User talk:Kaboldy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image Tagging Image:Flaga_tarnow.gif[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flaga_tarnow.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 11:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Kalisz Flaga.png[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Kalisz Flaga.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−


Image Tagging Image:Roulement3.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Roulement3.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. __ ABF __ ϑ 16:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:600px-Rudaslaska_flag..png[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:600px-Rudaslaska_flag..png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 10:29, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Bielsko_Biala_Choragiew.png[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bielsko_Biala_Choragiew.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 10:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Bielsko_Biala_Herb.png[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bielsko_Biala_Herb.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 10:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:UJoint2n.png[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Kaboldy!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. How do you turn this on (talk) 12:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:UJoint1n.png[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Kaboldy!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. How do you turn this on (talk) 12:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Kaboldy!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cams1.svg[edit]

Black rectangles are probably due to unwanted Inkscape "Flow text" elements... AnonMoos (talk)

File:Cams1.svg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


File:Neszmély hajó2.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Fokker G.1 and Fokker D.XXI[edit]

Do you have any 3-view drawings for these aircraft? FWiW 24.76.201.186 14:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are 3-view drawings about the G.1:

D.XXI:

Kaboldy (talk) 08:47, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JAS39_Gripen.svg[edit]

File:JAS39_Gripen.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ 10:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I copied your statement to Commons:Deletion requests/File:JAS39 Gripen.svg.   — Jeff G. ツ 15:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

great work[edit]

great work on the svg of airplanes. Decora (talk) 22:47, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Italian silhouettes aircraft[edit]

Dear Kaboldy, I am a fan of Italian aircraft they wish to do the silhouettes of aircraft Italian World War II, if I give you the document you may quietly do drawings of the same? Thanks in advance. The document is here:[1] My address: [2]--OppidumNissenae (talk) 12:22, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Hello! I've seen some of your outstanding aircraft line drawings, and I thought you might be interested in joining the Commons:WikiProject Aviation, which has been started recently. Consider having a look to the project page and, if you want to join in, please add your name to the list of members; you can also add the {{User WikiProject Aviation}} userbox to your user page. We're working on the creation of a WikiProject Aviation Graphic Lab in which your great skills in aircraft profile and line drawing could be greatly helpful. Thanks a lot, and... see you! Merry Christmas :-) --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 16:07, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome then! Of course, since the category you mentioned is automatically generated by the software, it's always better to check what drawings are actually missing... Just to avoid redundancy. Keep up the good job, and happy New Year to you too! --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 12:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gliders IL-32.JPG[edit]

Hi, can you upload a better image? Thanks.--Threecharlie (talk) 14:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, thanks, I see to provide to spam this in all wikies. :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 20:10, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A new challenge[edit]

Hi, if you want can start the drawings of this inusual plane, the interesting w:Focke-Wulf F 19 "Ente"?--Threecharlie (talk) 20:55, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful!!! Thanks ;-)

Re:Parallelism[edit]

You are right, thank you for thinking about this. Right now I'm working on the Santos-Dumont 14 bis, next up will be the Beech Bonanza and the North American B-25 Mitchell. :-) Cheers, --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 18:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually there seems to be something a little strange about the File:Fokker D.VIII 3-view.svg. I tried to open it in full resolution with Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox. Chrome gives me a little white triangle on the tail in the side-view, but it doesn't move. Everyhing is ok with Firefox instead. I don't know, if you think it's necessary I can upload a .PNG version which will be fully ok. Sometimes there is some trouble in the rendering of .SVG pictures. However, I'm not sure about why did you request the rotation of the file? --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 11:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, I just removed the rotation request :-) If the problem with the file persists, I can easily upload a bitmap version. Just let me know. About your new drawings, that's also fine. I've been quite busy with it.wikipedia recently so I haven't made much progess with the drawings I was working on. Cheers, --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 13:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Midway aircrafts.svg[edit]

