User talk:Jetstreamer

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jetstreamer!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File:AR_Inflight_Magazine_197.jpg

File:AR_Inflight_Magazine_197.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

92.9.41.51 21:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove deletion requests

---

Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

Common Good (talk) 19:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Addition of airlines to aircraft pictures

I have noticed that you add the "airline" to individual aircraft pictures. All pictures I have checked have also the registration category added (e.g. 9R-XXX (aircraft)) and in the registration category the airline is already added according to common practice and guidelines on Wikimedia Commons. Adding the airline again to each individual picture is therefore a double-entry and should be removed. Cheers, Simisa (talk) 05:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Removing watermarks

{{helpme}} Hello there. Can anyone please remove the watermarks from some of the images included in this category? I just don't know how to do it.--Jetstreamer (talk) 21:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Jetstreamer, just tag such files with {{Watermarked}} if it is not an urgent case (like here). In urgent cases request help at Commons:Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop. If have tagged all images which still had watermarks now (except File:Aeroflot Cargo McDonnell Douglas MD-11 cockpit.jpg - this is probably impossible to remove). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 18:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I was ready to carry out your suggestion but you already did it. Thanks! --Jetstreamer (talk) 00:34, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Hehe, good. Next time! :-) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Air Namibia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

---

Scope changed from Air Namibia to Air Namibia aircraft at Zurich International Airport --Jetstreamer (talk) 01:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment Needs geotagging. Also please create a category for the scope with the relevant images, and link it to the scope here. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
• Added category and geotagged in response to a user request.--Jetstreamer (talk) 01:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment The new scope is far too narrow. --Simone 20:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
• Mmm, I think you're right. I've learned from other images here that the scope is not mandatory, as pointed out by an editor. So, I will rollback to the previous scope, which I believe is wider.--Jetstreamer (talk) 01:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Air Namibia at Zurich International Airport to Air Namibia --Jetstreamer (talk) 01:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Best for the scope. Yann (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Best in the scope. --Simone 21:17, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Simone 11:24, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
TAM Linhas Aéreas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. 320td (talk) 11:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Commons' coverage of aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! russavia (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

0 Quercus suber - Filitosa JPG1.jpg

Hello Jetstreamer,

1. Thank you for your support to a newcomer.

2. The above mentioned file is geocoded now.

Best regards.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 01:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Don't mention it.--Jetstreamer (talk) 10:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Oleria paula

for this image the label is placed under the wings to show which are transparent. How else? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Merci, bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Valued image promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Uzbekistan Airways Boeing 767-300ER DME.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

---

Scope changed from Uzbekistan Airways to Uzbekistan Airways Boeing 767-300ER VP-BUF --Jetstreamer (talk) 01:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• Please create a category with the relevant images for the scope, and link it to the scope here. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
• Category created, as per request.--Jetstreamer (talk) 01:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Crop is tight but Uzbekistan Airways markings are well-depicted. The smoke from the wheels adds interest. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:56, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tupolev Tu-214.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Scope too narrow for me. I don't think we need a VI for each plane. A VI for each model is enough. Category:Tupolev Tu-214 would be OK. Yann (talk) 07:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Russian Air Force Tupolev Tu-214ON RA-65219 to Tupolev Tu-214 --Jetstreamer (talk) 12:57, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment Made scope wider, as per above request.-- Jetstreamer (talk) 12:57, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support OK now. Yann (talk) 17:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Looks great action to me. -- Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:48, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tupolev Tu-214.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Scope too narrow for me. I don't think we need a VI for each plane. A VI for each model is enough. Category:Tupolev Tu-214 would be OK. Yann (talk) 07:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Russian Air Force Tupolev Tu-214ON RA-65219 to Tupolev Tu-214 --Jetstreamer (talk) 12:57, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment Made scope wider, as per above request.-- Jetstreamer (talk) 12:57, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support OK now. Yann (talk) 17:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Looks great action to me. -- Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:48, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fokker 50.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope - no issues. --Claritas (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boeing 777 (Korean Air).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope and its subcategories contains 216 images.[1] While I don't have time to examine that many images, this one compares well to the ones I have studied. It is geocoded, albeit roughly (the center of the runways whereas the camera location is likely northwest of that location judging from shadows). It is fairly well described. Camera metadata is lacking, but that is not required. It was taken in 2011, so it is reasonably current. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment I think the scope is not good. This is a "plane of the Korean Air" company, not the "Korean Air". A stewardess in uniform, a desk of the company in an airport, or the logo itself, for instance, could illustrate the scope too. I'm tending to oppose for the moment.--Jebulon (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Korean Air to Korean Air Boeing 777 --Jetstreamer (talk) 04:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment Both of you are right, and I have made the scope tighter following your suggestions. Many thanks for your comments.--Jetstreamer (talk) 04:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Just now created, Boeing 777 (Korean Air) corresponds to the new scope. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment File:Korean Air B777-200 HL7575 at SVO 16-Nov-2011.jpg and File:Korean Air Boeing 777-200ER Monty.jpg are strong contenders, in my opinion. Neither is geocoded, but they could be (approximately). I suppose that value depends on the importance of a clean background. I don't know how to evaluate that for this subject. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:04, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment As you said above, both contenders are not geocoded, thus not fulfilling one of the VI criteria.--Jetstreamer (talk) 22:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support At this point I think we can promote that image, there's a job and a pugnacity. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment OK, but should the scope be changed to Boeing 777 (Korean Air) from Category:Boeing 777 (Korean Air) so that VICBot can mark it? When a gallery is linked in the scope, the bot will indicate (with a  ) which image of that scope is the most valuable in our opinion. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment Changed scope following the above suggestion. Thanks.--Jetstreamer (talk) 22:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Support --Walter Siegmund (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I confirm my vote with the new scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best in new scope. cmadler (talk) 16:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Looks good --Katarighe (Talk) 17:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:31, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Any ideas

