User talk:Gyrostat/Archive1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gruinc!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Gyrostat!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Do music.png was uncategorized on 15 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

How to delete a file

Regarding your question: Please see COM:DEL#How to list deletion requests -- Common Good (talk) 19:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Unsinnige Bildverschiebungen

Hallo Unkundiger,

bevor du weitere unsinnige Bildverschiebung und/oder Umbennenungen von A319 in A320 startest und dies mit zwei Türen über der Tragfläche begründest: Warum schaust du nicht mal unter http://www.airfleets.net/ nach als welches Muster die Kennung registriert ist, bevor du solche Aktionen startest? Deine bisherigen "Umbenennungen"

• Angeblicher A320
• Angeblicher A320
• Angeblicher A320

waren alle(!) verkehrt. Es kostet viel Zeit und Mühe, deinen Fehler in allen Sprachen wieder umzubiegen. Bitte künftig etwas gründlicher Prüfen und Recherchieren. Gruß, -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 09:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello. I am sorry about that. I know that airfleets.net, and the other aircraft spotting website, says that G-EZAS is an A319, but I am SURE it's not. The Airbus A320 is the only jet of the Airbus A320 family to have two emergency exit above the wing. IT IS THE ONLY ONE. Anyway, the Airbus A319 has only one emergency exit. I am sorry and I'll try to correct the links on the wikis. Best regards, Gyrostat (talk) 16:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC) I don't speak german.

PS: For example, this jet is an A319-100 (write on), and if you look closer, you can see only one emergency exit above the wing. I think Airbus doesn't built special jet for easyJet, their A319 are the same that the Lufthansa one's.

Sorry for writing in German. I was sure, you were German. Answering your statement, "it's the only one": I can find no proof, that the A320 is the only Airbus (from the A320-family) having two emergency exits. However, I found a document from EasyJet (unfortunately only in German) that EasyJet only operates A319 (see here). This piece information is also stated in the article. Btw: you do not need to copy this discussion to my page. In accordance with the convention I am watching this page. Regards, -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 19:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

PS: On this page, at the end of the first paragraph it is stated that "their fleet is equipped with two additional emergency exits". Here is stated, that the second exit is required by law in order to carry more pax. I hope this solves your confusion. -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 20:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

They are no problem for writing in German (because google translation exists ). I don't already watch your sources, but someone sent me a document who confirm's me that the A319 of easyJet is equipped with two additional emergency exits. I didn't know, and I am sorry (for me, an Airbus with two emergency exits above the wing was necessarily an A320...) Gyrostat (talk) 08:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

No problem. -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 09:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bandeau wikinews2.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bandeau wikinews2.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

_→AzaToth 17:51, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I am sorry for that, I hope the correction is good. I used the logo of Wikinews, and we want to use this file for Wikinews so I hope it's OK ;) Gyrostat (talk) 18:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Gyrostat, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Logo Wikinews sport

Bonjour. le logo File:WN-Sport3.png est dérivé de File:Sport3 icone.svg, dessiné par moi-même sous licences CC-BY-SA et GFDL. Il est normalement nécessaire d'adopter pour un travail dérivé une de ces licences. Je vous demande donc de bien vouloir modifier le copyright Wikimedia Fondation (c) en la licence libre de votre choix. --Barbetorte (talk) 13:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Barbetorte, cette demande n'est malheureusement pas possible : Gyrostat ne détient pas les droits sur le logo de Wikinews.

Gyrostat, le temps que tu négocies avec Barbetorte la chose, j'ai supprimé le logo en question pour violation de droit d'auteur.

J'ai vérifié le reste de la série de logos, tout est en ordre, c'est du travail dérivé autorisant la réutilisation sous une autre licence. --Dereckson (talk) 17:52, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Aïe, je me doutais bien qu'il y aurait un problème quelque part... Je vais essayer de trouver un logo WN sous licence libre, pour rendre compatible les deux licences. Gyrostat (talk) 20:51, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Morsi's ouster celebrations Tahrir 20130707-1.jpg

Hi Gyrostat, you have been uploading this image. Please look at this comment for a short review of license information.Kann es ein Fehler gewesen sein? Kannst du dich erinnern oder den Widerspruch aufklären? Greetings, --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 11:50, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry Gyrostat, Bobamnertiopsis ‎ already showed me: it was my fault (according to the "missing" source information). Greetings, --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 17:21, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Non-existent categories

