User talk:Iesmgb2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Iesmgb2!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


Pay attention to copyright
File:Entroido_en_Verín,_Galiza.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excelente labor[edit]

Excelente labor o que estás a facer. Grazas. Con todo, hai un pequecho problema. Observei que creaches unha categoría en galego cando as categorías hai que crealas en inglés. Eu, persoalmente non o considero moi relevante. Vou mirar como debería denominarse esa categoría (por se existe noutras linguas e para manter o mesmo esquema). Un cordial saúdo--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 17:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot (talk) 03:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Iesmgb2!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:CGAC, Santiago de Compostela.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 12:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added a comment on this DR. --GaAs11671 10:08, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Tomeza, Pontevedra-Lavadoiro,jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 12:59, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Category:People of Pontevedra[edit]

Ola. En realidade, as categorías sobre Galicia en Commons son habitualmente caóticas. Están creadas en inglés, galego, castelán,... e con frecuencia se solapan, ou hai moitas ramificacións onde non fai falta, e logo, onde sí sería necesario, van todas a granel nunha categoría demasiado xenérica. Neste caso, anque si é certo que a categoría, en puridade, se referiría só a xente do Concello de Pontevedra, na práctica emprégase para conter as de xente de toda a provincia. Por min, pódese deixar coma o puxestes ti, e co tempo ir creando novas categorías. Saúdos. --Iago Conversation 11:47, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes duplicadas[edit]

Hola, espero que no te importe que me comunique contigo en castellano. Acabo de ver que has subido algunas imágenes de la gastronomía gallega que ya se habían alojado en Commons (A vergoña do galego.jpg, File:Tarta de Santiago 2.jpg). Antes de subir cualquier otra, sería deseable que antes comprobaras siempre, navegando por las categorías, si esa imagen ya existe. Si la imagen ya está en Commons, el software da una advertencia de subido de imagen duplicada, y no se tiene que ignorar; pero puede ser que no salte esa alarma, por ejemplo con Tarta de Santiago- jlastras.jpg (que estaba recortada), o si la imagen se ha retocado de otra manera (por ejemplo al eliminar una de las marcas de agua de las fotografías de juantiagues). Confío en que tengas todo esto en cuenta de aquí en adelante, un saludo cordial. Lobo (howl?) 16:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Gracias por el aviso. No dudes en contactar conmigo para cualquier tipo de colaboración.
Adelanto que no duplico imágenes por gusto. Lo que si aseguro es que no puedo reparar en las categorías de Commons, pues ayer pude subir casi (por no exagerar) 100 imágenes de Flickr. Si el bot de subida no me avisa de que las imágenes fueron subidas, no lo sabré; aunque me avise, me puedo despistar.
Personalmente considero que que ocurra esa circunstancia de repetir imágenes en un 2% o 4% de las imágenes que subo es un problema menor, pero es discutible.
El caso es que he creado junto a otros usuarios un grupo en Flickr de propaganda de las Wikipedias (en concreto de la gallega) y de Commons (http://www.flickr.com/groups/galiza_dominio_publico/). El día a día, pues a veces tengo 20 imágenes pendientes de subir, me impide pararme a mirar detenidamente. Una de dos, o miro detenidamente y dejo de hacer lo que estoy haciendo; o hago las cosas tal y como las hago.
Yo ya he decidido. Pienso seguir igual. Pienso intentar seguir no cometiendo errores, pero no pienso mirar en categorías: Me resulta imposible subir casi 100 imágenes en un sólo día y mirar si existen. O el bot me lo dice (y me puedo despistar) o se repiten
Un abrazo--Iesmgb2 (talk) 20:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Error de subida?[edit]

Galego: Ola lesmgb2. Parece que con File:San Xose de Chandebrito, lateral.jpg, procedente de [1], houbo algún problema. A imaxe non se mostra. Sabes ti o que pasou e como se soluciona? Non cho digo para que o arranxes ti, senón para aprender eu a facelo. Grazas

