User talk:Johann Jaritz/Archive/2017

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Gartenterrasse 27122016 5874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Wappen Freiherr von Sterneck 27122016 4720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Arkaden 27122016 5875.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz Schloss Krastowitz und Bildungshaus 27122016 5873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Arkaden O-Seite 27122016 5878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Hans Kudlich-Denkmal 27122016 4726.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 3 Bildungshaus Gaestetrakt 27122016 5872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz W-Seite Fenster 27122016 4722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Manual Mode

Johann Jaritz,

Have you ever thought about taking images in "Manual" mode instead of "Auto"? Can give it a try and you don't like what you see with your images on your computer, you can always go back to "Auto". That would change the "Exposure Mode" and "White Balance" to "Manual Mode" and not "Auto". Just an idea to improve your photography for 2017! Adamdaley (talk) 03:49, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello Adam Daley! It`s a splendid suggestion of yours. So once in a while I will think about it, in order to improve my photographic results. HAPPY NEW YEAR anyway! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Turmvorhalle 29122016 5900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Chronogramm von 1714 29122016 5897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Gartenportal mit Barockkartusche 29122016 5891.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 06:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Gartenportal mit Barockkartusche 29122016 5890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Doppelwappen Schober-Kulmer 29122016 5889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metnitz Grades Filial- und Wallfahrtskirche hl Wolfgang NO-Ansicht 21122016 5784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metnitz Grades Filial- und Wallfahrtskirche hl Wolfgang Bering-Mauer Christophorus 21122016 4708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metnitz Grades Filial- und Wallfahrtskirche hl Wolfgang Wehranlage Innenansicht 21122016 5795.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metnitz Grades Filial- und Wallfahrtskirche hl Wolfgang Glockenturm 21122016 4695.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:27, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metnitz Grades Filial- und Wallfahrtskirche hl Wolfgang Ost-Bering-Mauer 21122016 5774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesach Stadtbefestigung und Blick zum Petersberg mit Filialkirche hl Peter 21122016 5823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesach Fuerstenhofplatz 3 Kastenspeicher 21122016 5814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesach Fuerstenhofplatz 3 Neues Rathaus Fuerstenhof Hofseite 21122016 5815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesach Fuerstenhofplatz 3 Kastenspeicher Zugang mit eisernen Hellebardentraegern 21122016 5817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesach Petersberg 209 Filialkirche hl Peter O-Ansicht 21122016 5813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Friesach Petersberg 209 Filialkirche hl Peter O-Ansicht 21122016 5813.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Friesach Petersberg 209 Filialkirche hl Peter O-Ansicht 21122016 5813.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesach Geyersbergweg 24 Ruine Geiersberg 21122016 4717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A week  Support. Main object might have been sharper and more detailed. --Michielverbeek 06:23, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesach Stadtpfarrkirche hl Bartholomaeus Kriegerdenkmal und Petersberg 21122016 5833.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:26, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesach Wiener Strasse ehemaliger Karner romanisches Portal SW-Ansicht 21122016 5838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesach Fuerstenhofplatz 3 Kastenspeicher 21122016 5818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Veit Burggasse 9 Herzogsburg samt Stadtmauer 14122016 5679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Veit Burggasse 9 Herzogsburg Supraporte mit Kaerntner Wappen und Bindenschild 1524 14122016 5688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Veit Burggasse 9 Herzogsburg mit Garten SW-Ansicht 14122016 5692.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Veit Burggasse 9 Herzogsburg mit Wohnfluegel zum kaiserlichen Zeughaus 14122016 5695.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Veit Burggasse 9 Herzogsburg samt Stadtmauer NO-Ansicht 14122016 5683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friesach Wiener Strasse ehemaliger Karner romanisches Portal Tympanon 21122016 5842.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --A.Savin 18:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Metnitz Grades Waldbank suedlich der Filial- und Wallfahrtskirche hl Wolfgang 21122016 5761.jpg

Hello, sorry that the nomination is not a success, however this is a successful image, at least for me! Visually this is even a very good image IMO, though apparently our colleagues don't manage to see the same thing as me, the image is well balenced, the mood is very special, the object is nice....but well they seems to think it was important to have more space at right. To each his tastes! Best wishes! Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Christian! I`d love to thank you for your friendly effort to nominate that picture of the hoar frosted bench. As there were only two opposite reviews, I decided to withdraw the image from the FP nominations. Many kind regards to Sète and a prosperous year 2017 to you. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Wasserablaufschleusenturm und Zinnen-Tor 14122016 5658.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus on subject. -- Ikan Kekek 03:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Veit Wayer Strasse 19 Schloss Weyer Hauptportal mit ehem Zugbruecke 14122016 4646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Veit Wayer Strasse 19 Schloss Weyer Portalinschrift 14122016 4657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Veit Wayer Strasse 19 Schloss Weyer Supraporte Wappenrelief Liechtenstein 14122016 4650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Veit Wayer Strasse 19 Schloss Weyer Supraporte Wappenrelief Khuenburg 14122016 4649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Veit Wayer Strasse 19 Schloss Weyer West-Aussenwand Sonnenuhr 14122016 4647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Frauenstein SW-Teilansicht 14122016 4680.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Part of a panorama? --XRay 05:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, no plans for a panorama. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Frauenstein SW-Teilansicht 14122016 4678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Part of a panorama? --XRay 05:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, no plans for a panorama. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Frauenstein SW-Teilansicht 14122016 4679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Part of a panorama? --XRay 05:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, no plans for a panorama. -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Frauenstein NW-Ansicht 14122016 5646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweissbad Woerther See-Ufer Roehricht 26122016 5852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweissbad Blick zur Halbinsel 26122016 5850.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Roehricht und Seeblick nach Maria Woerth 26122016 5857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Baeume 26122016 5862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Blumeninsel und Pyramidenkogel 26122016 5864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, except that there's a big dust spot not far from the left margin in the middle of the mountain and another small one above that in the sky. You may find more, perhaps, but the one on the mountain is the big problem. Once you fix it, I'll be happy to promote the picture. -- Ikan Kekek 05:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Ooops! Ikan, your eagle eyes detected what I overlooked. The issues should be resolved by now. --Johann Jaritz 06:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC) Yes indeed. -- Ikan Kekek 13:27, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Hoch-Liebenfels Burgruine 29122016 4733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Hoch-Liebenfels Burgruine SW-Teilansicht 29122016 5931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Hoch-Liebenfels Burgruine SO-Teilansicht 29122016 5930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Note: tower leans to the right. Can you recover?--Famberhorst 05:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Dominicus Johannes @Famberhorst: , for your review. I tried to eradicate the detected issue the best possible way. --Johann Jaritz 06:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC) Better now, good quality.--Famberhorst 06:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Hoch-Liebenfels Burgruine N-Ansicht 29122016 4749.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Hoch-Liebenfels 4 Buergerhaus ehemaliges Pfleghaus 29122016 5940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Soerg Blick gen SW auf das Klagenfurter Becken und Julische Alpen 29122016 4753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Intentionally very bright. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:23, 10 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Yes, indeed. Would you suggest it to be darker, Ikan? -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC) No, I think it's fine and was just making an observation because some people object to very bright areas in photos, but that's how the world looks pretty often. -- Ikan Kekek 05:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Taggenbrunn 11 Burgruine mit Weinberg 26042015 0837.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glanegg Mautbruecken 1 Burgruine Glanegg SO-Ansicht 29122016 4762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Uoaei1 07:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Dornhof 1 Schloss Ost-Ansicht 14122016 4660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Frauenstein West-Gesamtansicht 14122016 5635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Hohenstein 1 Schloss Hohenstein 29122016 4742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Uoaei1 07:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Soerg Blick gen SW auf das Klagenfurter Becken und Karawanken 29122016 4758.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Soerg 12 Pfarrkirche hl Martin Ost-Ansicht 29122016 4748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Soerg 12 Pfarrkirche hl Martin Ost-Ansicht 29122016 4752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Soerg SW-Blick 31122009 6443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and nice--Famberhorst 05:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Damtschach Schloss Ansicht vom Ortsfriedhof 06122016 5473.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 06:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Damtschach Friedhof Familiengruft der Orsini und Rosenberg 06122016 5458.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Damtschach Schloss NO-Ansicht 06122016 5451.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:00, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Damtschach Friedhof Wappenrelief Grabstein Freiherren Jöchlinger von Jochenstein 06122016 5461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Damtschach Schloss SW-Ansicht 06122016 5483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:00, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Damtschach Schloss NO-Ansicht 06122016 5449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 05:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Damtschach Schlosskapelle NO-Ansicht 06122016 5452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Damtschach Friedhof Grabstein Felix Wolfgang Freiherr Jöchlinger 06122016 5463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Damtschach Friedhof Wappenrelief Grabstein Freiherren Jöchlinger von Jochenstein 06122016 5462.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Damtschach Schloss Metallbank 06122016 5447.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Domplatz 4 Torbogenbau und Kapitelhaus NW-Ansicht 11012017 5991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Museumweg 1 Verein Freunde des Kärntner Freilichtmuseum 11012017 5966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Wallfahrtskirche Mariae Himmelfahrt Pestkreuz und Marienanstalt 11012017 4769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:54, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Arndorfer Strasse Pestkreuz Ost-Ansicht 11012017 4767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Arndorfer Strasse Pestkreuz 1523 Loggia Gewoelbemalerei 11012017 5971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:54, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Arndorfer Strasse Pestkreuz Sued-Ansicht 11012017 5967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:54, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Domplatz 6 Karner 11012017 5976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer-Esplanade mit Bootsanleger 11012017 6003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very interesting composition with the straight and diagonal lines. Might be worth an FP nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 03:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Parkhotel vom Werzerstrand gesehen 11012017 6005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and peaceful. -- Ikan Kekek 03:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Schilfrohr und Eis 11012017 6029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent composition. -- Ikan Kekek 03:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Seeblick nach SO 11012017 6013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 03:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Wallfahrtskirche Mariae Himmelfahrt SO-Seitenapsis 11012017 5977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 05:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Domplatz 6 Karner Epitaph Christoph Theinacher 01112017 5986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 05:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Domplatz 6 Karner Wappengrabstein Hanns Pruggmayr 11012017 5987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very high quality, terrific focus. -- Ikan Kekek 05:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Zehnte Oktober Strasse Wintertag 14012017 6039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Seeblick nach Osten 14012017 6094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Seeblick nach Osten 11012017 6019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think this may be my favorite of the 5, and the only potential problem I could see at FPC would be if some people think some of the light is "burnt". Congratulations! You nominated 5 excellent photos, none of which in my opinion would be out of place at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 03:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks, @Ikan Kekek: , for your friendly review. After dulling the image, I hope it won`t be too lackluster. --Johann Jaritz 05:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC) I wasn't actually suggesting that you tone it down, and I think you toned it down too much. Others might disagree. I think a very slight decrease in highlights from the previous version could be good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks again, @Ikan Kekek: for your constructive review. I tried to find an appropriate compromise between the old and the second version. --Johann Jaritz 05:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC) Certainly. This version looks good, but I don't understand why some areas that were previously in shadow are now in sun, and that feels wrong (sort of dishonest, as well as presenting a significantly different view) to me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:32, 15 January 2017 (UTC)  Done @Ikan Kekek: After all I decided to return almost to the primary version. --Johann Jaritz 14:34, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Zehnte Oktober Strasse Wintertag 14012017 6034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Zehnte Oktober Strasse winterliche Birke 14012017 6036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Bahnhofplatz OEBB-Bahnhof 14012017 6046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. -- DerFussi 06:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Weiden und Parkbaenke 11012017 6025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Schilfrohr 11012017 6031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 05:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schilfrohr im Woerther See 11012017 6016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 05:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Weiden und Parkbaenke 11012017 6024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Seeblick nach Osten 11012017 6020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination

Hi,i had nominee it[1]. Thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Bootssteg und Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 11012017 6009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 05:19, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Werzer´s Bootshaus 11012017 6008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 05:19, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade Westbucht und Pyramidenkogel 11012017 6006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Splendid, and would be a good FP nom. -- Ikan Kekek 05:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Promenadenbad Blumeninsel mit Pappeln 11012017 6010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 05:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Woerth Pfarrkirche hll Primus und Felizian Rosenkranzkirche Pyramidenkogel 12012017 4776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Erlen am Seeufer 14012017 6080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Woerther See Kopperbucht und Pirkerkogel 14012017 6090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Blick auf Ostbucht und Pirkerkogel 14012017 6087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Schilfrohr Blick Richtung Pyramidenkogel 11012017 6032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Seeblick nach SO 11012017 6023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. I like it -- DerFussi 05:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Schilfrohr und Ostbucht 11012017 6022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Seeblick nach Osten 11012017 6027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Kapuzinerinsel und Pyramidenkogel 11012017 6015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer-Strand Koschat-Denkmal 19012017 6159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg winterlicher Park mit Baeumen 14012017 6068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:38, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg winterlicher Park mit Reifenspuren 14012017 6065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Poertschach Werzerpromenade Westbucht und Pyramidenkogel 11012017 6006.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poertschach Werzerpromenade Westbucht und Pyramidenkogel 11012017 6006.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Promenade und Park 14012017 6069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:18, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 19012017 6147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzer Promenade Strandcasino Werzer 19012017 6158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Laterne mit Kletterrosen 19012017 6155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo, and what a difference from the spring! -- Ikan Kekek 06:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Elisabethstrasse Werbetafel vom Poertschacherhof 14012017 6056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 04:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg winterlicher Park mit Reifenspuren 14012017 6066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 04:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel 14012017 6078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 04:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Laterne mit Kletterrosen 14012017 6115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 04:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade mit Parkhotel 14012017 6109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 04:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Infopoint 19012017 6139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Baeume 19012017 6145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Ausschtspunkt Eiche 19012017 6146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Maybe it makes sense to add the category (Quercus in Austria). --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC))

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schiffsanlegestelle 19012017 6151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade mit Wahliss-Denkmal 19012017 6152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1. No ice in the lake? --Michielverbeek 07:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment No ice yet. Sorry! -- Johann Jaritz 08:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Blick nach Dellach 14012017 6097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach West-Aufgang zur Hohen Gloriette 21012017 6175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg Woerther See und Pyramidenkogel 21012017 6177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach am Woerther See Blick von der Hohen Gloriette 21012017 6183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 21012017 6202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

QIs

Hello, Johann! Thank you for your message and for complimenting my photos. I've also taken notice of your work, which tends to be of the highest quality. The pictures in question were one of the first to be taken with my current camera - and they turned out to be quite noisy, so downsampling them was the only option. I do, in fact, take all my photos with RAW, though, being somewhat of an open source fanatic, I process them in Darktable. I believe the current version is more than a match for Lightroom in all essential functions. Cheers from Canada; I really look forward to again seeing the spectacular landscapes of Austria, where I've sadly spent only a few hours so far, passing through the Alps. СССР (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello CCCP! Thank you for your friendly words. I apologize for favoring Lightroom. I understand your argument for using Darktable. That`s pretty OK. Just to tell you, that I am NOT A PROMOTER of Adobe, I am just convinced of the qualities of that program. About Canada: it is a pity that I never put a foot on your amazing country. But I admire the beauties of Canada and its stunning artists, like Joni Mitchell, Leonard Cohen, Robbie Robertson, Alanis Morissette, Neil Young and many others more. Greetings to Canada! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 153 Gemeindeamt 19012017 6122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 04:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Jilly-Beach 21012017 6195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 04:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Wahlissstrasse 11 Villa Johanna West-Ansicht 19012017 6124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 04:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Leonstainerstrasse 1 Schloss Leonstain 21012017 6190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 04:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Ostteil 21012017 6165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It might look deformed, but I think it's not --Michielverbeek 07:52, 25 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment It`s just the way it is, I can assure you that, Michiel. -- Johann Jaritz 07:55, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Mittelteil gefaellte Baeume 21012017 6171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Mittelteil 21012017 6172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Ostteil 21012017 6167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg Wanderweg Westteil mit Waldbank 21012017 6178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 06:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 217-219 Hotel Kaerntnerhof Portal-Vordach 21012017 6191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Nachfrage

magst du dich äußern: File talk:Vellach Kapelle Heilige Dreifaltigkeit.jpg? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Habe mich unter diesem Link geäußert. Danke für Deine Akkuratesse! LG. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Austria

