User talk:Infovarius

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Infovarius!

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Infovarius!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:CRE Pierson's Puppeteer-0684dedb ful.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Bob the Wikipedian (talkcontribs) 20:07, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Supercomputers[edit]

This graph is created from data from top500.org. I have it in .ods format - would you like to send it tou you or upload somewhere? --AI.Graphic (talk) 07:08, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@AI.Graphic: , Please send it to infovarius at Gmail. Infovarius (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 19:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perm news Milestone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Homo heidelbergensis (10233446)[edit]

Hello Infovarius,

You changed the category Unidentified Hominae to Homo heidelbergensis models on this image. I actually removed this category in september 2013 because there's no way to know for sure if this image is really depicting a Homo heidelbergensis. Also on flickr this image is contested (someone said: En realidad ese es un neandertal referring to the model being a Neanderthal). Best regards --Narayan (talk) 20:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Narayan: . Sorry, by form of the skull I would say that this is closer to heidelbergensis (according to other images in the category) than to neanderthal. Anyway, opinion of anonymous users are not valuable and it is logical to categorize image by presented name (otherwise, it should be renamed). Infovarius (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Антон, здравствуйте.

Поступило сообщение (на СОО), что Соотс подписан неверно (не № 13, а № 20 должен быть). Сравнение с фотографией Соотса говорит в пользу этого сообщения. Не можете ли Вы проверить? Спасибо. Lesless (talk) 07:20, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Прошу прощения, я только перенёс изображение из Википедии и к его источнику не имею отношения. Спрашивайте сканировавшего ru:User:Glavkom NN. --Infovarius (talk) 18:58, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Часть файлов я перетащил в Викигид, см. здесь. Ещё кое-что сохранено у меня на компьютере. Если нужно, обращайтесь (лучше сразу в почту, чтобы я мог отправить файлы и логи загрузки). --Alexander (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Игорь Филиппов (talk) 08:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Infovarius,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat (The Lumière Brothers, 1895).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 21:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auguste & Louis Lumière- Sortie des Usines Lumière à Lyon (1895).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 21:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Privet Anton,

what's the data source of your chart?--Recent contributor (talk) 18:38, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Recent contributor: , thanks for the question! I should have added a description. All the data is from Wikidata. I've got all "CLAIM[31:(TREE[11424][][279])" and obtained P577 from them. --Infovarius (talk) 12:09, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images with Maxima CAS source code"[edit]

Hi, Thx for adding category. Note that : Category:Images with Maxima CAS source code has parent : Category:Created with Maxima (software) which has parent : Category:Maxima (software)

So Category:Images_with_Maxima_CAS_source_code is a subcategory of Category:Created with Maxima (software). --Adam majewski (talk) 16:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've noticed. I just wanted to have at least one non-hidden category. If this relevant (some cannot see hidden categories and think that it is uncategorized category). --Infovarius (talk) 11:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Images by year has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 06:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Hi Infovarius. I noticed that you've made malformed deletion requests. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Sound Logo project[edit]

Wikimedia Sound Logo project
The Wikimedia Sound Logo project

Hello, the Wikimedia sound logo project is in an early development phase -- this stage is for asking all kinds of questions, developing and fielding ideas, finding themes and shaping the direction of the project. Here is a link to the meta page for the project: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Sound_Logo

Your input is welcome. Thank you.

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 15:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, rubin16 (talk) 13:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Шаверма и шаурма.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted poster.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 12:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andre Giesecke1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.90.144.45 09:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andre Giesecke2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.90.144.45 09:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Удаление дубликатов файлов[edit]

Добрый вечер! Я активно занимаюсь переносом файлов неактивных или заблокированных участников Русской Википедии на Викисклад, если те опубликованы под свободными лицензиями. В частности, это касается участников Водник (вклад) и Vladislavus (вклад), у которых значительный файловый вклад в русский раздел, а их фотографии на Викискладе используют иные языковые разделы.

Вы не можете удалить соответствующие дубликаты из русской Википедии? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 19:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MasterRus21thCentury, о, приветствую! Меня здесь не стали банить, потому что мой вклад здесь конструктивен. И да, хочу отметить, что когда я загружал свои фотографии в Википедию, то загрузкой их в Википедию я подтверждал, что не хочу, чтобы они использовались на Викискладе. В украинскую Википедию я также выгрузил одну фотографию под лицензией PD-Ukraine. Фрагменты партитур, связанные с Ежечасной молитвой святителя Иоасафа (Горленко) просьба не переносить, так как я прописал чёткую дифференциацию (во избежание обвинений в нарущении АП или рашистской пропаганде) - для Русской Википедии загружены только ноты российских композиторов, для Украинской только украинских. --Vladislavus (talk) 11:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Так или иначе станции Московского метро не подпадают под никакие ограничения, поэтому их фотографии я перенёс на Викисклад. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 12:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]