--HombreDHojalata (talk) 19:10, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xa está. Non sei por que ocorre que ás veces non se sobe a imaxe. Normalmente eu fago unha subida manual co mesmo nome. Xa o fixen. Podes velo en File:San Xose de Chandebrito, lateral.jpg. --Iesmgb2 (talk) 20:22, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Chuches in Nigrán has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saúdos--HombreDHojalata (talk) 11:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Muito obrigado pola corrección, o aviso e todo o traballo que pasaches. Se me deses un aviso previo xa o faría eu. Marquei a páxina para borrado rápido, tal e como se acostuma a facer co engadido de {{Bad name|Churches in Nigrán}}. Apertas--Iesmgb2 (talk) 11:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concello de Oza dos Ríos ou concello de Cesuras?[edit]

Ola, que tal?

Hai unhas imaxes nomeadas "Mandaio - Oza dos Ríos..." na category:Oza dos Ríos, mais, segundo a Galipedia, Mandaio non está en Oza dos Ríos senón en Cesuras.

Saberías ti aclaralo?

Moitas grazas--HombreDHojalata (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Uf. A toponimia de Galiza éche o demo. Ultimamente estou a colocar as fotos de Mandaio en Cesuras polo Nomenclator da Xunta, pero teño un amigo que vive alí e teño estado mil veces na súa casa, que considera que vive en Oza dos Ríos e en Mandaio. Nun comezo, cando comecei a subir fotos de alí, aceptei a súa palabra, despois, máis tarde, reparei no Nomenclator. Sexa como sexa, decidín, como é normal, seguir o Nomenclátor. Vou agora mesmo a buscalas e mirar de amañar o problema. Grazas polo aviso--Iesmgb2 (talk) 16:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mi ma! Case tódalas fotos son de Mandaio e case todas teñen o nome incorrecto. Non lembro a orde para solicitar o cambio de nome porque é un procedemento novo. Vou cambiar a categoría e, cando teña tempo, procurar o cambio de nome da imaxe. Apertas--Iesmgb2 (talk) 16:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Problema con categorías[edit]

Hola, no recuerdo haber categorizado mal a las iglesias de Pontevedra, aunque quizá fue un error por mi parte. Desde luego, estoy de acuerdo contigo, ya que es la estructura lógica y qye corresponde, y de hecho la aplico en Commons. No hay conflicto: Category:Churches in Pontevedra ha de estar dentro de Category:Churches in the province of Pontevedra, y así en todos los casos. Saludos Zarateman (talk) 15:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, espera, veo que aquí tenemos una desviación de la convención, al figurar la Category:Churches in Pontevedra (city); Habría que mover este nombre a Category:Churches in Pontevedra, ya que se da por sentado que Pontevedra a secas es la capital de provincia. Zarateman (talk) 15:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Me percato del matiz de Pontevedra (city), y tienes razón. Entonces, esa denominación de categoría hay que mantenerla. Zarateman (talk) 15:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Como andamos?

Temos un problemiña. Metiches fotos nesa categoría, pero alguén estivo facendo modificación e agora iso implica o Gondomar de Portugal, non o Gondomar de Pontevedra.

De momento movín as fotos cara outra categoría existente: Category:Gondomar (Galicia), e non sei como mellorar o tema.

Que pensas?--HombreDHojalata (talk) 17:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Avilés de Taramancos. Foto da AELG.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Elisardojm (talk) 00:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Luz Pozo Garza. Imaxe da AELG.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Elisardojm (talk) 00:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos da AELG[edit]

Boas, solicitei o borrado das dúas fotos da AELG de enriba porque na web desa asociación pon que só se liberan as fotos dos fotógrafos Eduardo Castro Bal e Santos-Díez, e esas non son deles polo tanto penso que non poden estar en Commons. Espero non ter metido o zoco, un saúdo, --Elisardojm (talk) 00:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Darío Xohan Cabana 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Elisardojm (talk) 22:35, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galeon rias bajas Moaña.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

87.216.155.59 02:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel García Barros 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 14:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Comisión festas Cabo de Cruz 2010 (Boiro).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisardojm (talk) 23:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]