User talk:Iifar/archive 2011-2012

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Iifar!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice[edit]

Many of the images you have uploaded are very good. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments![edit]

	WLM super uploader
	Thanks for uploading already more than 100 photos to Wiki Loves Monuments! Keep going, like this mill at Kinderdijk :) -- Effeietsanders (talk) 08:46, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vasalemma mõisa peahoone, 1893 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments distorted - easy to correct --Mbdortmund 19:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC). Not so easy for me, but perhaps it's ok now. --Iifar 20:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
CommentStill not really straight. Look at this: http://www.shiftn.de/. It's really simple. --Mbdortmund 13:43, 23 September 2011 (UTC) Thank you! I didn't know nothing about that program. Distortion fixed. --Iifar 17:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC) Shame of the cropped bench in foreground, but main subject good for QI. --Jebulon 20:28, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valtu mõisa -Puraviku- tuuleveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 11:10, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kohila kirik2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the best moment (09:09 h.), but good quality to me --Lmbuga 18:11, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lohu mõisa peahoone (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 05:59, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juuru kirik 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I think you could get a view without shadow later on the day. --Sfu 09:04, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn, Püha Siimeoni kirik, 1752-55, 1870 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice! --Ralf Roletschek 18:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keava mõisa ait-kelder2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:04, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ratasrist 1, Juuru kirikuaed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality Image. --Vassil 20:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saue mõisa peahoone, 18.saj (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too much useless grass in foregroung. Should be cropped, maybe.--Jebulon 21:36, 30 September 2011 (UTC). Cropped version is uploaded. --Iifar 19:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC) I think it is better, good for QI.--Jebulon 14:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lohu mõisa valitsejamaja (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark maybe (underexposed ?), but good enough for QI IMO.--Jebulon 15:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC). I added a bit exposure. --Iifar 16:39, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nissi kirik, 1873 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The main subject is maybe a bit obscured by the trees, but I like the light and the mood. It is a QI in my opinion.--Jebulon 14:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kehtna Peetri kirik1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 14:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

thanks! Regards, --ArildV (talk) 21:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila jaamahoone03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila jaama auruvedurite veevõtu kraan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila kultuurikeskus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn, Pääsküla jaamahoone, 1916 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 21:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Järlepa mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice shot. --Albertus teolog 14:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kehtna mõisa peahoone1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too much useless grass, IMO. maybe a crop would help.--Jebulon 14:20, 4 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Done Cropped version is uploaded. --Iifar 16:39, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good. Mattbuck 11:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voore mõisa abihoone varemed, 19.-20.saj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 22:57, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn, Balti Puuvillavabriku tööliselamu Sitsi 5A, 1901-1905 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 18:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saue mõisa pargi skulptuur -Herakles-, 19.saj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs a bit of sharpening (a very little), but good.--Jebulon 14:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC). Done --Iifar 16:15, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vääna-Posti kõrtsihoone, 19.saj (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 14:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Dear Iifar,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:17, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laitse mõisa peahoone2, 19.saj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn, Kalamaja kalmistu värav-kellatorn, 1780 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuusk Keila-Paldiski rdt ääres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 22:16, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EUFORGEN_Abies_alba.png[edit]

File:EUFORGEN_Abies_alba.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MPF (talk) 00:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riisipere raudteejaama veetorn, 1904 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 18:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruila paisjärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine to me.--NorbertNagel 22:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rabivere küla tähis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 14:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juuru kirikuaia piirdemüür värava ja päikesekellaga2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila algkooli hoone (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit soft at 100% view but good enough for QI, imo.--MrPanyGoff 06:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila jõgi Loone linnuse ees.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 09:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn, Seewaldi vaimuhaigla ravikorpus Paldiski mnt 52-3, 1909 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 19:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ääsmäe mõisa peahoone2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 17:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn, Rotermanni külmhoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment I find it OK for QI but as if a slightly lighter would be better.--MrPanyGoff 00:23, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Improved. --Iifar 07:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 08:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Callipogon cinnamomeus MHNT male 4.jpg[edit]

Thank you, I is not paid the final version. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

aquarium[edit]

Images aquarium are still dificille. It should crop the animal carefully and make a significant noise reduction and also smoothing the background. The animal itself can be improved by working colors. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I'm not the author of those images. I think they are not done in aquarium, but in the lake or sea. Pictures are showing their natural environment. --Iifar (talk) 10:24, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sutlema mõisa väravatorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Although the weather is bad, it's a very good picture. --Haeferl 15:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hageri kirikuaia piirdemüür2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 20:30, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinus nigra Keila.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI and useful--Lmbuga 20:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruunavere postijaama peahoone1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are some minor remarks but as a whole meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 08:24, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riisipere raudteejaam 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice colors, only the white stripes on the train side are slightly overexposed and the rear end of the train in the far background is out of DoF. Good Quality to me. --NorbertNagel 19:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kohila vesiveski (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 14:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nurme mõisa väravaehitus, 18.saj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:59, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rapla kivisild1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 08:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keava jaama kivist abihoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 08:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiviriidad Naissaarel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice, i like the colors --Ralf Roletschek 11:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naissaare kõrgeimad luited.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Põlendikukivi Naissaarel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila jaama kaubaladu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This is Quality. --NorbertNagel 21:35, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rapla jaamahoone2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --LC-de 12:24, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rapla, elamu-ärihoone Tallinna mnt 23 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think a crop is needed. Yann 08:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info Cropped version uploaded. --Iifar 20:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me --LC-de 12:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rapla, pangahoone Tallinna mnt 12 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --LC-de 12:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila raudteejaama veetorn01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some noise but otherwise a good photo and composition.--ArildV 16:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naissaare rand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Horizon is tilted. Please correct. Yann 13:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Iifar 16:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC) OK now. --Yann 17:35, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paadisadam Naissaarel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 13:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maidla jõgi Ääsmäe mõisa lähedal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment The horizon is tilted, this should be fixed. Pitke 18:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Iifar 16:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)It's ok IMO. --Vassil 17:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila jaama ait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila raudteejaama veetorn02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO. --ArildV 21:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camels in front of the tombs, Petra, Jordan.jpg[edit]

