User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive32

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:49, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Ząbkowicach Śląskich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Trójcy Świętej w Grochowiskach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:06, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Trójcy Świętej w Grochowiskach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:38, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Dwór w Służejowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Trójcy Świętej w Grochowiskach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP i św. Jana w Henrykowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:02, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP i św. Jana w Henrykowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:04, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP i św. Jana w Henrykowie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:04, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół św. Andrzeja w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół św. Andrzeja w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Mauzoleum Piastów w Henrykowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Most św. Jana w Ząbkowicach Śląskich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Most św. Jana w Ząbkowicach Śląskich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Mur obronny w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Droga do folwarku w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Droga do folwarku w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Mur ogrodu w Henrykowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Mur ogrodu w Henrykowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Most św. Jana w Ząbkowicach Śląskich 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:18, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Mur obronny w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Mur obronny w Henrykowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Mur ogrodu w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Mur ogrodu w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Mur ogrodu w Henrykowie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Oficyna zachodnia w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Oficyna zachodnia w Henrykowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kopalnia magnezytu w Potworowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:40, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP i św. Jana w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Oficyna zachodnia w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Oficyna zachodnia w Henrykowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Oficyna zachodnia w Henrykowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Oficyna zachodnia w Henrykowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Oficyna północna w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Oficyna północna w Henrykowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ogród w Henrykowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Park w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Park w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 01:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Opactwo cystersów w Henrykowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Mur ogrodu w Henrykowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:19, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Pawilon ogrodowy w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:31, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Pomnik Księgi henrykowskiej w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Pomnik Św. Trójcy w Henrykowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC) I really like this photo and the way the sunlight and shadows shape it. -- Ikan Kekek 01:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Pawilon ogrodowy w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Pawilon ogrodowy w Henrykowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Already a QI --MB-one 16:23, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP i św. Jana w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Pomnik Św. Trójcy w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Pomnik Św. Trójcy w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Park w Służejowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ratusz w Ziębicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but WB looks too cold --Uoaei1 04:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ratusz w Ziębicach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but WB looks too cold --Uoaei1 04:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Pomnik Św. Trójcy w Henrykowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive and good quality -- Spurzem 12:07, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Pomnik Św. Trójcy w Henrykowie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 12:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Popiersie Jana Pawła II w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:08, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Popiersie Jana Pawła II w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:08, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ratusz w Ziębicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ratusz w Ziębicach 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 01:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ratusz w Ziębicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ratusz w Ziębicach 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ratusz w Ziębicach 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Oficyna północna w Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentCould you improve the left crop?--Moroder 09:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)  Support QI for me. --Milseburg 17:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Szkoła podstawowa w Stolcu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ratusz w Ziębicach 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ratusz w Ziębicach 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Spichrz w Henrykowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 08:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ziębice, ul. Chrobrego 11 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ziębice, ul. Chrobrego 11 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ziębice, ul. Chrobrego 11 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie ul. Kościuszki 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Staw w Strąkowej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:17, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Wiadukt w Strąkowej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Wozownia w Henrykowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ziębice, ul. Chrobrego 11 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 36 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I wish the cars weren't there but that's a bit unrealistic wish, isn't it --Podzemnik 01:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 36 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Park w Służejowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 43-44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Good quality image. --Tsui 02:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Skyline-Dubai-2010.jpg

