User talk:Gruszecki/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Хватит терпеть.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Darwin Ahoy! 14:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I deleted it, but you can reupload it at local projects where fair use or similar is allowed. Regards, -- Darwin Ahoy! 14:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I agree, do not mind. --Gruszecki (talk) 19:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Please do not recreate deleted content
If you are trying to create a category, you must include "Category:" on the front of it, as in Category:Revolution through social network (August 3). Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Had been removed unnecessarily --Gruszecki (talk) 15:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
File:IVБелНарСход4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wizardist (talk) 16:56, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Mishail Savicki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:18, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
File:SavickiPost.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Photos general plan. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer.--Gruszecki (talk) 04:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Savicki9.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Savicki9.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Savicki9.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer.--Gruszecki (talk) 04:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Savicki8.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Savicki8.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Savicki8.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer. --Gruszecki (talk) 04:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Savicki7.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Savicki7.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Savicki7.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer. --Gruszecki (talk) 04:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Savicki6.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Savicki6.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Savicki6.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:19, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer. --Gruszecki (talk) 04:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Savicki5.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Savicki5.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Savicki5.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer. --Gruszecki (talk) 04:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Savicki4.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Savicki4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Savicki4.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer. --Gruszecki (talk) 04:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Savicki3.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Savicki3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Savicki3.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer. --Gruszecki (talk) 04:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Savicki2.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Savicki2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Savicki2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer. --Gruszecki (talk) 04:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Savicki10.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Savicki10.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Savicki10.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer. --Gruszecki (talk) 04:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Savicki11.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Savicki11.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Savicki11.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer. --Gruszecki (talk) 04:25, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Savicki1.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Savicki1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Savicki1.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Teofilo (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer. --Gruszecki (talk) 04:25, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Savicki1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Teofilo (talk) 03:22, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Freedom of a panorama. Photos general plan. The author died. Nobody's copyright doesn't suffer. --Gruszecki (talk) 09:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Nat. Bibl., Minsk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.61.181.19 21:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- This my photo, is made by me. The photo of library is executed on the general plan, therefore no violations here are present. Moreover is a - photo of a fountain against library.--Gruszecki (talk) 06:27, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Museum VOV.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 07:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
File:БАИ.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 08:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
File:CUM Minsk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
File:JunEurovis2010D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 09:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 10:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 10:13, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 10:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
File:BGEU, Sverdlov7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 12:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
File:City hall, Minsk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jarash (talk) 15:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Cinema October.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jarash (talk) 21:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Coat of arms, Minsk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
195.50.31.213 05:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Golden kupid.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 19:45, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Kolas str, 2 - Skorina av..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
195.50.31.213 20:56, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Better source request for your uploads
File:Granddad (bowlder).jpg --Jarash (talk) 11:41, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Вядоўцы АртС.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 10:25, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
File:GaraSh Kureichik&Grushecki.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 10:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Chirkova Stella Elena.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Chirkova Stella.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
File:ChirkovaStella.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Category:Stella_Chirkova has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Category:VikaTrenas has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jarash (talk) 16:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
You know several of my friends!
You know Olga Klimanovich and Kastus Khadyka! Very nice to find your photos on Commons!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, they are super! :) --Gruszecki (talk) 15:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- I corresponded with them back in the days of ABS, Kastus lives in Colorado now.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:43, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Фото со съемок фильма "ГараШ"
Уважаемый Олег Леонидович! Не могли бы Вы написать заявление в команду OTRS о предоставлении лицензии на следующие фото:
- File:Garash26.jpg
- File:Grushecki@ParashcankaTBM.jpg
- File:GaraSh18.jpg
- File:GaraSh19.jpg
- File:GaraSh2.jpg
- File:GaraSh3.jpg
С уважением, Jarash (talk) 14:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- А зачем заявление на собственное фото с собственного фотоаппарата? С уважением, --Gruszecki (talk) 16:34, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Я считаю, что авторское право принадлежит не владельцу фотоаппарата, а тому, кто производил фотосъемку. Поскольку в названных файлах Вы присутствуете в кадре, скорее всего фотографировал кто-то другой. --Jarash (talk) 19:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Доброго дня, уважаемый Jarash! Олег Леонидович поведал мне о данной проблеме, мы с ним бывшие коллеги по работе. Если это так важно - я производила фотосъёмку с его камеры. Не вижу в этом особой проблемы и не имею никаких возражений против того, чтобы Олег Леонидович (участник Gruszecki) размещал их под своим именем. Более того - даже за, так как не имею большого желания тратить на соответствующие оформления своё личное время. С уважением, --Odri Tiffani (talk) 15:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- Я считаю, что авторское право принадлежит не владельцу фотоаппарата, а тому, кто производил фотосъемку. Поскольку в названных файлах Вы присутствуете в кадре, скорее всего фотографировал кто-то другой. --Jarash (talk) 19:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
File:Theatre opera&ballet, Minsk.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lingveno (talk) 15:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:KirilShimko.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:KirilShimko.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:KirilShimko.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Sealle (talk) 02:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Kirill Shimko Rekord2016.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kirill Shimko Rekord2016.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kirill Shimko Rekord2016.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Sealle (talk) 02:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Shimko Kirill Rekord2016.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Shimko Kirill Rekord2016.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Shimko Kirill Rekord2016.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Sealle (talk) 02:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Kiril Shimko2017.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kiril Shimko2017.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kiril Shimko2017.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Sealle (talk) 02:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Серия фотографий с подложным авторством, информация о правообладателе доступна в метаданных. Sealle (talk) 03:14, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Согласие было получено, можете сами обратиться к Кириллу, он подтвердит. --Gruszecki (talk) 18:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- В этой реплике не соответствует политике проекта практически каждое слово. 1) Разрешение на публикацию авторских работ под свободной лицензией имеет право давать их создатель, но не изображённое на них лицо. 2) Даже если разрешение дано надлежащим правообладателем, то оно не означает, что получившее это разрешение лицо вправе объявить себя автором переданных работ. 3) Никто ни к кому обращаться не будет — обязанность доказывать лицензионную чистоту изображений лежит на загружающем их участнике, любому другому для оспаривания этой чистоты достаточно обоснованных сомнений. Sealle (talk) 19:55, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Dura lex, sed lex (закон суров, но это закон). --Gruszecki (talk) 18:52, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- В этой реплике не соответствует политике проекта практически каждое слово. 1) Разрешение на публикацию авторских работ под свободной лицензией имеет право давать их создатель, но не изображённое на них лицо. 2) Даже если разрешение дано надлежащим правообладателем, то оно не означает, что получившее это разрешение лицо вправе объявить себя автором переданных работ. 3) Никто ни к кому обращаться не будет — обязанность доказывать лицензионную чистоту изображений лежит на загружающем их участнике, любому другому для оспаривания этой чистоты достаточно обоснованных сомнений. Sealle (talk) 19:55, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Согласие было получено, можете сами обратиться к Кириллу, он подтвердит. --Gruszecki (talk) 18:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)