Hello Johann, it's just to notify you that when you nominate FP candidate taken in Austria in the category "Natural", there is a relevant gallery Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria, all countries have not their own gallery, but Austria yes as there are enough images. Thanks you to use it when chosing the category for your next nomination, if there is. Regards, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:54, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello Christian, merci beaucoup for your hint. If it happens, that I find an apted photograph for that category, I will heed your advice. A bientot! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Vellach Kapelle Heilige Dreifaltigkeit.jpg

Yours sincerely, Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you quite a lot, Herzi Pinki! Best regards, -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Wahliss-Bueste 21012017 6198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 04:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Woerthersee mit Parkhotel und Pyramidenkogel 21012017 6193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 04:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Leonstainerstrasse 1 Schloss Leonstain 26062016 2891.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is just a bit soft in places, but in my opinion more than adequate, given the large picture size. -- Ikan Kekek 09:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thank you for your specific comment and review, Ikan .-- Johann Jaritz 11:58, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Wahlissstrasse 19 See-Appartement Wienerroither 19012017 6126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Ernst Wahliss-Bueste 19012017 6153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 21012017 6204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Category Betula in Nov. I do not think is correct--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Shame on me! I corrected the stupid mistake, Agnes. -- Johann Jaritz 12:05, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schiffsanlegestelle 21012017 6203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:56, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg winterlicher Park mit Reifenspuren 14012017 6067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 05:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinsel-Promenade Ostbucht 14012017 6091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 05:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Parkbaeume und Schilfguertel 14012017 6083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Betula Nov. there is also again.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment I do apologize for that repetitive mistake, Agnes. -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Mittelteil 21012017 6170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Mittelteil Waldbank 21012017 6173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 05:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg Wanderweg Westteil mit Waldbank 21012017 6180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 05:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach W-Ortsanfang Hauptstrasse Villen-Ensemble 21012017 6179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Ressnig Drau hinter dem OEDK-Flusskraftwerk 28012017 6232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Ressnig ÖDK-Flusskraftwerk Staumauer-Krone Schienen-Befestigung 28012017 6239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think the picture is not sharp enough.--Famberhorst 07:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment I beg your pardon, Dominicus? @Famberhorst: Compared to your image "Roodbruine schijnridderzwam (Lepista flaccida) in een winters decor" this one is super sharp. Got it?-- Johann Jaritz 08:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC) It is my personal opinion. The rail is fine, but the bolts full resolution not to me. Dominicus.--Famberhorst 09:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)  Support - This is a very large file, and therefore a closeup to what looks larger than life size to me. I think the resolution is quite good and would promote the file. Should we take this to CR? -- Ikan Kekek 10:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment I imagine, it would be the convenient procedure to take it to CR. -- Johann Jaritz 11:22, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Okay, it will be my old eyes. I just wondered if the picture was sharp enough.--Famberhorst 16:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Ressnig ÖDK-Flusskraftwerk Staumauer-Krone Treibgutrechen 28012017 6224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Ressnig ÖDK-Flusskraftwerk Staumauer-Krone Treibgutrechen 28012017 6241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Ressnig ÖDK-Flusskraftwerk Staumauer-Krone Treibgut-Greiferkran 28012017 6240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks, good quality. --DXR 06:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Ressnig Volksabstimmungsdenkmal 28012017 6244.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Ressnig Drau hinter dem OEDK-Flusskraftwerk 28012017 6229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Ressnig ÖDK-Flusskraftwerk Staumauer-Krone mit Portalkran 28012017 6238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, composition. -- Ikan Kekek 05:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Ressnig ÖDK-Flusskraftwerk Drau Wasseroberflaeche Eisgebilde 28012017 6237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Delicate and pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 05:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Ressnig ÖDK-Flusskraftwerk Drau Staudammkrone und Stausee 28012017 6226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and very stark. -- Ikan Kekek 05:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Parkfriedhof Aufbahrungshalle und Skulptur Die Trauernde 28012017 6217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Parkfriedhof Skulptur Die Trauernde 28012017 6218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Parkfriedhof Skulptur Die Trauernde 28012017 6220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Parkfriedhof Holzkreuz 28012017 6216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Parkfriedhof Kriegerdenkmal 28012017 6207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Blick von Dollich zur Koschuta 28012017 6222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice winter panorama --Michielverbeek 06:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Parkfriedhof Aufbahrungshalle mit Relief 28012017 6206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Parkfriedhof Skulptur Die Trauernde 28012017 6205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Parkfriedhof Graeber mit Singerberg im Hintergrund 28012017 6213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferlach Parkfriedhof Grabstaette Wilhelm Jaritz 28012017 6209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach am Woerther See Blick von der Hohen Gloriette 21012017 6184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support WB maybe a bit cold but ok --Christian Ferrer 17:14, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Done @Christian Ferrer: According to your suggestion I moved the slider to warmer tones. Hopefully it fits. --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Poertschach Brahms-Haus Weisses Roessl 11062006 01.jpg

File:Poertschach Brahms-Haus Weisses Roessl 11062006 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

194.177.159.4 11:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Kirchengasse 12 Stadtpfarrkirche hl Ruprecht 30122016 5953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Kirchengasse 12 Stadtpfarrkirche hl Ruprecht 30122016 5949.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebenthal Oremusstrasse Glanfurt mit Ehart-Muehle vulgo Ambrusch 30042016 1810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebenthal Pfarrkirche Maria Hilf W-Ansicht 30122016 5944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebenthal Pfarrkirche Maria Hilf W-Portal 30122016 5945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

Hi, following File talk:Kapelle Heilige Dreifaltigkeit Vellach Okt 2012.jpg and an exchange with @Herzi Pinki: , I blocked your sockpuppet accounts. If you want to continue to use one of them for privacy issues (see WP:SOCK#LEGIT), please tell me. --Ruthven (msg) 12:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

It´s all right and I agree with your decision. I have not been using the sockpuppet accounts for many years. They only served this one purpose. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

QIs

Hallo, da habe ich wie's aussieht versehentlich und ohne es zu bemerken eine von Dir vorgenommene Promotion wieder rückgängig gemacht. Keine Ahnung wie das ohne Bearbeitungskonflikt passiert ist. Habe es jetzt wieder behoben. --Tsui (talk) 03:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Keine Ursache! Angesichts der frühen Tageszeit kann das schon mal passieren. Danke für Deine Promotion! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Danke auch Dir - speziell für das sehr geschätzte Kommentar! Sowas ist immer sehr willkommen und gibt gleich wieder einen Motivationsschub. --Tsui (talk) 03:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Ehre wem Ehre gebührt. Deine Porträts haben auch eine besondere Note. Und das ist zumindest erwähnenswert. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Kirchengasse 12 Stadtpfarrkirche hl Ruprecht 30122016 5956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 02:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Sankt Ruprecht Friedhof Grabmal Fam Herbert 30122016 5951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also well-composed and of good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt St Ruprecht Friedhof Grabmal Bischof Franz Anton Gindl 30122016 5954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Seltenheim Filialkirche hl Andreas Glockenturm Nord-Schallfenster 26052016 3210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seltenheim Filialkirche hl Andreas gotisches Spitzbogenportal 26052016 2084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seltenheim Filialkirche hl Andreas Grabstein Elspet Hanssen-Raidhaubt 26052016 3236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Seltenheim Wappengrabstein von Mlocki-Dziokowski 26052016 3215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Seltenheim Friedhof Wappenrelief von Mlocki-Dziokowski 26052016 3239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your edits to Via Telemaco Signorini, Riomaggiore