Hello, you were totally right with your comment on the picture, actually I was later on shocked that I didn't see all those dust spots. Please, let me know if the current version is good enough. I think that this time I got them all, regards, Poco a poco (talk) 21:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuusiku mõisa viinavabrik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Could you add the coordinates? --Óðinn 18:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC). Done --Iifar 18:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Hi Iifar, thanks a lot for your comment on File:Sonoma Coast, near Gleason Beach.jpg (quality image candidates). I actually didn't notice that the horizon was tilted that much. It's one of my favorite places along the Sonoma coast and I really enjoyed taking that picture. So, thank you so much again, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:House in Le Vésinet 005.JPG[edit]

Hi lifar, Thanks for this file correction. In my last update I badly croped the right side, bat your new version is OK for me. --Moonik (talk) 19:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town of Tallinn 06-03-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice & Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Birmingham_New_Street_railway_station_MMB_16_221133.jpg[edit]

Hi, I was wondering if you could explain this edit to me, where you removed something from CR without anyone else actually looking at it. I'm willing to accept the outcome, but I feel that it might have been a bit hasty to decline at CR when no one else had commented. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, maybe I was a bit rushing with the final decision. I was just following CR rule: after a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision - Promoted or Not promoted - will be registered at the end of the text. I think it will be ok, if you nominate it again. --Iifar (talk) 15:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Please add english description to all your QI candidates"[edit]

Sorry, my english is too bad. I have big problems to search categorys. --Ralf Roleček 20:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added. I hope there are correct. Przykuta → [edit] 05:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila kirik 15-03-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Question Is the spire leaning a little bit towards the nave in reality? --V-wolf 21:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality and QI to me, but I have never taken a photo with snow --Lmbuga 23:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This image would look much better with a white balance adjustment. Saffron Blaze 23:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Comment The tower may look a bit different from reality because the camera was not horisontal (to catch high tower) or because multiple frames were merged with software. What's wrong with WB?. --Iifar 07:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila mõisa peahoone (Harjumaa Muuseum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

for fixing the dust spots in File:Wackershofen Freilandmuseum Dorfkapelle Stoecken 20070716 2.jpg. I dont't think I would have found the time and patience to do that anytime soon. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 21:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kongresshalle Nürnberg[edit]

Hallo Iifar,

I have fixed the problems. Please proof if it is good now. Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:29, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teguise_-_Plaza_-_Iglesia.jpg - QIC - Consensual review[edit]

Hallo lifar, thank you for your review. I made the corrections you suggested. Please have again a look on the picture. By the way: Congratulations for your eager eye! --Llez (talk) 15:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kulina mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laekvere mänd 04-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Lmbuga 21:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Äntu mõisa viinavabriku korsten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Lmbuga 21:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Äntu mõisa viinavabriku varemed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and the lock is epic fail :) --Saffron Blaze 12:06, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone bridge in Kiltsi manor park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but I think you could have chosen a better perspective. --Saffron Blaze 12:06, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esna allikajärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Is the mug an experimental image composition or just an accident? --NorbertNagel 20:13, 26 April 2012 (UTC). The mug just was there, I didn't touch it. I think local people are drinking spring water. --Iifar 06:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saun Esna allikajärve ääres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good and nice --Carschten 18:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lelle jaama kaubaait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 09:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pilistvere paisjärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Cayambe 13:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolu küla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 17:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kehtna Peetri kirik2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Käru kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 21:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiltsi jaam.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK -- George Chernilevsky 20:10, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiltsi jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like this old station house. Atmospheric picture. --Florstein 17:54, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Käru paisjärv (Ingliste oja).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent picture. --Florstein 19:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olustvere raudteepeatus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lelle jaama veetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 18:21, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lelle jaamahoone (04-2012).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 18:21, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lokuta jõgi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retla jõgi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varangu Siniallikad.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice picture, but I'd like some more information on the description section--Moroder 21:54, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lelle jaama auruvedurite veevõtu kraan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Põltsamaa jõgi Kiltsis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:05, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Türi jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Türi jaama veetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Türi jaama kaubaait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:51, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lindrehti allikas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 23:17, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raudmetsa mänd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --Florstein 18:58, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Preediku järv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 04:19, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vana kelder Anna kiriku lähedal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice and good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jäneda raudteepeatus2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:40, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jäneda raudteepeatus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:40, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aravete allikad2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But the rubbishes on the foreground are a shame, I suggest another version with a crop. --Vassil 21:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC). Comment I wish to show things how they really are. --Iifar 05:29, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tegernau Panorama[edit]

