User talk:Jcb/archive/6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Sword images[edit]

Hi there. Please do not remove any more images I have uploaded as I am currently trying to find out from User:JurgenNL which copyright tag I am supposed to add, as I have express permission to use the images on Wikipedia. Thanks for your understanding. Andre666 (talk) 19:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please contact OTRS. If we find the permission valid, we will undelete the files. Jcb (talk) 19:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for deleting File:WikiConference UK 2012-4.jpg. :-) Mike Peel (talk) 21:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ZDF soziale Gerechtigkeit 2013.webm[edit]

Hey, could you please check again the deletion of

Although the Video was created by the german public TV station ZDF, it was done with for a cooperation with Wikimedia Deutschland called ZDFcheck. Like the other files in Category:ZDFcheck it is licensed under cc-by-3.0. The license information for File:ZDF soziale Gerechtigkeit 2013.webm should link to a video from the official ZDF account on youtube and the information on youtube should state that it is under cc-by license. Thanks sitic (talk) 21:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. I have restored the file. Jcb (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Emergency Request...sort of[edit]

Dear Admin Jcb,

A user named Nevertime constantly uploads images from flickr without ordering a {{Flickrreview}}

Almost all of his/her images have not been reviewed like these:

Someone needs to order a bot to review all this user's uploads from flickr. Do you know someone? Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe @Jarekt: ? - Jcb (talk) 22:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Omosexy Jalade.jpg is not a copyrighted material[edit]

An image file I recently uploaded which you deleted is not copyrighted; I took the shot myself with my personal DSLR when I visited the set of the movie 2 years ago. Please it will be appreciated if the image is restored. If you saw the image on websites, it was obviously uploaded by bloggers whom I might have shared it with (and also shared it with others perhaps) for promotional purposes. I repeat, it is not copyrighted! Please return the image.

Thanks. --Oyesunkanmi (talk) 16:45, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No file with this name has existed at Wikimedia Commons. Jcb (talk) 17:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Info You copied it from en.wp where it had the above name to File:Omotola Jalade Ekeinde.jpg. --Fæ (talk) 18:51, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link. The file has been deleted, because it came from here, without evidence of permission. Jcb (talk) 21:52, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I copied this file across from en-wp (giving it the new name, because it had been flagged for renaming there), and then discovered the apparent copyright violation. Refer to w:User talk:Trevj#File:Omosexy Jalade.jpg is not a copyrighted material and w:User talk:EuroCarGT#File:Omosexy Jalade.jpg if you wish. I don't know about the December upload. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 10:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I see. Some confirmation will be needed. You may wish to direct the original uploader to OTRS. Jcb (talk) 16:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to ensure the tone of this thread is read as intended. My information note above was literally just for information, I believe both the action to move to Commons and the subsequent deletion were both correct. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 11:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I clearly understood the intention and thanks to your comment I was able to find the involved file and tell why I deleted it. Jcb (talk) 16:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  • So, why wasn't I notified before deletion? You shouldn't be deleting users' files before notifying them. It wasn't even tagged for deletion. It looked like you removed it just because you could.
And what kind of proof do you need to verify that I'm the author? I should start taking voice recordings from friends I shared the files with? Why don't you inquire from the website the image was found if it has a copyright or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oyesunkanmi (talk • contribs) 20:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It was tagged by another user, because it came from another website. (See above). Jcb (talk) 21:30, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please recognize[edit]

that you inform the uploader before deleting files. Especially if there was no formal deletion request. Please avoid this kind of frustration and useless work in the future. Your deletion of the following picture has been wrong. I am the uploader, I am the author. File:Wappen Frankfurt am Main nach Klemens Stadler.svg N3MO (talk) 19:25, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaken. According to the history of your user talk page, you did receive a proper notification. Jcb (talk) 21:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anthem-of-Ukraine Chorus post2003.ogg[edit]

