User talk:Hladnikm/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Copyright status: File:Delavke v tovarni Iskra Lipnica.jpg
Copyright status: File:Delavke v tovarni Iskra Lipnica.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Delavke v tovarni Iskra Lipnica.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Didym (talk) 12:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Antonija Mihelic Dingolfing.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Antonija Mihelic Dingolfing.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Antonija Mihelic Dingolfing.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
JuTa 05:15, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Ju, please check my argumentation two chapters above User talk:Hladnikm#Copyright status: File:Antonija Mihelic Dingolfing.jpg. In addition: photos for personal documents per definitionem musn't include originality: if they do, they are not accepted by the authorities. Just try. So they are not original works and don't apply to the copyright. Considering the situation in 1942 or 1943 when the photo has been taken: even if the photographer was an inmate artist and has survived the imprisonment, the purpuse of his photographing thousands of forced laboureurs wasn't artistic at all. --Hladnikm (talk) 06:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- A Photo does not need to be artistic to be copyrightable. --JuTa 10:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, but it should have contained "originality", which here is not the case. --Hladnikm (talk) 11:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Delavke v tovarni Iskra Lipnica.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Delavke v tovarni Iskra Lipnica.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Delavke v tovarni Iskra Lipnica.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
JuTa 10:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Delavke v tovarni Iskra Lipnica 02.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Delavke v tovarni Iskra Lipnica 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Delavke v tovarni Iskra Lipnica 02.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
JuTa 10:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Pretnar grafomanije 03.jpg
Copyright status: File:Pretnar grafomanije 03.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Pretnar grafomanije 03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 09.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 02.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 10.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 01.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 11.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 05.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 12.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 04.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 13.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 07.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 14.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 08.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 15.jpg
- File:Pretnar grafomanije 06.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 00:24, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Protivladni protest v Ljubljani 4. februarja 2022 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 02:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Jana S. Rošker 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Roskerj (talk) 06:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
File:Partizanska pot na Vodiško planino.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 15:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Kot žrtve ste padli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 15:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Slovenski partizanski spomeniki na Geopediji.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 16:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Kozjak geopedija2.jpg
- File:Lipnica Geopedia 02.jpg
- File:Lipnica Geopedia 03.jpg
- File:Lipnica Geopedia 04.jpg
- File:Lipnica Geopedia 1.jpg
- File:Slovenski partizanski spomeniki na Geopediji.jpg
- File:Spomenik 18 ustreljenim partizanom, Šmartno v Tuhinju.jpg
- File:Zemljevid Otočca in Struge.jpg
- File:Zračni posnetek Otočca in Struge.jpg
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 16:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Aleš Primc, glas za otroke in družine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Partizanski spomenik na Jamniku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 14:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Spomenik požganemu Jamniku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 14:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 14:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Spomenik NOB na Erzelju.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 14:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Spomenik 39 padlim partizanom nad Ločico 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 14:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Predvolilni napisi 2. aprila 2022 10.jpg
- File:Predvolilni napisi 2. aprila 2022 11.jpg
- File:Predvolilni napisi 2. aprila 2022 12.jpg
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 19:03, 15 May 2023 (UTC)