User talk:Halibutt/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 1

File source is not properly indicated: File:C7P.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:C7P.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:C7P.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 16:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PBW June 1920.png[edit]

Am loving your maps. Are you sure Ukrainian(Petliura?)-controlled territory shouldn't be shown on this map? -Chumchum7 (talk) 07:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeżeli kolor terytorium Ukraińskiej Republiki Ludowej, który był sojusznikiem Polska? --Geliba (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Thommée Wiktor.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Thommée Wiktor.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Thommée Wiktor.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Filip em (talk) 12:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PB PLC CoA.png[edit]

File:PB PLC CoA.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JDavid (talk) 09:30, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Halibutt!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rzeczpospolita 1939.svg[edit]

Halibutt, do you have a version of this file without placenames on it? I'd like to use the file for location maps in Wikipedia articles, but location maps should not have any placenames shown on them.

File:Rzeczpospolita 1939.svg[edit]

- deleted -

File source is not properly indicated: File:Pocztowka portret sokola.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pocztowka portret sokola.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Pocztowka portret sokola.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--A.J. (talk) 06:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiprojekt:Fotografia[edit]

Właśnie powstał Wikiprojekt:Fotografia. Jeśli interesujesz się robieniem zdjęć i chcesz wspierać swoimi fotografiami Wikipedię, zapraszam do współpracy. :) -- CLI (talk) 14:44, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 21:30, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Armiya osvobozhdenya.jpg[edit]

File:Armiya osvobozhdenya.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:14, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Russian placenames on Poland maps[edit]

hello halibutt

your series of maps is a real great job but there are at least 2 mistakes on the russian territory (naturally, since these are maps of poland primarily) what is labeled volgograd is in truth voronezh (tzaritzyn/stalingrad/volgograd is in the south on the volga, as the name suggests) and what is labeled vyatka is the town of kirov (the real vyatka that was named kirov too when under soviet rule is far in the north urals)

these details aside, the maps are very much helpful, thank you for your work

best regards, k.f.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mapa hajnowka.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mapa hajnowka.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mapa hajnowka.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 14:43, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glownie.svg[edit]

File:Glownie.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.235.91.59 02:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 01:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edward Raczynski.jpg[edit]

File:Edward Raczynski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Someone not using his real name (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014[edit]

Вітаємо!

З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 20:13, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Juggler2005 (talk) 06:17, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Nkm wz38 FK.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nkm wz38 FK.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 20:54, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Cmentarzysko Jacwingow, Suwalszczyzna, Aug 2004 B.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cmentarzysko Jacwingow, Suwalszczyzna, Aug 2004 B.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 17:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

prośba o wyrażenie zgody[edit]

Szanowny użytkowniku,

zwracam się z serdeczną prośbą o wyrażenie zgody (przy zastosowaniu opisu bibliograficznego i podaniu linku, Twojego nicku ew. prawdziwych danych osobowych jeśli uznałbyś to za prawidłowe co do autorstwa zdjęcia grobu żołnierzy węgierskich w Raszynie). W najbliższym czasie ukaże się moja publikacja na temat pomocy Węgrów w Powstaniu i dlatego chciałabym umieścić Twoją fotografię w książce. Czytałam opis licencyjny pod fotografią i w 100% nie jestem pewna czy rzeczywiście fotografia podlega licencji pozwalającej na wykorzystanie zdjęcia również w wydawnictwie naukowym (czyli jednak jakkolwiek to brzmi-komercyjnym). Byłabym bardzo wdzięczna o możliwie szybką odpowiedź tu a najlepiej na e-mail: rexadmirabilis@gmail.com

Pozdrawiam, M.

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2015 в Україні. Увага! Опитування / Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Ukraine. Survey[edit]

Вітаємо!