Thank you for always making the nice svg-files! Just one comment to the Battle of Midway svg: In the Battle of Midway only the Boeing B-17E was used (and a single B-17D), the B-17G you included in the svg-file was not yet produced in 1942. You might want to change it. Cheers Cobatfor (talk) 22:58, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Award[edit]

For your 100 aircraft
Dear Kaboldy, for your awesome 100 aircraft line drawings and in recognition of the outstanding work you constantly do with aviation-related graphic designs, I hereby award you this brand-new WikiProject Aviation Graphic Designer Barnstar. Thank you very much, and... keep 'em flying! --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 16:40, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, you're welcome :) Friendly regards, --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 12:23, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

T-S diagram[edit]

May I ask how you generated this diagram? Which software did you use? And would it be possible to add values to the lines of x and specific volumina? RuBau (talk) 15:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a great figure. Thanks for uploading. On the right axis, some enthalpy numbers are wrong (2700 - 2600 - 2600 - 3000).

Season Greetings[edit]

and a "guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr", as we say in German ("a good slide into the new year"). Cobatfor (talk) 10:30, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Happy new year to you too! Best wishes, --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 12:10, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

lol thanks[edit]

thanks, happy new year back. Decora (talk) 04:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks, there's not a lot of vector graphics of airplanes, really good work on them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.42.38.3 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 27 February 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

File:Z-40 Béke.svg[edit]

Hi, perhaps you can check the designation of this glider - I think it is probably Z-04. PeterWD (talk) 11:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Operaház nézőtér.png[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Operaház nézőtér.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Public domain
This image (or other media file) is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous.
This applies to the European Union and those countries with a copyright term of 70 years after the work was made available to the public and the author never disclosed their identity.
Important: Always mention where the image comes from, as far as possible, and make sure the author never claimed authorship.
Flag of Europe
Flag of Europe
Warning sign
Warning sign
Note: In Germany and possibly other countries, certain anonymous works published before July 1, 1995 are copyrighted until 70 years after the death of the author. See Übergangsrecht. Please use this template only if the author never claimed authorship or their authorship never became public in any other way. If the work is anonymous or pseudonymous (e.g., published only under a corporate or organization's name), use this template for images published more than 70 years ago. For a work made available to the public in the United Kingdom, please use Template:PD-UK-unknown instead.

The File:Aszód címere HU.svg contains raster elements[edit]

Quality issue The SVG image File:Aszód címere HU.svg you uploaded contains embedded raster graphics and is now listed in Category:SVG images with embedded raster graphics. Such images are liable to produce inferior results when scaled to different sizes. If appropriate, please replace the raster graphics with vector graphics. You can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take this message personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 11:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

The File:HUN Visegrád Címer.svg contains raster elements[edit]

Quality issue The SVG image File:HUN Visegrád Címer.svg you uploaded contains embedded raster graphics and is now listed in Category:SVG images with embedded raster graphics. Such images are liable to produce inferior results when scaled to different sizes. If appropriate, please replace the raster graphics with vector graphics. You can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take this message personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 11:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

The File:Budapest alap.svg contains raster elements[edit]

Quality issue The SVG image File:Budapest alap.svg you uploaded contains embedded raster graphics and is now listed in Category:SVG images with embedded raster graphics. Such images are liable to produce inferior results when scaled to different sizes. If appropriate, please replace the raster graphics with vector graphics. You can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take this message personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 10:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

The File:Zar gát.svg contains raster elements[edit]

Quality issue The SVG image File:Zar gát.svg you uploaded contains embedded raster graphics and is now listed in Category:SVG images with embedded raster graphics. Such images are liable to produce inferior results when scaled to different sizes. If appropriate, please replace the raster graphics with vector graphics. You can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take this message personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 10:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

The File:Cogeneration chart.svg contains raster elements[edit]

Quality issue The SVG image File:Cogeneration chart.svg you uploaded contains embedded raster graphics and is now listed in Category:SVG images with embedded raster graphics. Such images are liable to produce inferior results when scaled to different sizes. If appropriate, please replace the raster graphics with vector graphics. You can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take this message personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 10:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposal about 3-views[edit]