Tere Iifar,

I have improved File:Tegernau - Gesamtansicht.jpg at QIC. If there is s.th. not ok let me know. Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[1], Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 2nd try of correction in the image above --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:38, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hi, maybe you can check out the 2nd try of [2]. Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kullavere jõgi (Voore).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Bgag 20:52, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaiatu paisjärv (Kullavere jõgi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prohveti mänd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedja jõgi (Jõgeva).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, and really nice view. - A.Savin 19:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Võikvere.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 11:08, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varbevere tuuliku varemed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good. --Carschten 15:28, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eivere küla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition. Good quality IMO. --JDP90 18:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Võduvere.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:16, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jõgeva endine jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jõgeva veetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --Florstein 17:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palamuse veskijärv (Amme jõgi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent! --Florstein 17:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaiu järv 26-05-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 20:09, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rapla ristid[edit]

Tere! Saaksid täpsustada, kas selle risti peal on registris toodud tekst "...EL...MA / IOHAN"? Laadisin sama registrinumbriga üles pildi teisest ristist, mille peal paistab olevat toodud tekst. Pikne 15:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Need ristid on ikka erinevad. Võisin registrinumbriga puusse panna. Mäletan, et ristide identifitseerimisega oli tükk tegu ja kõikides kirikuaedades ei suutnudki neid lõplikult eristada. --Iifar (talk) 17:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ma igaksjuhuks selle mõttega küsisin, et äkki seal oli mitu sarnase kirjaga risti. Aga kui sa ka kindel pole, siis võiks sinu pildi juurest esialgu registrinumbri ära võtta, et erinevad ristid sama numbriga poleks. Pikne 19:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sookail (Rhododendron tomentosum) Kaasikjärve rabas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Satisfies QI requirements. Biopics 23:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MS Azura (front).jpg[edit]

Hi Iifar. I did not see the dust spots, but I 'cleaned' the areas you indicated. Can you recheck? B.p. 07:26, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tapa Jakobi kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I find it very good.--MrPanyGoff 19:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tapa jaama veetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I find it very good too.--MrPanyGoff 19:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tapa auruvedur L-1361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:54, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arbavere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. Biopics 17:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Champs sur Marne château côté parc 1.jpg[edit]

Hi Lifar,

First, I would like to congratulate you for your nice pictures.

Second, I wish to thank you for all your kind supports of my own pictures, and for your careful reviews, very helpful.

It is the case for the picture mentioned above, you were right with the dust spot and the white line you annotated.

I think I've corrected the issues, and I've brightened a bit the stone façade, which was too much in shadow IMO.

Would you please be kind enough to have another look on the new version I uploaded ?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards from Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 22:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you were right. I think it is good now. Thank you, and sorry for the result of the football match. ;)--Jebulon (talk) 22:40, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Undla mõisa viinavabrik.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality! --NorbertNagel 17:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Undla veskijärv (Loobu jõgi).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:22, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kavastu mõisa (Haljala) tuuleveski2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:22, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Võipere küla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me.--S. F. B. Morse 12:45, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kavastu mõisa (Haljala) tuuleveski1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:40, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kadapiku küla (Kadrina).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:40, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rakvere jaama veetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good photo. --Florstein 17:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamsalu jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO.--ArildV 20:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vihula veskijärv (Mustoja).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jagro 11:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selja jõgi Arknas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but the colour saturation is borderline/heavy.. --NorbertNagel 17:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pikkjärve paisjärv - Nava oja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalevipoja lingukivi - Prossa hiidrahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaiavere järv.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:47, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alatskivi järv.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:47, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Männikjärve raba01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. - A.Savin 19:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaasikjärve raba02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 18:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sopa allikas2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I prefer this one : QI. JLPC 18:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sopa allikas1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

quality images comment[edit]

Thanks for your vaulable comment underneath one of my photos.
Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#June_19.2C_2012
--(GRAD) (talk) 07:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Savastvere järv (Alatskivi jõgi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 17:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Purskav allikas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK -- George Chernilevsky 22:07, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oostriku allikad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 22:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kemna Breslau type EM (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and interesting -- George Chernilevsky 08:39, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kemna Breslau type EM (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 08:40, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tabivere jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I addicted to old wooden station houses such this. Very good photo. --Florstein 20:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tabivere tuulik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 08:47, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kärneri tuuleveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:35, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Florstein 17:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste jaama veetorn1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste jaama veetorn2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odrapõld Sooru külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice light. --NorbertNagel 15:58, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rõngu–Otepää–Kanepi maantee Kõdukülas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:26, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palupera pritsikuur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 21:07, 1 July 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kõduküla mast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hellenurme järv (Elva jõgi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. What a beautful view! --Berthold Werner 17:43, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palupera jaama ooteplatvorm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo. --Florstein 17:03, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palupera jaama kaubaait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palupera jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palupera pritsikuur2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mägiste peatuskoht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, I think the mood is eye catching.--Jebulon 16:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puka keskuse veehoidla (Puka oja).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This decline: [3][edit]