8 липня 2015 року вийшов закон №122-ЗРК/2015 «Про внесення змін до Закону Республіки Крим ”Про об'єкти культурного спадку в Республіці Крим”», яким об'єкти культурної спадщини Криму було визнано такими, що підлягають державній охороні Російської Федерації. Спираючись на це, НП «Вікімедіа РУ» та спільнота російських учасників вікіпроектів цього року проводить щорічний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки» в Росії уже із Кримом у своїх конкурсних списках. Просимо висловитися щодо того, якою, на Вашу думку, має бути українська частина. Також Ви можете висловити Ваші ідеї щодо поліпшення конкурсу.Опитування за лінком / Survey is here.

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на Вікісховищі. 20:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Orda-Mir Castle.PNG[edit]

File:Orda-Mir Castle.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bogomolov.PL (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Inżynier-Gundlach-buduje2.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Inżynier-Gundlach-buduje2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Halibutt,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Deletion[edit]

Thanks for your message and apologies for deletion of wrong one. Also sorry to have put the people involved to any disruption. I have restored the image, please let me know if I can help any further. JarrahTree (talk) 01:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to check the text of the two images - and data - to make sure the correct image has the correct text and info, I think the dupilicate process or me - has fouled up the correct info somehow. You know the details, better for you to check Thanks JarrahTree (talk) 01:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You might be able to help - this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Malczewski_Polish_Hamlet.jpg seems the wrong way around as well - any thoughts? JarrahTree (talk) 05:35, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In relation to your comment - I think the process, sizing up the images to verify as duplicate is one thing, then the texts on the two - usually the smaller/derivative is a giveaway - perhaps fewer categories (if at all), and other tell tale signs.

However in the case of the two we know about - somehow a 'dupe' tagger (or the process itself has insufficient checks) gets it all back to front. Perhaps a guidelines for a more thorough investigation on the part of the admin/deleter is needed. I stand guilty of probably a few mistakes there, and am always prepared to be either slapped by the trout or asked to revert my own work. I also should stay away from languages I am yet to understand... I think simple deletes are one thing - maybe there is a need for a separate more complex delete to have extra criterion for checking... where the size and categories look similar but there are other factors that throw doubt as to one more than another being the appropriate item. JarrahTree (talk) 08:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK I get the message - I gonna steer clear of polish art works in the deletion caetgory! sorry to have caused problems JarrahTree (talk)

Oh well hope i undeleted the right one (see my edit history to check if need be) JarrahTree (talk) 10:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well here is to getting right the next time I venture into the depths of deletions... JarrahTree (talk) 10:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, Halibutt.

I've just seen that you created a logo for WikiWakacje based on the Wikivacaciones logo. If you wish, I can upload the original SVG file so you can modify it. That way, we can keep some consistency between logos.

By the way: Is WikiWakacje related to Wikivacaciones (is Wakacje = Vacations or something similar)? I'd like to know because it would be really nice to know that one of our group experiences is actually being replicated somewhere :)

Cheers! --Racso (talk) 04:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the contest had exactly the same concept. In fact, I though that you were replicating the idea, but now it's clear to me that it's simply a coincidence: we both arrived to the same conclusion with the same analysis. Anyway, if you (as a group) think (as I do) that it may be useful to somehow "unify" the contests (as WLM or WLE do), we may do it.
About the logo: yes, I saw your work, and it's really nice (and the svg is optimized, too). What I'm saying is related to the "unification" thing, as the logos aren't currently equal. They don't need to be equal, obviously, but I think it's better if they are.
Good luck with the contest! --Racso (talk) 03:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pattypan update[edit]

Hi, I see you've uploaded a few pictures with Pattypan that have the date formatted 11.09.15. Since the latest update, pattypan is suppose to recognize that this should be written 2015-09-11. Please update your Pattypan, thank you. --Vera (talk) 12:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiwakacje[edit]

Witaj Halibucie - witam Panie Krzysztofie - usiłowałam się dodzwonić przed chwilą pod wskazany w korespondencji telefon, ale rozumiem, że ta pora nie jest zbyt właściwa na poważne rozmowy ... więc próbuję standardowego sposobu kontaktu ... czyli pisanego :) . Myślę, że pisanie artykułu na temat konkursu "Wikiwakacje" adresowanego do wszystkich świętych jest całkiem dobrym pomysłem, ale cóż ja mogę mieć z nim wspólnego? Czyli w czym mogłabym pomóc? Zdjęciami swojego autorstwa zasilam już projekt Wikiwakacje, więc niby wydawać by się mogło, że wszystko co do mnie należy robię z pełnym zaangażowaniem. Cóż mogłabym więcej ... pozostając w zgodzie z regulaminem konkursu?