Hello! I wrote a proposal on the talk page of WikiProject Aviation about creating a page (see draft) where users can ask for wanted 3-views. Of course that doesn't mean you must draw only those aircraft, but I think it's a good way to coordinate our work. Let me know what you think about this, if you whis. Cheers :) --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 09:49, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks. Then I created the page Commons:WikiProject Aviation/Wanted 3-views. Maybe you want to sign among the "3-view drawers"! --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 17:32, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aquincum-Amphiteatrum.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aquincum-Amphiteatrum.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

I can also see the following needing similar maintenance

It might also be worth you looking at some of your other early uploads and see if they can do with some similar maintenance. If you could, that would be a great help. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:SVG aircraft 3-views[edit]

Hello! Could You please add to yours 3-views category SVG aircraft 3-views instead SVG aircraft? With best regards, --Maxrossomachin (talk) 05:38, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:It works[edit]

Hip hip, hurrah! You are right, it's working, but it is also thanks to your valuable collaboration! I'm very happy and I hope we can continue like this. :) --M.L.WattsAir Mail ✈ 21:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Köszi a rajzot. Majd lenne még pár javaslatom, beteszem őket a kérések közé. Látom, a lágyjeles problémát időközben már orvosolták is. --VargaA (talk) 08:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Aviation now on Twitter[edit]

Hi, as mentioned here, Commons:WikiProject Aviation is now on Twitter. I will be using the feed to tweet photos from our now extensive repository of aviation imagery, and will also use it for outreach activities. If you have any suggestions on how to get the maximum use out of Twitter feel free to leave suggestions on the Aviation project talk page. You can follow the account at http://www.twitter.com/commonsaviation. Cheers, russavia (talk) 14:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:1900 (aft) Lwow Ludwig Ritter von Habdank BIALOSKURSKI Oberlandesgerichts President Lemberg Foto Noel Lissa Dawniel C K Nadworny fotograf Henner.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1900 (aft) Lwow Ludwig Ritter von Habdank BIALOSKURSKI Oberlandesgerichts President Lemberg Foto Noel Lissa Dawniel C K Nadworny fotograf Henner.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 03:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vecsés címer[edit]

Kedves Kaboldy! Bocsáss meg, hogy vissza állítottam a Vecsés címert, de én törekszek az egységes kinézetre. Értem ez alatt a méretet, a színt és a vonalvastagságot is. Most jelenleg például három palettám van és a munkáim nagy részét az teszi ki, hogy az összeset arra portoljam át. Majd a Vecsés címert is megcsinálom a tiéd alapján, csak még inkább színezek. Üdv: Madboy74 (talk) 13:41, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Budapest alap.svg[edit]

File:Budapest alap.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 13:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use of 3-View-Drawings[edit]

Dear Kaboldy,

I am working on a booklet about fighters of WW2. May I use you excellent 3-Viev-Drawings for this work? If so, how would you like to be credited? Thank you!

Alexander Lüdeke from Germany

Dear Lüdeke,

I am very proud to know, that my works are useful for others. Naturally you may use them all in your book according to Creative Commons Attribution-Share 3.0 Unported license. If you want to give my name in the references, my real name is dr. Peter Kaboldy, but you may give Kaboldy, Wikimedia Commons too. Even if you need drawings of further planes, I can make them. You only should write your wish in Commons:WikiProject Aviation/Wanted 3-views - Wikimedia Commons In the end, when the book will be finished, I'd like to get a sample of it, eventually in PDF form.

