User talk:Jonas Rogowski

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jonas Rogowski!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 13:35, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Das war ne automatische Nachricht ;) --Ralf Roleček 12:51, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Jonas Rogowski!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:06, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Coca-Cola Weihnachtstruck in Rövershagen.jpg was uncategorized on 16 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:06, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Pest 2011 in Rostock.jpg was uncategorized on 22 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Tornado vor Warnemünde.JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
• Image:Tornadotrichter vor Warnemünde.JPG was uncategorized on 7 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Künstler in Rostock, Leuchttürme

Hallo Jonas, schöne Bilder, die du da so hochlädst :-). Bei den Künstlern weiß ich nicht, wo sie in Rostock aufgetreten sind, es gibt die Category:Stadthalle Rostock, die man, wenn es denn der richtige Ort ist, vergeben könnte. Ansonsten vielleicht noch der Tipp, dass es für das Kategorienmanagement in den Einstellungen > Helferlein > Kategoriehelferlein > HotCat gibt, dass dir die Arbeit sicher erleichtern kann. Und gucke mal bitte in Category:Warnemünde Hafen Leuchtturm und Category:Warnemünde Leuchtturm. Es sind zwei verschiedene Bauwerke. Wenn auch nur ein Leuchtturm als Hauptmotiv zu sehen ist, muss die Hauptkat "Warnemünde" nicht nochmal vergeben werden, da die Turm-Kat sowie auch die "Warnemünde in the 2010s"-Kat bereits in dieser stecken. Viele Grüße -- Niteshift (talk) 11:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Hej Niteshift, danke für die Tipps. Werd ich beherzigen und wenn das in der Stadthalle stattgefunden hätte, hätt ich die Kat auch vergeben ;-). Also Zuckerfabrik, MAU bzw. Festivals sind so meine Veranstaltungsorte und ich glaub mit den Bands, kann ich einen ganz guten Beitrag leisten...diesen Sommer steht noch so einiges an. Also sorry für die späte Reaktion und Grüße zurück --Jonas Rogowski (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Neue Cats

Hallo Jonas, bitte verzichte vorerst auf das Anlegen neuer Categorien. Bitte schaue dir zuerst das Kategoriensystem an und versuche, dich dort einzulesen. Ich habe auf eine deienr Kats einen Löschantrag gestellt. Kategorien sollte man erst anlegen, wenn die Anzahl der Kats die übergeordnete Kat. unübersichtlich macht. Außerdem wird in der internationalen Commons die englische Sprache verwendet, es sei denn, es handelt sich um Eigennamen. Gruß. --Schiwago (talk) 08:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, ich habe völlig übersehen, dass du ja Artikel angelegt hast. Das passiert hier so selten, dass ich von einer Kategorie ausgegangen bin. Entschuldige bitte den Zwischenruf. --Schiwago (talk) 08:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Hej Schiwago, also ist jetzt der Ist-Zustand vor dem Löschen wieder hergestellt? Ansonsten werd ich in Zukunft darauf achten, kein Problem. Gruß zurück. Jonas Rogowski (talk) 14:40, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Ja, ich habe gleich zurückgesetzt. Übrigens habe ich lange Zeit immer wieder an der Stadtschule vorbeigeschaut, um ein Foto ohne Gerüste zu machen, nun bist du mir zuvorgekommen! Sehr schön. Im Artikel fehlt irgendwie die neueste Geschichte (Umbau zum Konservatorium/Musikschule). Fiel mir gerade auf. Ich muss mal Quellen suchen. Gruß. --Schiwago (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Ja, ging mir genauso. Scheinbar wildern wir im gleichen Revier ;). Von der Geschichte weiß ich aber auch nichts weiter. Gruß. Jonas Rogowski (talk) 21:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorfkirche Bölkendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:55, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorfkirche Senftenhütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:55, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rostocker Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me it's QI --Moroder 17:34, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in the 2010s