I do not agree with your decline here. The only oppose is due to naming semantics, not due to any actual image issues. Furthermore, the image name is perfectly reasonable, it is a photo taken at the Clifton Rocks Railway. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you can always renominate. Decline was registered, because it had only one oppose vote and no support at all. --Iifar (talk) 12:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saku jaama peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and sharpness. --ArildV 17:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abja-Paluoja päästekomando depoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 11:56, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rapsipõld (Brassica napus) Toosi külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heimtali mõisa tuuleveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 20:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saku jaama kaubaait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 12:43, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pärsti paisjärv (Valuoja).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:39, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sürgavere ooteplatvorm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Õisu järv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo. --Florstein 06:21, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taagepera järv (Õhne jõgi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 21:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raudna tehisjärv (Heimtali karjäär).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 12:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sultsi-Abja-Paluoja tee Toosi külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 12:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saku jaama elamu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me... though I would crop or clone away the stone at the image bottom. --Cayambe 09:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Done --Iifar 12:12, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuigatsi paistiik (Kuigatsi oja).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raasiku raudteejaama elamu1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:28, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raasiku raudteejaama elamu2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo. --Florstein 18:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raasiku raudteejaama veetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 18:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loopealne Keilas 18-06-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me. -- JLPC 18:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liivaaugu tamm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Splendid oak! --Florstein 17:04, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Põldmagun (Papaver dubium) raudtee ümbruses.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality! ----Florian Fuchs 15:53, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

QIC[edit]

Hi Iifar,

maybe you can answer me here. Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:57, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loodi lehisepuistu (Larix decidua).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Danrok 19:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Old town of Tallinn 06-03-2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Old town of Tallinn 06-03-2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maardu mõisa tuuleveski varemed1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 21:23, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Loopealne Keilas 18-06-2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Loopealne Keilas 18-06-2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tartu–Räpina–Värska maantee Kärsa külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:16, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Räpina järv (Võhandu jõgi).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice landscape. --Florstein 20:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ahja Keskmine järv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:33, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste järv.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maardu mõisa tuuleveski varemed2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 17:28, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Väimela Alajärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent! --Florstein 22:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Partsi Kõrdsjiärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good too. --Florstein 06:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veriora jaama elamu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veriora jaama veetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veriora jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veriora raudteejaama ooteplatvorm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kärgula mõisa kõrvalhoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 19:00, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Järvere bussipeatus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mägestiku küla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kublitsa järv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice! --Florstein 19:00, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sõmerpalu jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pikareinu küla - Valgjärve telemast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please add Estonia to the file descr. --Cayambe 05:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Võru veetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 20:29, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Võru jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 17:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otepää Valgjärv2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Võru pritsumaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palu järv (Palu jõgi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:59, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled flag[edit]

Hi Iifar, I have given you the autopatrol flag (i.e. your contribution won't have any red mark ! and will be automatically marked as patrolled), I think you are a user that can be trusted and that you know the basics of our licensing policies (basically you use the good license tag or pd tag when needed). Best regards, --PierreSelim (talk) 15:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kehra jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kehra jaama kivielamu1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Florstein 17:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kehra jaama kivielamu2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaunissaare veehoidla (Jägala jõgi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:57, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pikajärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jõelähtme jõgi Kiviloo külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:46, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nõmbra küla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vinnkaev Võlle külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice! --Danny S. 19:37, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valge-toonekured Palvere küla põllul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kose-Jägala maantee Kose piiril.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nisupõld Kose alevikus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jalakäijate vantsild Kohilas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:40, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tohisoo mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. -- MJJR 08:24, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kernu–Kohila tee Masti külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:40, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piimapukk Kernu–Kohila tee ääres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valga–Uulu maantee Ristikülas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:50, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiisa jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sutlema mõisa viinavabriku varemed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, still the description could be enhanced with city / country, greetings from Tallinn :) --Poco a poco 19:23, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn–Saku–Laagri tee Jälgimäe Juuliku piiril.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 14:05, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saarde paisjärv (Humalaste jõgi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice! --King of Hearts 03:13, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koogiste jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pärnu–Tori maantee Tori alevikus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good! --Florstein 19:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reiu jõgi Surju vallas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good! --Florstein 19:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saarde Vabadussõja mälestussammas Kilingi-Nõmmes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo. --Florstein 18:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seljametsa järv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:12, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seljametsa Lasteaed-Algkool.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Surju–Seljametsa tee Vaskrääma külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tori jaama elamud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Libélula (Sympetrum fonscolombii), jardín botánico de Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-13, DD 02.JPG[edit]