Oczywiście ... jestem do dyspozycji, jeśli w czymś mogę pomóc ... będzie mi bardzo miło. Serdecznie pozdrawiam.

--Jolanya Dyr (talk) 17:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Raw list[edit]

Hi,

I've started the REST API to get information about uploaders.

Currently, the rough raw list works: https://tools.wmflabs.org/category-by-uploaders/v1/who?project=commonswiki&category=Fire%20escapes%20in%20Paris

Use https://tools.wmflabs.org/category-by-uploaders/v1/who?project=commonswiki&category= and append the category name (replace spaces by %20, _ or +, or don't replace them and your browser will do).

API specification and sandbox: /who and /status works, I haven't implemented /contributorsAndFiles yet.

Next steps are to implement /contributorsAndFiles, then to design a nice view. --Dereckson (talk) 07:28, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rezygnuję z udziału w konkursie WikiWakacje[edit]

Dzień dobry Panu

podjęłam definitywną decyzję o odstąpieniu od udziału w konkursie Wikiwakacje w związku z czym wycofuję też wszystkie swoje fotografie przesłane do repetytorium w czasie, w którym uczestniczyłam w rywalizacji to znaczy od 15 lipca 2016 roku.Uprzejmie proszę o usunięcie narzędziami serwisowymi wszystkich moich plików przesłanych w tym czasie do zasobów repetytorium ... tym samym, zaprzestaję też dalszej współpracy z WIKI. Jeśli sprawiam swoim zachowaniem kłopot, to bardzo przepraszam ... jest to ostatni kłopot jaki sprawię Fundacji.

Bardzo proszę o powiadomienie mnie emailem na adres jolantadyr@gmail.com, że procedura usunięcia dostarczonych przeze mnie na konkurs fotograficzny Wikiwakacje została zakończona, za co będę bardzo wdzięczna.

Serdecznie dziękuję, pozdrawiam --Jolanta Dyr (talk) 12:11, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rzeczpospolita 1920.png[edit]

Twoja mapa zawierala drobne bledy. Poniewaz byla ona kopiowana z drobnymi zmianami przez roznych ludzi, bledy sie rozpowszechnily. Móglbys zajac sie ich usunieciem? Odsylam do File talk:Rzeczpospolita 1939 ES.svg --Mewa767 (talk) 15:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Occupation of Poland 1939.png[edit]

Kajam się - poprawiłem. Kolorystykę tego pliku dwukrotnie zmieniał Poeticbent, ja mogłem zamieścić tylko w kolorach "pierwotnych". Na stronach artów wyświetla się już prawidłowo (z poprawką), na stronie pliku jeszcze "cuduje". Serdeczności --lonio17 (talk) 09:07, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiesław Wojnowski[edit]

Hej Krzysztof, za pomocą kreatora załadowałem na commons fotografię profesora, podałem jednocześnie w danych pliku nazwisko fotografa. Sfotografowany profesor uwolnił prawa autorskie - czy skoro zlecił wykonanie tej fotografii (i za to swego czasu zapłacił), to czy mógł tak zrobić? Czy powinien użyć innej licencji, by uniknąć zastrzeżeń?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wieslaw_Wojnowski_Gdansk_University_of_Technology_2003.jpg