Best regards:Kaboldy (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2015 (UTC) e-mail: peter.kaboldy@yahoo.com[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Technical Barnstar
Amazing and extraordinary work! Sammd (talk) 22:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ilyushin DB-3 & IL-4[edit]

Hy Kaboldy! I want to thank you about your fantastic work on "Wanted 3-views". I know we have File:Iljusin Il-4.svg but you know it differs a lot from "BD-3x" Ilyushin developped before. In fact we (en.wiki and it.wiki, I mean) have separate pages: en:Ilyushin Il-4 and en:Ilyushin DB-3. Anyway I'm not here to ask you to work to a new file, but only to underline that "I know" we have the file you mentioned. Thank you, once again! --Leo Pasini (talk) 10:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, don't worry... DB-3 has been without 3-view for so long time, I really think it will be difficult that anyone will complain that you'll wait "some more" days! So, take it easy and enjoy grandchildren: they need you and won't ever forget days spent playing with you. Hy! --Leo Pasini (talk) 11:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think you deserve a monument. Great work, as usual! Thank you!!!! --Leo Pasini (talk) 21:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:HUN Kerepes Címer.svg[edit]

Szia! Rá tudsz nézni, hogy miért nem jelenik meg a városnév a bélyegképen? --Tacsipacsi (talk) 09:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm a templomokat[edit]

Köszönöm, hogy raktál föl képet a Sződligeti templomokról. Úgy látom, hogy ezekről nincsen még más képünk a Commons-on, pedig érdemes látni őket. – b_jonas 09:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Szolnok címerének színei[edit]

Szia! Át tudnád színezni Szolnok címerét az önkormányzati rendeletben megjelölt színekre? (Ugyanott látszik, hogy a koronán a két aranyszínű gömbnek fehérnek kellene lennie.)

  •      R:252 G:214 B:0
  •      R:0 G:129 B:196
  •      R:223 G:62 B:80
  •      R:0 G:90 B:60
  •      R:31 G:26 B:23
  •      R:222 G:222 B:221
  •      R:255 G:255 B:255

Előre is köszönöm! Máté (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A nemzetijelkepek.hu is gyöngyoket ír a koronán („ötágú, nyitott, rubinokkal és smaragdokkal ékes, aranyleveles korona [három levél között két gyöngy]”), amelyek jellemzően fehérek, szóval szerintem követhetnénk az önkormányzati rendeletet, de a biztonság kedvéért írok a megadott kapcsolattartó e-mail címre. És köszönöm a bíztatást a fényképekkel kapcsolatban, szétnézek, mi található a gépemen. Máté (talk) 09:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gyorsak voltak:

Köszönjük szépen észrevételét!

Helyes címernek mindenképpen a helyi rendeletben szereplő címert fogadjuk el, és kizárólag csak kérésre javítjuk. Ezt ebben az esetben is megtesszük, javítjuk.

Üdvözlettel:

[…] tartalommenedzser

Máté (talk) 10:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm! Máté (talk) 17:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nyékládháza[edit]

Szia! A régi címeren, a magyarcimerek.hu-n és az önkormányzat honlapján is arany és ezüst mező, valamint vörös kar és rózsa van, a nemzetijelkepek.hu leírásában is ez szerepel. Van valami indokod a nemzetijelkepek.hu hibás képén kívül arra, hogy átszínezd a fenti elemeket? Ha nem, akkor légy szíves, javítsd. Köszönöm! --Tacsipacsi (talk) 11:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANT-16[edit]

Szia! Küldtem Facebook Chaten egy linket. Üdv, --VargaA (talk) 13:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

«Autopatrolled» status for your account in Russian wiki[edit]

I've recently requested «Autopatrolled» status for your account in Russian wiki. In this status your edits in ru-wiki automatically will be marked as «Autopatrolled». Can you please accept this status? Your acceptation needed as a part of formal procedure.

P. S. Thanks for all your work. --Maxrossomachin (talk) 11:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, «accepted» or «not accepted»? :) --Maxrossomachin (talk) 17:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done! --Maxrossomachin (talk) 20:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Stipa-Caproni[edit]

Hi, can you create a new file from File:Stipa-Caproni piani.jpg? The original uploader declares that the image is a copy of a photo in PD-Italy, but I think it's an original graphic work, a copy of perspective tables found in a magazine or book. I think using that license the image can be erased so that a small change perhaps it would make a completely new image and free from all doubt, can you deal with it? Thanks ;-)--Threecharlie (talk) 11:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 06:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Supermarine Swift.svg[edit]

