User talk:J.-H. Janßen/Archive 5

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lienen Hohes Haus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 04:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lienen Diekesdamm 1 Haus des Gastes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hopsten Haus Ahrens 01.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hopsten Haus Ahrens 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

B dash (talk) 01:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Borkum Evangelisch Reformierte Kirche 17.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:33, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

just so you know

Dublin is not in the United Kingdom. DS (talk) 05:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the lesson, but I already knew that, as you can see here or here (one of many pictures taken during my 2012 stay in Dublin)! It was simply a careless mistake. Pardon me! But mistakes can happen also due to poor categorisation… --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 11:17, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tecklenburg Habichtswald Alter Tecklenburger Weg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely, and it's completely fine that individual leaves aren't sharp, because this is a picture of the woods. -- Ikan Kekek 20:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Recker Moor 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:22, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tecklenburg Habichtswald Alter Tecklenburger Weg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/07/Category:Funeral chapels

You may be interested in Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/07/Category:Funeral chapels, because you have edited own or more of the categories discussed there. - Jmabel ! talk 07:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear J.-H. Janßen,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Kasnevitz St Jacobi 07.jpg

renaturalisierte Version

Guten Tag J.-H.

mit deiner sogenannten Entzerrung hast du die Kirche ja völlig zerknautscht.

Die Winkel zwischen realen Waagerechten untereinander, zwischen realen Senkrechten untereinander

und zwischen einzelnen realen Waagerechten und realen Senkrechten,

die wir brauchen, um die Proportionen eines Gebäudes einzuschätzen,

stimmten überhaupt nicht mehr.

Ich habe versucht, ein möglichst wenig zerknautschtes Bild daraus zumachen.

Am Luftbild ist zu erkennen, dass es schwer ist, das Gebäude aus ausreichendem Abstand zu fotografieren.

Trotzdem wäere es nett, wenn du auch Fotos aus etwas größerem Abstand (aber ohne hässlichen Vordergrund) in den Commons bereitstellst.

Und das unbehandelte Original dieses Fotos wäre auch nützlich.--Ulamm (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Ich bin nicht der Meinung, dass ich die Kirche im Zuge der Bildbearbeitung „völlig zerknautscht“ habe. Es ist jedoch in der Tat so, dass dieses Bild im äußersten Winkel des Kirchhofs aus aufgenommen worden ist – mehr Abstand zum Objekt ist für diese Perspektive schlicht nicht drin gewesen. Von anderen Aufnahmestandorten aus hat man wiederum zu viele störende Elemente im Bild. Wenn Du meine Arbeiten in Commons verfolgst, wirst Du feststellen, dass ich dort, wo es möglich ist, Bauwerke in der Regel aus mehreren Perspektiven zeige. --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Wenn ich es nicht vermeiden kann, Weitwinkelaufnahmen zu machen, "entzerre" ich nie stärker als bis zu den Winkelhalbierenden zischen den realen Senkrechten und den Bild-Senkrechten.

Bei sehr nahen Aufnahmen hat man ja zwei Möglichkeiten:

• Die Senkrechten unvermindert "stürzen" lassen, sodass die Betrachter gedanklich den Kopf in den Nacken legen.
• Bei nicht zu kompliziert geformten Gebäuden auch die Waagerechten entzerren, siehe Category:Reduced distortion of horizontal lines.--Ulamm (talk) 15:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für den Kurzkursus in Sachen Bildbearbeitung. Vielleicht sollten wir dazu mal einen wikipedia-internen Workshop veranstalten... In der Tat verlasse ich mich mittlerweile (möglicherweise zu blauäugig) auf die automatische Entzerrung im Bearbeitungsprogramm Photoshop Lightroom, deren Ergebnisse ich meist nicht mehr weiter verfeinere. Schließlich werden die Tools dieser Software ja gern und häufig marktschreierisch genug als „mächtige Werkzeuge“ angepriesen – mächtigere findst du nit! In diesem Sinne weiter frohes Schaffen! --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 07:52, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo J.-H. Janßen,

im Namen von Organisationsteam und Jury danke ich Dir für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland.

Im Jahr 2018 wurden ebenso wie im Vorjahr etwa 24.000 Fotos hochgeladen, von denen viele die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia illustrieren werden. Die Teilnehmerzahl lag diesmal bei 683, im Vorjahr waren es 1063.

Unsere Jury hat die Top100 der Bilder aus Deutschland ausgewählt. Die zehn bestplatzierten Fotos nehmen an der internationalen Ausscheidung teil.

Falls Du Lust auf einen weiteren Fotowettbewerb hast: Im September läuft Wiki Loves Monuments, wo Bilder von denkmalgeschützten Gebäuden eingereicht werden können.

