User talk:Grunpfnul

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

---

-- 12:42, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token a56a6ba3324053557bf9568831c267b8

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uka landeplatz morgengrauen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 01:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC) Please add English description. --Kadellar 23:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Grunpfnul. You have new messages at Gauravjuvekar's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gauravjuvekar (talk) 13:31, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Corrected CA

Hallo! Hab nun die verbesserten Bilder hochgeladen, ich habe dich zitiert, hoffe, habs richtig gemacht. Danke nochmals bestens für deine Hilfe. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:19, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Propyläen, Königsplatz, Múnich, Alemania11.JPG

Hallo, ich habe gesehen, dass du 2 Bemerkungen im Bild eingefügt hast. Es handelt sich um keine Bildverzerrung, sondern eher um eine uneinheitliche Spannung des Taubennetzes. Das Bild entspricht genau dem Original, ich habe nichts bearbeitet. Viele Grüße, Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Alles klar :-) --Grunpfnul (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Variant

Hallo, schlage diese Variante vor? Der Hintergrunt ist interessant und unterbelichtet. Ich habe rasch versucht den dunklen Teil aufzuhellen aber dir gelingt es sicher besser, da der helle Strassenanteil doch zu hell geworden ist; habe auch das Bild um 0.96 Grad gedreht - tschüss --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:49, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

Hi Grunpfnul, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
• Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Sreejith K (talk) 05:09, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Hopperstad drawing.jpg

Hi, can you explain why you have deleted the drawing of w:en:Hopperstad stave church? The drawing is from 1878 and has an unknown author. It is in several books about stave churches, and I suspect that the coauthor on the articles in Wikipedia actually used one of the books that itself are in the public domain now. This drawing predates even the old copyright law in Norway, but given that it would have been without protection already in 1939. According to the new law it would have been protected until 1959. I guess it would be safe to say there is no problem with this drawing. Jeblad (talk) 11:48, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

No given source, and i didn't delete it - i made the call for deletion and an admin deleted the file after visit. --Grunpfnul (talk) 03:17, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

New URL for OgreBot's old version filemover

Hello. I've identified you as a user who has previously used OgreBot's old version filemover. Please note the new URL: toollabs:magog/oldver.php. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:41, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Domhof Aachen eye of god.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:51, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

cat-Entfernungen

Hallo Grunpfnul,
ich habe ein paar von deinen cat-Entfernungen von Fotos aus Aachen rückgängig gemacht, weil die ursprünglichen Kat. m.E. passend waren und die ersatzlose Entfernung nicht gerechtfertigt. Die Kategorisierung soll natürlich nicht redundant sein, aber eher inklusiv als exklusiv, denn es geht ja darum dass alle relevanten Aspekte eines Bildes erfasst werden. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 07:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Hallot Túrelio - Die Änderungen hatten Sinn, da sich die Kategorie "Winter in Aachen" unter "Nature of Aachen" befindet. Inwiefern das Rathaus Aachens den winterlichen Charakter der Natur der Stadt darstellt, oder unterstreicht, erschließt sich mir auf den ersten Blick nicht und sorgt nur für eine weitere Auffächerung der Kategorie Aachen, die eh wie "Kraut und Rüben" im Moment erscheint. Vorschlag zur Güte: Lass uns doch eine neue SubKategorie mit "Jahrezeiten in Aachen" erstellen, in der wir exakt diese Bilder _aus der Stadt_ mit einer winterlichen _Stadtkulisse_ einpflegen. --Grunpfnul (talk) 09:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

O.k., damit kann ich die Logik deiner Edits nachvollziehen. Dennoch bleibt die Frage, ob "Winter in Aachen" durch die Überkategorie "Nature of Aachen" determiniert werden muss. Bei solchen Fragen schaue ich immer erstmal nach wie es denn bei Parallelkategorien "Winter in Dingsbum" gehandhabt wird. Das gilt analog für "Jahreszeiten in Aachen" (Kat.name sollte auf englisch sein). Gib es analoge Kat. auch für andere Städte? Ich würde bei "Winter in Aachen" jedenfalls nicht zwangsläufig an Naturszenen denken, denn Aachen ist ja nunmal eine Stadt. --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Der Hauptbestandteil der Bilder ist aber thematisch der Natur gewidmet, wenn ich mich nicht täusche war die Kategorie auch zuvor zusätzlich nochmal mit "Nature in Aachen" kategorisiert. Dass die Kategorien in Englisch gehalten werden sollen, ist mir eben so bewusst wie ein Blick über den Tellerrand zu anderen Städtekategorien ;-) (wobei es da leider wohl kein einheitliches Schema vom Hauptprojekt aus zu geben scheint). Was ich andachte: Cat "Views of Aachen" -> "Seasons in the city of Aachen" -> "winter at aachen" / Umbenennung oder Neuanlage einer "Nature at winter in Aachen" --Grunpfnul (talk) 17:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Wenn der "Blick über den Tellerrand" ergibt, dass analoge Bilder aus anderen Städten einen ebensolche Kategorisierung aufweisen, dann nur zu. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Your modifications of Aachen Germany Imperial-Cathedral-01.jpg

