User talk:Haagschebluf/Archive2013

archief 2013

Copyright status: File:Dr. B.A. Vermaseren, Bernard Antoon (1912-1989).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dr. B.A. Vermaseren, Bernard Antoon (1912-1989).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 17:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Foucault.jpg

Hi Haagschebluf! We had to delete your picture of Foucault, because it seemed to be copy from this source and we accept images only with free license - see Commons:Licensing. And please, next time use this tool for upload and choose another, unique name, ok? :) Have a nice day, --Podzemnik (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

File:De katholiek in het openbare leven van deze tijd. 1954.jpg

File:De katholiek in het openbare leven van deze tijd. 1954.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Natuur12 (talk) 16:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Oorkonde van 21 juli 1229. Archief klooster Bethlehem..jpg

File:Oorkonde van 21 juli 1229. Archief klooster Bethlehem..jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

file:Detail kaart Gelderland en Kleef 1573.jpg

Beste, ik heb de licentie wat voor u aangepast omdat deze afbeelding zo oud is dat hij in het publieke domein valt. Zou u zo goed willen zijn de titel van het boek toe willen voegen waaruit u deze pagina gescand heeft voor de volledigheid? --Natuur12 (talk) 16:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Oke. Ik ben (nog) niet zo handig met dit soort zaken. Overigens zijn de foto's van Bethlehem allemaal oude foto's die ik al zo'n 30 tot 40 jaar heb. Haagschebluf.

File:Aantekening van 12 juli 1579 Klooster Bethlehem.jpg

File:Aantekening van 12 juli 1579 Klooster Bethlehem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 16:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Deze foto is in 1967 gepubliceerd en was te koop bij boekhandel Raadgeep in Doetinchem. Ik ben beslist niet de enige die het in bezit heeft, waarschijnlijk zwerven er wel enkele honderden. Het originele aantekenboekje is in het Geldersch Archief. Haagschebluf

Het probleem is hier dat het geen kunst is dus een twijfelgeval. Het kan vrij zijn vanwege de leeftijd van het manuscript maar het kan ook auteursrechten bevatten voor de fotograaf. Maar 1967 is natuurlijk even een handig detail om te vermelden. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

En ik heb het 40 jaar geleden gewoon gekocht. Wat mij beweegt om het nu op wiki te zetten, is dat het anders verloren gaat, dat het in de vergetelheid raakt. Ik vind het wel historische waarde hebben, en uit alles hier op wiki bemerk ik dat men niet zo gemakkelijk meer onderduikt in de archieven om iets boven water te krijgen. Haagschebluf.

Een foto is normaal pas rechtenvrij 70 jaar na het overlijden van de fotograaf of als de fotograaf onbekend is 70 jaar na publicatie. Nu is er hopelijk nog een redmiddel namelijk PD-Art tag maar het is niet helemaal duidelijk of een foto van een manuscript hier ook onder valt. Uw werk om dit soort werken te uploaden is lovenswaardig. Helaas gaat er wel meer verloren door auteursrechten die ik weet niet hoe lang blijven gelden. Hopelijk valt dit onder die kunst-licentie en kan het blijven. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Ik weet niet hoe boekhandel Raadgeep eraan gekomen is. Ze bestaan nog, dus ik zou het na kunnen vragen. Zij zullen ook op een of andere manier toestemming gekregen hebben. Overigens ben ik ervan overtuigd dat Raadgeep blij is met mijn artikel over Bethlehem. Zij onderstellen dat het pand, althans de plek van hun pand, dat het oorspronkelijke pand, een huis van Bethlehem was, dat de kloosterlingen daar in de Staatse tijd hun toevlucht gezocht hebben. Het zou wel heel jammer zijn als de afbeeldingen niet in het artikel mogen. Ze zijn naar mijn idee essentieel. Haagschebluf.

Dat zullen ze ongetwijfeld zijn want het is een leuk artikel. Maar als ze de rechthebbende zijn dan kunnen ze hun toestemming verlenen. Maar misschien valt dit ook wel onder kunst en is het stiekem toch vrij. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Ik heb nog eens oude krantenknipsels nagekeken. In 1967, waarschijnlijk oktober, heeft er in de Graafschapbode een artijkel gestaan waarin deze foto is afgedrukt. Haagschebluf

File:Oorkonde van 21 juli 1229. Archief klooster Bethlehem..jpg

File:Oorkonde van 21 juli 1229. Archief klooster Bethlehem..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Michel de certeau.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Michel de certeau.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:07, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:De stille kracht 1ste druk.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De stille kracht 1ste druk.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:13 c lvd 268676 2 THUMBNAIL.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:13 c lvd 268676 2 THUMBNAIL.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 19:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mieke Bal Zwarte Piet.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mieke Bal Zwarte Piet.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Mieke bal.jpg

File:Mieke bal.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

File source is not properly indicated: File:SK-A-4154 Johanna Henriette Engelen (1789-1878).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SK-A-4154 Johanna Henriette Engelen (1789-1878).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JurgenNL (talk) 11:16, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Kasteelbewoners jpg 994161c.jpg

File:Kasteelbewoners jpg 994161c.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

JurgenNL (talk) 11:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Willem 20130908-shakespear020.jpg

File:Willem 20130908-shakespear020.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

JurgenNL (talk) 11:21, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:S-K-A-4153 Daniel Francis Schas (1772-1848).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:S-K-A-4153 Daniel Francis Schas (1772-1848).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JurgenNL (talk) 11:21, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Stille kracht dvd.jpg

File:Stille kracht dvd.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

JurgenNL (talk) 11:26, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Juli 2011 800px-Rheden Rhederhof 32.JPG

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Juli 2011 800px-Rheden Rhederhof 32.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JurgenNL (talk) 11:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Miniatuur in het Plenarium van het klooster Bethlehem Doetinche.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Miniatuur in het Plenarium van het klooster Bethlehem Doetinche.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Miniatuur in het Plenarium van het klooster Bethlehem Doetinche.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JurgenNL (talk) 11:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ebghuizen defile 1925.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ebghuizen defile 1925.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ebghuizen defile 1925.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JurgenNL (talk) 11:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Ebghuizen defile 1925.jpg

File:Ebghuizen defile 1925.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:38, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Middeleeuwse Enghuizen Hummelo.jpg

File:Middeleeuwse Enghuizen Hummelo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

JurgenNL (talk) 11:41, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Atlas algemene en vaderlandse geschiedenis Vermaeseren 20ste druk.JPG

File:Atlas algemene en vaderlandse geschiedenis Vermaeseren 20ste druk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dqfn13 (talk) 12:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Atlas Vermaeseren 16de druk.JPG

File:Atlas Vermaeseren 16de druk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dqfn13 (talk) 12:40, 11 December 2013 (UTC)