Hello, Johann! Thank you very much for taking the time to edit the photo, your version looks greatly improved. Have a wonderful day as well! — Alexei. СССР (talk) 04:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Alexei! Thanks for your kind reaction and that you accept my edit to your image. I will give it a «PRO» now and ping Jacek Halicki at the same time. All the best wishes to Canada. Congrats to the gold and bronze medals in men`s Super-G of Saint Moritz! What a performance! Greetings from Austria. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Ortsfriedhof Grabstaette fuer Seelsorger Petschenig 31012017 6261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 04:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Ortsfriedhof Familiengrab Lesiak 31012017 6259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 04:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt St Ruprecht Friedhof Grabstein Kassin Marmormedaillon 30122016 5955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt St Ruprecht Friedhof Grab-Aedicula Famile Ohrfandl 30122016 5960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromendade Landspitz Pavillon 05022017 6281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That's a nice one. --Tsui 03:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Laterne mit Kletterrosen 05022017 6284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 03:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Ortsfriedhof Familiengrab Wienerroither 31012017 6262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Ortsfriedhof Familiengrab Allnoch de Roxas 31012017 6267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Ortsfriedhof Grab Kupelwieser Arbesser und Lobmeyr 31012017 6257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Dornhof 1 Schloss Ost-Ansicht 14122016 4661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Dornhof Felder und Baumgruppen mit Magdalensberg dahinter 14122016 4662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Frauenstein Nord-Ansicht mit Burgkapelle 14122016 5676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Frauenstein Haupttor Supraporte und Fenster 14122016 5671.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Frauenstein Gedenkstein ueber Haupttor 20062015 4998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 02:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Park mit Erlen und Schilfguertel 05022017 6277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Schilfrohr und Ostbucht 05022017 6279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Viktring Stift Sued-Trakt Spiegelung im Parkteich 01112015 8594.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow, very nice. You may want to make the white facade just a little bit darker, and to remove the dust spot on the water at the very left. But QI anyway. --A.Savin 04:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)  Done @A.Savin: Edited version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Ostbucht 05022017 6278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Sorry, but loss of detail (NR?) especially visible on trees. --A.Savin 04:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)  Done @A.Savin: NR was too much. I put it to a lesser denoise level. Perhaps you can approve it now? --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC) OK this one looks much more natural --A.Savin 11:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Stift Viktring Pfarrkirche Maria vom Siege NO-Ansicht 08062015 4581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Stift Viktring Arkadenhof 08062015 4613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Viktring Stift Befestigungsanlage Nord-Gebaeude 02092016 4037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Stift Viktring Arkadenhof 08062015 4606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Untere Fellacher Strasse 8 Herrenhaus della Grotta 17062015 4835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Untere Fellacher-Strasse 8 Herrenhaus Eck-Erkerfenster 17062015 4836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Untere Fellacher Strasse 8 Herrenhaus della Grotta SW-Ansicht 7062015 4839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Untere Fellacher Strasse 8 Herrenhaus della Grotta Portal und Biforium 17062015 4829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villach Untere Fellacher Strasse 8 Herrenhaus della Grotta 17062015 4828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Stift Viktring Ost-Ansicht 08062015 4570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Stift Viktring Arkadenhof Portal Supraporte mit Wappen 08062015 4607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Stift Viktring Marienhof Marienbrunnen Rueckseiten-Ansicht 08062015 4598.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Viktring Stift Praelatur Portal und Erker 08062015 4590.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Stein Friedhof Kriegerdenkmal Erster Weltkrieg 08062015 4626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Frauenstein SW-Ansicht 14122016 4673.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Wasserablaufschleusenturm und Zinnen-Tor 14122016 5660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Frauenstein Nord-Ansicht mit Burgkapelle 14122016 5657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Frauenstein Auffahrtsrampe mit Vorwerk (Verwalterstoeckl) 14122016 5674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz 07 Khevenhuellertor 1582 01062015 1192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenstein Schloss Wasserablaufschleusenturm und Zinnen-Tor 20082015 5008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 11:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz 05 Loewentor 01062015 4259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz 08 Landschaftstor 1570 01062015 4289.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Need a bit of perspective correction and there are CAs --A.Savin 04:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)  Done @A.Savin: All my apologies for the insufficient edit of the previous version. --Johann Jaritz 05:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC) OK. Better --A.Savin 02:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz 09 Reisertor 1575 01062015 4294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz 10 Waffentor 1576 01062015 4398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Burial_grounds_in_Vorarlberg

