User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive26

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bardo, ul. Główna 31 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Ukoronowania NMP w Bardzie, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qulaity. PumpkinSky 02:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qulaity. PumpkinSky 02:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The main object is sharp, so GQ. Tournasol7 00:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Bardo, ul. Główna 31 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Modlitwy w Ogrójcu, Bardo 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Modlitwy w Ogrójcu, Bardo 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Narodzenia Jezusa w Bardzie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Ofiarowania Jezusa w Świątyni, Bardo 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Ukrzyżowania w Bardzie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 11:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:10, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rühmann1.jpg[edit]

File:Rühmann1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Znalezienia Jezusa w Świątyni, w Bardzie 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 00:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 00:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 00:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 00:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 00:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 02:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:09, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lach a little bit of sharpness, but enough for QI in my opinion. Tournasol7 00:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mateusz-morawiecki-mlody.jpg[edit]

File:Mateusz-morawiecki-mlody.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: false licence, uploader is not copyright holder of this work, taken from http://superbiz.se.pl/galerie/201254/659624/mateusz-morawiecki-rodzina-dziecinstwo/

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

WTM (talk) 16:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Jacku. Nie wiem dlaczego automatycznie wysłało powiadomienie do ciebie. --WTM (talk) 16:12, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, ul. Noworudzka 9, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, ul. Noworudzka 9, 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 10:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, ul. Noworudzka 9, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:17, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:18, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:13, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, QICbot (talk)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but more detailed description is missing. Tournasol7 00:16, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Magnetofon szpulowy Aria M 2408 SD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Odbiornik Radiowy Merkury DSH-303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebiania w Przyłęku, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebiania w Przyłęku, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebiania w Przyłęku, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:09, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:28, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebiania w Przyłęku, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 01:32, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebiania w Przyłęku, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 01:32, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebiania w Przyłęku, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:09, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Anny w Przyłęku, 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Most w Przyłęku, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Most w Przyłęku, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 00:03, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Most w Przyłęku, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:07, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny, spichrz, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 00:03, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

QIC[edit]

Sorry, myślałem, że Ty dałeś pierwszy zdjęcia, a wyszło, że wtrąciłem się przed Ciebie... Tournasol7 (talk) 00:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Most w Przyłęku, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Most w Przyłęku, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Maksymiliana Kolbego w Grodziszczu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościoł Michała Archanioła w Rudnicy 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Potworów 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Difficult light conditions, a sharper angle would haven given a worser composition, quality just high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:51, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Radmor 5102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Srebrna Góra, most wiszący 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:40, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice and good quality. Tournasol7 00:06, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 01:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:45, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ząbkowice, Krzywa Wieża, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:05, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz komunalny w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:09, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz komunalny w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:05, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2018, Jacek Halicki! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 23, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 29, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 35, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 39, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 47, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe crop on the left? BTW good quality. Tournasol7 00:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:11, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cmentarz żydowski, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cmentarz żydowski, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Grunwaldzka 2b, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:12, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Grunwaldzka 2b, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The clouds are on the white side. But if you remove the stain on the far right side. Is the quality good for me.--Famberhorst 16:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Gacka 5, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, ul. Kościelna 6 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, ul. Kościelna 6 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 4, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 6, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 10, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:03, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 14, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 22, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:02, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 31, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 42, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 42, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 7, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Radmor 5102 stereo receiver, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zakłady Radiowe im. Marcina Kasprzaka w Warszawie, Aria M 2408 SD tape recorder, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:41, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:41, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, cukrownia, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:41, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Minerałów w Złotym Stoku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:41, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, główny budynek 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:41, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziębice, Grunwaldzka 2b, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 22:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, główny budynek 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego, mur 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kamienica, kościół św. Jerzego 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help![edit]

Hello. The Iran Islamic Republic's terrorists remove images of people on Wikipedia from 2017–18 Iranian protests, they get money from the government and have access to remove images. They do not want people to see the protests :( As a typical Iranian citizen, we do not have much familiarity with Wikipedia. Please report to the administrator. if you want see this.. Mohammadmosalman (talk) 21:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Kosciól Matki Bożej Nieustającej Pomocy 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków Brama Wrocławska, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Przasnysz. Kościół i klasztor pasjonistów.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Przasnysz. Kościół i klasztor pasjonistów.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Przasnysz. Kościół i klasztor pasjonistów.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 07:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:El-Mellah 2017.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:El-Mellah 2017.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:El-Mellah 2017.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 23:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Brama Kłodzka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:22, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Dom w Starej Bystrzycy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Dom w Starej Bystrzycy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Dom w Starej Bystrzycy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Dom w Starej Bystrzycy 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Dom w Starej Bystrzycy 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, planty, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, mury obronne, 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -Lmbuga 00:05, 7 january 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paczków, ratusz, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -Lmbuga 00:05, 7 january 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 3 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 5 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 5 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 16 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 16 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz w Kłodzku, główna aleja, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice --PumpkinSky 00:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz w Kłodzku, główna aleja, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz w Kłodzku, główna aleja, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz w Kłodzku, pomnik sybiraków.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zapora na Jeziorze Paczkowskim, w Kozielnie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice --PumpkinSky 00:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Nysa Kłodzka, wodospad 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 01:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, starówka 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 01:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, starówka 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 01:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, starówka 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 01:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most żelazny 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 01:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Zdjęcie rentgenowskie lewego stawu barkowego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's the second time I see an X-ray image here. I have no idea about it but in this concrete case, I can't see why it shouldn't be a QI, it looks quite OK. OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate QIC review[edit]