File:Skyline-Dubai-2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 51 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:07, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:07, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Aliantów 2 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:07, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 36 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 48 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 48 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Aliantów 2 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Armii Krajowej 4 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Armii Krajowej 4 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Armii Krajowej 8 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Armii Krajowej 8 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 51 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Bohaterów Getta 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Armii Krajowej 4 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Armii Krajowej 8 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Armii Krajowej 8 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Dolnośląska 1 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Konopnickiej 1 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Św. Wojciecha 1 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Św. Wojciecha 1 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Polish Tower of Pisa in the background? :) --Podzemnik 01:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Św. Wojciecha 2 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 01:19, 14 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Św. Wojciecha 2 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Dolnośląska 1 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Grunwaldzka 2 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some CAs in the upper right corner, easy to fix --Llez 05:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)@Llez:  Done--Jacek Halicki 08:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)  Support OK now --Llez 15:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Grunwaldzka 2 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Grunwaldzka 2 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Konopnickiej 1 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Św. Wojciecha 1 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Św. Wojciecha 6 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Maryi Matki Kościoła w Dzierżoniowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:43, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Św. Wojciecha 6 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:45, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Św. Wojciecha 6 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kościół Maryi Matki Kościoła w Dzierżoniowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 14:37, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Św. Wojciecha 2 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:10, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Park w Służejowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Pakoszów, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Ostróg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Intel Optane memory.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Is it too late to ask for the category (and thus the scope) to be renamed to "Intel Optane memory". The word "memories" suggests nostalgia rather than digital storage. --Bobulous (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

@Bobulous:  Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Support I've edited the English description to add links to relevant Wikipedia pages, and added the image to the category "Solid-state drives", and I now believe that this image satisfies all six of the VI criteria.--Bobulous (talk) 12:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sobieszów, exposure from Chojnik Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Nowa Wieś.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I am not happy with this building being called a "Palace" in English. In English, a "palace is a grand residence, especially a royal residence, or the home of a head of state or some other high-ranking dignitary, such as a bishop or archbishop".

I checked the Polish to English Google Translate and I saw alternative Polish words for "pałac" - "zamek" which translates into "chateau" in English and "dwór" which translates into "Mansion" or "Manor House". Given that the building has the same name as the village, I suggest that either the scope be "Nowa Wieś manor house" or that its Polish name be retained. Furthermore, since there is no description of this building in Wikipedia (Polish, English or French), I suggest that the description shoudl include a short note about when it was built, who built it etc. See for example here. Martinvl (talk) 22:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schronisko Pod Łabskim Szczytem, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schronisko Pod Łabskim Szczytem, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Radio and Television Broadcasting Center Śnieżne Kotły, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Radio and Television Broadcasting Center Śnieżne Kotły, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tvarožník (Krkonoše), exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tvarožník (Krkonoše), exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trzy Świnki, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trzy Świnki, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corpus Christi church in Szklarska Poręba, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corpus Christi church in Szklarska Poręba, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of redirects

Hi, Jacek. In the future, if you nominate redirects for speedy deletion, then please add {{speedydelete}} tag before redirect, not after. When you add the tag after redirect, then wiki software shows in speedy deletions category like you want to delete whole file. Experience is needed to understand, that you actually want to delete only redirect.

Tłumacz Google: Cześć, Jacek. Jeśli w przyszłości wybierzesz przekierowania do szybkiego usunięcia, dodaj tag {{speedydelete}} przed przekierowaniem, a nie po nim. Po dodaniu tagu po przekierowaniu oprogramowanie wiki wyświetla się w kategorii szybkiego usuwania, tak jakbyś chciał usunąć cały plik. Potrzebne jest doświadczenie, aby zrozumieć, że tak naprawdę chcesz usunąć tylko przekierowanie. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Jacek Halicki,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wysoki Kamień Hostel, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Andrzejówka hostel, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Andrzejówka hostel, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lookout tower on Ruprechtický Špičák.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kłodzka Szkoła Przedsiębiorczości.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:Featured pictures by Jacek Halicki

I have removed a number of your photographs from this category. As a sub-category of Category:Featured pictures by creator, it should only contain images that are featured on Commons. Some users have separate categories for images featured on Wikipedias, if you wish to track those. -- Colin (talk) 11:18, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mods (electronic cigarettes), power supply Lost Vape Modefined Sirius 200W TC and vaporizer Geek Vape Ammit MTL RTA.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Police Station in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jedności Square in Kłodzko, bus station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monastery of the Congregation of the Sisters of Mary Immaculate in Bardo, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monastery of the Congregation of the Sisters of Mary Immaculate in Bardo, spire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Shame about the tv aerials though. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maria column on Bardzka Pass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ursuline Convent of the Roman Union in Bardo, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Prośba

