User talk:Haagschebluf/Archive2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

archief 2015

Welkom op de overlegpagina van Haagschebluf.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Haagschebluf!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wapens van Gelre tot het einde van het ancien régime.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove problem tags

[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  日本語  עברית  +/−


Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

Natuur12 (talk) 21:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Natuur12, ik had geprobeerd een afbeelding te uploaden, maar de afbeelding zelf vergeten. Daarna probeerde ik het hele lemma te verwijderen. Ik zal nu een verzoek voor verwijderen doen. Verplichte informatie is hier niet aan de orde, denk ik. Haagschebluf (talk) 06:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Wapens van Gelre tot het einde van het ancien régime.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gouwenaar (talk) 12:08, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Haagschebluf, I've noticed that you reverted my last edit on this file. Can you please tell me, which rijksmonument is shown on this picture? It is a view from the "Steenen Tafel" (the rijksmonument corresponding to the monument id in the file description). Is there another rijksmonument? For the "Steenen Tafel": I added the category Category:De Steenen Tafel (Arnhem) to this image. This category is already categoriezed as a Category:Rijksmonumenten in Arnhem. If we leave this category at the file it is a case of COM:OVERCAT.

BTW: I guess the "Steenen Tafel" is a part of "Park Klarenbeek"? So we shoud add this category to Category:De Steenen Tafel (Arnhem). Am I right? Kind regards, Bardenoki (talk) 17:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kunt u uw vraag in het Nederlands stellen? Haagschebluf (talk) 17:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, sorry. If I would try I guess you would start laughing ;O). I could repeat it in German if this would be an alternative. Regards, Bardenoki (talk) 17:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Beste Bardenoki, Park Klarenbeek is geen beschermd monument. Het staat wel op de nominatie om de status van gemeentelijk monument te krijgen. De in het park gelegen watertoren en voormalige buitenschool met twee openlucht leskuilen zijn in 2000 geregistreerd als Rijksmonument. De arbeiderswijk die begin twintigste eeuw gerealiseerd is in het zuidwestelijke gedeelte van het oorspronkelijke park is in 2000 als complex Rijksmonument 'Beschermde Stads- en Dorpsgezichten' met 24 onderdelen geregistreerd.
Ik heb inmiddels alles wat met Rijksmonument te maken heeft weggehaald uit dit bestand.[File:Klarenbeek uitzicht vanaf de Stenen Tafel.jpg] Het uitzicht maakt geen deel uit van het beschermde monument. Haagschebluf (talk) 18:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the edit and thank you for your explanation. Additionally I added category Category:Park Klarenbeek Arnhem to Category:De Steenen Tafel (Arnhem) because I understood that the watertower is located in Park Klarenbeek. Kind regards, Bardenoki (talk) 18:32, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Beste Bardenoki, ik heb minder moeite met duits dan met engels. Dus bij voorkeur uw reactie in het duits. Haagschebluf (talk) 18:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, mache ich gerne. Ich denke, hier ist aber alles geklärt. Ich hatte bei der Kategorie Category:De Steenen Tafel (Arnhem) noch die Kategorie Category:Park Klarenbeek Arnhem ergänzt, da du oben in der Erklärung geschrieben hast, dass der Wasserturm ein Teil des "Park Klarenbeek" ist. Gruß, Bardenoki (talk) 19:32, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]