Hallo Jonas, ich hatte die Kategorie gestern erst geleert. Sortierst du deine schönen Bilder bitte gleich in die Unterkategorien (bspw. "2012 in Landkreis Rostock") ein? Vielen Dank! Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 19:21, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Hej Niteshift, klar mach ich. Ich nehm die bei Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in the 2010s raus und pack sie bei Rostock rein. Soll die dann komplett leer bleiben? Sicherlich kommen da sonst noch neue dazu irgendwann. Gruß Jonas Rogowski (talk) 21:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Jonas, da die 2010er Jahre auf Grund der Menge an Bildern in 2010, 2011 und 2012 unterteilt sind und wir so tief wie möglich kategorisieren, sollte sich in der Hauptkat kein Bild befinden ;-). Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Feuerwehr Lütten Klein

Hallo Jonas, wieso hast du hier die Cat entfernt? Gruß. --Schiwago (talk) 10:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Hej Schiwago, das kommt davon wenn man unkonzentriert ist. Hatte nur M-V gelesen und schon wars gelöscht. Ist wieder drin. Besten Dank für den Hinweis :). Jonas Rogowski (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Party.San + Festivalsommer 2013

Hallo Jonas Rogowski,
sehr prima - eine Bitte: wäre es möglich, dass du eine Kategorie zum Party.San Open Air parallel zu Category:Wacken Open Air u.a. anlegst und mit den Bildern befüllst? Ich würde dich ausserdem gern auf de:Benutzer:Achim Raschka/Festivalsommer 2013 hinweisen, wo ich ein Projekt zur Planung eines Festivalsommers 2013 gestartet habe - wäre schön, wenn du dabei wärest. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 11:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Hej Achim, hab mich gerade in deinen Festivalsommer eingetragen und noch das Party.San als Veranstaltung hinzugefügt. Hoffe das war ok. Es ist aber auch sehr wahrscheinlich, dass ich dort wieder dabei bin. Das mit der Party.San-Kat versuche ich. Gibt es da eine Möglichkeit alle Bilder auf einmal oder zumindest alle Bilder aus einer meiner Benutzer-Kat zusammen dort dann einzutragen oder muss ich jedes Foto einzeln nachtragen? Gruß --Jonas Rogowski (talk) 13:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jonas, gern auch mehr ;O) - als Tool für solche Verschiebungen kenne ich nur Commander (muss auf deine Kats angepasst werden). Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 14:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Jonas,

wir haben einige Deiner coolen VENOM Fotos für ein Interview verwendet (http://www.voicesfromthedarkside.de/Interviews/VENOM--9585.html). Falls der Copyright Hinweis so nicht ausreichen sollte, bitte kurz melden, dann ändern wir das ab. Danke! :-)

Das sieht gut aus. Trotzdem Danke für dir Meldung :-) --Jonas Rogowski (talk) 12:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Margret Seemann, SPD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 16:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Doberaner Münster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Festivalsommervorlage

Hi Jonas,
wie ich sehe lädst du schon eifrig Bilder von Wacken und vom Parti.San hoch - kannst du bitte in alle Bilder die Vorlage {{Festivalsommer 2013}} aufnehmen, damit die in die entsprechende Kategorie aufgenommen werden? Infos zur Vorlage: Template:Festivalsommer 2013. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 21:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ihsahn, Vegard „Ihsahn“ Tveitan at Wacken Open Air 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK under the circumstances. --Mattbuck 21:27, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tsjuder, Jan-Erik „Nag“ Romøren at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Vassil 11:19, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anaal Nathrakh, Dave „V.I.T.R.I.O.L.“ Hunt at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Martin Kraft 13:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpathian Forest, Roger „Nattefrost“ Rasmussen at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sabaton, Joakim Brodén 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 20:06, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sabaton, Joakim Brodén 04.jpg