Jacku, Proszę o radę. Czy można coś zrobić z tym skanem starej fotografii? Aż dziw bierze, ale ta ciekawa i zmarła ponad 20 lat temu poetka nie zostawiła po sobie dostępnej fotografii, chociaz szukałem i w internecie. Znalazłem (w bibliotece) tylko to zdjęcie - na obwolucie jej poetyckiej powieści wydanej w 1973. Zakładam, ze obowiązuje licencja PD-Polish i że mi tej fotografii nie skreślą. Biogram poetki jest tutaj. Serdecznie pozdrawiam - Henry39 (talk) 17:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

• Bardzo dziękuję. Pozdrawiam - Henry39 (talk) 21:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
• Jest skanem z książki z 1973. Po Twoich poprawach wygląda o wiele lepiej! Wstawiłem je już do biogramu. Jeszcze raz dziękuję - Henry39 (talk) 22:09, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gorzanów train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• File:Gorzanów station.jpg has a better angle, but this is a better photo. You might consider taking a photo from that angle to avoid having the poles and wires being in the way. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Przedborowa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It's not a rule, but we have an informal agreement to only nominate three images every day. Charles (talk) 13:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

It's been a while since I've been here and I didn't knew that. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ursuline Convent of the Roman Union in Bardo, Angela Merici.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rail tunnel in Bardo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Disassembled hard disks, 3,5" i 2,5".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Hedwig church in Przedborowa, tented roof.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Seems useful to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remington Model 1858, .36, replica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Why would we want a VI of a replica when there are images of an original gun? Charles (talk) 13:25, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Currently produced copies differ from the original in many details. In my opinion copies deserve separate scope due to their vast popularity and large volumes of production. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remington Model 1858, New Army Target Carbine .44, replica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Colt Navy 1851 Leech&Rigdon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good image -- Spurzem 21:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Hedwig church in Przedborowa, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colt 1851 Navy, replica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:42, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:07, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:08, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Zwrócona.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23, 24 Market Square in Dzierżoniów, No.23.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cold front in Kotlina Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Don't these cloud formations all have special names? A cold front mean something else in English. Charles (talk) 23:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: These are stratocumulus clouds. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23, 24 Market Square in Dzierżoniów, No.24.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
26 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kaplica górska w Jaworku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:35, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kaplica górska w Jaworku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:32, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kaplica górska w Jaworku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:32, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kaplica górska w Jaworku 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:32, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
27 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
28 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
29 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
33 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Could you check the scope of this and the following image please? Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

@Rodhullandemu: I have improved the scope. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Question I've probably asked before Jacek, but where can we access the Polish Government Register of these buildings. The number you quote as 'authority control' just links to Wikidata which is naturally not an authority. Thanks. Charles (talk) 20:34, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Look here. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope The background info is not critical to assessment of the image. Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect thanks Charles (talk) 14:26, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
34 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful good image and obviously the only in scope -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:28, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
35 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
36 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:37, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
37 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
39 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
51 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:54, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
54 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
55 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Dzierżoniów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Świdnicka Street in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Ząbkowicka Street in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Ząbkowicka Street in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Ząbkowicka Street in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Jacek Halicki,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Ząbkowicka Street in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Ząbkowicka Street in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Ząbkowicka Street in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, Jacek Halicki! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:22, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

			* Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, Jacek Halicki! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- Llez (talk) 22:35, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
16 Ząbkowicka Street in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Ząbkowicka Street in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Mary the Mother of the Church in Dzierżoniów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Florian church in Olbrachcice Wielkie, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Penitence cross in Piława Górna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park in Koziniec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Arne (talk) 14:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment While all of the image information and GPS coordinates appear to be in order, I find the scope of “Park in Koziniec” to be uncomfortably vague. I am sure there is more than one park in Koziniec, Poland. Can you think of a better scope? Can you add further information as to the reason on why you think this image should be VI? --GRDN711 (talk) 04:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