Burial grounds in Vorarlberg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Liberaler Humanist (talk) 00:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bleiburg Mießbergstrasse Loibach 1a Filialkirche hl Andreas mit Friedhof 18082015 6737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bleiburg Pfarrkirche hll Peter und Paul Sued-Aussenwand mit Stuetzmauern 21092015 7699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bleiburg Pfarrkirche hll Peter und Paul Vorlaube 21092015 7702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bleiburg Pfarrkirche hll Peter und Paul West-Ansicht 21092015 7711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bleiburg Pfarrkirche hll Peter und Paul Westwand mit Vorhalle 21092015 7704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Schlossallee 6 Stift St Georgen 12092015 7261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Schlossallee 2 Kirchturm Gedenkstein 1676 Baujahr 12092015 1500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Schlossallee 2 Pfarrkirche hl Georg N-Portal 12092015 7273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Schlossallee 2 Stiftsgebaeude Nord-Trakt Arkaden 12092015 1522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Georgen am Laengsee Stiftsgebaeude S-Portal Supraporte Wappen 12092015 1497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:06, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Leonstainerstrasse 1 Schloss Leonstain Innenhof Brahms-Bueste 30082016 3967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 03:41, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Brahmsweg Nischenbild Taufe Jesu 21012017 6192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 03:41, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Pfarrkirche hl Johannes d T Fuchs-Glasfenster Kluch 19082015 6781.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweissbad Woerther See 16022017 6288.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweissbad Ruderboot im Winterschlaf 16022017 6289.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 06:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweissbad Ruderboot im Winterschlaf 16022017 6290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:09, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Blick auf Maria Woerth und Halbinsel 16022017 6299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a little too much noise reduction, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 05:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)  Done @Famberhorst: According to your suggestion I diminuished the amount of NR. --Johann Jaritz 09:39, 18 February 2017 (UTC) Note: Thank you. Full resolution now that the trees in the distance to the church beautiful.--Famberhorst 16:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Werzerpromenade Westbucht und Pyramidenkogel 16022017 6303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely. -- Ikan Kekek 06:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel 16022017 6304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice reflections on the ice. -- Ikan Kekek 04:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 106 Villa Edelweiss Fenster im Erdgeschoß 16022017 6295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 119 Seevilla Elli Holzturm 30073016 4079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweissbad Woerther See 16022017 6287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice to see ice in the lake. Pier is sharp enough for me for Q1 but other parts not. A weak support --Michielverbeek 06:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Park Blick auf den Woerther See 16022017 6298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinsel Landspitz Schilfguertel und Maria Woerth-Blick 16022017 6301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Laterne mit Kletterrosen 14012017 6112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eberndorf Loibegg 55 Filialkirche hl Magdalena NW-Ansicht 21092015 7683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some distortion but good quality. --Juliancolton 03:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)  Done @Juliancolton: I tried an improvement over some distortion. --Johann Jaritz 03:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Sankt Ulrich Pfarrkirche hl Ulrich Sued-Ansicht 11042016 2993.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolfsberg Aichberg Filialkirche hl Bartholomaeus mit Friedhof 26082015 7019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweiss-Bad Woerther See-Ufer Roehricht 16022017 6291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Quellweg ehemaliges Bienenhaus NO-Ansicht 19022017 6330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg 58 Am Kåte vulgo Ostermann NW-Ansicht 19022017 6309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte Streuobstwiese Doerrkasten 19022017 6311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte Streuobstwiese Doerrkasten 19022017 6314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gnesau Zedlitzdorf 34 Pfarrkirche Unsere Liebe Frau 09122015 9452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griffen Lind Filialkirche hl Matthaeus 24032015 1136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Hauptplatz Nymphenbrunnen Gesamtanlage 28062016 2972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Hauptplatz Mariensaeule Dreifaltigkeitsgruppe 02072016 3552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Himmelberger Strasse 5 Antoniusheim 04072016 3032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Rauterplatz Schuesselbrunnen 02072016 3519.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Villacher Strasse 11 Gasthof Seitner 28062016 2929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 03:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Kleinkirchheim Sankt Oswald Kirchweg 16 Pfarrkirche hl Oswald 17092015 7547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Kleinkirchheim St Oswald Kirchweg 16 Pfarrkirche hl Oswald Grabsteine 17092015 7574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Kleinkirchheim St Oswald Kirchweg 16 Pfarrkirche hl Oswald Christophorus-Fresko 17092015 7562.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Kleinkirchheim St Oswald Kirchweg 7 Pfarrhof SO-Ansicht 17092015 7585.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Kleinkirchheim St Oswald Kirchweg 7 Pfarrhof Nord-Teilansicht 17092015 7578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Gedenktafel Wilhelm Muench 20022017 6335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Seeufer Roehricht 15122016 5714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Blick auf Maria Woerth 20022017 6334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality and nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 05:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Ostbucht Weide 03052015 3094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some parts of the photo are a bit soft at full size, but still a QI, and besides, full size is very large. -- Ikan Kekek 05:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)  Comment @Ikan Kekek: The soonest possible I`m gonna try to improve this with LR. --Johann Jaritz 05:51, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach am Woerther See Werzer Astoria und Prueller 21012017 6201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Quellweg Eiche am Waldrand 19022017 6324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade mit Parkhotel 20022017 6337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Laternen Kletterrosen Strandleben 20022017 6340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse 57 Gaestehaus Hoermann 19022017 6305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Quellweg Blick zum Zocklwirt vulgo Rumasch 19022017 6322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse 77 vulgo Rumasch 19022017 6308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse 70 Brock Hof 19022017 6307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Streuobstwiese Apfelbaum 06022016 0558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg mit Blick auf Drautalbahn II 25022017 6361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 04:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Strandleben 20022017 6338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Terrific. Maybe this motif is different enough from your other photos that it might be able to get enough votes for a feature at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 04:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thank you for your benevolent words. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Leonstainer Weg 25022017 6351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photo seem tilted to the right, but good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)  Comment It isn`t. Because the terrain is downward sloping to the right. -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC) Okay thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Pfarrkirche hl Johannes d T SW-Ansicht 26062016 2880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Pfarrkirche hl Johannes d T W-Fassade Fentserrose 26062016 2873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Bannwaldweg im Herbst 16112015 9051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Glorietteweg Mittelteil Waldbank 19112015 9215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach am Woerther See Blick von der Hohen Gloriette 25022017 6359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 08:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Ostermann-Kapelle West-Ansicht 16112015 9023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eberndorf Kirchplatz 1 Augustinerchorherrenstift S-Ansicht 28022017 6377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eberndorf Kirchplatz 1 Augustinerchorherrenstift Pfarrkirche Mariae Himmelfahrt SO-Ansicht 28022017 6380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eberndorf Kirchplatz 1 Augustinerchorherrenstift aeusserer Torbau N-Ansicht 28022017 6383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Pfarrkirche hl Johannes d T NW-Ansicht 26062016 2864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 110 Villa Almrausch 28032015 1154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Seeburger Weg Ost-Teil 25022017 6341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! I wonder how you get rid of the noise with this high ISO --Moroder 07:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment By means of Adobe LR and the NR slider. -- Johann Jaritz 08:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Pfarrkirche Mariae Himmelfahrt Epitaph Peter Schweinshaupt 01032017 4798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:23, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sittersdorf Sonnegg Sonnegger See 28022017 6374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition. Under these weather circumstances sharp enough for me for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sittersdorf Sonnegg Sonnegger See 28022017 6370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Pfarrkirche Mariae Himmelfahrt Sakristei-Aussenwand Kreuzigungsfresko 01032017 4811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:05, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Kollegiatstift Karner Steinrelief 01032017 4828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Pfarrkirche Mariae Himmelfahrt Sakristei-Aussenwand Fries 01032017 4800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Pfarrkirche Mariae Himmelfahrt Epitaph Jakob Scheließnig 01032017 4799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Freilichtmuseum Skorjanzstadel Nord-Ansicht 13092016 4267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Freilichtmuseum Doerrhuette SW-Ansicht 13092016 4268.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Freilichtmuseum Steinerkasten Ost-Ansicht 13092016 4238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Freilichtmuseum Ledererkasten West-Ansicht 13092016 4262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Freilichtmuseum Hausschmiede Ost-Ansicht 13092016 4190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Karlsberg Ulrichsberg Gedenkstaette 02032017 6430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Karlsberg Ulrichsberg Kreuz Inschrift 02032017 6457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Karlsberg Ulrichsberg Gedenkstaette Kreuz 02032017 6453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Karlsberg Ulrichsberg Kirchenruine Legende 02032017 6402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Bichl Ulrichsberg Kirchenruine Weihestein ISIS NOREIA 6405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Promotion in advance. Stone looks reversed. ;-) May be right. DoF could be better, but acceptable. Description must be fixed, syntax errors. --XRay 10:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Description fixed. Reversed stone on purpose by the builders. -- Johann Jaritz 11:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz SW-Ansicht 29122016 5929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Gartenterrasse 27122016 4729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Gartenterrasse 27122016 5869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Karlsberg Ulrichsberg Kirchenruine 02032017 6452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Karlsberg Ulrichsberg Kirchenruine 02032017 6414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Karlsberg Ulrichsberg Kirchenruine Vermächtnis 02032017 6403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Karlsberg Ulrichsberg Kirchenruine Portal 02032017 6404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Woelfnitz Sankt Peter am Karlsberg Ulrichsberg Kirchenruine Presbyterium 02032017 6407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Domplatz 4 Torbogenbau und Kapitelhaus SO-Ansicht Mariensaeule 01032017 6400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Wallfahrtskirche Grabstein Reliefbuesten zweier roemischer Ehepaare 01032017 4803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Kollegiatstift Karner Wappenstein der Moederndorfer 01032017 4829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dechantei Abgang Grabinschrift Primianus und Valeria Procula 01032017 4821.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Turm-W-Seite Fenster 27122016 4719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurt Welzenegg Krastowitz 1 Schloss Krastowitz Turmvorhalle und Portal 27122016 4725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Kollegiatstift Karner Wappenstein der Moederndorfer 01032017 4825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Schulhausgasse 4 Sporthalle Ausschnitt 04072016 3646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It might be not the most interesting composition, but focus to main part of the photo is good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment You are absolutely right, Michiel. But thank you anyway. -- Johann Jaritz 15:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Schulhausgasse 4 Sporthalle Ausschnitt 04072016 3647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Schulhausgasse 4 Sporthalle Ausschnitt 04072016 3637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Schulhausgasse 4 Sporthalle Ausschnitt 04072016 3641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Schulhausgasse 4 Sporthalle Ausschnitt 04072016 3644.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse Edelweissbad Woerther See-Ufer Roehricht 08032017 6466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice photo, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 04:47, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Stadtpfarrkirche Mariae Himmelfahrt Kirchturm 15092015 7401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse Friedhof Bildstock Maria-Dorn-Figur 04072016 3633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse Friedhof Bildstock Maria-Dorn-Figur 04072016 3622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse Friedhof ehem Wehrturm Urnenhalle 15092015 7410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirchen Kirchgasse Friedhof Kriegerdenkmal 28032015 1196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Jilly-Beach Café-Terrasse 08032017 6511.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. Nice light. Juliancolton 03:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Buchen und Parkhotel 08032017 6477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromendade Landspitz Pavillon 08032017 6500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Erlen am Seeufer 08032017 6480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Schilfrohr 08032017 6490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:36, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Woerther See Halbinsel mit Mittagskogel 08032017 6461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Clockwise tilt needs fixing. Juliancolton 03:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)  Done @Juliancolton: Thanks for your care. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC) Looks good. I think it's still tilted very slightly but not enough to complain about. Nice work. Juliancolton 04:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC)  Done @Juliancolton: Now I shifted the slider from -0.4 to -0.6 in ccw direction. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromendade Landspitz Brahmsweg-Kennzeichnung 08032017 6502.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:30, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Werzers Bootshaus Haselbusch 08032017 6514.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:29, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 08032017 6507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Slizza

Slizza has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Deine Bilder in Category:Pfarrkirche St Nikolaus, Preitenegg