Please upload your version as a derivate. The version your overwrote is already assessed as QI and can not altered without loosing the QI status. Furthermore I do not agree with your override as your version with all due respect is overprocessed. Thank you --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraftwerk Weisweiler im Sonnenaufgang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Overexposed sun, but IMO it's a QI image. --XRay 07:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie

Hallo Grunpfnul,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

• Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.

• Vom 6.-8. November findet erneut die Europäische Denkmalmesse in Leipzig statt. Mit Unterstützung von Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. werden wir zum zweiten Mal die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Monuments im Rahmen eines Standes sowie eines Workshops vorstellen.

WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

File:Special one dollar coin - front.jpg

File:Special one dollar coin - front.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

RHM22 (talk) 09:51, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Denkmal Oppenhoffallee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good, but IMO DoF and crop could be better. IMO still QI --XRay 04:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief Triumph Napoleons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Denkmal Einhard Eschweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Grunpfnul,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

File:Ito Hirobumi and Mutsu Munemitsu.jpg

File:Ito Hirobumi and Mutsu Munemitsu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Y.haruo (talk) 12:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DenkmalStadtgarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The picture is OK, but the text of this nomination is much too long, the category of the depicted man should be added, and geocoding would be fine. --Palauenc05 16:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC) CommentSorry, i'm back after a long break - category and geoloc have been added --Grunpfnul 18:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality.--Palauenc05 21:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elisenbrunnen Aachen zur blauen Stunde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen Couvenmuseum Exterior 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Kurhaus Aachen Eingangsbereich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:11, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hartziel M47 Patton Brander Wald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit of noise but still fine to me --Poco a poco 18:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de la Chartreuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Zinkhütte Steinfurt Firma Peters Hauptkamin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camp Gabrielle Petit - Kirchengebäude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Norwegian polling graph update and alteration/axis extension

Hi, I found your name mentioned on Commons:Graphic Lab/Wikigraphists and was wondering if you can update this graph please? I've detailed the request and relevant Wikipedia articles below.

• 
  Norwegian Opinion Polling, 30 Day Moving Average, 2021-2025

Article(s): * en:2025 Norwegian parliamentary election
* en:Opinion polling for the 2025 Norwegian parliamentary election

Request

Graph update and axis extension.

Can you please update this polling graph using the latest polls on the English Wikipedia page above so it is up to date, including the 30-day averages bar charts? Can you also please extend the Y percentage axis to 40% as the Conservative Party (H) have polled over the current maximum of 30% on the graph and gone above 35% in a poll to 35.6%. Helper201 (talk) 19:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but i'm not specialised in graphs. As a fast research on the original authors comment section, he used excel for the creation of this sort of graph: Hi! I use the latest version of excel to make the graphs. --Avopeas (Diskussion) 19:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Maybe this could help Grunpfnul (talk) 12:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Death at the Pulpit of the Cathedral of St. Michael and St. Gudula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserspiel vor der Kirche St. Laurentius in Laurensberg (Aachen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegkreuz in der Nähe zu St. Laurentius in Laurensberg (Aachen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:40, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuer Bahkauvbrunnen Seitenansicht links.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunnen Fischpüddelchen in Aachen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kongressdenkmal - Nahaufnahme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Institut für physikalische Chemie - RWTH Aachen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 14:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegkreuz Aachen-Laurensberg Karl-Friedrich-Straße-Hander Weg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 20:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegkreuz Aachen-Laurensberg OT Vetschau Laurensberger-Niersteiner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathausstr. 10 - Ehemalige Seifenfabrik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesus am Kreuze - Kirche St. Jakob in Aachen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Grenzwacht - Verwaltungsgebäude der Stadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Baudenkmal

