User talk:Harrypotter

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Harrypotter!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

Re:Situationist Internationale

[edit]

Where are you getting that from? J Milburn (talk) 21:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you can actually provide some evidence, the images are gonna end up deleted anyways... J Milburn (talk) 10:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I am getting that from the published position of the Situationist International. Please take the trouble to check it out the evidence is in their publications. The evidence is in what they have repeatedly published. In fact it is printed in their material. The evidence is there. Why don't you get a copy of the referenced Journal where it precisely says what I say. It doesn't just say it one issue. No! it says it repeatedly. i.e. again and again. Not just in issue 1, or just issue 1 & 2. But also 3, 4 and 5. Look at issue 6 its says it again. It is repeated in each issue. The evidence is there. 7, 8, 9 and 10. And please don't doubt that it is said also issues 11 and 12. As for the other issues, these were never produced, so you will excuse them not putting in those issues BECAUSE THEY DO NOT EXIST and therefore the inclusion would be irrelevant as there is nothing to reproduce. Each time the same provision is made on teh inside cover. There, that's your evidence. How much evidence do you need?Harrypotter (talk) 13:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]