File:Sabaton, Joakim Brodén 04.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Yanguas (talk) 01:23, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-12-06 Orkan Xaver in Warnemünde 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Copyright status: File:Heidemarie Beyer, SPD.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Heidemarie Beyer, SPD.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gabriele Měšťan, Die Linke 01.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gabriele Měšťan, Die Linke 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gabriele Měšťan, Die Linke 02.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gabriele Měšťan, Die Linke 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Michael Nötzel, CDU.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Michael Nötzel, CDU.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Eberhard Hoppe, SPD.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Eberhard Hoppe, SPD.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gottfried Timm, SPD.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gottfried Timm, SPD.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wolfgang Griese, Die Linke.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wolfgang Griese, Die Linke.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Klaus Gollert, FDP.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Klaus Gollert, FDP.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ute Schildt, SPD.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ute Schildt, SPD.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Joachim Steinmann, CDU.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Joachim Steinmann, CDU.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anaal Nathrakh, Mick „Irrumator“ Kenney at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Torsten Koplin, DIE LINKE.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Torsten Koplin, DIE LINKE.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 02.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 02.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 03.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 04.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 05.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 06.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 07.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 08.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 09.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 10.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 11.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 12.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 13.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 14.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR 15.jpg
• File:02-08-2014-W.A.S.P. at Wacken Open Air-JonasR.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Moin! Ich vermute mal source = own? Hab's fix nachgetragen. Wenn falsch bitte um Info. LG --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 04:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Hej vielen Dank! LG --Jonas Rogowski (talk) 08:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Jan-Böhmermann-Foto auf pdh.djv-bildportal.de

Hallo Jonas,

eines meiner Fotos fand ich vor Kurzem auf http://pdh.djv-bildportal.de. Nach Beschwerde meinte der Betreiber, er habe das Bild korrekt verwendet.

Er hat viele, viele eigene Fotos in seinem Bildportal, aber er verwendet auch gern einzelne Bilder von commons.wikimedia.org.

Auch eines Deiner Bilder fand ich dort: http://pdh.djv-bildportal.de/webgate/detail/0002170024.html Bilder findet man über das Suchfeld auf http://pdh.djv-bildportal.de/webgate/frameset.html.

Einige Infos aus den EXIF-Daten des genannten Bildes:

Urheber: Jonas Rogowski Copyright: pdh Anweisungen: Honorarpflichtig nach MFM! Autor: -pdh- Beerfurther Straße 81a, D-64385 Reichelsheim, Tel. +49-6164-54689 Mobil +49-172-5906597 - Bankverbindung: BIC: GENODE51MIC IBAN: DE03508635130000028185 (Da diese Daten ja vom Seitenbetreiber selbst in den EXIF-Bilddaten des Bildes auf der Detail-Seite 0002170024.html öffentlich zugänglich hinterlegt sind, sehe ich kein Problem darin, sie hier unverändert wiederzugeben).

Mein Bild wurde inzwischen entfernt, die Details waren genau wie im Falle Deines Bildes. Diese Info poste ich hier, weil ich auf https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Weiternutzung/M%C3%A4ngel lese: "Einzelnutzungen eines Fotos oder einer anderen Mediendatei werden hier nicht gelistet. Bitte informiere in diesen Fällen den jeweiligen Urheber direkt auf seiner Benutzerdiskussionsseite oder auf der Diskussionsseite des Bildes (ggf. auf Commons)." Ich denke, das ist in Deinem Sinne, auch wenn es mich nichts angeht. Sollte dies Bildverwendung aber so mit Dir abgesprochen sein: Sorry.

Beste Grüße, Michael (Pixeldost (talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC))

Hallo Michael, vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis! Ich kümmere mich natürlich darum, denn die Bildverwendung ist so mit mir nicht abgesprochen. Gruß Jonas Rogowski (talk) 07:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Glenn Danzig Photo Permission Request from Zumic

Hi,

I hope this message finds you having a good day.

My name is Jacob Grossfeld and I am the managing editor for Zumic, a music news website.

I'm writing to you because we discovered your photo of Glenn Danzig (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Glenn_Danzig_at_Wacken_Open_Air_2013_02.jpg) online with a Creative Commons license, and we would appreciate your written permission to use it on our website, as well as your preferred attribution credit and any other specifications you might require.

A little background about Zumic: We cover all styles of music, giving artists and fans the respect they deserve. The name Zumic comes from our goal of "Music that revolves around you." Our philosophy champions a true appreciation for musicianship. We celebrate artists and make their work more accessible to people who will enjoy it. We truly believe that music has the power to educate, heal, and bring people together.

If you would like to request more information about Zumic, please do not hesitate to inquire.

Best regards, Jacob Grossfeld jacob (at) zumic.com Jgrossfeld2 (talk) 19:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)