Mam też 2. pytanie: Chcę zamieścić fotografię profesora, który zmarł w 1976 r., powszechnie znana i używana jest jego fotografia paszportowa, którą można znaleźć m.in. tu: http://www.ipsb.nina.gov.pl/a/biografia/wlodzimierz-rodziewicz Jaką licencję mogę użyć i czy mogę np. nazwać "autor nieznany"? Fotografia zapewne została wykonana przed laty w jakimś zakładzie fotograficznym i zapewne i tamten fotografowany wyniósł za opłatą z zakładu negatyw i odbitki, stając się tym samym ich właścicielem.LukaszKatlewa (talk) 10:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki za błyskawiczną odp. A które licencje w tych dwu przypadkach uznałbyś za najodpowiedniejsze? A jeśli np. nie ma kontaktu z fotografującym? Dobrego dnia!LukaszKatlewa (talk) 10:55, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcie Joanny Cygler[edit]

Witaj, na prośbę mojej koleżanki z SGH wgrałem jej zdjęcie na Commons, a fotograf p. Wojciech Kurek przesłał zgodę OTRS. Ty 8 czerwca oznaczyłeś je the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for this file. Czy możesz mi proszę opisać, jaki jest dokładnie problem z przesłaną zgodą? Dziękuje. Boston9 (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nie zapominaj proszę, że to ja wgrałem te zdjęcie, widziałem także przesłaną od razu zgodę OTRS. Moim zdaniem jest całkowicie w porządku, bazując na moich 1500+ wgranych zdjęciach, do których taka zgoda była uprzednio wysyłana. Stąd chciałbym się dowiedzieć od Ciebie, dlaczego od 8 czerwca wciąż mam na koncie swoim koncie na Commons OTRS pending. Jeżeli zmieniły się zasady, chciałbym o tym wiedzieć. Dziękuję. Boston9 (talk) 19:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A więc zakwestionowałeś oświadczenie woli osoby człowieka, który poświęca dla nas swój czas i uwalnia majątkowe prawa autorskie, gdyż oceniłeś, że zostało wysłane z „niewłaściwego” adresu mailowego? Nie będę tego komentował. Adres mailowy p. Wojciecha na jego www jest zgodny z adresem, którego 6 czerwca została przesłana zgoda OTRS. Ponawiam zatem prośbę zatem o jej nadanie. Dziękuję. Boston9 (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Polish KPRM files[edit]