Hello lifar, I cannot change the resolution of that image. The resolution = sharpness + megapixels (depending on camera sensor). You tell me that sharpness is good (and I can hardly make it sharper without damaging it), so I can just increase the crop in order to increase the file size. That is no problem, but I am not sure if that is what you are asking for, all the best from Spain Poco a poco (talk) 12:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krauss-Maffei auruvedur 52 3368 Haapsalus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent! --Florstein 17:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auruvedur L-1646 Haapsalus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:48, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auruvedurite veevõtukraan Haapsalu jaamas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Florstein 17:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auruvedur Su 252-94 Haapsalus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vene keisririigiaegsed kaubavagunid Haapsalus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 04:59, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mootorvedur TEP60-0924 Haapsalus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mootorvedur VME 1-116 (Ganz–MÁVAG M44) Haapsalus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sõjaaegne reisivagun Haapsalus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rabelos en el río Duero, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 17.JPG[edit]

Hello! I have made a new attempt. I have to say that it is quite hard to get rid of that CA because whatever I do there is always something less, but cannot see anyhow that remaining CA at 100%, take care! Poco a poco (talk) 11:28, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Essu mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assamalla–Kadrina tee Võduveres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 05:33, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kabala mõisa (Viru-Nigula) kõrvalhoone varemed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 20:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kabala jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --Florstein 20:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kabala jaama elamu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good picture. --Florstein 20:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kohala mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:40, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kadrina jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very well ! --Florstein 18:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloodi mõisa kõrvalhoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:40, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloodi mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 04:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ulvi mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sämi–Sonda–Kiviõli tee Viru-Kabalas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:59, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toolse jõgi Põdruse–Kunda–Pada maantee lähedal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andja mõisa kuivati varemed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --TommyG 19:58, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Põdruse–Kunda–Pada maantee Andjas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --TommyG 19:58, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Põdruse–Kunda–Pada maantee Mallas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:40, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

a[edit]

a

Tere,

Mis e-maili aadressil sinuga ühendust võiks saada?

Martin Suuroja (talk) 09:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

iifar(ätt)hot.ee --Ivar (talk) 14:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunda mõis-Sämi tee Kohalas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 16:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tootsi jaamahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good result, nice -- George Chernilevsky 20:17, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uljaste järv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 16:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sharpness issue[edit]

Dear Ivar, you were totally right. For whatever reasons the mask settings did not work in the last days, although I am not aware of having changed anything. The lost of sharpness was actually very obvious in the FP candidate of the virgin at Coimbra's university, as you mentioned. I have fixed the problem now (please, see here, here and here) but I feel that it will cost me that FP. Thanks anyhow for your help! Best regards from Spain Poco a poco (talk) 16:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pärnu–Rakvere–Sõmeru maantee Udrikus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:13, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Tootsi jaamahoone.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tootsi jaamahoone.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puente Don Luis I, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 13.JPG[edit]

Just to let you know, regarding [4], the {{Weak support}} and {{Weak oppose}} templates should not be used, because they make it more difficult for the FPC bot to count the votes. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vao mõisa viinavabrik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You're lucky, you have an inexhaustible source of atmospheric images. :) --Florstein 10:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vao mõisa sepikoda.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vao mõisa kuivati1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vao tornlinnus1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viljandi vana veetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esna mõisa piimaköök.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Järva-Peetri kirik2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:54, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viru-Jaagupi kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viru-Jaagupi kiriku torn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muuga mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --ArildV 19:23, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muuga mõisa väravaehitis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muuga mõisa tuuleveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vao mõisa tuuleveski1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:02, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Võhmuta mõisa tõllakuur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karinu mõisa peahoone1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karinu mõisa peahoone2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Köisi tuuleveski2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pilistvere kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 18:46, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pilistvere kirikuaia piirdemüür väravaehitisega.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 18:46, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kõo mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 18:46, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Särevere mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:54, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Särevere mõisa kuivati.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:54, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laupa mõisa kuivati.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. --Florstein 16:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jändja puumassivabriku tamm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Florstein 16:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varangu mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CW tilt in the left part. - A.Savin 07:18, 3 September 2012 (UTC). Fixed --Iifar 11:23, 3 September 2012 (UTC) OK now. - A.Savin 15:27, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arussaare õigeusu kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:39, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varangu mõisa tõllakuur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Haneburger 10:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa viinavabrik ja härjatall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olustvere raudteejaama peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good! --Florstein 20:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa kelder 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa viinavabrik2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa töölistemaja.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, although I'd crop out that red car portion --Poco a poco 19:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa sepikoda.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa meistrimaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olustvere mõisa peahoone2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:02, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olustvere raudteejaama abihoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seidla mõisa tuuleveski2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 20:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Väätsa mõisa park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent quality, beautiful picture -- Lothar Spurzem 20:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirna mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuremaa mõisa tuuleveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --Florstein 18:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eivere mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. I would do it for privacy reasons --Moroder 13:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anna kirikuaia piirdemüür.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anna kirik1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Purdi mõisa tuuleveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albu mõisa peahoone2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koordi mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Jebulon 15:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roosna-Alliku mõisa valitsejamaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 01:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seidla mõisa tuuleveski1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Prenn 15:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seidla mõisa peahoone1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ambla kirikuaed.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (maybe a small left crop?) --ArildV 18:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Done Thank you. --Iifar 18:45, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palamuse apteek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuremaa mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, I like this "non frontal" composition, it works with the shadows, IMO.--Jebulon 15:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aaspere mõisa tuuleveski1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aaspere mõisa tuuleveski2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vihula mõisa tuuleveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:56, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kavastu mõisa tuvitorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vihula mõisa peahoone 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:01, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vihula mõisa pesuköök.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you get rid of the car in the right? Poco a poco 18:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC) Done --Iifar 18:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torma mõisa kupjamaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torma kirik3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torma kirik1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ratasrist Palamuse kirikuaias.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palamuse kihelkonnakooli hoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Türi kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Kreuzschnabel 18:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kabala mõisa tõllakuur (Pilistvere).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kabala mõisa peahoone1 (Pilistvere).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kuremaa mõisa tuuleveski.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kuremaa mõisa tuuleveski.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vohnja mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 20:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vihula mõisa palmimaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laiuse linnuse varemed1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torma kirikuaia paviljon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laupa mõisa peahoone 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --Kadellar 16:27, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jändja vesiveski varemed1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some of the water is overexposed but not that big of a deal. --King of Hearts 23:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rochers Sierra Nevada.jpg[edit]

