User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive14

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Floriana w Święcku 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:04, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jakuba Apostoła w Woliborzu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:04, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jakuba Apostoła w Woliborzu 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done --Jacek Halicki 19:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jakuba Apostoła w Woliborzu 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Sarny w Ścinawce Górnej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Sarny w Ścinawce Górnej 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Sarny w Ścinawce Górnej, spichrz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Posąg św. Jana Nepomucena w Ścinawce Średniej 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Prepozytura jezuitów w Ścinawce Średniej, pałac 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Sarny w Ścinawce Górnej 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wieża mieszkalna w Starej Łomnicy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:49, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Extension tubes for Nikon F-mount.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Ukrzyżowania w Bardzie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rolf H. 08:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Słupcu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Świetlica w Święcku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:57, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Słupcu, ogrodzenie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:57, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Słupcu, ogrodzenie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 11:24, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Floriana w Święcku 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Even when the morning sun is not the best time to capture the front. --Hubertl 11:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, chapel of the nativity of Jesus Christ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Ezarateesteban 22:54, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, chapel of finding Jesus in the temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, chapel of Prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, flagellation of Jesus Christ chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Święcku 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica św. Alfonsa Liguori w Bardzie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica św. Alfonsa Liguori w Bardzie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Matki Boskiej Bolesnej w Nowej Rudzie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Narodzenia Jezusa w Bardzie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Charming! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:09, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Narodzenia Jezusa w Bardzie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Narodzenia Jezusa w Bardzie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Znalezienia Jezusa w Świątyni, w Bardzie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Znalezienia Jezusa w Świątyni, w Bardzie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, chapel of the presentation of Jesus Christ in the temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, chapel of the crowning with thorns.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful --Ezarateesteban 22:06, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, chapel of the Cross in.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support the best picture of the others of same subject --Ezarateesteban 22:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, chapel of the Crucifixion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Ezarateesteban 22:12, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:48, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, Chapel of the Resurrection of Jesus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Rosary chapels in Bardo, Pentecost Chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Znalezienia Jezusa w Świątyni, w Bardzie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I like this scenery --Hubertl 08:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Modlitwy w Ogrójcu, Bardo 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Braci Gierymskich 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015 Kaplica św. Krzyża w Boguszynie 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Kaplica św. Krzyża w Boguszynie 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Biczowania Jezusa, Bardo 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Biczowania Jezusa, Bardo 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Cierniem Koronowania w Bardzie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Cierniem Koronowania w Bardzie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Cierniem Koronowania w Bardzie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't know how it is in other countries but in Poland that's not a problem. --Jacek Halicki 20:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Cierniem Koronowania w Bardzie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:33, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Ofiarowania Jezusa w Świątyni, Bardo 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Ukoronowania Najświętszej Maryi Panny w Bardzie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Dźwigania Krzyża, Bardo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Dżwigania Krzyża, Bardo 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Dźwigania Krzyża, Bardo 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Ukrzyżowania w Bardzie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Ukrzyżowania w Bardzie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Zmartwychwstania Jezusa w Bardzie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Zmartwychwstania Jezusa w Bardzie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:17, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Zmartwychwstania Jezusa w Bardzie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Zesłania Ducha Świętego w Bardzie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 08:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Cierniem Koronowania w Bardzie 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Zesłania Ducha Świętego w Bardzie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Zesłania Ducha Świętego w Bardzie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:38, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Dusz Czyśćcowych w Bardzie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Dusz Czyśćcowych w Bardzie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Dusz Czyśćcowych w Bardzie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

hi jacek,

Please, don´t overrule me while I´m discussing a slightly fault with Poco. He will repair it, then I can promote it. You know, this is our standard practice and will avoid an unnecessary 8-day-lasting consenual review! Thanks! --Hubertl 10:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Remiza OSP w Bardzie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Tsungam 09:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Stare miasto w Bardzie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me now. --Cayambe 22:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół Nawiedzenia NMP i klasztor w Bardzie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nysa Kłodzka w Bardzie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 08:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Bielicach 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 08:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Bielicach 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Bielicach 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 08:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Siennej 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:41, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Bielicach 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Pse see my note. --Cccefalon 07:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Znalezienia Jezusa w Świątyni, w Bardzie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 14:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Modlitwy w Ogrójcu, Bardo 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Szczytna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Leśna w Szczytnej 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Leśna w Szczytnej 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zamek Leśna w Szczytnej 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