Hi. By no means I want to criticize your work, especially that it illustrates Swift well (and I can't draw myself) :), but while studying a subject for the Polish article, I wanted to let you know, that this picture has a mix of features. Wings have a dog tooth (Mk 4-5, possibly also retrofitted to Mk 3), a canopy is late bubble FR Mk 5, but a nose is a fighter variant (Mk 1-4), and an engine has no reheat (Mk 1-2). A fin seems early lower one (Mk 1-3). Regards! Pibwl (talk) 22:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Mk 5 had a blunt nose with a camera, not pointed (although the difference is very small) - and a tail fin seems lower. You can find a nice book on Swift here [3], with colour drawings and plans. Pibwl (talk) 15:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:HUN Kemecse Címer.svg[edit]

Hello Kaboldy!

Ha nem bánnád, akkor törlésre jelölném a File:HUN Kemecse Címer.svg képet a Commons talk:Deletion requests oldalon és a nevére neveztetém át a File:HUN Kemecse Címer1.svg képet.

Üdv,

-- ato (talk) 10:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian coats of arms on Wikidata[edit]

Good evening!

I've noticed you consistently produce high-quality pieces of hungarian civic heraldry. Please, consider adding your work to the Property 94 on the page for the town on Wikidata – that way Wikipedias, that use Wikidata as a source for Infoboxes – including Hungarian Wikipedia, for which you are a contributor, though you may still need to edit the article if the file name is filled locally – can instantly use the new vector version without anyone having to edit the page but more importantly without having to notice there is a new file superseding the Bitmap version to begin with. :) (In case you don't already know – you can find the related Wikidata page either through the article about the town or through the bitmap's File Usage section.) I've also checked your previous uploads and it seems they have been added to Wikidata by other users, so you don't need to worry about it.

Thank you.--TFerenczy (talk) 21:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fw Ta 152[edit]

What can I say?! It's impossible to describe how I appreciate your work... It's a pleasure to know that YOU are here, working at my side. --Leo Pasini (talk) 11:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pink Panther.svg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pink Panther.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Sfs90 (talk) 23:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

画像の追加をお願いします[edit]

Please make Japanese fighter picture, Nakajima Ki-44 Shoki. Sorry, I'm Japanese, so I can speak and write English a little. Thank You. Umeyou (talk) 04:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Przemyśl fortress[edit]

Many, many, many thanks for the detailed plan you crafted of the Przemyśl fortress! I had been looking for such a map for a long time and I am very happy to have found it! ViennaUK (talk) 18:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Super drawings! Thank's Mazapura (talk) 09:17, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ːБoльшoe спaсибoǃ

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mechanical Tolerance Definitions HU.svg[edit]

Szia Kaboldy! A File:Mechanical Tolerance Definitions HU.svg kép bal felső két mérete (alsó és felső eltérés) az angol változathoz képest (File:Mechanical Tolerance Definitions.svg) fel lett cserélve. Ki tudnád javítani? Köszönettel, -- ato (talk) 15:32, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Subdiction" kép magyarítása[edit]

Ide is írok, hogy biztos legyen. A kezdőlap vitalapjára megérkezett a fordítás hozzáértőbb szerkesztőtársaktól. Ha lementenél a fenti svg képből egy magyar feliratú változatot, akkor március 4-én megjelenhetne a kezdőlapunkon. Ezek alapján meg tudod csinálni? Előre is köszönöm! -- ato (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make a new 3-views from Fiat C.R.32?[edit]

Hi, I wanted to ask you a courtesy if you can and if you want. In it.wiki a user has lately expanded the article on the Fiat C.R.30, the progenitor of the well known Fiat C.R.32, models that are very similar and where the most obvious difference lies in the different wingspan (only the superior?), shorter in C.R.32. I wondered if it was possible for your intervention to change the File:FIAT CR-32.svg into a new 3-views that reproduces the C.R.30, you can find more images in this pages. Thanks :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 10:46, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I modified your scheme of the Boundary Layer[edit]