Hello Iifar,

I thank you very much for your numerous and lenient reviews of my pictures.

You made a very interesting comment on this one, and you were right.

Would you please be kind enough to have another look ? I've reworked it, and I hope you will find it fine now (I'm trying Lightroom4 as postprocessing software, very interesting but a bit difficult at beginning !)

If it does not work for you, no problem for me, feel free to decline, of course.

BtW, congratulations for your own pictures in general, they make your country very interesting to me, but... they are already promoted when I review !!

Regards from Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 22:09, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

QIC Review[edit]

Hi Iifar

fixed now. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste mõisa peahoone1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent atmosphere! --Florstein 17:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste mõisa peahoone2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tammistu mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alatskivi mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:20, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taagepera mõisa peahoone2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holdre mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support : Good quality. --JLPC 08:33, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vihula mõisa ait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I'd crop a bit of the grass in foreground, but QI nevertheless--Jebulon 15:54, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torma postijaama peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Jebulon 15:37, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Alatskivi mõisa peahoone.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alatskivi mõisa peahoone.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hageri kirik 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me --Adrianek2501 14:42, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palamuse vesiveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 22:11, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mälestis[edit]

Tere. Mulle tundub, et sellel pildil [5] on vale ID. Interjööri järgi otsustasin. Kas sa leiad õige üles? Aga no super ilusad pildid sul. Edu! Mona

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu kuursaal 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 09:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu linnuse varemed1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 09:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu linnuse varemed2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 09:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu raudteejaama ooteplatvorm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 09:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kohila vesiveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition, colors, and sky.--Jebulon 18:00, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kose kirik suvi 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sutlema mõisa väravatorn 02-08-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CA[edit]

What is "strong CA"? --Kikos (talk) 18:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll try to fix it. --Kikos (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aakre mõisa viinavabrik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support : very good. --JLPC 07:17, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malla mõisa peahoone 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vasta mõisa tuuleveski varemed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Väätsa mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments too dark IMO --Taxiarchos228 12:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC) Info More exposure added. --Iifar 07:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK to me. Mattbuck 12:56, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rakvere linnuse varemed vallikraaviga1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. (Maybe I'm a little worried about the saturation of the greens. Didn't check the gamut though.) --Ximonic 12:05, 16 September 2012 (UTC). Comment I didn't touch the saturation button. --Iifar 17:47, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viljandi ordulinnuse varemed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. (Maybe I'm a little worried about the saturation of the greens. Didn't check the gamut though.) --Ximonic 12:05, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestions[edit]

Thanks for your two suggestions about my two pictures... and for your votes. I really appreciate this kind of help. -- Thanks too, for the quality of your pictures on Wikipedia. (Sorry for my English.)-- Best regards. JLPC (talk) 20:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Good morning, I wanted to thank you for your comment on image quality, I wonder if I've corrected the problem, thank you very much --The Photographer (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have been evaluated tools to remove chromatic aberration purple color, but not in green colors. If you know any tool or method to remove it, please, I'm open to learning. thank you very much --The Photographer (talk) 14:40, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tartu Raekoda 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tartu Peetri kirik 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and very nice --Taxiarchos228 08:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagadi mõisa peahoone pargipoolne külg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --D4m1en 15:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuigatsi mõisa tuuleveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --D4m1en 15:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiviloo mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:01, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lasila mõisa peahoone 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality.--ArildV 14:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pikajärve mõisa peahoone2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice. --Ralf Roletschek 11:25, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vallimäe tuuleveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 10:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rakvere kirik 05-06-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 10:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taagepera mõisa peahoone1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would be great if you can increase the crop to avoid the cut of the car on the left, but still QI to me --Poco a poco 20:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kohila mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Your pictures are damn good. --D4m1en 17:29, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mõdriku mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I tried really hard to find a stitching error. I failed. --D4m1en 17:29, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tartu Ülikooli peahoone 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa peahoone2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Sfu 10:28, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pikajärve mõisa peahoone3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:11, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rakvere linnuse varemed vallikraaviga2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:11, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sangaste mõisa peahoone3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Distracting leaves/twigs in the upper left corner, apart from that it’s fine. --Kreuzschnabel 18:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC). Done --Iifar 14:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elamu Viljandis Pikk 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 11:47, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleksander I ja Napoleoni sõdade mälestusmärk1 (Mõdriku).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aleksander I ja Napoleoni sõdade mälestusmärk2 (Mõdriku).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ahja mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (but a pity for the building). - A.Savin 16:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alatskivi kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. - A.Savin 16:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maarja-Magdaleena kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:33, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laatre kirik2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Difficult light conditions add to the atmosphere here.. --Cayambe 14:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Säckingen Panorama[edit]