Hi, noticed your edit here where you have added a category that does not exist. That makes the image invisible to users, so no-one can find it via the category tree system. I suggest you fix that, and that you refrain from such a bad practice, thank you.PeterWD (talk) 08:04, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for that... As of now, I will be more careful and add several categories and create the registration catefory if it doesn't exist, it might be the best way to deal with it. Gyrostat (talk) 12:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Gyrostat,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:SIA 9V-SKN A380!071 EDDF 16042014.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SIA 9V-SKN A380!071 EDDF 16042014.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:SIA A380 9V-SKN071 EDDF 16042014.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I uploaded these files using Flickr upload bot, so the license on Commons should be the same as the one on Flickr. The license template is located in the Summary, at the section Permission. I hope it's alright, otherwise, thanks for your attention ;-) Best regards, Gyrostat (talk) 21:15, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Air France Flight 447‎.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : OK but I can't see this file in the category. Can you put it in, please ? --JLPC (talk) 13:17, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Well, the file is not in the category because it's not a picture of the crash itself. But Cat:AF Flight447 is a subcategory of Category:F-GZCP (aircraft), where the file is. This could work ? Gyrostat (talk) 17:02, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

 Done by Clockery. Gyrostat (talk) 17:10, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

 Support : OK now. --JLPC (talk) 17:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2014-05-12 A319 EZY G-EZWI LFBO.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2014-05-12 A319 EZY G-EZWI LFBO.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:13, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I did'nt indicate the license, because I can't choose CC-BY-SA 4.0 during the upload process. I added a valid copyright tag. Thank you for your vigilance ; Gyrostat (talk) 22:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Delivery of an A380 to Korean Air.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : the scope is not linked to a category ; can you fix this, please ? --JLPC (talk) 16:02, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

 Support : All criteria met now. --JLPC (talk) 13:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EP2014 posters Castanet-Tolosan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Malala Yousafzai.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AIB A330 F-WWCB 18jun14 LFBO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:50, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BGA Beluga F-GSTD 5jul14 LFBO-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 07:21, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AIB A380 F-WWOW 5jul14 LFBO-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Sftt2013.jpg

File:Sftt2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DrKiernan (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DWT AT72 HB-ACA 24oct14 LFBO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AIB A350 F-WXWB 24oct14 LFBO-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BEL RJ100 OO-DWG 24oct14 LFBO-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:40, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! QTR A380 F-WWAJ!143 3nov14 LFBO-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TBM-850 N850BN 29sep14 LFBO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blocage UT2J nov14 (5814).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Airbus A380 of Air France landing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment as Los Angeles International Airport is in the scope I would expect to see some more of the airport. The tower maybe, or a characteristic terminal building. This could basically be any airport with a runway 24 R… --El Grafo (talk) 15:08, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

• Fair point. I'll see if I can think of another scope, then. Gyrostat (talk) 17:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment : I think it would be Ok with :"F-HPJB (aircraft)" as a category and "Airbus A380 of Air France landing" as a scope... --JLPC (talk) 14:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Airbus A380 of Air France at Los Angeles International Airport to Airbus A380 of Air France landing --Gyrostat (talk) 20:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment I'm fine with the new scope, but wouldn't it be better to link it to Category:Airbus A380 (Air France)? There are surprisingly few rivaling images of Air France A380s landing. If I sort out those where the aircraft is somewhere at the end of the final approach rather than just before touchdown, I'm left with File:Air France Airbus A380 F-HPJB @YUL.jpg, File:Airbus A380-800 Air France (AFR) F-HPJB - MSN 040 (9233108784).jpg and File:AFR F-HPJI A380!115 KSFO 14-04-14.jpg. For the first two, I'm assuming it's a landing based on the position of the flaps and the angle of attack – but I might be wrong, and since their file descriptions don't say anything about whether it's a landing or a takeoff, it might be better not to consider them here as potential counter-candidates. The third one has serious quality problems, probably due to hot air, so I'd rule that out. So I guess that's a  Support from me, on the condition that the category is adjusted to something more appropriate than this specific aircraft. Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 14:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done + added the cat to the file. Gyrostat (talk) 16:24, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AME B707 T.17-3 23dec14 LFBO-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:29, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:RAF Typhoon inflight.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RAF Typhoon inflight.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Régal'ad (Kréma).jpg

File:Régal'ad (Kréma).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🎂CAKE🎂 23:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Régal'ad (Kréma)2.jpg

File:Régal'ad (Kréma)2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🎂CAKE🎂 23:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Manifestation Charlie Hebdo Toulouse, 10jan15-14.jpg