Hi, I've noticed you've uploaded images from various websites. I'd be interested in doing the same however there are a few things of which I am not sure, for instance where on here [2] is the licensing information necessary to upload. Mtaylor848 (talk) 14:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Not all pictures included in the website I uploaded pictures from have a license to do it. You should contact User:Russavia.--Jetstreamer (talk) 19:42, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Airbus A330-300 (China Eastern Airlines).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

• Is each pair of airplane class and owning airline worth a scope? --Ikar.us (talk) 19:08, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
  • This is something that should be posted at the VI talk page. Nevertheless, I don't see why not, as there's a different scope for each variety of plant, mollusc, or butterfly, just to mention a few examples.--Jetstreamer (talk) 19:31, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

removal template watermark

Regarding the picture: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Uzbekistan_Airways_A310_UK31002_TAS_April_2011.png, I am clearly in the wrong. I hadn't seen the watermark at the top of the picture on several occasions. Thinking that someone had made a mistake, I removed the watermark template. That I did this on several occasions is caused by the fact that this is what I mostly do on Wikimedia: removing watermarks. Several a day. I scan the pages for pictures having watermarks. And remove them. I didn't know that I did this to the same picture again and again. Had I known I wouldn't have done it. So, I apologize for the inconvenience and will remove the watermark at a later time. Citypeek (talk) 10:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I have removed the watermark in the picture and the template watermark on the page. Citypeek (talk) 06:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks!--Jetstreamer (talk) 21:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 01:56, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!--Jetstreamer (talk) 01:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boeing 767-300ER (Air Canada).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:21, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Airbus A321 (Ural Airlines).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ethiopian Airlines Boeing 757-200 ET-ALY HKG 2010-9-18.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ethiopian Airlines Boeing 757-200 ET-ALY HKG 2010-9-18.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ethiopian Airlines Boeing 757-200 ET-ALY HKG 2010-9-18.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Martin H. (talk) 13:42, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boeing 777-200ER (American Airlines).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, and nice picture.--Jebulon (talk) 19:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Jetstreamer⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Images lacking licenses

{{Helpme}} Hello. Can you please check the images uploaded by 737-8Z9 (talk · contribs)? I don't think they have the proper license attached to them. Thanks.--Jetstreamer (talk) 23:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

In the meantime I started a deletion request. — TintoMeches, 00:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Jetstreamer,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boeing 737-800 (Orenburg Airlines).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful (I've linked the scope to the right category, I think.) --JLPC (talk) 16:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Aviation now on Twitter

Hi, as mentioned here, Commons:WikiProject Aviation is now on Twitter. I will be using the feed to tweet photos from our now extensive repository of aviation imagery, and will also use it for outreach activities. If you have any suggestions on how to get the maximum use out of Twitter feel free to leave suggestions on the Aviation project talk page. You can follow the account at http://www.twitter.com/commonsaviation. Cheers, russavia (talk) 14:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Cool, thanks for the notice.--Jetstreamer (talk) 16:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Please upload photos in JPG not PNG!

Hi, and thanks for your valued uploads of aircraft photos!
It would however be much better if you uploaded the original JPG files instead of converting them to PNG. The quality doesn't get better when converting from JPG but the file size is tremendously raised, leading to an unnecessarily high transfer volume and an inacceptable loading time especially on slow internet connections.
Also please upload the image with (!) the watermark before removing it using a lossless JPG cropping tool such as JPEGTRAN. Then upload the cropped JPG as an update. If you don't know or don't want to use that tool, just add the {{Watermarked}} tag and leave the task for others.
I'm going to check whether a bot can automatically reupload the already uploaded photos to replace your PNG copies. Otherwise we'd have to do that manually. Thanks and best regards, --PanchoS (talk) 10:56, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jetstreamer, I too echo this request. PNG isn't made for photographs, and what PanchoS says is pretty much correct. Just upload photos in JPG format. Cheers, russavia (talk) 16:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

About the Turkish Airlines destinations article

I've sent you 2 messages (in Spanish), then I noticed you wouldn't be able to reply me back, since I have not enabled my e-mail here in Wikipedia. As I told you, I have, for now, been blocked from editing on English Wikipedia (since I had some disagreements about some articles and I didn't deal with them in the most correct way), but I'm editing on Spanish, Portuguese, Italian and French Wikipedias. And I have a user page on Spanish Wikipedia (also in French, Portuguese and Italian, but they're very simple). As I was telling, I've got a map here about Turkish Airlines destinations that already has the Philippines in dark blue, so I was asking your opinion about if I should already update the map (with the corresponding subtitle of "2014/2015", instead of "2014", or if I should wait until 1 January to change the map. For now, I'll keep it like it is now, but I'll take into account your opinion about that. About the article itself, it mentions Siberia in Europe. Well, Novosibirsk is thousands of miles away from Europe, and considering that both Novosibirsk and Yekaterinburg (this one being much closer to Europe) belong to the same country, the continental criteria that is used concerning to one shall (in my opinion) also be considered to the other. I can't change now the article in English Wikipedia, but maybe you might take that into account in your edits. Thanks so much for your attention. Greetings from Portugal! Mondolkiri1 (talk) 02:51, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

About the Turkish Airlines destinations map

Do you think that colouring one country in violet if all destinations in that country are suspended is correct or do you think that dots over the suspended destinations in Syria and Libya are a better option? I'd be glad to listen to your opinion about this. Thanks for your attention.Mondolkiri1 (talk) 01:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Gostomel_Airport

Gostomel Airport has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:29, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)