@GRDN711: This park is cultural heritage monument in Poland. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 00:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I assumed that there is only one park in Koziniec because the place with 650 inhabitants is quite small.--Arne (talk) 07:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope Thank you both for your convincing comments. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:22, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint James the Greater church in Koziniec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Owiesno castle outbuilding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:22, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Owiesno castle gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:02, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John of Nepomuk monument in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The monument and the statue are two separate subjects. Here is the monument. The statue could be the subject of another appointment. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
16 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:32, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle in Owiesno, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it would be good to add the direction of the shooting --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:12, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John of Nepomuk statue in Dzierżoniów, statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
30 Market Square in Dzierżoniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grochowiska, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Holy Trinity church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park Gate in Henryków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former hospital building in Henryków, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former servants house in Henryków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Famberhorst (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Służejów, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The only one in scope und useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:26, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park in Służejów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stolec (województwo dolnośląskie), elementary school.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Obviously the only one in scope, useful and used -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ziębice Town Hall, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Chrobrego Street in Ziębice, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:31, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Chrobrego Street in Ziębice, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mountain chapel in Jaworek.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum of Piasts in Henryków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 07:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Defensive wall in Henryków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western outbuilding in Henryków, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western outbuilding in Henryków, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Garden Pavilion in Henryków, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity monument in Henryków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Garden and park in Henryków, hedges.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Granary in Henryków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carriage house in Henryków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Cistercian abbey in Henryków, Księga henrykowska monument.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Cistercian abbey in Henryków, bust of Ioannes Paulus II.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Cistercian abbey in Henryków, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monastery in Henryków, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:39, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Andrew church in Henryków, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monastery in Henryków, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monastery in Henryków, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:12, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monastery in Henryków, side portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Martin church in Piława Górna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Charles (talk) 10:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Charles (talk) 10:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
26 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Charles (talk) 10:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
27 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Charles (talk) 10:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
32 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Charles (talk) 10:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
36 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:37, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Charles (talk) 10:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
42 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
43-44 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
48 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:26, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Pomnik Księgi henrykowskiej w Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kaplica górska w Jaworku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Armii Krajowej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
48 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
50 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:04, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
51 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Aliantów Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Armii Krajowej Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Armii Krajowej Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Best in scope, but aren't there two buildings' facades in the picture, such that the scope should include both? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: This is one building, see on OpenStreetsMap or on GeoLocator. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

 Support - Very well. The way they paint the facade is confusing, what with the pipe separating it into two parts. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Armii Krajowej Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Grunwaldzka Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:34, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Dzierżoniów, Rynek 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 E-papieros mod.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Lornetka Baigish 8x30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Suwmiarka cyfrowa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Noże kuchenne Gerlach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Laila Ali at Heart Truth 2011.jpg

Yours sincerely, QTHCCAN (talk) 19:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Re: File:DomŚląski-UlicaKrólewska-POL, Kraków.jpg

Dobry wieczór. Przywróciłem poprzednią wersję, gdyż była ona nieco ciemniejsza, a przez to moim zdaniem ogólnie ładniejsza, jak również lepiej oddaje naturalną kolorystykę i ekspozycję budynku. Pozdrawiam. Mach240390 (talk) 20:55, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Witaj. Przepraszam, że musiałeś dość długo czekać na odpowiedź. Jeżeli chodzi o typy matrycy w monitorze, to ja używam kilku urządzeń, z czego dwa mają matryce IPS i jeden TN. Pokrycie przestrzeni sRGB nie wiem jak wygląda na tamtych, ale na tym z którego teraz korzystam jest na poziomie 95%. Nie wiem nic o kalibrowaniu wyświetlaczy z mojej strony, chociaż jest możliwe, że coś takiego miało miejsce w serwisach. Mach240390 (talk) 08:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Emilia Clarke Dior Rose des Vents.jpg

