User talk:Guilleamodeo
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Logo of Paisley Magic Circle.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Paisley Magic Circle.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo of Paisley Magic Circle.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Motopark (talk) 11:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission Motopark (talk) 11:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Honorary presidents of PMC.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Comment at closed DR, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Honorary presidents of PMC.JPG
[edit]copied from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Honorary presidents of PMC.JPG
"Sorry but I don't agree with you. The photo belong to me as I asked her to take the picture with my camera. Tell me, if I hire a photographer to take a photo of my family, and I pay him/her for the photo. Does the Photographer owns the copyright ? Because if it does, then it could potentially sell it to anyone or put it on the public domain, but its my family who is showing. Also, do I own the copyright of all the photos I took of couples that have asked me so they can both appear in the photo ?. Your logic of ownership seems broken to me.(Guilleamodeo) (talk to me) 19:20, 20 May 2014 (GMT)" [copy ends]
- First, don't make comments in closed DRs. You should have used my talk page if you had something more to say.
- Second, the issue has been thoroughly explored. As a general rule, the copyright belongs to the photographer. In the case of a paid professional portrait, in a very few countries, the copyright to a commissioned portrait belongs to the subject, but in most, it belongs to the photographer. The largest portrait studio in the USA, Olan Mills, explicitly retains the copyright unless the subject purchases a CD with all of the images. They cannot, however, sell the images to others -- since the images were taken in a non-public setting, they cannot be sold or published without the subject's permission.
- More broadly, a copyright says nothing about the ability to use an image, only about the ability to prevent others from using it. If I take a photograph of a recent sculpture in the USA, I own the copyright to the photograph, but I cannot publish it (except under fair use conditions) without permission from the sculptor. Similarly, if I take a photo of you in private, I own the copyright to the photo, but cannot publish it without your consent. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Logo of Paisley Magic Circle.svg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Paisley Magic Circle.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Motopark (talk) 12:37, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
As far as I know Public Domain material (CC0) doesn't need explicit permission. And I AM the author and have published the work under the CC0 license, as you can see if you click on the link provided in the permissions section of the file.
- Please store your logo to english Wikipedia as fair use permission--Motopark (talk) 15:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content
[edit]Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.
We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.
|
Motopark (talk) 12:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
You will have to explain why you consider my logo to be fair use media. It is the logo of our Club and it has been drawn and put on the public domain by me, as stated on the link to my Public Domain work, which appears in the File's permission's section. Guilleamodeo 14:32, 22 May 2014 (GMT).
- If the logo belongs to the club, then keeping it on Commons will require a license from an officer of the club, using the procedure at Commons:OTRS. If the logo does not belong to the club, then it is just personal art and is out of scope. Either way it will be deleted unless an officer of the club provides an appropriate license. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
You read very little do you ? All you do is to say things without finding them out first. I AM an officer of the Club, as you can read in the wikipedia entry for the club that I am trying to put together. I am adding this logo in the wikimedia because I plan to translate it for the spanish wikipedia. Like I know the material has to be free I made the logo and the pictures myself, and made them public domain. And all you are doing is to complicate a simple process to the point of making me regret to have ever donated money to wikimedia because it gives people like you the right to control what others can do with their own material just because you have nothing better to do. You are putting this so difficult that I am decided to delete everything and forget you guys exist. So please delete my logo and my picture and don't talk to me ever again. NEITHER OF YOU. I'll unload it to the wikipedia and if you delete it again I will swear and call you names and put a link to the logo in the wikipedia. Guilleamodeo 18:42, 22 May 2014 (GMT).
- Actually, I see that a person with a name similar to your user name is an officer of the club. However, it is very common for people to take user names that are not their own and impersonate others. That is why we have rules that require that when a copyright is owned by an organization, an officer of the organization must send an e-mail as described at Commons:OTRS. This is not very difficult and protects your organization from impersonators. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:29, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
please change information to logo in english wikipedia
[edit]please change information and permission to logo in english Wikipedia like this [1]--Motopark (talk) 19:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)