User talk:Harmonia Amanda/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

a beautiful star for a star in spite of her

Bonsoir! J'ai juste corrigé ton blason maintenant c'est vraiment entrelacé! Otourly (talk) 19:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Autre chose: En français j'ai toujours entendu parlé de Rosace que de Rose quel est la différence s'il y en a une? Otourly (talk) 20:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Belles photos d'églises

Et merci pour les contributions qui valent la catégorisation! Man vyi (talk) 15:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Changes aux peintures

Salut!

Si tu n'a pas vu encore, j'ai essaié d'améliorer les peintures de l'église saint Merri. Si tu n'aimes pas les changes, tu les peux reculer simplement. --chris 17:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

J'ai vu ma discussion propre trop tard :) J'ai repondu là.--chris

Nice images

Hi. You have uploaded a lot of nice images under the license {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}}. Would you be willing to change that to {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}} (adding 3.0)? --MGA73 (talk) 07:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Salut, en gros dans commonist tu dois changer dans le fichier "licences.txt" {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} en {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}; il me semble que tu peux mêne être plus radicale en faisant comme moi: {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} (toutes les versions) pour ce faire, tu peux demander conseil à Okki. Otourly (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Harmonia Amanda. You have new messages at MGA73's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Last question. Otourly suggested that you changes to ...cc-by-sa-all instead og ...cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0. The difference is that "all" will include 3.5, 4.0 etc. if and when new wersions will be made. Before I make my bot change the images I would like to be sure that I change it to whatever you prefer. Thanks again. --MGA73 (talk) 18:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
My bot should now has changed the license. Thank you! --MGA73 (talk) 04:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

opération horloges astronomiques

Bonjour, l'opération s'est déroulée comme prévue. Category:Astronomical_clocks_by_country Otourly (talk) 11:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Harmonia Amanda!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 14:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Pozdrav

Dobrý den, máte úžasné fotografie. Prosím, ty vitráže ze Chartres s detailem rozet z oken ve vysokém chóru - Simon z Montfortu, Amaury z Montfortu, Ludvík VIII., Filip Hurepel, Tibault IV. a dalších máte? Přeji krásný den a spoustu dalších nádherných fotografií..:) --Acoma (talk) 20:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello, you have amazing photos. Please, the stained glass of Chartres with rosettes detail of the windows in the high choir - Simon de Montfort, Amaury de Montfort, Louis VIII., Filip Hurepel, Tibault IV. and others have? Have a lovely day and many other beautiful pictures ..:)--Acoma (talk) 17:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
And I ask where are you? France is a beautiful country, very happy where I ride.:)--Acoma (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I live in Prague.:)--Acoma (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Réutilisations d'images

J'ai omis les pages sur l'hôtel de ville, mais je peux les ajouter [1]

En plus des liens donnés hier. Otourly (talk) 20:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 17:46, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux099.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 17:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux101.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 17:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Je suis désolé, mais elle est ratée cette photo. Tu veux vraiment la garder ? --> {{Speedy delete}}. --GaAs11671 19:47, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Mais non ça ne m'amuse pas :( --GaAs11671 20:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


Atelier photo, le Retour

Bonjour,

l'atelier photo qui avait lieu ce week-end s'est suffisemment bien passé pour que l'on envisage d'en organiser d'autres éditions. Comme tu avais exprimé de l'intérêt sans pouvoir venir, je me permets de t'écrire en priorité pour te demander s'il y a des lieux ou des dates qui t'arrangeraient ou te sembleraient pertinents. Si tu as des idées, tu peux les soumettre sur User talk:Rama/atelier photo 2.

Merci et peut-être à un de ces jours ! Rama (talk) 09:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz042.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 20:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz072.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:28, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz037.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz070.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:30, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz047.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz046.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:32, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz076.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:33, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz069.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz068.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:35, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz045.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz044.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:37, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz043.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:37, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz040.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:38, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz038.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz034.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz033.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:40, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz029.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz027.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz023.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:44, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:44, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:48, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_saint-etienne_metz014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rh-67 (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux098.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 21:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:52, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux028.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux029.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux030.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux032.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux033.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux035.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux036.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 18:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux037.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:00, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux038.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:00, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux039.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux041.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux042.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux045.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:03, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux043.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:04, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux046.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:05, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux047.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux048.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:08, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Cathedrale_nd_chartres_vitraux049.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Idw/layout Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:15, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 19:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 09:37, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 09:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 09:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 09:39, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 09:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 09:42, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 22:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Elizabeth of Aragon or Elisabeth of Hungary?