Krzysiek, Template:Polish KPRM files powinien mieć jakiś dowód potwierdzający ze Kancelaria Prezesa Rady Ministrów udostępnia pliki na wolnej licencji, i sprecyzowania na jakiej wolnej licencji. Moze jakiś link albo list do OTRS? Zostałem poproszony o pomoc z plikiem File:Maria Andrejczyk i Beata Szydło.JPG który został zakasowany ponieważ "Licencja" na flickr jest https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ co niestety nie jest licencja i nie jest uznawane na Commons. Moja pozycja w dyskusjach na ten temat zawsze była ze pliki z mark-1 przesłane na flicr przez właścicieli praw autorskich powinny być traktowane jako {{PD-author}} ale wygląda na to ze takie pliki są teraz kasowane. --Jarekt (talk) 01:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarekt: Sądzę, że {{PD-author}} nie wchodzi w tym przypadku w grę, a zdjęcia należałoby traktować jako materiały urzędowe (udostępnione jako informacja publiczna na podstawie przepisów o informacji publicznej) I nie podlegające w Polsce prawy autorskiemu w ramach {{PD-Poland}}. Dlatego KPRM nie może użyć innego szablonu licencji na Flickr.
Być może, należałoby oficjalnie zapytać KPRM o status prawnoautorski tych zdjęć, sugerując, że jest taki jak wyżej wskazałem. Kiedyś przerabialiśmy ten temat z Polimerkiem i Kancelarią Prezydenta RP w odniesieniu do przemówień. Rzecz w tym, że w trybie zapytania o informację publiczną, na takie pytanie muszą odpowiedzieć. Natomiast zadać je może tylko imiennie konkretna osoba (podając swoje pełne dane osobowe) lub instytucja (np. WMF lub WMPL). Najlepiej by było, gdyby pytanie zadał formalny właściciel serwisu (WMF); nie wiem, czy WMPL może je zadać w imieniu WMF. Ankry (talk) 18:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jarekt and Ankry: No to gadajmy w jednym miejscu, bo nam się wątek pogubi :) Dział prawny WMF ma pełne ręce roboty w tej chwili i kolejkę oczekujących jak stąd do wieczności, więc nie ma co. Ale też w ogóle nie musimy pytać przecież o Commons. Wystarczy spytać "czy dobrze rozumiem, że zdjęcia tu i tu są udostępnianie w trybie takim a takim" - i bardzo podziękować za to, że je udostępniają. Jeśli odpowiedź będzie twierdząca, to forward na OTRS i jazda. Jeśli będzie przecząca - to wtedy można się zastanawiać co dalej. Halibutt (talk) 19:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Tak jeśli ktoś by się zapytał czy można te pliki traktować jako CC-zero albo czy tez może podlegają art. 4 pkt 1 i 2 ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych (Dz. U. z 2017 r. poz. 880 z późn. zm.) (zobacz Template:PD-Polishsymbol/pl) i jeśli by ta odpowiedz była przesłana do OTRS to by sprawa była jasna. Także jeśli jest jakaś strona internetowa na serwerze KPRM która jest na temat praw autorskich to tez by było jasne. Nie jest ważne kto zada pytanie. W przeszłości podobne sprawy były zadawane przez Polimerka w imieniu WMPL. Także User:Boston9 kontaktował się z kancelaria Senatu (Template:Polish Senate partnership). --Jarekt (talk) 19:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jarekt: Raczej Art. 4.... Strona o prawach jest, ale nie wiem czy wystarczy: Korzystanie przez użytkowników z materiałów urzędowych opublikowanych w serwisie www.premier.gov.pl nie wymaga zgody Kancelarii Prezesa Rady Ministrów (KPRM) (podkreślenie moje). Nic nie piszą o materiałach w serwisie Flickr (jest tylko link do niego, więc można przyjąć, że jest to serwis oficjalny KPRM). @Halibutt: zerknij może na ticket:2014110810008636. Tam jest pismo z KPRP; może ci to wyjaśni czego można się spodziewać. Ankry (talk) 20:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Powązki: Adam Borowski[edit]

Tak, zgadza się, to jego grób. Dobrze, że poprawiłeś 1919 na 1918, dzięki. Julo (talk) 08:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:RM 70 MRL.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:RM 70 MRL.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:RM 70 MRL.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 05:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meta / commons[edit]

There appears to be minimal linking from meta to commons re the competition - even a minimal comment could have helped - rather than just delete with no comment - for thickheads like me who cannot always get what is going on (viz the talk we had some time back further up your talk page) JarrahTree (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

nah it seems jcb edits and response explains the issues JarrahTree (talk) 01:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects[edit]

Hi, please do not create cross namespace redirects. Jcb (talk) 23:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And why is that exactly? Halibutt (talk) 23:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Because we don't allow them. Jcb (talk) 23:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Redirect doesn't mention that. Is there any rule actually prohibiting it? Also, please be so kind as to respond on my talk page - or ping me the next time. Halibutt (talk) 01:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You should have responded at your talk page in de first place instead of here. I will mere the discussion. Jcb (talk) 08:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion, general reason 2. Jcb (talk) 08:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: , the reason states Page is an unused and implausible redirect. Neither is applicable here: the redirect is both used and plausible. Sure, the reason also states that cross-namespace redirects may also be deleted under this criterion. Which implies that it's not automatic: they may be deleted, but this is not obligatory. To me it is clear that it all depends on the context: whether the redirect makes sense or not. Anyway, it's clear that cross-namespace redirects are - contrary to what you wrote in the edit summary - not disallowed. They may be discouraged{{Fact}}, but the rule clearly doesn't prohibit them as such. Halibutt (talk) 09:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: to sum it up, you are free to nominate the page for deletion using ordinary means, but speedy deletion seems like a step too far in this context. Halibutt (talk) 09:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Halibutt/Archive_2&oldid=264727781"