Hello, Kaboldy. Your SVG picture https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:S%C3%ADk_hat%C3%A1rr%C3%A9teg.svg is nice, but I had to modify it for using it on https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Couche_limite#Th%C3%A9orie. Notice that I made a PNG file and that a general use svg would be better (but I don't know how to do it). Thanks, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 09:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ! Thank you, Kaboldy for the SVG picture. But look as you can see on the png picture : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Evolution_couche-limite_plaque_plane_d%27apr%C3%A8s_S%C3%ADk_hat%C3%A1rr%C3%A9teg.png, the thickness of the turbulent boundary layer must be taken from the wall to the top of the boundary layer. Also note that the leading edge of the plate must be chamfered. Last little thing: it would be good to separate the text "X critique" from the oblique line ... If you make these three corrections, I will translate the text in english and may be in Spanish and Portuguese (except in Turkish!)... Regards, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 21:19, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Toborzás.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Toborzás.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Toborzás.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Regasterios (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tejas svg[edit]

Can you please make on HQ svg line drawing for HAL Tejas? Best Regards Shashpant (talk) 13:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

english electric canberra bomber[edit]

Good morning I would like to use your drawing of a canberra bomber WH915 on a memorial to the crew of a canberra which crashed near here. I understand that the image should be attributed to you, but this would be impossible on the metal plate. May I have your permission to not attribute it to you on this occasion?

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xyzjohnbeasley (talk • contribs) 10:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Insignia of Regiments of Indian Army[edit]

Hello @Kaboldy:

I request you to please create SVG vector images of insignia of Indian Army's regiments. If you wish to do so here is the list of insignia -

Thanks and hope you will respond.

Regards Soap Boy 1 (talk) 10:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Soap Boy 1,
first a questionː are you really a girl? (According your user page you are.
secondː unfortunately I am busy in a program to draw coats of arms of all Hungarian towns and villages. There are cca. 3500 and I made only 1790. I am 84 years old and I hope my life will be enough to finish them. The I'll be ready to fulfill your demand. Regards Kaboldy (talk) 13:11, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Soap Boy 1 (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3-View Layout[edit]

I have greatly benefited from your many 3-view drawings of aircraft. I always wonder why the view layout seems to violate drafting conventions. If the top view has the nose of the aircraft to the left and the tail to the right then the front view should be to the left of the top view and the left side view should be below the top view. In that manner the views line up with respect to one another if the sheet is folded at 90 degrees between the views. As the views are positioned in your drawings a fold between the top and front view will not only show the front view at the rear of the aircraft but it will also be upside down with respect to the top view. Similarly for a fold between the top and side view.

Your J-3 3-view drawing.
The same 3-view with the layout I expect.

Maybe I don't understand something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thayneh (talk • contribs) 01:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Thayneh, the answer is very simpleː there are 2 drawing conventions (standards) in the world, the American and the European. I am a Hungarian, we use ISO standards, but if you like, you can change all my drawings to US conventions. Kaboldy (talk) 04:07, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhh ... now I understand. I couldn't imagine that with your mechanical engineering background that you would place the views in an arbitrary way. In my short four years (27 years ago!) employed doing drafting and mechanical design in the U.S. I had no reason to venture into the ISO layout standards. While I'll point out that there are many U.S. and ANSI standards that, to me, are broken (dates being one of them - they should be written YEAR-MONTH-DAY!) I'll have to side with the ANSI view layout as being more natural (at least to my brain). No, I have no motivation to re-work your drawings - especially now that I understand why the views are the way they are.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thayneh (talk • contribs) 15:42, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Őcsény község címere[edit]

