User talk:Kai3952/Archive 1

Category:Pinglin Tea Museum

Let's talk about just one of this subject.

I try to group museums in one city (e.g. New Taipei) to be in Category:Museums in New Taipei. And after that, the parent category of Category:Museums in New Taipei is Category:Visitor attractions in New Taipei (all museums are obviously visitor attractions). That's why I remove the Category:Visitor in New Taipei from each museum name (e.g. in this case is Category:Pinglin Tea Museum). If not, we will have redundant categorization that Category:Pinglin Tea Museum is visitor attractions in New Taipei, and Museums in New Taipei (parent category of Pinglin Tea Museum) are also in the Category:Visitor attractions in New Taipei. I hope you understand this kind of categorization.

Same case like Category:Visitor attractions in New York, you cant find any New York museums there (directly under that category), because all museums have been categorized inside Category:Museums in New York, which is the child category of Category:Visitor attractions in New York. I'm following this more well-established format of categorization. This is exactly the same format as what I've been doing to museums in Taiwan with regards to visitor attractions in each of its municipality/city/county. Chongkian (talk) 13:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Please put into correct category

Please put File:Yuli Wildlife Sanctuary+ fu tang chen+005.jpg into the correct category. - Takeaway (talk) 10:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Beigang Creek, Renai Township, Nantou.jpg

Hi. You wrote "The photo shown is not Beigang Creek." in your summary of this edit. From the geocoding, it appears to be a nearly dry creek bed viewed to the north northeast from Qingfeng Road overpass (200' north of the Qing Liu Tribe bus stop, 1000' south of Nantou County Police Bureau on Mingyue Lane, 2000' north of Zhonghua Road (Route 80)), Ren’ai Township, Nantou County, Taiwan. If the flowing water below is not Beigang Creek, what is it? More importantly, what should the file be named?   — Jeff G. ツ 02:32, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Re: Category:Views from buildings in Penghu

No, the problem was mine, not yours. I've reverted my own edit. --Howard61313 (talk) 14:50, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:觀音山眺望社子島關渡FUJI4450.jpg

Ho, Kai3952, I was wondering how the Sacred Heart High School for Girls is related to this image. Thank you for your time. :) Lotje (talk) 14:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Public art at the junction of Provincial Highway 20 and Provincial Highway 21.jpg

File:Public art at the junction of Provincial Highway 20 and Provincial Highway 21.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Tunyuan Trailhead.jpg

File:Tunyuan Trailhead.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:29, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop canvassing.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 08:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Visitors in Corridor of 10th Floor, Cin Building, NTNU before Speech 20151230 retouched.jpg

File:Visitors in Corridor of 10th Floor, Cin Building, NTNU before Speech 20151230 retouched.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The source, author, date, and license of the underlying topographic map of Hualien County are not specified. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 03:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

關於Category:Shanghua Renai Building

集集大地震已經經過18年，但是臺灣中南部到現在還有很多待拆除重建的危樓。像是2018年2月8日才開始拆除的雲林斗六祥瑞大樓，如照片所見，雖然外觀看似尚可，但內部早已不能住人，這些建築當然算Earthquake damage，還是足下對Earthquake damaged buildings的認知不同，願聞其詳。

如果說足下認為尚華仁愛大樓中有仁愛尚華大樓的照片而有疑義，已有人創建仁愛尚華大樓分類並加調整，至於尚華仁愛大樓拆除改建的經緯，請參考這裡。--玄史生 (talk) 12:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

@玄史生: I have already answered here.--Kai3952 (talk) 11:37, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

about File:History Gallery of Chien-Chiao Air Force Academy in Axiation Museum 20130928.jpg

框內這些1930年代空軍官校創校初期的照片是在中國浙江省杭州的筧橋所拍攝；照片框展示於桃園機場原航空科學館，也是1981年開設時即有的展示品，絕對不是2013年的高雄照片。如果以屬地論，最多只能算「2013年在桃園拍攝的照片」。--玄史生 (talk) 19:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

@玄史生: We can know from these two messages: "Please stop tracking my edits" and "Re: about File:History Gallery of Chien-Chiao Air Force Academy in Axiation Museum 20130928.jpg", I have evidence that can tell you why it is tracking and why it is harassment. I want to let everyone know that I have told you, thus I speak English again. The evidence is as follows:

1. This is your first time: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and [6]. These are a large number of you back or modify the status quo, but you did not write a reason in the edit summary and you have not notified me in my talk page.
2. [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], and [70]. Among all 64 edits, you make the same edits as you did for the first time. Therefore, I think that your behavior is vandalism. See: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive_10#玄史生.
3. I see you told me in your reply, I did not add Category:Dajia Mazu Pilgrimage at File:張善政出席大甲鎮瀾宮媽祖遶境進香回鑾安座儀式 03.jpg, so you say that I think it is not "Dajia Mazu Pilgrimage", and you emphasize that "you cannot because this photo was taken at the Jenn Lann Temple".
4. You remove my edits here, and then you said to me on my talk page: "The appearance of the building was not damaged, but it is still damaged by the earthquake".
5. In this one edit you stated: "The content of this photo is: Shihgang Dam has been repaired".
6. In this one edit you stated: "This photo not show any trains".
7. In this one edit you stated: "The Photo Frame was not Photoed or Display at Kaohsiung. and Historic Photographies in Frame was Photoed in 1930's".

As can be seen above, he would have ended up in these file I've edited with to somehow oppose me. Especially at 3, his behavior told me he was tracking my edits; otherwise, how does he know which I edited? Also, like he is in 4, 5, 6, and 7, he has many reasons! This looks like a farce to me. In every time, it turns out that it's not my problem but what that he made a mistake or his own problem. For example, 3 and 7: these six files(refers to all the photos in Category:Shanghua Renai Building) did not show that the building was damaged by the earthquake. As for 7, before I edit, he has added Category:Republic of China Air Force Academy when uploading File:History Gallery of Chien-Chiao Air Force Academy in Axiation Museum 20130928.jpg. In his every act, I was forced to listen to him for his sake. Otherwise, he will continue to back or to remove my edits. Feeling I wasted my time because of his problems makes me mad. I hope User:玄史生 can stop his own behavior. If the same thing happens in the future, I will not read the message he left for me and I will not answer him. Because I had repeatedly advised him not to do so. See: "Please stop tracking my edits" and "Re: about File:History Gallery of Chien-Chiao Air Force Academy in Axiation Museum 20130928.jpg".--Kai3952 (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)