Ich möchte nur mal erwähnen, dass cultural heritage monuments nicht unbedingt buildings sind. Quality images of buildings darf dann ruhig stehen bleiben. --XRay 💬 16:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Danke für die Anmerkung, aber im Rahmen der Vermeidung einer Überkategorisierung hatte ich diese Bilder entsprechend in die "Baudenkmalliste" überführt - vergleichbares Thema zu "wann ist es zu genau, wann nicht?". Wäre es da nicht sinniger, die "cultural heritage monuments" Kategorie mit der "Buildings" zu kategorisieren? Grunpfnul (talk) 17:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Sehe ich nicht. Das wäre mir zu ungenau. Dann wären manche Parks und Skulpturen auch als Gebäude klassifiziert. Meiner Meinung nach dürfen solche Kategorien auch nebeneinander existieren. Es ist halt eine andere Thematik. --XRay 💬 17:24, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Die Thematik sehe ich als vergleichbar mit den "Items" oder "Objects" an, aber über Geschmack lässt sich bekanntlich streiten und von daher jedem seine Meinung :-) Grunpfnul (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Hatten wir heute schon mal, oder? Hier ist es noch recht einfach. Ich habe schon in manchen Ländern fotografiert und dann hochgeladen - und habe mitunter recht merkwürdige Ansichten kennengelernt. Auch bei einigen Themen haben sich seltsam anmutende Regeln eingebürgert. Oft werden solche Regeln nicht dokumentiert und nur von wenigen getragen. Schwierig wird es für mich, wenn sich Regeln widersprechen. --XRay 💬 17:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Einfach ist immer eine Frage der Tiefe und gewünschten Betrachtungsweise - als Beispiel: Die Domschatzkammer gehört nicht direkt zum Dom (von diesem auch nicht zugänglich), sondern wäre als eigenständiges Gebäude zu betrachten. In der Denkmalliste der Stadt Aachen wird diese zudem noch nicht einmal unter ihrer Adresse aufgeführt. Also unter Kategorie Aachen cathedral? Oder, aufgrund der ausgestellten Exponate, unter cultural heritage? Oder doch nur Building? Von daher: Über Geschmack lässt sich streiten ;-) Grunpfnul (talk) 18:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Die Domschatzkammer als "Museum" ist untergebracht in einem Gebäudekomplex, der als historischer Anbau mit Atrium, Kreuzgang, Domchor, etc. und in früheren/frühesten Jahren als Stiftsunterkunft diente und zusammen mit Dom, Rathaus (Pfalz) und "Siedlung" unter "Katschhof" in der Denkmalliste aufgeführt ist. Die Adresse wäre korrekterweise Johannes-Paul-II.-Straße 15, aber dies sieht die Denkmalbehörde nicht so genau. Da es sich beim Artikel Domschatzkammer aber um das "Museum" handelt, wird hier natürlich nicht die Kategorie "Baudenkmal in..." eingetragen, anders wäre es, wenn es einen Artikel über das Bauwerk selbst geben würde. Darüber hinaus ist dieser besagte Gebäudekomplex für "Insider" vom Dom her über interne Gänge durch die Nikolauskapelle zugängig, die früher von den Stiftsherren und heute noch (soweit mir bekannt) noch von der Domsingschule benutzt werden können. Ich glaube sogar, dass über diesen Weg gewisse Exponate, die zeitweilig im Dom (z. B. Vorhaltekreuz, etc.) genutzt oder ausgestellt werden, über diesen Weg Einlass in den Dom finden und (aus Sicherheitsgründen) nicht über die Straße getragen werden. Soweit mein Wissen dazu, Gruß, ArthurMcGill (talk) 08:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegkreuz AC Lemiers Senserbachweg-Schneebergweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sascha Faber - Aachen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mauer in Mödlareuth 20230617 HOF00008 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 18:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegkreuz an der Kirche St. Peter in Orsbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegkreuz - Aachen-Soers im Müschpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite sharp and well composed. I think the shadows at the top can be raised for better clarity. --Tagooty 03:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC) uploaded a new version, better by now? --Grunpfnul 15:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Universitätsklinikum Aachen 2023 Front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kongressdenkmal mit Rosengarten - Aachen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Focus stacking errors

Hi sorry to support the QI dragonfly image you justifiably opposed because of stacking errors. In case you wondered what I was referring to here is the FPC with stacking errors Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlsbrunnen Aachen - Bronzefigur eines Fisches 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 12:16, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzigungsgruppe St. Nikolaus Aachen 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Needs to be slightly straightened out at the bottom, otherwise this is good. ReneeWrites 08:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC) Thanks for your review @ReneeWrites - the fence isn't straight, as the ground stones too - if you take a look at the relief you can see its straight --Grunpfnul 08:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good catch. I have no further comments then :) ReneeWrites 10:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --多多123 13:11, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möschebrunnen Aachen 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 08:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauen mit Schirm - Aachen - Heinz Tobolla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Der Durchbruch - Ansicht 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Maybe VI too? --Terragio67 17:42, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzigungsgruppe 2023 Jakobstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture of St. Stephan - King of Hungary (1993) by Imre Varga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 06:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ungarnkapelle Aachener Dom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 06:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlsbrunnen - Karl der Große 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WgdV - Aachen, Frère-Roger-Str 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof 13 in Aachen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hermann Heusch - Aachen 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