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 04:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Elisabeth of Hungary

1 My English is bad.

2 Becose 'Patronne des Souers du Tiers Orde', I think she is Elisabeth of Hungary.

Is easy to confuse the two

It is easy to confuse the two. Both are secular Franciscan, both are Raiheu, both have the miracle of the roses ... I think others have also made this mess in the Wikimedia Commons. Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Wiki Loves Monuments... and you !

Merci de participer à Wiki Loves Monuments ! Puissent mille chatons te suivre !

Léna (talk) 14:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Mais le vidage dans le répertoire MH de ce qui ressemble à une pellicule foirée craint un tantinet... --Pline (talk) 11:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Je n'exige rien, mais comme, au fil du temps, comme le nombre de photos ratées du même sujet se multipliait (il y en a quand même une soixantaine), je me suis inquiété .... Puis ca fait un peu tache pour les contributeurs français dans le cadre d'une compétition amicale européenne. Par ailleurs la présence d'un grand nombre de photos non utilisables est un des facteurs qui contribue à rendre le contenu de Commons plus difficilement exploitable avec le temps.
« pellicule foirée », « Une soixantaine de photo ratée » ? Je me permets d’intervenir pour stopper ces remarques inappropriés.
@Pline : Je me permets d'être un peu franc mais : qui es-tu pour jugé et surtout qu’est-ce cela peut bien te faire ! (surtout que « l’exploitabilité » dépend de l'organisation du site et des catégories, pas de contenu). Chacun a le droit de participer comme il veut ; et comme le dit Pierre de Coubertin : l’important c’est de participer !
Personnellement, vu que j’ai checké chacune de ces photos, je dois dire que j’ai été impressionné par ces photos. D'accord, elles ne sont pas toutes techniquement parfaite mais quelle photo l’est ?
Et en dehors de la technique, les photos ne servent pas uniquement à illustrer les articles de Wikipédia, elles peuvent être utiliser sur les autres projets Wikimédia ainsi que sur certains wikis externes.
Cette photo File:PA00087655-Thoiry048.jpg est unique donc pertinente et utile sur Commons (en plus d'avoir une composition intéressante et de présenter une sacré difficulté lors de la prise !). Elle pourrait parfaitement convenir pour illustrer un portail (sur le château de Thoiry ou sur un autre sujet ; optiquement, il y aurait des choses encyclopédiques à dire sur le bokeh). Attention donc à ne pas juger trop rapidement une photo (et surtout pas uniquement sur son aspect technique). Surtout que la catégorie était quasiment vide avant ces imports.
Donc merci à toi Harmonia pour ta participation et pour tes photographies originales.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Une photo ok ; je suis intervenu lorsque j'ai vu la 30 ème itération ... --Pline (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

WI NID YA!

J'espère que tu reconsidéreras ta participation à WLMFr. N'écoute pas les gens aigris, les illustrations de commons servent aussi à Wikibook. Tu as des photos ratées, moi aussi ? Et si ça peut servir et ben tant mieux (un wikibook sur la technique photo par exemple). On a jamais assez de photos. Pour les rendre utilisable il faut les mettre dans les bonnes catégories et avec les bonnes descriptions surtout. Voilà, je suis un peu blasé de voir ce qu'on est capable de s'envoyer dans la gueule entre wikimédiens.

PierreSelim (talk) 14:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

J'abonde : les boules de voir le fiel de certains alors que tu y mets toute ta bonne volonté. Ta photo ne plait pas à Untel ? Tant pis pour lui. Fais toi plaisir : le concours porte aussi sur le côté joli de la photo. Courage ! Trizek here or on fr:wp 15:49, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


Wiki Loves Monuments!