Can you provide the last description of file (by email or any other way)? Thx. Alex Spade (talk) 23:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{copyvio|1=A whole choir and orchestra is on the recording. It's very doubtful that such media was created by a single person.}} =={{int:filedesc}}== {{Information |description={{en|1=Choir with updated lyrics (march 2003)}}{{it|1=Coro con parole aggiornate all ultima modifica governativa del Marzo 2003}} |date=2011-12-17 |source={{own}} |author=[[User:Italoucraino|Italoucraino]] |permission= |other_versions= |other_fields= }} =={{int:license-header}}== {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} [[Category:Uploaded with UploadWizard]] [[Category:Anthems of Ukraine]]
Here you are. Jcb (talk) 23:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

suppression de photo[edit]

Bonjour, j'avais importé une photo réalisée personnelement et vous me l'avez supprimé, j'aimerai en savoir la raison, d'autant plus que j'en suis l'auteur. Merci de me dire au plus vite vos raisons. Edmony Krater

Je ne vois pas des photos supprimées de votre compte? Jcb (talk) 16:24, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Future Film Festival - Bologna.jpg[edit]

I passed this image about 2 days ago. It has several derivative photos in it. Can Commons use this image or should it be deleted/face a DR? It seems to have been taken in an Italian film festival. I need an experienced Admin's view here--and you are one of the best on Commons. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question[edit]

Do I understand correctly that the problem with File:McPherson Ridge Gettysburg Hist Marker.jpg was a lack of proper license for the photo itself? Just wanting to make sure that it's that, and not a problem with the marker that was in the picture; its recent DR noted that it was published in 1947 without a copyright notice. Nyttend (talk) 00:21, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's true, the marker was not the problem. The picture came from an external website, without evidence of permission. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

I have started Commons:Deletion requests/File:SM-Entertainment-Logo.jpg Gnangarra 23:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your assistance please...[edit]

You deleted File:It's showing sigh sing out loud to the world- Couse she inspered me to sing as well outher singers- 2014-01-03 22-44.jpg, after User:TeleComNasSprVen marked it as a "possible copyright violation".

Could you please tell me whether TeleComNasSPrVen provided any actual justification for characterizing it as a "possible copyright violation"? TeleComNasSPrVen only marked it on January 3rd, and you deleted it the very same day. Can I assume TeleComNasSPrVen provided really compelling evidence?

I am concerned User:NickyKushonga123 has been a victim of BITE. Geo Swan (talk) 03:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm that the hyperlink as visible in the deletion log indeed provides evidence that the uploaded file was a copyright violation. Files tagged with {{Copyvio}} can be deleted immediately, of course after checking if the tag is correct. Jcb (talk) 17:19, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About Copyright violation: http://bruffinelli.cdn.chilenetworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/mg_8084.jpg[edit]

Hi. I have written permission from the photographer to use and license this picture. May you reconsider the deletion?

--Lvanguld (talk) 03:35, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hablas español!, qué bien. Subi la foto nuevamente. Contacté al fotógrafo (nuevamente). Subió la foto a su cuenta de flickr bajo licencia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en y permanecerá bajo esa licencia. Si puedo hacer algo más para asegurar que no se borre una vez más, te agradecería que me indicaras pasos a seguir. Muchas gracias.

Lvanguld (talk) 04:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lo mejor sería enviar un mensaje a OTRS. Puedes escribir en español, el equipo de OTRS tiene suficiente miembros con conicimiento del idioma. En OTRS, alguien (posiblemente yo mismo) va a ayudarte. Si vemos suficiente evidencia de permiso, restauramos el archivo. Jcb (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jardin botanique de Sedan 5.JPG[edit]

There is my own work, and i was in holidays the last week ..... could you restore the image please, i would write the right licence .... regards--Adri08 (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the file and reset the timer. Please add a valid license before 15 January. Jcb (talk) 17:35, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS agreement for File:Copy of Polish regimental gun wz.0226.jpg[edit]

Hi,

We've just received proper agreement for the File:Copy of Polish regimental gun wz.0226.jpg. [1]. Please undelete it. Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 20:19, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I can't read PL, but I trust you. File restored. Jcb (talk) 20:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Polimerek (talk) 09:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Galerie 2016 File:Photo-accueil.jpg[edit]

Dear Jcb,
You have delete the image that I had rights.
File: Photo-accueil.jpg
I have the rights to the logo as well as all the photos for which we have mandated photoghraphes ...