Just FYI I removed these to promotions because someone else had already promoted it, so it generated an error. Looks like an accident, so I just erased it. Hope you don't mind. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:32, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most żelazny 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, pręgierz 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, pręgierz 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, pręgierz 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 00:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, pręgierz 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 00:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, pręgierz 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, pręgierz 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, pręgierz 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, pręgierz 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, pręgierz 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Franciszka Ksawerego w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kaplica św. Franciszka 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kaplica św. Franciszka 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. These ads are everywhere :) Tournasol7 00:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Franciszka Ksawerego w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Daszyńskiego, kładka 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kanał Młynówka 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kanał Młynówka 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kanał Młynówka 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kanał Młynówka 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 00:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Daszyńskiego, kładka 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Enough for good quality IMO. Tournasol7 00:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena, 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice! --PumpkinSky 00:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kamień Napoleona 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, studnia miejska 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, studnia miejska 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ratusz w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Długopole Dolne, kościół św. Jerzego 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 27 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Stary Paczków, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół, budynek bramny 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Stary Paczków, kościół Wszystkich Świętych 00.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Grzegorz Skawiński w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame about the disturbing background right. But the artist is sharp and in focus.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, pręgierz 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Krosnowice, dwór 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Krosnowice, park przy dworze, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Krosnowice, park przy dworze, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Krosnowice, park przy dworze, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 00:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grzegorz Skawiński in the 2010s.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Piława Dolna, kościół św. Katarzyny 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Piława Dolna, kościół św. Katarzyny 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Piława Dolna, kościół św. Katarzyny 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Piława Dolna, kościół św. Katarzyny 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Piława Dolna, kościół św. Katarzyny 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul. Wojska Polskiego 18 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Piława Dolna, kościół św. Katarzyny 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Piława Dolna, kościół św. Katarzyny 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Piława Dolna, kościół św. Katarzyny 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Piława Dolna, kościół św. Katarzyny 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Piława Dolna, kościół św. Katarzyny 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, muzeum, targi staroci 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Piękne to Kłodzko. Good quality, Tournasol7 00:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kanał Młynówka 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kanał Młynówka 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:11, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, mury miejskie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:12, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Jagiełły 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Top of the turret is croped, but good quality IMO. Tournasol7 00:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, muzeum, targi staroci 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 09:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 10:09, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Chorzelowie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Chorzelowie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Chorzelowie 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:20, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Chorzelowie 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Chorzelowie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Krosnowice, park przy dworze, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Alright, OK now --Daniel Case 02:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Chorzelowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bazylika w Chorzelowie, cmentarz 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Chorzelowie 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, rynek 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Komputer PC 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Komputer PC 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Komputer PC 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 03:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, rynek 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bazylika w Chorzelowie, cmentarz 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Lmbuga 22:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka I 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka II 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka III 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka III 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018 Komputer PC 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka przydrożna w Przecławiu 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I see a little blur (see a note). Fixable? Tournasol7 00:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC) Fixed--Jacek Halicki 00:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Good quality, Tournasol7 08:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:07, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 00:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:09, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 11.jpg[edit]

Przepraszam, ale nie daje rady poprawić tego zdjęcia. Jak nie piony to poziomy uciekają... Tournasol7 (talk) 17:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 60.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Color balance[edit]

I saw your improvements to File:Falstaff (1893).jpg; very impressive. I wonder if you could do the same to File:Rodolfo from La Boheme (1896).jpg? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Michael Bednarek:

Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thank you very much. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 51.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 53.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kapliczka św. Barbary 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kapliczka św. Barbary 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You could better move the frame further to the left; the table wouldn't be croped. But on QI enough. Tournasol7 00:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough, I guess --Daniel Case 00:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, park, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, park, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Urząd Miasta i Gminy w Sobótce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Urząd Miasta i Gminy w Sobótce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Urząd Miasta i Gminy w Sobótce 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jakuba Apostoła w Sobótce 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jakuba Apostoła w Sobótce 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, kordegarda 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, park, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jakuba Apostoła w Sobótce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jakuba Apostoła w Sobótce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:06, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jakuba Apostoła w Sobótce 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Urząd Miasta i Gminy w Sobótce 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:05, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Urząd Miasta i Gminy w Sobótce 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive26

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:Rühmann1.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:Mateusz-morawiecki-mlody.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

QIC[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Please Help![edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File tagging File:Przasnysz. Kościół i klasztor pasjonistów.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:El-Mellah 2017.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Duplicate QIC review[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 11.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Color balance[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Navigation menu

Search