Hi Iifar,

there is now a new version of this image --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:40, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you prescience the quality problems? It would be nice if you could constitute unasked in the future not to see-saw. Thanks. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:46, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Taagepera mõisa peahoone2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Taagepera mõisa peahoone2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taagepera kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuhala kirik tagantvaates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:09, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila kindlustatud elamu varemed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:29, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vasta mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I don't know what's the reason for downscaling but quality is ok. --Sfu 18:08, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saadjärve mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kõpu kirik ja Tartu–Viljandi–Kilingi-Nõmme maantee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 07:27, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viljandi Jaani kirik2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vana-Võidu mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I just wanted to thank you for your reviews, however, I'm pretty much of a commons newbie and I simply can't fix some stuff, so I just withdrew one more nomination. Anyway, every review helps me in general. Thanks a lot! -Barras (talk) 14:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kuremaa[edit]

User:Julia W has expanded the Kuremaa article at the English Wikipedia, for your windmill pic. Would you check the article against the sources in Estonian please? Thanks! Phantasten (talk) 21:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I responded to you at my talk page on en:wp: [6]. Julia\^talk 21:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu kuursaal 2012-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 17:47, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viljandi Jaani kirik1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:00, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elamu Viljandis Tallinna 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:00, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suure-Kõpu mõisa peahoone 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:00, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ratasrist Viru-Nigula kirikuaias1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vasta mõisa park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:00, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malla mõisa tuuleveski varemed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks nice --Moroder 19:44, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malla mõisa tõllakuur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malla mõisa teenijatemaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:00, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battersea Park railway station MMB 24 377XXX 377445 377453 455806.jpg[edit]

Hi, you asked that I remove some CA from this image (QI, 20th september). I have done so. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:54, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vasta mõisa koertemaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:02, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ratasrist Viru-Nigula kirikuaias2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunda tsemendivabriku pudelahi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunda tsemendivabriku Dietz-ahju korsten nr 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

QI promotor :)[edit]

	Yeah
	You are really promotor of QI idea for all these people play WLM this year ;) Przykuta → [edit] 17:30, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veltsi mõisa viinavabrik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very well. --Florstein 18:38, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andja mõisa tuuleveski varemed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! --Florstein 18:38, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veltsi mõisa kuivati.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Barras 20:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kultusekivi Konnakõrtsi kivi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice! --Moroder 20:22, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu raudteejaama ambulants.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:38, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

I'm sorry for going contrary to the policy of featured photos nominations.

I'll reduce the number i've submitted to 2. In fact, I don't know of that though. But i think ignorance isn't an excuse.

Thanks

--Nkansahrexford (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu raudteejaama tööliste elamu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 04:06, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu raudteejaama sepikoda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tartu Toomkiriku varemed 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:51, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tartu Raekoja plats 18 ja 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 19:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu raudteejaama meistri elamu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 19:39, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu raudteejaama veetorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu Maarja õigeusu kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --TommyG 19:48, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haapsalu raekoda 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:36, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Haapsalu kuursaal 2012-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haapsalu kuursaal 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heinamaa Rihkama külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 09:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saarde kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 20:01, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lodja postijaama peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments On the first glance this picture seems a bit strange, because it is an very-wide-angle panorama. But IMO the distortion is still OK, light and sharpness also. --DKrieger 23:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elamu Sindis Paide mnt 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elamu Sindis Paide mnt 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sindi raudteejaama peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:47, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Viljandi ordulinnuse varemed.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viljandi ordulinnuse varemed.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinna–Paldiski maantee Valkse külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 20:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lahepere laht ja Pakri poolsaar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:06, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuhala kirik lõunakülg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tori kirik2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ravila mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saku mõisa peahoone1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otepää kiriku kroonlühter 29 tulega.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 22:11, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linnamäe mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- MJJR 21:05, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sõmerpalu mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Historisches Botanisches Institut München[edit]

Hi Iifar, thanks for your favorable vote in QIC for File:Historisches Botanisches Institut München qtl1.jpg. I'd like to inform you that I replaced the image by a new version with corrected colors and perspective. Best wishes, --Quartl (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heinamaa Laitse külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:03, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tori kirik1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Crop in the left is improvable and the flags are not straight (perspective correction needed?), otherwise very nice Poco a poco 18:32, 4 October 2012 (UTC). Fixed --Iifar 05:22, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you fixed a picture, but not this one Poco a poco 22:40, 6 October 2012 (UTC). Silly me! Hope it's ok now. --Iifar 13:39, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, now I can see the result :) QI --Poco a poco 17:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tartu Raekoja plats 6, 8 ja 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Mattbuck 12:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haapsalu linnuse varemed1.jpg[edit]

