User talk:Hallel/4

File:Portugueselanguagedialects-Brazil.png

Hallel, gostaria de sugerir um pequeno ajuste nas linhas do mapa das zonas dialetais. A área de abrangência do sotaque nordestino adentra a Bahia: no norte e no centro do estado, a exemplo de Paulo Afonso, Canudos, Monte Santo e Chapada Diamantina, o dialeto nordestino é predominante. Por outro lado, a linha do sotaque baiano está avançando muito sobre Goiás e Tocantins, porém já no Oeste da Bahia (região que fez parte de Pernambuco até o século XIX e, quase desabitada em meados do século XX, foi colonizada por sulistas) o dialeto baiano se mostra muito tênue.--Juniorpetjua (talk) 16:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Formigas Humanas da Serra Pelada.jpg

File:Formigas Humanas da Serra Pelada.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gnom (talk) 10:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Brasil Estado Tapajos.PNG

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Brasil Estado Tapajos.PNG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Ixocactus (talk) 22:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Área do Rio São Francisco (proposta de unidade federativa)..png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Área do Rio São Francisco (proposta de unidade federativa)..png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Ixocactus (talk) 22:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Category:Wesleyan_Methodist_Church

Wesleyan Methodist Church has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)