[[:#switch:int:Lang]]

Template:WLM-thankyou-message

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Croquant (talk) 09:29, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Croquant (talk) 09:29, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Croquant (talk) 09:37, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ezarateesteban 14:18, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 15:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate GFreihalter (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Pimprenel (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 08:45, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 10:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 13:37, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 13:38, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 13:38, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 13:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 13:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 13:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 13:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 13:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 13:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 04:18, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 04:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 04:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Suppressions de photos

Bonjour,

Avant tout, merci pour les photos des édifices religieux. J'ai proposé la suppression des photos floues. Ce sont essentiellement des photos d'intérieur. Un petit conseil de photographe, si cela peut être utile: depuis plusieurs années, j'utilise un trépied photo pour l'intérieur car les bougés sont inévitables. Cela permet un meilleur cadrage, essentiel en photographie. Pourrais-tu éliminer ces photos floues avant le téléversement ? Bon courage pour la suite. Cordialement, Ralph Hammann (talk) 04:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 10:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 10:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 10:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 10:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 10:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 10:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 10:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 10:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Ralph Hammann (talk) 10:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Edelseider (talk) 11:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 12:53, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 12:56, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 13:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 13:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 13:39, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 13:39, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 13:40, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Parsifall (talk) 13:41, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Reinhardhauke (talk) 13:58, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Photo de Bernard Werber

Bonsoir, En effet, comme c’est le premier –et sans doute le seul– versement de photo de Michel Restany, il faudrait qu’il fasse parvenir en même temps que la photo une autorisation OTRS pour être certain qu’il ne s’agit pas d’un copycvio de quelqu'un qui aurait simplement copié la photo sur le web comme cela arrive tous les jours.

Je te conseille de contacter User talk:Yann qui est le sysop qui, à ma demande, à supprimé l’image et lui expliquer tout ça. Il pourra sans doute te guider sur la manière de procéder. Cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 22:41, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour,
J'ai restauré le fichier. Il faudrait envoyer une permission d'ici une semaine. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 03:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 20:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

D'accord et merci ! --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

hop

ce sera plus facile comme ça ^^


El pitareio ([[User talk:El pitareio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:22, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Stefan2 ([[User talk:Stefan2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate AFBorchert ([[User talk:AFBorchert|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Sitacuisses ([[User talk:Sitacuisses|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:45, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:45, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Good day! This photo shows Sergey Dudakov. You are confused. Daniel, on the original photo, sits to Anna's left. Expose the file to rename, please. The application from you, as from the author, will be considered faster. Thanks for your input. If you have questions about the photo, please contact. --Luu ([[User talk:Luu|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:42, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! Template:Ping. I was cropping both Sergei Dudakov and Daniil Gleichengauz in your picture and I made an error while naming. You caught it just before me. I corrected all the other wrong uses I made and will ask for renaming. --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:56, 30 December 2018 (UTC) (Edit: renaming asked)

Template:Autotranslate Ies ([[User talk:Ies|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Bob Ferguson

Any particular basis for this? He's an outdoorsy type, but no more so than tens of thousands of people around here, and a fine chess-player, but we don't usually consider that a sport in this sense. - Jmabel ! talk 15:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Well, I'm adding the category to all people who have both an occupation subclass of "sportspeople" and the property "country for sport" with the value "United States" on Wikidata. I do believe that chess players are considered sportspeople, yes? Since chess is a sport in multisports events... --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be a lot more useful to add some sort of category about him being a chess player (there are no such parent categories for him right now) than this, to my mind somewhat misleading, category? - Jmabel ! talk 19:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Şebnem Kimyacıoğlu

Hi. Please read Category talk:Şebnem Kimyacıoğlu and tell me there if you have any objections. You made a bold move, I reverted it, added info and arguments. I hope this is enough. I also added a "Women of the United States" cat to her page. Cheers. --E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

int:wikilove-barnstar-kindness-title
Thank you for helping out with the categorization. Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

WD

Hi, could such categories not automatically added by the Template:Tl? --Arnd ([[User talk:Aschroet|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:59, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Possibly but not easily (you would need to query either "category for people born this place", or make a category intersection to have the category of the city, then the correct subcategory. And you would still miss people who on Wikidata are born in a specific hospital or neighbourhood, which is in the city but won't have it's own category (and you can also query that in SPARQL, but not in an infobox). It's really not easily done with a template, there are too many different cases to query everything without timeout or problems. --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:03, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
To be more clear, the infobox could deal with the most straightforward cases, but these may be something like 20/30% of the people. --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Use of WD