I just withdraw the © on the gallery website http://www.galerie2016.ch/, Could you please undelete it ?

This user will be happy when this picture will be undelete :D

Please send a message to OTRS. If the OTRS team can verify the permission, they will be able to undelete the file. Jcb (talk) 23:12, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

37 Request for clarification regarding the deletion of File:منظر عام لغول جندب.jpeg[edit]

37 Request for clarification regarding the deletion of File:منظر عام لغول جندب.jpeg

It did not have a license. Files must have a license at Wikimedia Commons. Jcb (talk) 16:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Khaled Gharsellaoui (Photo)[edit]

Bonsoir

pourquoi vous avez supprimé la photo de Khaled Gharsellaoui c'est moi qui est avec le joueur sur la photo en plus c'est ma propre photo prise par mon appareil

Nous avons trouvé le fichier sur le web. S'il vous plaît demander au photographe de contacter OTRS pour vérifier l'autorisation. (Fichier: File:Khalid Gharsallaoui.jpg) - Jcb (talk) 22:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heart Center in Sheba Medical Center Israel.JPG[edit]

Hi Jcb, as I see it, if someone copied a picture and upload it and declare that he took the picture, this is a copyright violation. Hanay (talk) 11:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That may be true, but if a file with the correct attribution can be kept, speedy deletion for copyvio is not needed. The reason I changed the tag is that the 'duplicate' procedure makes sure that any usage of the file will be replaced by the original file before the file gets deleted. Jcb (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kabaret_Pod_Napieciem.jpg[edit]

File_talk:File:Kabaret_Pod_Napieciem.jpg - I am author of this photo, why you remove it?

It came from a website. Please contact OTRS if you are indeed the copyright holder. Jcb (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights Violations[edit]

you told me: (Hi, please do not upload copyright violations. Also Fair Use is not allowed at Wikimedia Commons.)

OK, i will not do it again! this is ridiculous! so stupid things, everyone can find those pictures even in internet. i was trying to help for fair purpose! but i will not do this anymore, im not going to waste my time helping a stupid PAGE!

It's the purpose of Wikimedia Commons to provide free content, but we can only do that if we only accept free content. Jcb (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pétafine onctueuse.jpg[edit]

Is this image unsourced? It appears the uploader gave a different colour to the food and the bowl. This uploader is usually reliable. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, this is not unsourced. I have fixed the page. Jcb (talk) 21:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ...[edit]

... read my copyvio-comment here? Greets, FDMS (WP: en, de) 22:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I just handled nominated files. Please do not ask from admins that they spent time on a user of your choice, we do choose our own priorities. Jcb (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not saying that you had to look into the other uploads, but would it not have been easier for you or another admin to delete them all at once, with the knowledge of dealing with the uploads of a user who obviously doesn't care about copyright and puts "own work" even below pictures with a copyright watermark? |FDMS (WP: en, de) 23:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We would first have to look at them one by one. Feel free to look at them and tag every file that occurs to be copyvio and we will flush them. Jcb (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Don't users like him/her get banned? He/she didn't violate copyright unintentionally by claiming to be the photographer ... |FDMS (WP: en, de) 00:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Before blocking, we normally warn first. If that doesn't help, we start with short blocks. All (just 15) uploads of this user took place in 2012, so I don't think there is any need for additional action. Jcb (talk) 00:27, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for answering, thanks for deleting. Have a nice day (I guess night)! |FDMS (WP: en, de) 00:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This DR[edit]

