User talk:JonnyBrazil/Archive/2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Korrektur der Perspektive

Hallo, für die Korrektur der Perspektive nutze ich das kostenlose shiftn, die Automatik arbeit meist recht zuverlässig und außerdem paßt es Breite und Höhe an korrekt an. Das solltest du dir mal anschauen wenndu häufiger Gebäude fotografierst. --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp, werd ich mir installieren. --JonnyBrazil (talk) 14:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, JonnyBrazil/Archive!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 18:35, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

das wartende Pferd

Mir gefallen Motiv und Titel wirklich so gut, daß ich es gewagt habe, mit pro zu stimmen. Ich meine, man sollte nicht allein die technische Qualität eines Fotos bewerten, Bildaussage, Formatwaht, Motiv sind oft noch wichtiger. Ich versuche mal, das Bild in cmyk etwas zu verbessern. Ich lade normalerweise nicht über fremde Bilder drüber, im Falle dieser kandidatur würde ich es aber machen, wenn du nichts dagegen hast, kannst ja auch schnell revertieren. Wenn es trotzdem durchfällt, würde ich es mal mit kontrastreichem Schwarzweiß über Grünkanal und erneuter Kandidatur versuchen. Gruß vom Piefke aus Preußen ;) --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 17:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Schau es dir an und setze zurück, falls es dir nicht gefällt! Die Eingriffe waren ziemlich stark, ich bin nicht böse, wenn du sagst, daß ich Murks gebaut habe. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 19:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Freut mich wenns dir gefällt und danke für die Überarbeitung. schaut nicht schlecht aus. Ich kann mich noch gut an die Situation erinnern: 4.Jänner und wir waren am Friedhof an der weißrussischen Grenze. Beim Zurückgehen stand das Pferd da und guckte mich an. Hatte leider keine brauchbare Kamera dabei. Das Originalbild ist total blaustichig, das habe ich schon mal korrigiert. Danke nochmals, aber was hast du genau gemacht? --JonnyBrazil (talk) 05:20, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Ich habe kanalgetrennte Tonwertkorrektur in cmyk gemacht, leicht in cyan, stark in magenta. Weil das noch nicht gereicht hat, Verlaufsfilter dunkelgrau ins nichts von oben bis Bildmitte, diesen mit Farbton verrechnet und am Dach maskiert. Danach noch Tiefen/Lichter mit 22 und über Hochpass 3 geschärft. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 07:57, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Trotz der technischen Mängel auch meiner Meinung nach wertvolles Bild. Derartige Aufnahmen - Arbeitspferd, unverfälscht und abseits etwaiger Folkore - wird man auch an der weißrussischen Grenze bald nicht mehr so leicht machen können, es ist daher von hohem dokumentarischen Wert. Zur Pferderasse (typisches Panje, imo) müßte man mal recherchieren, ich werde zunächst insoweit mal häuslichen Rat einholen :-). --Alupus (talk) 15:27, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Danke, ich freue mich sehr und nehme das nächste mal eine bessere Kamera mit - versprochen. Zu der Pferderasse: Panjepferde sind eher dunkel habe ich gelesen. Aber es stimmt schon, auch in der Ukraine werden immer mehr Pferde verkauft und durch Maschinen ersetzt. --JonnyBrazil (talk) 20:00, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NOE Kleinhadersdorf Pfarrgasse 1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Saubere Arbeit, schön weiches Licht --Ralf Roletschek 06:40, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterlandschaft in der Ukraine 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterlandschaft in der Ukraine 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ukraine Pferd wartet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments schönes Motiv, herrlicher Titel aber der Himmel!!! Die Kamera war überfordert. Hier kommt bestimmt noch mehr an Kommentaren, leider. --Ralf Roletschek 17:19, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NOE Poysdorf Josefsplatz 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Sfu 11:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Italien Volterra Teatro Romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice ! Needs maybe more contrast, but good for QI nevertheless.--Jebulon 17:25, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NOE Erdberg Kath Pfarrkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. But not categorized properly (only hidden categories). Please correct this.--Jebulon 15:33, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gräf&Stift C12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sparkly. --Mattbuck 20:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear JonnyBrazil/Archive,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stochid im Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very bleak. Mattbuck 11:24, 16 December 2011 (UTC)