Hallo Johann Jaritz, deine Bilder in Category:Pfarrkirche St Nikolaus, Preitenegg sind teilweise falsch benannt. Da ich gesehen habe, dass du gelegentlich deine Bilder auf für dich einheitliche Namen verschiebst (aus meiner Sicht eig. kein Verschiebegrund, in der Kat. treffen sie ohnehin mit den Bildern anderer Namenskonventionen zusammen. Das aber nur nebenbei.), wollte ich dich bitten, ob du nach dem Verursacherprinzip die Bilder so verschieben möchtest, dass der Namensteil Heiliger Martin jeweils durch St. Nikolaus ersetzt wird. Dabei kannst du dann auch deine Namenskonventionen umsetzen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:07, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Herzi Pinki, besonders herzlichen Dank für die Aufdeckung dieses groben Missstands um die vielen falschen Dateinamen der Preitenegger Pfarrkirche hl. Nikolaus. So gut wie möglich habe ich diese Fehler nunmehr behoben. Wie auch immer diese Makulatur entstanden sein mag, es sollte nicht sein. Dem Himmel sei Dank, dass Du so gut über allem wachst. Wie bereits vor Jahren erwähnt, bin ich Dir einiges "schuldig"; solltest Du wieder einmal an den Wörther See kommen, würde ich mich richtig freuen, wenn wir gemeinsam auf ein Getränk ins Café Wienerroither gehen könnten. Selbstverständlich auf meine Kosten. Viele liebe Grüße hinaus in die Bundeshauptstadt. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Danke vielmals – für's Tun und für die Einladung. Komme nur so selten an den Wörther See, lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Na, vielleicht schaffe ich es doch wieder einmal nach Wien. Dann lade ich Dich ins Hawelka ein, wenn es Dir zusagen sollte. Oder ins Sacher. LG. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Woerther See Pyramidenkogel und Mittagskogel 08032017 6465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Uferzone Schilfrohr 08032017 6481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Promenadenbad Rutschenturm 08032017 6506.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schiffsanlegestelle 08032017 6501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Park Uferzone Schilfrohr 08032017 6484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Removing like twig top left--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)  Done @Agnes Monkelbaan: Ooops! I overlooked that twig in the sky. --Johann Jaritz 07:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel-Strandpavillon 08032017 6478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Uferzone Schilfrohr 08032017 6482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the front --Michielverbeek 06:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannaweg Schilfrohr Blick Richtung Pyramidenkogel 08032017 6473.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Schilfrohr 08032017 6493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Laterne mit Kletterrosen 08032017 6505.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Brockhof altes Auszugshaus S-Ansicht 12032016 6530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte 10032017 4867.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely composition and good light --Moroder 06:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Gaisrueckenstrasse 19 Grenzstein Burgfried Moosburg 12032017 6520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Streuobstwiese Am Kåte 12032017 6536.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Am Kåte NO-Ansicht 10032017 4874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade mit Parkhotel 08032017 6504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done  Support, the lake works as a mirror --Michielverbeek 06:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Halbinselpromendade Woerthersee-Blick mit Petzen 08032017 6492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Annastrasse 38 Hotel 7 Werzer Muehlbach 08032017 6515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 119 Seevilla Elli 08032017 6472.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Hauptstrasse 106 Villa Edelweiss und 108 Und-Haeuschen 08032017 6470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse 70 vulgo Brock-Hof und vulgo Ostermann 12033017 6546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 03:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Karnburg Pfalzstrasse Pfarrkirche hll Peter und Paul 03032015 0130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Karnburg Pfarrkirche hll Peter und Paul mit Pfarrhof 11012017 4763.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:48, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Karnburg Pfalzstrasse Pfarrhof 05102015 7980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:51, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Karnburg Pfarrkirche hll Peter und Paul mit Pfarrhof 02032017 4859.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. QI. But the roof bottom right is disturbing..Cheers --Moroder 06:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment You are completely right. There was no possibility for a higher camera position in between those houses. Sorry! -- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Karnburg Pfalzstrasse Pfarrkirche Lapidarium Grabtitulus 05102015 1653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Weiher und Brockhof S-Ansicht 12032016 6524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Weiher 12032016 6529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:56, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Birnbaumallee mit Brockhof 12032017 6526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:10, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Brockweg Brockhof altes Auszugshaus S-Ansicht 12032016 6532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte Acker 12032017 6560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte 12032017 6549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte Hochsitz 12032017 6554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte Acker 12032017 6556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 08:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poertschach Winklern Gaisrueckenstrasse Am Kåte Acker 12032017 6557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg SW-Ansicht 17032017 6689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Sternberger weg 44 Pfarrhof Ost-Ansicht 17032017 6691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg Chorschluss Ost-Ansicht 17032017 6705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg Nischenportraitgrabstein mit Reliefbuesten 17032017 6703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Friedhof Karner Sued-Ansicht 17032017 6706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg mit Friedhofsportal West-Ansicht 17032017 6686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent composition --Moroder 06:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg Vorhalle 1586 bez 17032017 6692.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg Vorhalle doppelt gekuppeltes Renaissancefenster 17032017 6690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 07:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Friedhof Blick auf Rosental und Karawanken 17032017 6697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg Chorschluss Juno-Emblem 17032017 6704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a little more contrast, but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)  Done @Agnes Monkelbaan: The contrast was increased. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Sternberger Weg 40 ehem Pfarrhof NW-Ansicht 19032017 6725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 03:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg SO-Ansicht 19032017 4895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:50, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Sternberger Weg 40 ehem Pfarrhof NO-Ansicht 19032017 6715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg Sakristei-Stiege Spolie Junones-Heiligtum 19032017 6751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg Vorhalle doppelt gekuppeltes Renaissancefenster 19032017 6748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Friedhof Karner West-Ansicht 19032017 6735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg SO-Ansicht 19032017 6716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg Vorhalle 19032017 6743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Pfarrkirche hl Georg Vorhalle Friesblock mit Meergreifenrelief 19032017 6753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernberg Sternberg Friedhof Karner West-Ansicht 19032017 6736.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focdus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:07, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guttaring Deinsberg Friedhofsmauer Nussbaum 21032017 6769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 04:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guttaring Johannesbrücke und Bildstock mit Schnitzfigur 21032017 6890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, sharp photo. Sun-problem in right top corner well done --Michielverbeek 04:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment @Michielverbeek: Thanks for your specific in-depth comments on my images. --Johann Jaritz 04:50, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guttaring Deinsberg Landschaft mit Maria Hilf Wallfahrtskirche 21032017 6762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guttaring Maria Hilf Pfarrhof und Wallfahrtskirche Sued-Ansicht 21032017 4920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

#invoke:Autotranslate Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Klassische Musik

Vielen Dank lieber Johann für das überschwängliche Lob von Dir. Deine Fotos sind in punkto Qualität eine ausgezeichnete Orientierungshilfe für mich. Jazz höre ich auch sehr gerne bin aber in der klassischen Musik mit dem Waldhorn unterwegs (gewesen).--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Wow! Dann habe ich leicht daneben getippt. Aber ich bin auch ein großer Fan der klassischen Musik. Das Waldhorn, für mich das romantische Instrument des 19. Jahrhunderts schlechthin! Mein Lieblingskomponist ist Gustav Mahler und die "Jagdszenen im Wald" fallen mir dazu ein, die im "Titan", seiner 1. Symphonie durch das Waldhorn so hervorragend dargestellt werden. Wie viele Tränen der Freude und der Trauer habe ich beim Hören Mahlers Kompositionen bereits vergossen! Aber auch Richard Wagner ist zu nennen. Das Königsschloss Neuschwanstein des Bayernkönigs Ludwig II. fällt mir dazu ein. Warst Du im Opernfach unterwegs oder eher bei den Symphonien? Oder quer durch den "Kräutergarten"? Liebe Grüße aus der Wörther See-Gegend (dort wo das Komponierhäuschen Gustav Mahlers steht). -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Lieber Reinhold! Übrigens sind Deine Fotos so gut und ausgewogen durchkomponiert, dass dies erwähnt werden musste. LG. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your wishes. Already 30 years old... Tournasol7 ([[User talk:Tournasol7|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

One day after your birthday will be mine. But so much older than you. My age will be the one, John Lennon dedicated a song to: "When I`m 64". -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Template:Statuephotoyear-Germany

Template:Autotranslate Achim ([[User talk:Achim55|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Koordinaten

Hallo Johann, woher kommt das? Habe es einfach mal gelöscht. --Arnd ([[User talk:Aschroet|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Arnd, der Zwischenraum (blank) vor dem gelöschten String "5556" hätte nicht hingehört. War mein Fehler. Ist aber auch so OK, da die letzten Stellen hinter dem Komma kaum mehr einen relevanten Einfluss auf die Geo-Position haben. Danke jedenfalls für Deine Aufmerksamkeit. ;=) -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:27, 4 May 2017 (UTC)}

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

AUTHORIZATION REQUEST

Johann Jaritz, I would ask: could you authorize me to publish for 13th May 2017 your photo (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madonna_di_F%C3%A1tima#/media/File:Moosburg_Freudenberg_Wallfahrtskirche_Maria_Sieben_Schmerzen_F%C3%A1tima-Statue_26092006_01.jpg) on my International Catholic Page (https://www.facebook.com/antiateismoantiatheism/) ? Thank you very much Yours Sincerely

N.B. Could you reply me to email address achille93@live.it if you authorize me ? Template:UnsignedIP2

You are authorized, sincerely -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:43, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Dateinamen, Änderung

