User talk:Hemmers

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hemmers!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:National Rifle Association of Australia Logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Εὐθυμένης (talk) 10:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Shooting Australia Logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Εὐθυμένης (talk) 10:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Andrew St George Tucker.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exhibition Hut, National Shooting Centre 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quite noticable CAs and IMHO you can brighten a bit the shadows. Fixable. --C messier 09:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Recompiled a new HDR with less CA, brighter highlights --Hemmers 12:28, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment There is no reason to move this to CR because there is no vote, just a review. You need at least one positive or negative vote and someone disagreeing to move an image to CR. I reverted this to "Nomination". Please discuss here. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 13:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr LP2 (right hand side).tif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. While TIF files are allowed, they are way bigger than necessary, I'd prefer a high-quality (like 99 %) JPG. --Plozessor 04:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr LP10 (breech right hand side).tif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Why a multi page TIFF? I fail to see the purpose. --MB-one 15:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TIFF because having gone to the effort of taking studio photos, I wasn't going to lossy compress them! However yes, the Capture One recipe embedded a thumbnail in as a second page. Didn't even realise it was doing that. I've uploaded a thumbnail-free version. Not that it affects the question of QI! --Hemmers 21:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support An isufficient file format (like multi page TIFF for a single image) absolutely affects the question of QI. But now it's good --MB-one 14:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 12:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr LP2 (left hand side).tif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 16:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]