What do you think of this DR before it is closed? I assumed that this image of a building interior is prohibited on Commons since Italy has no COM:FOP but it is also picture of an elevator---which makes the situation more complex. Admin McZusatz has told me on his talkpage that some FOP cases would not justify a speedy tag and it appears that he would be right here. Unfortunately, it is 1:20 AM in Vancouver and I have to sign off soon. But Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's true that FoP cases need a normal DR. This has generally two reason. In the first place FoP is a complex subject. Some cases are quite clear, but others leave room for discussion. Regulations differ from country to country and a correct interpretation of the law texts is not always easy. Another reason is that a lot of uploaders of pictures of buildings and artwork are totally unaware of FoP. A normal DR will give them the opportunity to ask questions about the nomination and other users can explain the situation to the uploader. Jcb (talk) 12:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression image disponibilité des hyperviseurs...[edit]

Bonjour, vous avez supprimé une image que j'ai créé moi même, avec mes propres icones et mon propre texte. Je me suis, certe appuyé sur un article, mais comment faire autrement pour illustrer cette solution....

Merci pour votre retour, Cordialement Saiens.

Il n'avait pas de licence. J'ai restauré le fichier: File:Disponibilité des vm lors d utilisation des service HA.png et réinitialiser le compteur. S'il vous plaît ajouter une licence valide avant le 19 Janvier. Jcb (talk) 12:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Excusez moi, je débute dans wikipedia et je ne sais pas faire pour mettre une licence valide. Je souhaite que mon image soit libre....

Merci Saiens

La licence la plus standard ici est {{CC-BY-SA 3.0}}. Êtes-vous d'accord pour libérer le fichier dans ce permis? Jcb (talk) 17:10, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, oui je suis d'accord pour cette licence. Comment ce met elle en place?

Merci Saiens 

:Je l'ai fait pour vous. Jcb (talk) 22:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup pour votre action. Saiens

File:Georgia Guidestones5.jpg[edit]

Is this image from Georgia, USA, OK to pass without FOP issues? Someone created a category for them. I assume its a building and not art. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:44, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit reserved toward FoP cases. I think Jameslwoodward should have a look at this case. Jcb (talk) 19:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Both text and sculpture have a copyright. Since the artist is anonymous, we can't even get OTRS permission. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:צילום_ביטאון_בית_החולים_שערי_צדק_"שער_פתוח"_גיליון_38.png[edit]

Hey, why was this file deleted with copyright stuff? it's just a photocopy of a freely available magazine Dafuki (talk) 07:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Freely available or available with a free license? The first seems the case, while the second would be needed to be allowed to reuse it on our servers. Jcb (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't this be considered as a "fair use" license? to quote Non-free content "Cover art ... for visual identification only in the context" for acceptable use and "An image of a newspaper article ... of copyrighted text" for unacceptable use, while this is not a copyrighted text and a cover to identify the source Dafuki (talk) 17:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fair Use is allowed at several versions of Wikipedia, including English Wikipedia, but Fair Use is not allowed here at Wikimedia Commons. Jcb (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation and questions Agim Zajmi,[edit]

Bonjour Johan,

Merci pour tes comments et votre aide. J'ai encore besoin de ton aide précieuse car je ne sais pas comment faire. problème 1: Il existe toujours l'image http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/sq/a/a8/Ngritja_e_Flamurit_De%C3%A7i%C3%A7_1911.jpg qui est en violation claire des droits d'auteur. L'artiste n'a jamais donnée l'accord pour quecce ouevre soit dans wikipedia. Le problème n'est pas wikipedia, mais les autres sites Interent qui utilisent cette image comme ils ont envie, sans mettre le nom ed l'auteur, sans date, sans technique, etc. Donc simplement il faut SUPPRIMER CETTE image, wikipedia albanais ou pas, sinon je vais devoir saisir des organismes Interent et de la justice !!! Aidez-moi s'il vous plaît pour ne pas arriver là.