City tunnels tourist route in Kłodzko

Really fine works! Usually, you don´t use tripods so much, I presume.. --Hubertl 10:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok now. --Hubertl 17:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Ofiarowania Jezusa w Świątyni, Bardo 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Równia pod Śnieżką, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo ul. Główna 23, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Plebiania w Przyłęku, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, podziemna trasa turystyczna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Ukoronowania Najświętszej Maryi Panny w Bardzie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No wow! -- RaboKarbakian 03:36, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, ul. Główna 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 13:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Daszyńskiego 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, portal przy ul. Czeskiej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, portal przy ul. Czeskiej 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, portal przy ul. Czeskiej 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, portal przy ul. Czeskiej 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Daszyńskiego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica przydrożna w Starym Gierałtowie, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Podziemna trasa turystyczna w Kłodzku 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Długosza, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, even when it's not perfect straight on the right side. --Hubertl 20:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaplica Zmartwychwstania Jezusa w Bardzie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A little bit too bright I think. Could you darken the bright parts? --Dirtsc 16:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 13:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)  Comment Need perspective correction --Billy69150 21:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 18:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)  Support Ok for me now --Billy69150 16:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:51, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Uliczny iluzjonista w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Uliczny artysta w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 3, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 3, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 3, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 12:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Igliczna, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Igliczna, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Łężyckie Skałki 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Łężyckie Skałki 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kwiat tulipanowca amerykańskiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Łężyckie Skałki 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Obiektyw Nikkor AF-S DX 16-85 mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The cut out at the bottom is a little bit sloppy and improvable. Also, some of the dusts could be stamped out easily. Elsewhere good and all details sharp. --Cccefalon 12:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 14:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)  Support Well done. --Cccefalon 15:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Model mamuta w Szczytnej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dzwonnica przy kościele św. Bartłomieja w Czermnej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wieża widokowa na Wapniarce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI, no doubt.--Jebulon 10:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Droga leśna na Wapniarkę.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:42, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Rittner-Horn-Haus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful day. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Lewin Kłodzki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. ----Ermell 07:42, 10 November 2015 (UTC)undefined 07:38, 10 November 2015 (UTC)--Ermell 07:42, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Winobluszcz trójklapowy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:40, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Winobluszcz trójklapowy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:40, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 3, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 10:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 3, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 2, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 2, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 2, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 2, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I like this --Medium69 12:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 2, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 2, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 6, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 6, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 7, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 9, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 9, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 9, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 21, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 21, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 22, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 22, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 22, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 23, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grunwadzka 4-6 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Uliczny muzyk w Pradze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Uliczny muzyk w Pradze 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zegar astronomiczny w Pradze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zegar astronomiczny w Pradze 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very special and good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zegar astronomiczny w Pradze 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very special and good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Browar Strahov w Pradze.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Fontanna Kohla w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 11:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Toskański w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Latarnia przy ul. Loretańskiej w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Martinicki w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac arcybiskupi w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Generali w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pomnik św. Jerzego w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Hotel U páva w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Dietrichsteinów w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac Wallensteina w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Turyści na ul. Loretańskiej w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pomnik przy klasztorze na Strachowie w Pradze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pomnik przy klasztorze na Strachowie w Pradze 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Samochód do przewozu turystów w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wiadukt w Lewinie Kłodzkim (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 11:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kudowa-Zdrój, ul. Zdrojowa 36 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kudowa-Zdrój, ul. Zdrojowa 36 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 23, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 26, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 26, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 26, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 27, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:27, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 29, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (A little bit noisy.) --XRay 10:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 29, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (A little bit noisy.) --XRay 10:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 27, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 27, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Samochód przygnieciony drzewem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rolf H. 10:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wojbórz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted little bit CW (to the right). --Halavar 10:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 12:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me. --Halavar 19:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 29, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 30, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 30, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 31, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół w Wojborzu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Hubertl 10:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 31, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 31, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 32, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 32, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 33, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight CA, but overall QI to me --Poco a poco 19:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 33, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 33, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 34, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 35, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 35, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. However, I had inamed in the description as "Architectural detail" --Cccefalon 16:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Nowy Zamek Królewski w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:07, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Ratusz staromiejski w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:07, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pomnik przy klasztorze na Strachowie w Pradze 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:07, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kanał Młynówka w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:05, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 37, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 37, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 37, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 38, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 42, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 30, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really good. --Jacek79 20:17, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 29, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well made. --Jacek79 20:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 42, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 47, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 47, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 47, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 35, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 31, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 35, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 38, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 38, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 39, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 40, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 40, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:37, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 40, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 42, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 47, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 47, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 47, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, kościół ewangelicki, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, kościół ewangelicki, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 35, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments When I ask for further description I implicitly mean additional categories. I have added 2 on my own. Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, kościół ewangelicki, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:20, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, kościół ewangelicki, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, kościół ewangelicki, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 09:33, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, kościół ewangelicki, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:20, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:20, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:15, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

