User talk:JJMC89/Archives/2020/02
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
 |
|---|
|
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
BSicon reports 2020-02-11
Hi, would you mind generating the reports for 2020-02-11? The bot appears to not have run that day. Jc86035 (talk) 13:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- I've started the bot on it. I think the previous day took too long to run causing this one to miss the start time. — JJMC89 21:14, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. Possibly consequentially, the bot seems to now have missed 2020-02-14. Could you generate that day's reports as well? Jc86035 (talk) 15:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Jc86035: Yea. The changes report is inefficient. Right now it goes through every BSicon and checks its history for edits on the corresponding date. I'm thinking about switching to recent changes. Inclusion options:
- Only edits that don't have corresponding log entries
- Everything except moves from a non-BSicon name to a BSicon name (This edge case is rare.)
- Everything
- The options are from most efficient to least efficient. I'm not sure what the efficiency loss is from 2 to 3. Do you have a preference on whether or not the logged ones are included? — JJMC89 01:24, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- There are (hopefully) other users reading the logs, so it probably shouldn't depend solely on my personal preference. My preference is that I would find the changes report more useful if it omitted log entries, though (i.e. #1). Jc86035 (talk) 02:12, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. I don't know who else looks at them. Would you mind asking around to those that may use them? — JJMC89 02:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- I've notified some of the more active BSicon uploaders in case they might mind. Jc86035 (talk) 02:20, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. I don't know who else looks at them. Would you mind asking around to those that may use them? — JJMC89 02:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Either way is fine by me. (What I would really like was something completely diefferent, likely much simpler to pull out and more usedful for everybody, but that’s old news.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: What do you think would be more useful? — JJMC89 06:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- There are (hopefully) other users reading the logs, so it probably shouldn't depend solely on my personal preference. My preference is that I would find the changes report more useful if it omitted log entries, though (i.e. #1). Jc86035 (talk) 02:12, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Jc86035: Yea. The changes report is inefficient. Right now it goes through every BSicon and checks its history for edits on the corresponding date. I'm thinking about switching to recent changes. Inclusion options:
- Thanks. Possibly consequentially, the bot seems to now have missed 2020-02-14. Could you generate that day's reports as well? Jc86035 (talk) 15:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Question
Hi, I just saw your edit on this photo. May I ask you if It's or Its not eligible to be included Commons? Since file also said: "This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License". Just asking since that's new for me and I've asked to Commons:Village pump (es) but nobody answer yet like one week ago. Also, by any chance this photo is eligible? I asked to the uploader in his English talk page and he said we can use it in for Commons. Just to make sure. --Chrishonduras (talk) 22:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- en:File:Venus D Lite.jpg: The licensing update was for uploads before August 1, 2009, so my edit has no bearing on its eligibility for a transfer to Commons. en:File:MADONNA-OIL PAINTING BY RAJASEKHARAN.jpg has already been uploaded to commons as File:MADONNA - OIL PAINTING BY RAJASEKHARAN.jpg. — JJMC89 01:38, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