problème 2 (plus simple): J'aimerais mettre ces images d'illustration et d'information uniquement (avec le nom de l'artiste déjà dans la peinture) dans la page d'Agim Zajmi. Or, je ne sais pas comment faire . Tu me proposes soit {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} mais le problème est que les images sont libres de modificaions et ceci je ne le veux pas. Ou tu me proposes {{PD-self}}, donc je donne le droit de donner à tous le droit de faire n'importe quoi, et cela c'est exclu. Comment je fais pour les mettre pour illustrer sans donner le droit de faire n'importe quoi???

Mes meilleures salutations. ps. je suis le fils de l'artiste. ps2: même message à JuTa.

English.

Hi,

Please help me with those images. problem 1: Still in your servers http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/sq/a/a8/Ngritja_e_Flamurit_De%C3%A7i%C3%A7_1911.jpg. PLEASE DELETE IT. It is a copyright violation and other websites use those pictures without putting the name of the author. You must delete it becouse you are out of copyright laws.

problem 2: i am trying to put painting of Agim Zajmi with his name included in the picture, for promotional and illustratin purposes. Or i dont want give all the right about those files , so {{PD-self}} is not appropriate because give all the rights for use for other peoples, and is the same for {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}}. Please, help me i dont know how to put them???

Best Regards. ps. i am the soon af the artist. ps2: same mesage to JuTa

Hi, I am aware that the files are still present locally at sq.wikipedia.org. I am working on it. The problem is that I am not an administrator of sq.wikipedia.org, so I am depending on colleagues for those files. Regarding the licenses: Here at Wikimedia Commons we only accept content with a free license, so that whoever can reuse it. So if you upload a file to Commons, the inevitable consequence is that others will be allowed to use it. Jcb (talk) 17:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johan,

Thank you very much for your help. Please tell me if i can do some thing about this file with cpopytight violation in Wikipedia sq. If they dont erase this file i will contact Internet instances about copyright violations and make a complaint against wikipedia and wikipedia sq specially. I know that you are doing all the possible to help me so thank you very much. Best regards.

I keep an eye on it. If SQ community doesn't delete the files within one week from now, I will contact somebody with global right to fix it. Jcb (talk) 21:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Files turn out to have been deleted from SQ wiki today. Jcb (talk) 21:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keep_Wiseman_Alive_2013.jpg[edit]

Hello! You have deleted the following image because of copyright violation: File:Keep_Wiseman_Alive_2013.jpg. I asked the photographer to upload it again, and to send the permission e-mail. Is it enough or do we need also the permission of the band? Deligabi (talk) 19:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Permission from the photographer is sufficient. Jcb (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:Iguana Barranquilla1.png[edit]

Hello, Jcb/archive. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Kriti Sanon Image[edit]

Please confirm if you have read my post on the File:Kriti-Sanon-Photos-cropped.jpg talk page. Like I said, the site's terms of use states that the image is from a public domain. If that's not enough, how do I convey their consent --Mv.one (talk) 20:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)?[reply]

Yes, I did read the post. I also read the sentence after the one you quoted, where it becomes clear that they understand 'public domain' as 'visible to the public' instead of 'free from copyright'. Jcb (talk) 21:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What license?[edit]

You very quickly deleted a screenshot I uploaded before I had a chance to correct the licensing template. But there seems adequate reason to suppose that it's possible to display this - I copied the exception from another screenshot currently displayed on English WP.

The software is free for anyone to download here, but is copyright by Google. But it's a sample which is used to display the software not for the point of its content, and therefore seems to me fair use.