QI-candidate File:Römermuseum Heitersheim 09.jpg

Congratulations for your sharp eye. I corrected the minimal tilt of File:Römermuseum Heitersheim 09.jpg. Please have again a look on it and I hope you will withdraw your oppose --Llez (talk) 20:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wgdv - Barockfabrik 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:57, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakobstraße204-206-208 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me, but I recommend a double exposure time with lower ISO :) --PantheraLeo1359531 20:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Jakobstrasse 80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Jakobstrasse 90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Trichtergasse 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Красный 19:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Königstraße 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 14:33, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WgdV - Jakobstraße Ecke Klappergasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 14:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walter Hasenclever - Denkmal Aachen 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baudenkmal - AC Laurensberg - Roermonderstr 386-388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikolauskapelle Aachener Dom 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baudenkmal Aachen Annastr 33 zugl Frère-Roger-Straße 1 - 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tafel St. Foillan - Aachen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Königstraße 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC Brunnen Türelüre-Lißje.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Karlsgraben 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Johanniterstraße 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Königstraße 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments needs perspective correction (right side) --Virtual-Pano 14:29, 4 September 2023 (UTC) You mean the streetlantern, which was hit by a car? --Grunpfnul 23:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Yes indeed that threw me off, sorry for the confuriosn - Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:50, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aachen - Laurensberg Rathausstr 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Liridon 12:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baudenkmal Annastraße 9 - Aachen 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sky a little bit annoying but IMO it is good quality. --Terragio67 15:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD RWTH Rogowski Institut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 13:17, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Haus Löwenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 13:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Markt 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 13:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Pontstraße 40-42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Königstraße 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Karlsgraben 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Oppenhoffallee 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Liridon 15:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Zollernstraße 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WgdV - AC Oppenhoffallee 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Relativity 02:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Zollernstraße 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Zollernstraße 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Viktoriastraße 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:22, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Viktoriastraße 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rogowski-Institut RWTH Aachen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

   Commentcorrected, sorry - my first try on a VI Nomination Grunpfnul (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Support We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

   CommentGeocode added Grunpfnul (talk) 14:08, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Bismarckstraße 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --FlocciNivis 09:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Bismarckstraße 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --FlocciNivis 09:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Bismarckstraße 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --FlocciNivis 09:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Bismarckstraße 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --FlocciNivis 09:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Annastraße 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Liridon 13:49, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Zollernstraße 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Bismarckstraße 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 04:11, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC Fassade Wespienhaus 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 12:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Königstraße 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Zollernstraße 29-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Viktoriastraße 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Oppenhoffallee 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Bismarckstraße 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's something wrong with the horizontals here (particularly at the top), fixable? --Mike Peel 07:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC) Thanks Mike Peel, uploaded a new and corrected version --Grunpfnul 18:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Much better now, thanks! --Mike Peel 19:37, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Dreikaiserhaus Fischmarkt 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Pontstraße 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can you recover a bit of the highlights? --C messier 18:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Uploaded a new version, hightlights in the background corrected. Better now? --Grunpfnul 18:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 06:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Zollernstraße 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Horizontal issues again, particularly visible on the roofs (they all slope towards the centre of the photo). Fixable? --Mike Peel 19:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC) The other picture was realy distorted (my fault), but here comes a naturally crooked house - i've uploaded a new version with small changes --Grunpfnul 07:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks, small changes, but big difference IMO, particularly top left. Remaining natural crookedness is good. --Mike Peel 07:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Mauerstraße 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Mauerstraße 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 13:22, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Mauerstraße 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Mauerstraße 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Mauerstraße 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Königstraße 22 Var2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Moroder 13:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Elisenbrunnen at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Hühnerdieb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Rubber Duck (8374802487).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Kirche St. Michael - Statue Erzengel Michael.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC IT Oecher Penn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wasiul Bahar 17:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Annastraße 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 22:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Aureliusstraße 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Holzgraben 1-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC SO Domportal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Jakobstraße 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC SO Portaltür mit Spendern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but need more specific category/ies --Poco a poco 20:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC) Done, thanks --Grunpfnul 12:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Aureliusstraße 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Aureliusstraße 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Aureliusstraße 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC DM Franziska Schervier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC Kreuzigungsgruppe Lindenplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Umformerwerk Minoritenstraße 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Hühnermarkt 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok --Poco a poco 13:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Trichtergasse 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Kapuzinergraben 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Theaterstraße 9-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC DM Edelstahl-Lokomotive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 19:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC BD Markt 42 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)