File:Emilia Clarke Dior Rose des Vents.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Govvy (talk) 07:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Zaręba ul. Jana Pawla II 10 1083475 Fotopolska-Eu.jpg

File:Zaręba ul. Jana Pawla II 10 1083475 Fotopolska-Eu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:35, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Kościół św. Wacława w Pisarach - Fotopolska-Eu.jpg

File:Kościół św. Wacława w Pisarach - Fotopolska-Eu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Kaplica w Marcinowie 88049 Fotopolska-Eu.jpg

File:Kaplica w Marcinowie 88049 Fotopolska-Eu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Ratusz w Dusznikach fotopolska.eu.jpg

File:Ratusz w Dusznikach fotopolska.eu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Kolumna maryjna w Ruszowicach 116182 Fotopolska-Eu.jpg

File:Kolumna maryjna w Ruszowicach 116182 Fotopolska-Eu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Remiza Ochotniczej Strazy Pozarnej w Ratnie Górnym 675330 Fotopolska-Eu.jpg

File:Remiza Ochotniczej Strazy Pozarnej w Ratnie Górnym 675330 Fotopolska-Eu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Osip Mandelstam 1934.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Zespół Szkół Społecznych w Kłodzku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:17, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Zespół Szkół Społecznych w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice to meet you here again :) --Tournasol7 14:28, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Zespół Szkół Społecznych w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Tumska 2 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Tumska 2 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Tumska 2 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Tumska 2 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Tumska 2 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:24, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Tumska 2 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sonya7iv 08:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 7 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:10, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Błogosławionego Księdza Gerharda Hirschfeldera 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 13 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 13 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 17 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sonya7iv 08:57, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 17 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:18, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 19 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:18, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 19 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:18, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Muzealna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Category isn't existing yet. --Milseburg 09:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)@Milseburg:  Done--Jacek Halicki 16:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)  Support --Milseburg 18:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Muzealna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Browarna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Browarna 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 09:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech HDR 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 22:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 15 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 22:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 7 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Tumska 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Tumska 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Tumska 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Tumska 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Browarna 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 7 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Browarna 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:59, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Browarna 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:59, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Łukasiewicza 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:59, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Łukasiewicza 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:59, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Browarna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:33, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 17 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Browarna 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Browarna 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Acceptable. A lot of shadows. --XRay 05:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kłodzko, ul. Zawiszy Czarnego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 10:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

File:John Demjanjuk 1.jpg

File:John Demjanjuk 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 23:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Łężyckie Skałki 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 07:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Ząbkowicach Śląskich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 07:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Dom nr 108 w Olbrachcicach Wielkich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moahim 07:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Dom nr 108 w Olbrachcicach Wielkich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Kapliczka w Olbrachcicach Wielkich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Dom nr 107 w Olbrachcicach Wielkich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019 Dom nr 107 w Olbrachcicach Wielkich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 15:29, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adrian Zandberg Sejm 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC) Original photo by User:Boston9 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 17:54, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maciej Konieczny Sejm 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC) Original photo by User:Boston9 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 17:54, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Yakov Dzhugashvili.jpg

File:Yakov Dzhugashvili.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomasz Aniśko Sejm 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Original photo by User:Boston9 --Andrew J.Kurbiko 17:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality IMO --PJDespa 14:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Bols Blue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:45, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Refraktometr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left part is maybe a bit on the bright end, but it's still OK for me --D-Kuru 21:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Sfigmomanometr elektroniczny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Celeda 08:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Konkurs fotograficzny Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2020