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Luebeck Theaterschiff 07.jpg

Copyright status: File:Luebeck Theaterschiff 07.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Luebeck Theaterschiff 07.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 14:42, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Gratuliere …

… zu deinem einmal mehr großartigen Abschneiden bei Wiki Loves Monuments. Tolle Bilder, besonders die auf Platz 4(!) geführte „Sassnitzer Kurmuschel“ gefällt mir ausgesprochen gut. Chapeau! --Watzmann ^Talk 20:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Danke schön, aber natürlich auch Dir meinen Glückwunsch zum Erfolg mit der Hunnenporte! Mit meinen Westfalen-Bildern bin ich diesmal im Wettbewerb leider gar nicht durchgedrungen. Der Kurmuschel gönne ich die hohe Platzierung in der Tat ebenfalls – ich versuche ja in jeder neuen Auflage des Wettbewerbs mit einem Werk von Ulrich Müther dabei zu sein. Das war auch in den Vorjahren schon mal von Erfolg gekrönt. Schön, dass bei „Wiki Loves Monuments“ auch Baudenkmäler aus der jüngeren Vergangenheit durchaus ganz gute Chancen haben. Auch diesmal finde ich die Mischung insgesamt schon passend und abwechslungsreich. Allerdings sind meiner Ansicht nach drei Aufnahmen des Holstentors unter den Wettbewerbssiegern ein bis zwei Fotos des Guten zu viel. Aber gut, da will ich jetzt auch nicht dran rumkritteln... --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 21:24, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Hallo J.-H., komme erst jetzt zu einer Antwort, war den ganzen Abend mit der Stammtischeinladung nach Vreden beschäftigt (btw: Kommst du? Würde mich freuen). Ja, ich finde auch, dass man nicht jedes Jahr erneut die 100fach abgelichteten Holstentore, Moritzburgen und Neuschwansteins in der Wertung ganz nach vorne nehmen muss. Dennoch, auch das sind schöne Bilder. Aber insgesamt sollte das Interesse dahin gehen, Lücken zu schließen und auch weniger bekannten Denkmälern eine Chance zu geben. Es ist im Vergleich viel schwieriger, weniger fotogene Motive gut ins Licht zu setzen. VG --Watzmann ^Talk 20:51, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Auch hier schließe ich mich an! --XRay ^talk 09:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Nochmals vielen Dank! Ja, in der Tat müssen in der Wettbewerbsjury diesmal ganz große Lübeck-Fans gesessen haben. Wobei ich allerdings auch nicht bestreiten möchte, dass mir der Fotostreifzug durch Lübeck großen Spaß bereitet hat. Eine wunderschöne Stadt, die man wirklich gesehen haben sollte! Und das Wetter war an diesem Tag einfach ein Traum. Schon richtig ist aber, dass auch ich mich ansonsten besonders aufs Lückenschließen konzentriere. Prerow etwa ist nun fast ganz abgearbeitet, und auch für Rheine konnte ich schon viel Fehlendes ergänzen. Letztendlich dürfte es ohnehin die vielfach unspektakuläre fotografische Kärrnerarbeit sein, die wirklich grundlegend wichtig ist. Das wird mich auch künftig auf die entlegensten Försterfriedhöfe Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns treiben, um dort denkmalgeschützte Grüfte ins Bild zu setzen. Ich habe aber auch so noch aberhunderte unbearbeiteter Bilder im Archiv, da geht mir die Arbeit nicht aus und vor den nächsten Fotowettbewerben ist mir nicht bange... Doch jetzt zur Stammtischeinladung nach Vreden: Es freut mich, dass es mal wieder ein Stammtischtreffen geben soll. An dem Tag hat allerdings Vaddern Geburtstag, und ich weiß noch nicht genau, ob da irgendetwas geplant ist. Das muss ich erst in den nächsten Tagen abklären, bevor ich zusage. Aber ich wäre natürlich schon gerne dabei in Vreden... --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 21:08, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Du hast...

... Post. :-) Viele Grüße --Z ^thomas 21:30, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Besten Dank, da werde ich etwas in die Wege leiten... Gruß --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 21:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

na dann! viel Spaß, ich kann leider nicht kommen. Es waren auf jeden Fall ne menge tolle Fotos von dir... wie immer :-) Gruß --Z ^thomas 08:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sassnitz Kurmuschel 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luebeck 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:56, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

			* Happy Holidays 2019, J.-H. Janßen! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten! Glückliches Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- XRay talk 06:44, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Freibad Laggenbeck Go Music 20th Anniversary Jubilee Tour Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 02.jpg

File:Freibad Laggenbeck Go Music 20th Anniversary Jubilee Tour Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xylometa1980 (talk) 06:56, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Freibad Laggenbeck Go Music 20th Anniversary Jubilee Tour Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 09.jpg

File:Freibad Laggenbeck Go Music 20th Anniversary Jubilee Tour Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xylometa1980 (talk) 06:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Freibad Laggenbeck Go Music 20th Anniversary Jubilee Tour Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 05.jpg

File:Freibad Laggenbeck Go Music 20th Anniversary Jubilee Tour Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xylometa1980 (talk) 06:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Freibad Laggenbeck Go Music 20th Anniversary Jubilee Tour Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 06.jpg

File:Freibad Laggenbeck Go Music 20th Anniversary Jubilee Tour Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xylometa1980 (talk) 07:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Freibad Laggenbeck Go Music 20th Anniversary Jubilee Tour Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 08.jpg

File:Freibad Laggenbeck Go Music 20th Anniversary Jubilee Tour Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xylometa1980 (talk) 07:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)