I'm close to supporting this excellent image. However, I'm troubled by the apparent slope of the buildings. The verticals are all perfect. The horizontals less so. Any cylindrical projection is going to show some problem with horizontals but could the vertical midpoint of the projection be adjusted to minimise such distortion (if that is indeed what it is) on the central buildings? In Hugin Quick Preview, if you hold down shift as you drag the image up/down in the projection, that will constrain adjustment to the vertical axis and let you experiment with the effect (press Undo if you don't like any change). Colin (talk) 19:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm wondering if that suggestion will just screw up the vertials. I'm no expert but here's whats worked for me. I use vertical control points where possible on most of the picture elements provided the structure really is vertical. I rarely use horizontal control points. These need to be used, if needed at all, on something that really is both horizontal and perpendicular to the camera. I also find the choice of anchor image can be a factor. For example,[:File:King's Cross Western Concourse - central position - 2012-05-02.75.jpg]] is a straightforward cylindrical projection. I chose as the anchor image one that was both central horizontally but also where I'd held the camera level. I used many vertical control points but only horizontal points on the very middle and central horizontal surfances in the image (because ones further away are curved). Colin (talk) 07:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munalaskme–Laitse tee Kaasiku külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:31, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila–Ääsmäe tee Tuula külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leevaku tellisevabriku korsten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:31, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa viinavabrik2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 18:39, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa auruveski katlamajaga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:07, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ääsmäe-Haapsalu mnt Kabila külas2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Rjcastillo 20:45, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa tall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 23:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa viinavabrik1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 23:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa tall-tõllakuur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 20:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa puutöökoda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 18:05, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Escorial facade Espagne edit.jpg in QIC[edit]

Hello my dear (and watchful) friend from Estonia !

Don't you like the spanish sun ? :)

By magnifying at 400%, I've understood where you saw color banding.

I've tried to reduce this by less contrast in the sky, it is not perfect.

I've made some corrections around the vane in foreground, but I don't see what I could do for the vane in background, I've corrected a bit all around the roof.

I hope it is better but now, there is nothing more I could do in order to improve again this picture, I'm sorry. So it will stay as it is.

Anyway, I thank you very much for your useful reviews, even if it made me work very hard !!

Kind regards from Paris, friendly, --Jebulon (talk) 23:44, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa tööriistakuur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa viinakelder-elamu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 18:50, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa meierei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa peahoone3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taali mõisa peahoone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 22:10, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neeruti Tagajärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Bgag 19:38, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa peahoone1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 19:38, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 19:10, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiidjärve vesiveski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pikajärve mõisa park (Johannishofi allikas).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 10:03, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neeruti Eesjärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 19:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jõepere mõisa viinavabriku varemed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and nice. --Selbymay 07:14, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaanimõisa ait-kuivati.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 19:50, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tapa Ristija Johannese õigeusu kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:44, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vahakulmu paisjärv (Valgejõgi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quallity. --Vizu 18:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jõepere-Vahakulmu tee Vahakulmu külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:52, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ääsmäe-Haapsalu mnt Kabila külas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 03:03, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooste mõisa piirdemüürid väravate ja kellatorniga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:05, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viljandi raudteejaama depoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aegviidu Siniallikad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Rjcastillo 19:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lehtse jaama elamu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice quality picture, clear, detailed and nice colours.--Danesman1 17:27, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nelijärve Nikerjärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maardu mõisa peahoone1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jägala–Käravete maantee Aegviidus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Prenn 08:45, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saha kabel1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Question Isn't it tilted? Poco a poco 02:55, 16 October 2012 (UTC). Comment Nope, perspective/tilt is already corrected. --Iifar 05:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I will rely in your statement Poco a poco 02:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harku järv 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not bad, perhaps a bit too much of the sky. - A.Savin 18:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nelijärve Vahejärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Clarkcj12 02:17, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kostivere mõisa kelder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 18:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rebala kalmeväli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kostivere mõisa peahoone1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality... but please expand the file description. --Cayambe 17:45, 18 October 2012 (UTC) Done and Thank you. --Iifar 18:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kostivere mõisa sild.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiidjärve mõisa ait-kuivati.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --PierreSelim 06:45, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harku mõisajärv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --Rjcastillo 18:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jüri kirik 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jõelähtme kirikuaed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 18:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valkla mõisa tall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 20:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuusalu kirik 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --JLPC 00:03, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiiu tornlinnus 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --JLPC 21:18, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jõelähtme kirik2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:48, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jõelähtme postijaama peahoone 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:50, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jõelähtme kirik1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 19:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albaicin 2012 San Nicolas Sacromonte.jpg in FPC[edit]

Hello Iifar.

I've just noticed your annotations, and now the issues are corrected.

Would you please have another look please?

Thanks for the first check, and thanks in advance for you next review !--Jebulon (talk) 12:21, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harju-Jaani kirik1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taagepera mõisa kutsarimaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --JLPC 22:21, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taagepera mõisa piirdemüürid väravaehitistega.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 20:27, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vapp tammepuidust uksel (Benkendorfi kabel).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for QI--Jebulon 16:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Neeruti Tagajärv.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neeruti Tagajärv.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:10, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karksi kirik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:51, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Õisu mõisa valitsejamaja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:15, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]