Drogi Wikimedianinie, piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu zeszłorocznemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Miło mi poinformować, że właśnie trwa kolejna edycja tego konkursu! Zachęcam do wzięcia w nim udziału po raz kolejny – więcej informacji znajdziesz pod adresem www.zabytki.wikimedia.pl. Czekamy na Twoje fotografie do 30 września :)

Paulina Studniczka (WMPL) (talk) 13:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Dom nr 43a w Bojanicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul. Kościelna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:24, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Józefa Oblubieńca w Boleścinie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Józefa Oblubieńca w Boleścinie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Józefa Oblubieńca w Boleścinie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Boleścinie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Przedszkole w Boleścinie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Aleja dębowo-klonowa w Boleścinie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Aleja dębowo-klonowa w Boleścinie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Boleścinie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Przedszkole w Boleścinie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Aleja dębowo-klonowa w Boleścinie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The wires are disturbing, I believe that the images would benefit from a crop without them --Poco a poco 10:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)@Poco a poco:  Done--Jacek Halicki 11:52, 27 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Anny w Grodziszczu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Anny w Grodziszczu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Józefa Oblubieńca w Boleścinie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Anny w Grodziszczu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Plebania w Grodziszczu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Plebania w Grodziszczu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Plebania w Grodziszczu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Remiza OSP w Grodziszczu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (maybe a small right crop to avoid the car?) --ArildV 07:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Józefa Oblubieńca w Boleścinie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Krzywa Wieża w Ząbkowicach Śląskich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Remiza OSP w Grodziszczu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Grodziszczu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Grodziszczu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Krzywa Wieża w Ząbkowicach Śląskich 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Oh very nice – even better than the day shot --Augustgeyler 10:06, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Park pałacowy w Grodziszczu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:37, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Park pałacowy w Grodziszczu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Mur z dwoma bramkami w Grodziszczu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Mur z dwoma bramkami w Grodziszczu 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Mur z dwoma bramkami w Grodziszczu 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 07:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Mur z dwoma bramkami w Grodziszczu 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 13:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Mur z dwoma bramkami w Grodziszczu 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Rodhullandemu 09:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Mur z dwoma bramkami w Grodziszczu 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Rodhullandemu 09:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Mur z dwoma bramkami w Grodziszczu 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Rodhullandemu 09:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Krzyżowej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Krzyżowej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Krzyżowej 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Krzyżowej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 08:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Krzyżowej 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Krzyżowej 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Mur z dwoma bramkami w Grodziszczu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Mur z dwoma bramkami w Grodziszczu 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Mur z dwoma bramkami w Grodziszczu 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Park pałacowy w Grodziszczu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Aleja dębowo-klonowa w Boleścinie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Krzyżowej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Maybe a tiny little bit overexposed (but the over reviewers did not object, so I assume the building is really that bright ;–). --Aristeas 09:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Krzyżowej 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Same comment as to the other one. --Aristeas 09:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Krzyżowej 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Krzyżowej 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:30, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Pałac w Krzyżowej 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Folwark w Krzyżowej, pralnia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The rooftop is hidden by that tree and cropped very tight. --Augustgeyler 09:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Obviously not easy to find an ideal shooting position but overall and considering thatwell done and above QI-bar for me. --Milseburg 12:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Folwark w Krzyżowej, pralnia 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Folwark w Krzyżowej, stróżówka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 08:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Folwark w Krzyżowej, wozownia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Dom nr 10 w Lutomii Dolnej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Nice and good quality. --Aristeas 09:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Krzyż kamienny w Lutomii Dolnej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2020 Krzywa Wieża w Ząbkowicach Śląskich 4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2020 Krzywa Wieża w Ząbkowicach Śląskich 4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Folwark w Krzyżowej, wozownia 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Dom nr 10 w Lutomii Dolnej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kapliczka w Lutomii Dolnej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Kościół Jana Chrzciciela w Mościsku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Mur z dwoma bramkami w Grodziszczu 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 Park pałacowy w Grodziszczu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:37, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 12 October 2020 (UTC)