File:Manifestation Charlie Hebdo Toulouse, 10jan15-14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 03:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Manifestation Charlie Hebdo Toulouse, 10jan15-19.jpg

File:Manifestation Charlie Hebdo Toulouse, 10jan15-19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 03:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Rassemblement Charlie Toulouse 9jan15-3.jpg

File:Rassemblement Charlie Toulouse 9jan15-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 03:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Rassemblement Charlie Toulouse 9jan15-1.jpg

File:Rassemblement Charlie Toulouse 9jan15-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 03:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Rassemblement CharlieHebdo TLSE - libertéexpr assassinée.jpg

File:Rassemblement CharlieHebdo TLSE - libertéexpr assassinée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 03:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright

I did not see your questions in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Régal'ad (Kréma).jpg earlier (the questions are now deleted), but I try to answer.

An artwork is protected with copyright even when not represented entirely. It is obvious for films and books, but this is also used for photos and logos.

Does file:Women's downhill, 2014 WOG cropped.jpg violate podium packaging author's copyright? No, the podium packaging is not main object of photo and it is considered de minimis. But if somebody crops the sportsmen out and shows only podium, then packaging becomes main object, although not represented entirely, and crop can be deleted.

Does file:ST vs LOU - Yannick Bru.jpg violate taylor's copyright? No, it is not main object of photo and it is de minimis. But photos of fashion show can be deleted, because they have clothing as main object. Also there are copyrighted logos on the photo, which are also de minimis, but if somebody crops the photo to show only the logos, then the crop can be deleted as copyright violation.

Does file:Петергоф, Большой Дворец.jpg violate gardener's copyright? By principle, landscape architecture has really copyright. But the garden is situated in Russia and since 2015 Russia has freedom of panorama for architecture. In some country, for example, France or Italy, such kind of photo violates gardener's copyright and before 2015 such photos from Russia got also deleted. The other nuance: the garden was restored using 18th century projects. The copyright holder is therefore dead for more than 70 years and such photos can be free. Even in France and Italy photos of gardens can be free, if gardener is dead more than 70 years.

Sometimes copyright is not easy to understand. Sorry. Taivo (talk) 22:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your precisions. Actually, the main subject of the photographs were the candies and not the packagings themselves, reason why I disagreed in the first place. Furthermore, I'm not sure that all the elements of the packaging can be considered copyrighted... but at least it makes (a little more) sense now. Gyrostat (talk) 14:57, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Germanwings

Hi Gyrostat. Following up on [1], why does it have to be the other way? I came across the commons category from reading the enwp article (after hearing about the tragic incident in the news), and I was surprised to see photos of the aircraft on enwp that weren't available through the commons category link there; when I realised that this was due to the categorisation structure I swapped the category membership around. Perhaps an alternative way of pointing readers towards the aircraft category would be moving the aircraft category up to the first category link instead of the last? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi @Mike Peel: . IMO, this is the correct way to categorize as D-AIPX is a characteristic of 4U9525, but 4U9525 is not a main characteristic of D-AIPX. That's why te other way seems wrong to me (like if Category:Airbus A380 maiden flight‎ were a main category to Category:F-WWOW (aircraft) rather than being a subcategory, see my point?).

I think adding a link to the aircraft category would be a good alternative, don't you think? ("You can find pictures of the aircraft involved here") Gyrostat (talk) 21:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Gyrostat. Fair enough. I see that you've linked to the aircraft category in the header text - thanks for doing that. :-) The question in my mind is whether category structures like this should be weighted by notability: the crash is much more notable than the airframe, so users will look first for the accident category more often than they will the aircraft category. However I understand the argument of 'events involving X' being categorised under 'X', and that is the standard way of doing things here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Départementales2015 posters Castanet-Tolosan.jpg

File:Départementales2015 posters Castanet-Tolosan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 23:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DLH A319 D-AILR 8may15 LFBO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:08, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AFR A320 F-HBNB 8may15 LFBO-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:44, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Bots

You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

• The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
• Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GayPride 2015, Toulouse cvg 2-0158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! GayPride 2015, Toulouse cvg 2-0151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. However, it is not a man but a woman. --Cccefalon 06:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC) Oh, you're right, I didn't noticed the inscription on the mask --Gyrostat 18:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