Hallo Johann Jaritz, bitte ändere nicht die Dateinamen von mir hochgeladener Bilder. Dein System mag für dich gut sein, ich finde es zu kompliziert. --~~

Hallo, selbstverständlich folge ich Deinem Wunsch und werde es künftig unterlassen. Tut mir leid, dass ich übergriffig wurde. LG. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:03, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

New Nikon

On July 25, the 100th anniversary of Nikon, they're supposed to announce a new camera, the name D820 or D850. It's an upgrade to the D810 and will have a 45MP sensor. That's gonna be awful tempting.... ;-) PumpkinSky talk 13:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for these long expected news about the release of a Nikon D810`s successor. Awful tempting, that`s correct. Although I´d wish a sensor of about 75MP; but I think, I am asking too much. Considering the Canon 5DSR with over 50MP, Nikon should exceed that sensor size at least up to 60MP. Anyway, we are looking forward to July 25, what surprise will be unveiled. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you very much for your vote but that nomination didn't go well. It got beat up, like my others. PumpkinSky talk 21:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Once in a while I`m asking myself, how some people are voting. I know from my own experience, that there are some picky guys at the FPC. I only ask you, not to give up and try again and again. Kind regards to the New World. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:15, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

QIC signature

Thank you for supports. This one "Monarch butterfly - male injured" only got a date not your name in the signature. I think you only put three tilde there not four. PumpkinSky talk 02:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Sorry to disappoint you, but I don`t take photos of butterflies. This must be from another guy. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Ooops! Now I got it. Sorry for my mistake. I corrected it now. Shame on me! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:21, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:07, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

FP timing

I noticed that the two photos I have at FPC right now were taken only 24 minutes apart. Wish I could do that more often ;-) PumpkinSky talk 23:43, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

You just had a perfect day with your two shots of your two FPC. [2] -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:10, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

It was cloudy and I went to the Botanical Garden because of that. Plant photos are usually better on cloudy days. We get lots of bright sun here in the summer. PumpkinSky talk 02:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Anyway, you made it all right. The photos are staggering. Everything fits. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:19, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:09, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:08, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Alternative view of Strassburg

Yes, I like that one more. Daniel Case ([[User talk:Daniel Case|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Review request

Hi Johann. I was wondering if you'd look at some images I took today. It was cloudy today. I took 8 photos of pine bark and 8 of a Japanese style bell. The bark ones are uploaded but not yet the bell ones. The bark ones are just exported from RAW to JPG and totally unprocessed. I'm especially interested in focus and DOF. If this is too much to ask and imposing upon you, please say so. I understand. If you do accept, I'll put links here. Thank you for your consideration, whatever you decide. PumpkinSky talk 01:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

With pleasure I'd look at your photos if I could find your link to them, but there is no. If you place your photos here, so I can pay a closer look at them, it would be fine. Best regards. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:56, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

That's very kind of you. I didn't want to be overly presumptive and put them here before you agreed. Here are the pine bark ones. I'll work on the bell ones tomorrow. The bell and bark ones were all taken at different shutter speeds, distances, and f/stops. Danke Schoen. It's very kind of you. PumpkinSky talk 03:01, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Just a short comment. With the setting of the diaphragm you receive an increase of DoF. But the right upper corner cannot be made sharp by setting of the diaphragm. There are methods of making several photos with different focusings, which you put together into one photo by means of a stitching program. With the help of a tripod, a tablet and an appropriate program you can solve this issue. Best regards. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I only have Lightroom, which doesn't do focus stacking. It's hard to get a subject like this all in focus with one shot, lots of texture and depth at a close range. I should mention last night I ordered a new tripod. My old one was worn out--the piece that connects the camera to the tripod head had gotten very wobbly, so I ordered a new sturdier tripod. This was a really bad problem with the bell photos, which I'll work on today, because I took them in portrait mode. As for the bark photos, I agree photo 2 seems the sharpest at the focal point. I think I'll crop it. Thanks again! PumpkinSky talk 10:01, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

I took this one yesterday too. Do you think it'd have a chance at FPC? I love the clear reflection of the bridge in the stream.

. PumpkinSky talk 10:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

To my eyes it is well suitable for FPC and I'd support it for sure. Others may see it in a different way, especially Colin, Ikan Kekek, King of Hearts, Daniel Case and Daphne Lantier.
But to stitch photos of a series into one, you can download a program that controls the DSLR dashboard: Click here! My wife downloaded it by means of GOOGLEPLAY and paying 9€. I imagine, it will be about the same amount in US-$. I have to confess, that I haven´t tried it yet. Shame on me! But you can choose the focusing range from near to far by selecting the amount of focusing steps. A tablet (iPad, Samsung, ...) of 7" or better 10" display is highly recommended to have a better visual image control. I imagine you own a tablet and if not, it must not be the most expensive one.
Yes, the second photo of the bark series is the best. But please use a tablet with that mentioned program along with your D5300 on top of the new tripod and you will see what difference it makes. This way you can produce several candidates convenient for FPC.
For the moment I am looking forward to seeing the bridge photo in FPC.
Btw I am using Adobe LR as well.
Good luck and n-joy! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 11:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

The brige photo is at FPC now. Glad you like it! Yea, I/we know who the picky people at FPC are. About 2 days ago Daphne was discovered to be a sock account and then she went on a delete spree and got blocked and her admin rights removed. See her user page, talk page, and admin boards. I'll check out that program. I may have to breakdown and get Photoshop too. I just bought a large screen new laptop with 16gb RAM and 1TB drive about 5 weeks ago; my old one died. It was very old. Thanks. Working on bell photos now. PumpkinSky talk 11:55, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Here are the bell photos. By this time the clouds were breaking up so some have shadow issues. They have some processing. Thanks! PumpkinSky talk 12:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Later I will pay a look at them. Now I am going out with my family, what will last a couple of hours. See you l8er then. Wishes from -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

The bell photos all look fine both artistically and technically. According to my opinion and taste. If I had to choose, I'd select the second photo of the series. Regards from -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much. PumpkinSky talk 17:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		Danke für all die tollen Bilder aus dem Nachbarland. Beeindruckende Motive! XRay talk 16:56, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Besten Dank, Dietmar! Allerdings habe ich diese Auszeichnung noch nicht verdient. Denn wenn ich mir Deine Fotos angucke, muss ich sagen, dass Deine wesentlich gehaltvoller und aussagekräftiger sind als meine.
Dennoch nehme ich den Barnstar dankend an, in dem Sinne, dass er mir zum Ansporn gereichen möge, noch genauer zu werden und die Ergebnisse weiter zu verbessern.

Herzliche Grüße aus dem südlichen Nachbarland! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

The Pear Photo

Thank you for your kind comments on my focus stacked pear photo. It's made of 19 photos. While the branch is crystal clear, I see a few issues for FP at top left and top right, and upper right side. It's a bit blurred, probably from leaves being blown by the wind. We could get rid of a lot by bringing the crop down, but if we crop in the right side more, I think it could be perceived as too close to the two main fruits. Thoughts? PumpkinSky talk 03:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

You are right. A too tight crop might jeopardize the balance and harmony of the photo. And for some of the guys, who are even more than picky, everything should fit perfectly. Thus to think twice whether to nominate an image at the FPC or not. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

See Cart's comment on my talk page. I'll work on her tips first.PumpkinSky talk 10:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Pretty revealing analysis of an experienced photographer. So far I haven't worked on stacking several photos into one, because I am too impatient to work with a tripod and do that time-consuming painstaking retouching work afterwards. Kudos to you! For starting that fight with the “dragon”. I am looking forward to all the gorgeous photos you are going to produce in the weeks to come. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:04, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Sharing credit with you since your processing got it promoted. Thanks! PumpkinSky talk 09:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

I`m just glad it worked the way it should. Important is, that you are awarded with one more featured picture. That`s what counts in the end. I know from my own experience, how hard it is to find an image to please at least to seven people. And it is time-consuming. But that`s what we are here for. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:57, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

New Pear Attempt

See User_talk:Ermell#Request, since he saw the issues in the last one. We'll see what happens. PumpkinSky talk 01:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

To my eyes the image is very well done. And I imagine you spent quite a lot of time doing that job. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:57, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Yes, I've now spent about 30 hours processing it. I've now put up the new version at FPC. Vielen Dank fuer die Hilfe! You've been very kind. PumpkinSky talk 22:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:05, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiDaheim

Hi Johann!