What license can I use? Chris55 (talk) 18:31, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use is allowed locally at some Wikipedia versions, including English Wikipedia, but not allowed at Wikimedia Commons. Jcb (talk) 18:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
thanks. Chris55 (talk) 18:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

kurtoskalacs[edit]

Dear Johan,

My name is dr. Peter HANTZ (www.hantz.hu), I'm the manager of the Kurtoskalacs Trade Corporation (www.kurtos.eu). Please do not destroy our work and do not delete the pictures for the wikipedia pages we corrected and completed. Except one of them (the long cake), they are our work. We took the pictures when I was baking the cakes and having lectures organized by Elo Erdely Egyesulet (www.eloerdely.ro). I think one "family picture" was taken by a photographer (Sandor Haaz), but we did personally all of their design. If you look our homepage, you can see that they can be used free by everybody, by making reference to the origin. Most of the picture simply belong to us, I made them in my weekend house. If required, I, the EEE and the photographer can send you by e-mail a written agreement for using the pictures. best, Peter

A valid permission can be send to OTRS. This department is able to undelete pictures when they receive permission. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We sent the necessary e-mails to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org - Me too, the Elo Erdely Egyesulet too. We put explicitely the the copyright code on the homepage:
"@ The content of this page can be freely reproduced if references are made to the source; CC-BY-SA-3.0 ". I hope this is enough. Please restore the pictures. Thanks, Peter
Response from OTRS may take some days, but they will respond and deal with the case. Jcb (talk) 10:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Volvió a subir las banderas.[edit]

Hola Jcb.

Al parecer esta persona nunca se dentendrá.--Inefable001 (talk) 07:12, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jim ya lo arregló. No sé como esta persona todavía puede pensar que va a lograr algo. Jcb (talk) 16:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Si tiene tanto interés en subirlas porqué no expone sus razones o demuestra que son reales. Esta persona tiene una obsesión media extraña, no entiendo el empeño por subir estas banderas, lleva como dos años en lo mismo, increíble.--Inefable001 (talk) 18:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request to restore the deleted file: Jean-Claude_"Gaby"_Briault.jpg, deleted on Commons by Jcb ; for : Copyright violation[edit]

Dear Jcb,

I believe that the above-mentionned Jean-Claude_"Gaby"_Briault.jpg file that you deleted should still be online, for 2 reasons: 1) I own the rights to use this image 2) It is the official public image of a public figure (politician)

Please let me know if any further steps are required on my part for the image to be restored. Kind regards,

Wiki Eager Learner

The best thing is to contact OTRS. Jcb (talk) 22:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This DR[edit]

If you can, please feel free to state if this image can be kept without COM:OTRS permission. I have no clear views on it, just some doubts whether the flickr owner owns its copyright outright. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed a strange case. I have responded to the DR. Jcb (talk) 17:31, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kydia calycina[edit]

18:07, 20 January 2014 Jcb (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Kydia calycina 01.JPG (Copyright violation: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons.) (global usage; delinker log)

Its CC By 3.0 ; does it mean the file should be removed from Commons? --Vinayaraj (talk) 15:02, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Something must have gone wrong with the license review. The source does indeed state a valid license. I have restored the file. Jcb (talk) 17:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Vu Van Mau[edit]

Cher Monsieur,

Je demande la restauration des fichiers d'images de Mr Vu Van Mau. En effet ces photos proviennent de mon album de photos familial. Ii s'agit des photos de mon père. Mon nom est Mr Vu Hoang Chau un des fils de Mr Vu Van Mau. Il n'y a qu'une photo que j'ai pris la liberté de copier sur un journal.Merci

Le titulaire d'une photo d'auteur est le photographe, pas la personne représentée ou le possesseur. Jcb (talk) 18:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Puskin image[edit]

Hi, could you please check again the deletion of this File:Puskin szovjet követ beiktatása Budapesten - 1945. november 2. - Mafirt Krónika 13.jpg. Here is the permission of the page on this side: http://filmhiradokonline.hu/privacy.php

  • 3. A szolgáltatások igénybevétele
  • 1. Bárki regisztráció nélkül látogathatja a honlapot, kereshet a honlapon és lejátszhatja az általa kiválasztott filmhíradót vagy annak egy részletét, a filmhírt. Az általa kiválasztott filmhíreket közösségi oldalakon megoszthatja, beágyazhatja más honlapokon, blogokon, illetve elküldheti e-mailben.
  • 3 Utilization of services
  • 1 Anyone can visit without registering on the website, you can search the site and play the chosen newsreel or a portion of it, the movie news. The films he has chosen to share the news on social networking sites, you can embed on other websites, blogs, or send an e-mail.