File:AirbusA380-July2012.JPG

Hey there! Just curious, how did you figure out the aircraft registration on this image? Cheers, Rehman 23:55, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I zoomed in on the nose gear door, which displays the last two letters of the registration. In this case, we can read DA or OA, and as it is an Emirates' A380, it as to be A6-EDA or A6-EOA. EDA was delivered to Emirates in July 2008, and EOA first flew in April 2014, so I conclude that only A6-EDA could be shot in July 2012. Basically, these are basically the kind of elements I try to find so that I can figure out the registration if it isn't clearly readable on the image. Gyrostat (talk) 08:51, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Genius man, genius. Good job! :) Rehman 14:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CDC A320 F-WWBD!6671 30jun15 LFBO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please brighten the darks, the background is drowning in black colours. --Cccefalon 11:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Would that be enough? --Gyrostat 13:33, 4 July 2015 (UTC) Yes! Well done! --Cccefalon 15:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EZY A319 G-EZDL 2jul15 LFBO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:15, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EZY A320 G-EZWM 2jul15 LFBO-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:24, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HOP AT72 F-GVZR 2jul15 LFBO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BEL RJ100 OO-DWH 2jul15 LFBO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:32, 8 July 2015 (UTC) Good quality --Billy69150 21:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC) *  Comment this was already promoted, Billy69150! --Hubertl 23:44, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VOE B717 EI-EWI 31jul15 LFBO-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Pages de discussion orphelines

Bonjour,

• File:Manifestation Charlie Hebdo Toulouse, 10jan15-14.jpg
• File:Rassemblement_CharlieHebdo_TLSE_-_libertéexpr_assassinée.jpg

Merci de ne pas créer des pages de discussion sur des fichiers supprimés.

Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:40, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, le fait est que, même si ces fichiers ont été supprimés (pour des accusations que je conteste, mais ça tout le monde s'en fout), l'utilité de ces PDD est bien là. Et, très franchement, je ne vois pas vraiment quel dérangement cela peut bien occasioner.

Mon travail a été supprimé, certes, mais j'ai besoin de garder ces traces. Cordialement, Gyrostat (talk) 14:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Voici les données qui étaient sur les pages supprimées :

• File:Manifestation Charlie Hebdo Toulouse, 10jan15-14.jpg

{{Published
|cite           = web
|legal          = yes
|title          = What will freedom of expression look like post-Charlie Hebdo?
|url            = http://themediaonline.co.za/2015/01/what-will-freedom-of-expression-look-like-post-charlie-hebdo/
|last           = Davis
|first          = Rebecca
|date           = 2015-01-12
|publisher      = The Media online
}}

• File:Rassemblement_CharlieHebdo_TLSE_-_libertéexpr_assassinée.jpg :

{{Published
|cite           = web
|legal          = yes
|title          = Living together well: secularism, liberal democracy and uncertainty in the wake of Charlie Hebdo
|url            = http://religionfactor.net/2015/01/20/living-together-well-secularism-liberal-democracy-and-uncertainty-in-the-wake-of-charlie-hebdo/
|last           = Wilson
|first          = Erin
|date           = 2015-01-20
|publisher      = Religion Factor
}}

Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

@Thibaut120094: merci, je m'en contenterais. Tant que tu/vous es/êtes aux bonnes actions, je pourrais te demander de jeter un coup d'oeil aux procédures ci-dessous ? Je les conteste, mais je sais que personne ne lit mes arguments avant la suppression... Gyrostat (talk) 22:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File:GayPride 2015, Toulouse cvg 2-0003.jpg

File:GayPride 2015, Toulouse cvg 2-0003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 14:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Contre Monsanto, mai 2015, Toulouse-1977.jpg

File:Contre Monsanto, mai 2015, Toulouse-1977.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 14:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Contre Monsanto, mai 2015, Toulouse-1832.jpg

File:Contre Monsanto, mai 2015, Toulouse-1832.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 14:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Contre Monsanto, mai 2015, Toulouse-1829.jpg

File:Contre Monsanto, mai 2015, Toulouse-1829.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 14:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Rassemblement Zyed&Bouna Toulouse15-1133.jpg

File:Rassemblement Zyed&Bouna Toulouse15-1133.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Manifestation Charlie Hebdo Toulouse, 10jan15-13.jpg

File:Manifestation Charlie Hebdo Toulouse, 10jan15-13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 15:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Rugby 15 TGS14 (6548).jpg

File:Rugby 15 TGS14 (6548).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 15:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:248113newyorkheader.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:248113newyorkheader.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:248113newyorkheader.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Natuur12 (talk) 20:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turdus merula (AU)-full.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)