Hello. I understand you make mass edits, something with which I'm not familiar. (I edit with two fingers, sometimes all night. :) I corrected a couple of (there are many more) edits about Turks from Germany. Playing in FC Leverkusen does not make someone German nor playing in Istanbulspor SK makes a person Turk. I know you work also in WD so please help clean up things about Turks who may have been born in Germany (and may also have double nationality) but have chosen Turkey as their "national team". That one is the "first" (or only, sometimes) nationality they have. If there are categories about "Women's football players by team -Leverkusen" of course she/they can appear there. As long as they do not play for the German National Team, they cannot appear as "sportspeople from Germany". I have no objection to add to their WD data their German nationality if these people have it. They can appear as "Women of Germany by name" also, but not "Sportspeople from Germany" as long as they do not play for "Germany". (Leverkusen is only a "club" and may have players from all around the world.) Regards. --E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping I understand perfectly and I agree with you. But the thing is, I didn't add the information based on what nationality they have but what country for sport they have on Wikidata. So either revert me so that I can get a notification and correct things on Wikidata, or correct Wikidata yourself. Some years ago, some users added country for sport based on sports clubs; most of it has been cleaned since but obviously not all. So if you see me make this kind of mistake, it's coming from Wikidata and at least one Wikipedia and both should also be corrected (either by me if you ping me, or by you). Thank you! --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Places of birth

Fırın sütlaç from Turkey

Thanks for the great work! - Jmabel ! talk 15:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Yessir! I agree with you. Some dessert for Amanda. --E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:54, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Birth and death categories

I saw that you've been adding these recently through QuickCategories. It's probably simpler to just include them through Template:Tl, so I've added the functionality in Template:Tl. Can you try that and see if it works as you would expect it to, please? Thanks. Mike Peel ([[User talk:Mike Peel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

It would probably help if you said to me exactly what you added. The infobox doesn't add red categories when the category doesn't exist on Commons like it does for names (probably a good idea given the amount of disambiguation needed and potential errors), it doesn't work when someone is born in a neighborhood of a city (doesn't handle the subdivisions?), don't even seems to work on some more straightforward cases? I know Wikidata is still missing way too many P1464, are you using that property? --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:47, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
From what I understand of this you are using the English label? (I may be completely wrong about that, but I don't see P1464 in here), and the English label is usually added from the English Wikipedia, who made some very different choices than Commons concerning disambiguation and so would not work correctly for many locations (in addition, categories with an English sitelink have a "Category:Born in" instead of "Births in"…). Can you explain to me what you did exactly? Template:Ping --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Ok, it's worse than I thought, it does add red links based on the English label, so doesn't spot the correctly linked, existing category Category:Births in Bergen, Norway, trying to add an non-existing Category:Births in Bergen. Presumably it won't care about all other disambiguations since by nature Wikidata labels won't have that disambiguation, and so add in the same category people born in Glendale, Ohio and Glendale, California. If I'm right about what it does it's a very bad idea. --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:04, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. I'll leave this in the sandbox for now, and I'll have a think through these issues. Thanks. Mike Peel ([[User talk:Mike Peel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:59, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping, my first idea would be to search for the P1464 of the birthplace and see if it has a Commons sitelink. It certainly wouldn't add the categories everywhere since so much data is missing, but we would be sure that the data added that way would be correct. --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
That's similar to how we auto-include the award categories, so that should be feasible, but probably needs Template:Ping's help to do something similar to 'getAwardCat' in Module:WikidataIB. Thanks. Mike Peel ([[User talk:Mike Peel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:05, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate And also:

Yours sincerely, Castillo blanco ([[User talk:Castillo blanco|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:00, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ping Thank you, I must have deleted the line in Commonist without seeing it (it's the whole import of men at the JGPF which is missing [2]). Do you know a gadget/tool which could give me a warning when I forget this line? It would be useful to me to check at the end of the day that I didn't make any mistake. --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
I corrected all these but do I need to check all my other imports from the last few days? (I imported ~2000 pictures so that's a lot). I don't see "missing source" in the special pages, so I know some other tool must exist somewhere… --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:33, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Your other uploads should be fine. I found these files in this category and selected your uploads via the 'perform batch task' tool, so the list above should be complete. Castillo blanco ([[User talk:Castillo blanco|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! I didn't think about checking for a category! --Harmonia Amanda ([[User talk:Harmonia Amanda#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 13 August 2019 (UTC)