Szia, láttam hogy még te készítetted el többek között Őcsény község címerét is jobb minőségben. A címerrel kapcsolatban lenne néhány javaslatom. https://kep.cdn.index.hu/1/0/1841/18412/184129/18412985_1130689_8b80b4332b9ec49afb26560d010bf892_wm.jpg Ez a kép az őcsényi polgármesteri hivatalban készült, melynek falán látható a címert is tartalmazó zászló. Mint az a képen látható, van pár kisebb eltérés a képen látható és az általad feljavított kép között. Egyrészt a címer magassága kicsit kisebb és talán szélességre kicsivel szélesebb. A címer széle nem fekete színű, hanem aranyozott. Továbbá a kék és a zöld színek enyhén halványabbak. A többi rész szerintem ugyanolyan. El tudnád készíteni a címert úgy, ahogy az a zászlón is kinéz? Netpartizán (talk) 12:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Természetesen meg tudom csinálni, de kételyeim vannak, mert Őcsény hivatalos honlapján (https://www.ocseny.hu/) pontosan az a címer látható, mely az enyémnek megfelelː Kaboldy (talk) 17:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A weboldalon lévő címer szerintem annak köszönhető, hogy a nemzetijelkepek.hu oldalon is az általad elkészített kép volt fent már jópár éve, azt vehette át a község weboldala is. Magán a weboldalon egyébként is látszik, hogy dizájn szempontjából már jó régen frissült. Azért is érdekes ez a helyzet, mert a zászlón kívül az őcsényi közétkeztetési épületben is a zászlón található címer szerepel. Úgyhogy mindenesetre érdekes a helyzet. De köszönöm, hogy elkészíted. :) Netpartizán (talk) 18:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nem készítem el, csak ha bizonyos vagyok benne, hogy a másik a jó, van még egyéb dolgom. Kaboldy (talk) 20:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Rendben, azért köszönöm a lehetőséget. További szép munkákat kívánok:) Netpartizán (talk) 20:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Szia, bocsi hogy újból írok. Ugye a címer témát megbeszéltük, egyet is tudok érteni veled, hogy amíg nincs konkrét addig nem lenne korrekt lecserélni a jelenlegi általad készített fajtát. A zászlóról mi a véleményed? Mármint ugye amit küldtem képet és a jelenleg wikin fentlévő zászló és lobogó nem egyezik néhány dologban. Szerintem az általam küldött képen lévőt tekinthetjük hivatalos zászlónak, de természetesen kíváncsi vagyok a te véleményedre is. Mint mondtad van így is sok munkád, szóval nem az a célom hogy mégjobban leterheljelek, tehát bőven ráérne a dolog.
Itt egy kép, amin jobban látszódik a zászlón lévő felirat:
https://kep.cdn.indexvas.hu/1/0/1841/18412/184129/18412979_f0675631c7fa948da7958be4f2b7ff0e_wm.jpg Netpartizán (talk) 17:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Amennyire tudom, a címerek (meg esetleg a zászlók, ha egyáltalán vannak ilyenek) olyanok, amilyeneket a település önkormányzata megállapít. Ha van ilyan, akkor ezt kell figyelembe venni. Ha nincs, akkor minden vélemény csak esztétikai vagy ehhez hasonló lehet. Miért fontos pont ez a címer neked? Kaboldy (talk) 09:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mivel én is az adott településen lakok, így fontosnak tartom, hogy a község fejlődjön az online térben is.
A község rendelkezik zászlóval, ez benne vagy egy települési rendeletben, ami az ocseny.hu weboldalon is megtalálható. Tehát a település meghatározta, és mint küldtem élő példával ismertette is a rendeletben leírtakat. Tehát igen, az én észrevételem esztétikai kérdésű, mivel a hivatalos zászló nem teljesen egyezik a wikin is fent lévővel. Netpartizán (talk) 10:41, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Loire 130 3-view request[edit]

Hello! Would you please back to business once again and make another beautiful 3-view drawing? For this File:Loire 130 3-view L'Aerophile June 1944.jpg Maxrossomachin (talk) 14:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am in business constantly. If you are seeking good airplane drawings, try it in a Russian websiteː http://www.airwar.ru (Ugolok nieba). I̟'ll make an svg dɽawing, if I will have time. Kaboldy (talk) 14:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Thank you! Maxrossomachin (talk) 17:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
My admiration for all the detailed aicraft - construction drawings! Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 12:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! Kaboldy (talk) 13:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kaboldy&oldid=848349659"