Thanks. Phurtoo (talk) 14:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is not a free license. I does not allow people to use it for whatever purpose, even with modifications or for commercial goals. Jcb (talk) 18:26, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vasily Klyukin in Monaco nov 2013.jpg[edit]

I haven't marked this image above. If you think this image is OK, please feel free to mark it. Its just that the uploader had 2 similar named images deleted in November and the flickr account's images are not very consistent with many professional images of models and then some personal images. This other image by the same uploader names the photographer in the metadata but not the one above. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I leave it in the review category. I don't speak Russian. Jcb (talk) 18:28, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minnesota_State_Senator_Doran_Isackson[edit]

Hoi Johan, kan je deze even terugplaatsen? Ik heb de toestemming ontvangen. Dank u! Grashoofd (talk) 14:12, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Grashoofd, volgens mij is hij nog niet online dus ben ik zo brutaal geweest om het bestand alvast te herstellen voor je. Natuur12 (talk) 15:20, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Imagens from page Umbará[edit]

Hello Images of the page Umbará that were summarily deleted without warning or reason, with my own permission by the owner of the website owner http://www.umbara.com.br, and if necessary I present the authorization the use of these images Please return the images as they tell the story of the neighborhood involved. --DullahanCWB (talk) 16:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The best thing to do is to contact OTRS for verification. Jcb (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration of images[edit]

Hi, can you please restore File:Hansühn Orgel (2).jpg and File:Hansühn Orgel (1).jpg - I can confirm that they are covered by Template:OTRS ticket. Thanks Nthep (talk) 16:58, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - Jcb (talk) 17:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Nthep (talk) 17:22, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate deletion of photo - File:CherokeeIDCardsByPhilKonstantin.jpg[edit]

This was deleted without any official discussion I was aware of.

The standard is that Government documents are not copyrighted unless expressly stated. The person proposing the deletion of my photo (CN3833) has provided no proof that these documents are copyrighted. I have been engaging him about the accuracy of his contention on his talk page. While establishing a website for the San Diego Cherokee Community satellite group for the Cherokee Nation, I had a long discussion with CN administrative personnel about what images the CN considered copyrighted. They considered certain graphics which were designed specifically for the nation as copyrighted. The Great Seal was also considered exclusive to the Nation. No other documents were mentioned in this manner.

From the Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_work_by_U.S._subnational_governments#cite_note-1): Copyright law in the U.S. places all edicts of any government, local or foreign, in the public domain. In other words, there are no copyright restrictions on any laws, court rulings, mandatory codes or regulations of any government. § 206.01 of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices Such documents include "judicial opinions, administrative rulings, legislative enactments, public ordinances, and similar official legal documents."

The "Blue Card" and the new Photo ID fall under the official legal document category. This photo is of my personal Cherokee Nation Citizenship documents. I used my personal ID cards in case there might be some contradictory privacy law covering publication of these legal documents.