Wollte dich nur darauf hinweisen, dass es noch bis 7. Oktober einen Fotowettbewerb rund um die Gemeinden Österreichs gibt: de:Wikipedia:WikiDaheim. Du kannst deine Bilder auch nachträglich mit der Vorlage kategorisieren, sofern sie im Hochladezeitraum (ab 28. Juli) hochgeladen wurden. LG, Braveheart ([[User talk:Braveheart|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:31, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Braveheart!
Besten Dank für diesen Hinweis. Ich werde nachschauen, ob ich geeignetes Bildmaterial zu diesem Thema habe. LG. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Crop

I've cropped that image number 2. Thanks for the suggestion. As for image number 1, yes, I wasn't real pleased with how it came out and almost didn't nominate it. PumpkinSky talk 02:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

From my own experience I know how hard it is to get good results of a bark of trees, as the trunks are curved. Thanks for cropping that image number 2. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Every tree we have in our yard provides food: two Asian Pears, one banana, one plum, one peach, two persimmons, one fig, and one guava. PumpkinSky talk 03:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Wow! What a variety of best fruits you own in your yard. I enjoy them all and I am tree enthusiast. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:58, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Kindness Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Johann, you have been very kind and helpful in helping take better pictures and how QIC and FPC work. I know I still have a lot to learn about photos. I do truly appreciate all your help. PumpkinSky talk 00:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

My gratefulness for your kind award is deeper than the ocean; with one word: I am truly overwhelmed by your friendliness. Thank you one thousand times. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Und ich danke Sie. PumpkinSky talk 02:22, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Le Corbousier

Hallo, danke für dein Zitat, dass besonders hier zutreffend ist. Grüße aus Venedig ,-) --Wolfgang Moroder ([[User talk:Moroder|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Hallo, aber natürlich. Auch für mich sind die Dolomiten die allerschönsten Berge, die es überhaupt gibt. Vor 20 und 25 Jahren habe ich den Sella-Stock mit dem Rennrad umrundet. Einfach großartig! Für mich gibt es keine schönere Gegend. Aber auch in Venedig bin ich verliebt. Vermutlich besuchst Du dort die Kunst-Biennale in den Giardini und dann noch das Film-Festival, wo Jane Fonda und Robert Redford mit Ehren-Auszeichnungen für ihr Lebenswerk geehrt werden sollen. Viel Spaß! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Johann und Template:Ping, Für mich hat Banff, Alberta, Kanada die schönsten Berge. PumpkinSky talk 15:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Template:Ping I figure out, there is a certain truth in what you suggest. Of course, the Rockies are stunning beauties. ;=) -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Fahre jede Woche nach Venedig in die Praxis dort. Keine Zeit für Biennale etc. ;-)) War viel in den Rockies USA zum Skifahren aber leider nicht Banff--Wolfgang Moroder ([[User talk:Moroder|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Allerdings und Gott sei Dank Zeit Qualitäts-Fotos von der Serenissima zu machen. ;-) -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:17, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Weltfrieden durch tolle Fotos. PumpkinSky talk 02:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Regen

Ich würde heute in den Botanischen Garten gehen, aber es regnet. Traurig. PumpkinSky talk 14:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Wow! What an excellent German!
The same here in Austria. Raining and pretty cool temperatures. Autumnlike. No taking photos, no riding my mountain bike, only staying at home, mostly sitting in front of my iMac 27" 5k Retina. What would I do without this fine "companion"?
By the way, thank you very much for your kind supports at the FPC. ;-) -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:53, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Hüttenberg Pfarrkirche hl Nikolaus SW-Strebepfeiler Bezeichnung 1491 21032017 6862.jpg

Die "4" sieht aus wie nichts, was ich vorher gesehen habe. Woher kommt dieser Stil? PumpkinSky talk 02:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

During the Gothic period, which lasted from about 1250 until 1570 (in Carinthia), they wrote the "4" as shown in the photo. Strange, isn`t it? -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:40, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Very. PumpkinSky talk 09:50, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

River Kwai floating market

Since you voted for this photo at FPC, you may want to see the comments there from this evening. Input appreciated. PumpkinSky talk 00:53, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

FF Hohenthurn

Hallo Johann, du hast Fotos der FF Hohenthurn hochgeladen. Ich nehme aber schon an, dass das das frühere Feuerwehrhaus war. Ich habe leider nirgends etwas über das aktuelle gefunden. Aber in Vergleich zu anderen halte ich das nicht für das aktuelle :-). danke und lg nach Kärnten K@rl ([[User talk:Karl Gruber|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Karl, du hast selbstverständlich vollkommen recht mit Deiner Vermutung, dass es sich um das alte Feuerwehrhaus dicht an der Kirche handelt. Das neue befindet sich zirka 50 Meter südlich davon. Leider kann ich Dir davon kein Bild präsentieren. Habe mich gefreut, von dir Nachricht zu erhalten und sende Dir liebe Grüße hinaus nach Wien -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Danke, die Kategorien werde ich mir gleich anschauen, grüße retour am Wörthersee :-)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Johann did you erase my QI ? I cant find it there. --Mile ([[User talk:PetarM|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

I do not know. Hopefully it was not done by accident. If so, I apologize, but I do not see anything what I might have done wrong.-- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

FPC Votes

I don't understand your voting at FPC. You seem to rapidly support just about every nomination that hasn't already been opposed. This photo has a bit of something (a boat frame?) in the bottom corner. So that's a rather obvious technical flaw that would need cropped out. This photo really is a classic QI. There's nothing extraordinary at all, and the camera isn't even level. You take lots of great photos yourself, so have a good eye for a photo when behind the camera, yet seem to me to be very lax IMO when judging others. There are dozens of failed FPCs in recent months that have received your early support. I don't really understand the point. Given the relatively low (7 support) threshold for success, supporting most nominations just seems to me to devalue the process. Surely "finest on Commons" means to be selective and consider that the image I'm supporting is head-and-shoulders above just another QI. -- Colin ([[User talk:Colin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

You have a point with your reproof. All what you say is correct. Yes, I am too lax with my reviews concerning the FP candidates. I will try to change my reviews and become more serious. Primarily with technical issues. And I know, the wow factor should be essential at the FPC. Promised! I imagine you are pretty mad at my lax behaviour at the FPC. Yes, we all can learn lots from you to have the very best images in FPC. Thank you for your heckling, I will raise the bar to a higher level from now on. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks. I'm more puzzled than "mad". I knew that you know what makes a great photo, so just puzzled. I know some reviewers never like to oppose, which I understand, but then it just seems all the more important to be selective in what you support. See you.. -- 08:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks too. I appreciate you as an in-depth reviewer. That`s how it should be at FPC. I admit, that I did my "job" too superficially. We are here to learn how to make better photos. That`s the purpose of the "game". And you are right, only the special photos should be featured, the rest is for QIs. I intend to be more up to the guidelines of FPC in the future. And I will also try to oppose, if there is a striking reason given. See you. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:59, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Kaffee mit sahne zum Frühstück

genießen! PumpkinSky talk 03:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I enjoyed your drink a lot! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

irrtümliche Promotion von QIC-Bildern

Hallo Johann, hast Du gesehen, daß diese beiden von Dir als QI bewerteten Fotos von PumpkinSky unscharf sind? -> [3] und hier sollte das Auto scharf sein, nicht der Acker dahinter: [4] --Granada ([[User talk:Granada|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Julia, wie auch immer, nach dem Gong gibt`s kein Schlagen mehr. Die Akte wird nicht wieder geöffnet. Das nächste Mal setze ich mir meine Brillen auf und sehe noch genauer hin. Versprochen! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and wishing for eternal Peace in world

I truly wish you, your family, and your friends Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, and wishing for eternal Peace in world. Have a great holiday season. PumpkinSky talk 15:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)ha

Thank you very much! The same for you and your family.

PEACE, PACE, FRIEDEN, SHALOM, SALAM, PAIX, PAX, etc. etc.
https://fthmb.tqn.com/ZvPUKoRtsKAcuq93uOD1_fIIjg4=/1200x1386/filters:no_upscale()/-christmas-tree3-57e0069e5f9b586516714d64.png -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, BASEPAGENAME! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much, George! The same I wish to you. And A Happy New Year! May all your wishes come true! Regards from -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted} Template:QICpromoted} Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018!

		* Happy Holidays 2018, BASEPAGENAME! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! --Pierre André (talk}}) 10:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! The same to you! -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)