kansankylpylä.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tammerkoski railway bridge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tammerkoski railway bridge 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 07:00, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noormarkun ruukki 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 21:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tammerkosken väliaikainen kävelysilta 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 21:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaleva Church 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PJDespa 17:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Baltic Princess 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karhuluoto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isojärvi sunset 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isojärvi panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water drops on car roof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice idea. --DXR 12:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Betula pubescens subsp. tortuosa Saana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Parco Naturale Tre Cime horses 3.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Very nice shot

Fjordgård_4.jpg Jim Evans (talk) 00:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! —kallerna (talk) 11:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Review at Closed Discussion

Hi there, I saw that you voted on this QI candidate (File:Mantra_-_De_mooiste_vlinders_van_de_stad.png) after the discussion was closed. I was wondering if there is any rule that you can vote after a no-consensus-close was done since you’re an admin here and know better. Thanks --Vincent60030 (talk) 12:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't note the discussion was closed. —kallerna (talk) 10:06, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Näsinneula view 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restaurant Näsinneula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support very good composition --Augustgeyler 22:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fjordgård 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and composition --Tagooty 15:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuopio Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 17:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuopio Town Hall 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Purjehdus Helsingin edustalla 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Wow, great shot. Detail is sharp at 100% until the back of the boat, and even then it's adequate. Exposure is well controlled, and the composition is great. --Bobulous 17:20, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Näsinneula view 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Näsinneula 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:07, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea caves Cape Greco 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Interesting shot. Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 14:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea caves Cape Greco 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice shot! Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 14:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural Bridge Cape Greco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 14:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea caves Cape Greco 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konnos Beach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea caves Cape Greco 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cape Greco view 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 06:37, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cape Greco view 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saana 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyngseidet 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyngseidet 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kilpisjärvi panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:38, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mannakoski 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saana 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lyngseidet 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:04, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konnos Beach 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ballesvikskartunnelen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sea caves Cape Greco 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sea caves Cape Greco 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sea caves Cape Greco 9.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sea caves Cape Greco 9.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nickel mine Senja 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raekoja plats 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uusikaupunki aerial 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Asmodea Oaktree 14:08, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Cardenal Gonzalez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente Romano de Córdoba 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 22:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente de Las Ermitas 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente Romano de Córdoba 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Córdoba - Templo Romano 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta de San Esteban, Mosque-Cathedral of Córdoba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:07, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosque-Cathedral Puente Romano de Córdoba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta de San Ildefonso, Mosque-Cathedral of Córdoba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:38, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fields near Córdoba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 10:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Córdoba Airport 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 10:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Rambla aerial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:29, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Ermitas panorama Córdoba 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Ermitas panorama Córdoba 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente de la Constitución de 1812 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 22:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de San Sebastián Cádiz 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:15, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)