Phil Konstantin Philkon (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

First I fail to see how this document is a law, a court ruling, a mandatory code or a regulation. Second there is the copyright on the picture. Additionally you could better not have such a document online, because you may become a victim of identity fraud. Jcb (talk) 00:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jcb: It's antagonistic not to respond more directly to the "official legal document" point Phil makes. I provided a better reply elsewhere.--Elvey (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zonder titel(C.Stauthamer).JPG[edit]

Hi, if you use a copyvio-tag, please tell why it is copyvio, e.g. a link to a website where it comes from. Jcb (talk) 22:12, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the artiste is not dead since +75 years. --Chatsam (talk) 11:12, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Answered at User talk:Chatsam (which is on my watchlist) - Jcb (talk) 11:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Claudia leitte rock in rio.jpg[edit]

Recreated again, for the third time, despite several notifications on the uploader's talk page (my latest warning after their latest upload). Could you keep an eye on them and take whatever action you feel necessary if they continue to re-upload it. Thanks.  An optimist on the run! 15:53, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have put the uploader's talk page on my watch list. New notifications on that page will attract my attention and may lead to a block. Jcb (talk) 16:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chartres cav 1762.PNG[edit]

certainly not identical with File:Cav Chartes 1762.png because the last is simply the more precise and sowith simply better version, isnt it? -- L' empereur Charles (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but speedy deletion is not the right procedure. Please use a regular DR instead. Jcb (talk) 14:12, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
so I'm at work to replace many of these - until the next admin says „why do you not use the speedy for so simple things and makes us unnecessary work?“ thats already happened, but how you want, for me it's not an extra effort (by the way, it dit it with speedy since month....with no complications, however.....-- L' empereur Charles (talk) 14:23, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have placed some information on your talk page that probably will be helpful. Jcb (talk) 14:27, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smite_generic_logo.jpg[edit]

Why would you delete the file? I sent a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, with proof that the file was allowed to be hosted here, and on top of that, it was only marked yesterday, it had a whole week to be "proven" (which I already did).--Malvodion (talk) 20:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations can be deleted immediately. If you can convince the people at OTRS, they will restore the file. Jcb (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since you were the one that removed the file: Well, I had already sent the proof last week, but I never recieved a recesponce, and the file is still deleted. Is this supposed to take this long, or did something go wrong?--Malvodion (talk) 15:32, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, unfortunately it may take several weeks before you get a response from OTRS. We have quite a backlog, I am sorry. Jcb (talk) 15:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Request_to_restore_the_Mass_Deleted_Free_Licensed_Material_on_Commons[edit]

It seems the permission is OK now. Jee 14:32, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done - thanks for the notification - Jcb (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Jee 04:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Please use a regular DR instead"[edit]

Hi Jcb,
What is the expected template in these cases? [2] / [3].
Thanks, --Aga (d) 06:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in the tools menu on the left there is a link: 'nominate for deletion'. If you click this link and enter a reason, a regular DR will be created. (Denniss has nominated these files in the meantime). Jcb (talk) 17:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Thanks. Never seen before (shame) this "Proposer la suppression" on the left. Thank you! --Aga (d) 17:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Juliusbear007[edit]

Im not sure the proper way to leave you a message but you keep removing a link I put up of a photo I took with a timer on Mykonos this past summer. You state that it may not be Bacolas who took the photo. I am Johnny Bacolas (Juliusbear007). Please do not remove the link anymore-reinstate if possible. Thank you, Johnny--Juliusbear007 (talk) 07:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We found it on the web. Permission via OTRS will be needed. Jcb (talk) 17:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:00tavor.jpg[edit]

Hi, why was this removed? I have documented a free license. --Partikelmatrikel (talk) 10:47, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source does not state a free license. Permission via OTRS will be needed. Jcb (talk) 17:11, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kunststudentin2[edit]

Dear Jcb, I have recently uploaded several images (one of them is for example https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eberhard_Havekost%2C_Kino%2C_2012.jpg) that show artworks by artists represented by the gallery I work for. The photographs of the respective artworks were taken by our order, so we actually possess the files I am trying to upload. Still, they were deleted... Please tell me what exactly is the copyright problem in this case. Thank you in advance!

Permission from the photographer and the artist will be needed. The best way is to use OTRS. Jcb (talk) 17:53, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Loverator[edit]

Thanks! --Gampe (talk) 06:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks! — Jagro (talk) 11:43, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jcb/archive/6&oldid=115832446"