VI scope change - Corinthian Arch, Stowe Gardens.jpg

Hi Jacek, thanks for your support vote on my VI nomination Commons:Valued image candidates/Corinthian Arch, Stowe Gardens.jpg. However, following a comment from another reviewer I have changed the scope.

Support votes made before a scope change, like yours was, are cancelled. So I would like to ask you to reconsider your vote please. Thanks, DeFacto (talk). 15:11, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Świerk pospolity.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice depth of field --Ximonic 13:50, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kapliczka św. Barbary 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It would have been better if the cross on top of the shelter hadn't been cropped off, but I think it is good enough for QI status. --Michael Barera 02:16, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:51, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 13:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:23, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 02:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 02:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 E-papieros mod 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, kościół ewangelicki, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, synagoga, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, synagoga, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, synagoga, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mods (electronic cigarettes), accu Segelei Mini Book 40W TC and vaporizer SvoëMesto Kayfun V4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old town in Bardo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 03:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nysa Kłodzka in Bardo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 03:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Igliczna, Sudetes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment. Where? This mountain is hardly known outside Eastern Europe. May I suggest that the scope be changed to "Igliczna, Southern Poland".

•  Support, best in scope. Unless there's more than one mountain with this name, the scope is fine for me. DeFacto (talk). 09:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Grunwaldzka 2b, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Grunwaldzka 2b, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Grunwaldzka 2b, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Grunwaldzka 2b, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Grunwaldzka 2b, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prague Astronomical Clock, whole.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, exquisite - best in huge scope! DeFacto (talk). 20:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prague Astronomical Clock, calendar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Breweries in Prague, Strahov Brevery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kohl's Fountain in Prague.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:45, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tuscan Palace in Prague, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rittner-Horn-Haus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lewin Kłodzki, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Candelabrum in Loretánská street.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 21:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Martinický palác.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 21:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archbishop Palace, Prague, Anton Peter Příchovský von Příchovice coat of arms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 22:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, ul. Kościelna 6 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, ul. Kościelna 6 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, ul. Kościelna 8 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, ul. Kościelna 8 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 09:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, ul. Kościelna 8 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:32, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Gacka 5, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Gacka 5, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, ul. Kościelna 6 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, ul. Kościelna 6 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, ul. Kościelna 6 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palác Generali, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotel U páva.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Ditrichštejnský palác (Hradčany), main gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valdstejn Palace, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:33, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 2, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 2, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 2, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 2, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wodna 1 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 4, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 5, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 5, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 6, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 10:58, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 6, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 10:58, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015 E-papieros mod 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 E-papieros mod 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 8, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 8, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 8, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 9, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 9, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 6, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:42, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 6, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 7, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:03, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 8, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:03, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 8, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statues in Hradčany, monument at Strahov Monastery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 23:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
36 Zdrojowa Street in Kudowa-Zdrój, oriel window.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 12:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. Satisfies all criteria. WikiPedant (talk) 04:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wojbórz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mammoth models, in Szczytna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 23:04, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Obelisk (Prague Castle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, I had to look hard at all the other images in this scope, but this one is, I think, the best. DeFacto (talk). 19:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 9, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 9, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 10, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 10, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 10, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:55, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 10, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 10, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 11, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 11, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 11, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 11, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 12, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 12, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 14, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 14, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:13, 17 December 2015 (UTC)