User talk:Greymanby

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Greymanby!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:24, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wild poppy.JPG

Copyright status: File:Wild poppy.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wild poppy.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Nude male with erection.png

Copyright status: File:Nude male with erection.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Nude male with erection.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nude male using a massager to stimulate his penis.png

And also:

• File:Massager fun.png
• File:Massaging penis.png
• File:Male nude reclining.png
• File:Male orgasm whilst reclining on a bed.webm
• File:Vignette of a male with an erection.png
• File:Orgasm in a forest.webm
• File:Nude reclining.png
• File:Vignette of nude reclining.png
• File:Globe and nude dance sequences.webm
• File:Penis masturbation.png
• File:Nude male with erection.png
• File:Nude male with erection detail.png
• File:Virile male in landscape.png
• File:Standing nude in forest.png
• File:Virile male nude in forest.png
• File:Joyful moments in the woods.webm
• File:Posterior or rear view of a male subject.png
• File:Male bottom.png
• File:Male penile orgasm.webm
• File:STAGES OF ORGASM DEPICTED.png
• File:An erect penis.png
• File:A male with an erection.png
• File:Male orgasm and ejaculation.webm
• File:Wet orgasm from vintage 8mm video.webm
• File:A rear view of a male subject.png
• File:LITTLE TWITCHY BIRD.webm

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Stop overcategorising

Hi, you are inappropriately over-categorising your uploads. Please pay attenton to Commons:Categories#Over-categorization. --Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

He's still overcat his uploads. [1] --Mjrmtg (talk) 15:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Male Orgasm wetness excerpt.webm

And also:

• File:A male with a very strong erect penis.png
• File:Intimate indoor wet wank short.webm
• File:Nature boy.webm
• File:A natural pleasure.webm
• File:Young male with an erect penis.png
• File:Nude in wood with strong erection.png
• File:A quick wee.webm
• File:Detail view of male with very frim erect penis.png
• File:A Young male with a very firm erection standing in a green forest.png
• File:Copious ejaculation of sperm.webm
• File:Big erect human penis.webm
• File:The complete male orgasm a short educational film.webm

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons is not an amateur porn site

---

 

Thank you for your interest in contributing to Wikimedia Commons, a non-profit media repository with the primary scope of providing educational and informative images and media. Submissions that are low quality or do not fall into Commons' scope may be subject to deletion.

One or more of your recent contributions has been identified by another Commons user as a possible image not in Commons' scope. Commons has guidelines on nudity, as a result of already having a large number of photos of genitalia, specifically the male reproductive system and the penis.

If you have objections to the proposed deletion of your image(s), please see the links to the relevant deletion discussion(s) (listed above or below this message box). This message is not intended to be taken personally. Thank you for your understanding.

--Yann (talk) 13:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

GREYMANBY wish to say finally, in wikimedia commons that they are sorry if you were offended by their videos and images. However, fail to see how a picture of a 'twitchy bird' at a window showing an innocent dunnock bird looking at itself, sent earlier in year [one the first entries], was deemed 'explicit' that's like putting trousers on a horse! Or for that matter a very sensuously filmed scene of a normal nude male dancing about a field, in a graceful, and for that matter, totally unaroused state of being is so obscene in itself; I wonder, Perhaps, you did no therefore look at every single file? Yes most of the other images were explicit as well; however is that to say the only ones allowed on now are those that have got through the inititation process, or have been on a long time?

Does that mean therefore that even those I myself would deem unsuitable or with risky titles, [some I would term almost illegal under age acts] or subject matter I believe is a lot more offensive, which I can list hundreds [and through politeness I will not name them] where they have little context to me, personally, are to somehow be let off the hook? [because they have been there for ages].  The body in itself is always a surprise to people, and the openness your site provides is a usually welcome change from the pursed up lips of society, and its prejudices or misunderstanding of the human form; in all its glorious expressive ways.

Not surpisingly we got big viewing figures too [it took us both by surprise!] Obviously there is a market for truthfulness in representation of the human form. So there will be a lot of dissappointed folk out there; who now have to make do with much more explicit and unnatural stuff, on other sites. Not an amateur porn site? Really you tell me; that's why so many like to look on the site, and that's fine, or at least it should be, after all they're bodies of all shapes and sizes [ apart from the Greymanby nude now!] and that is the joy of it. Everything more truthfully represented; real people, and genuine orgasms [what a shock]!

Are we to then 'fig leaf' everything again?

Is there to be a person to come along and put pants on our bodies; even if they all have the same parts hid beneath. That is surely almost Victorian in its attitude. [And by the way the Victorians were at it as well - think of the old 'what the butler saw' card flick books scenarios in fair grounds! [or as another example; the film titled 'massages' old Edwardian grainy film on Commons site itself..] Maybe that should be removed?

We cannot help but feel like we have been made an example of [to show others what will happen]. And it does feel a little like a sort of mild descrimination against one particular user group; who dared to show truthfully the human body in all its sometimes surprising glory, and rude ways of being. The labels placed on for several weeks were very over done and gave the impression of something gratuitously offensive to the point of being outrageous [and yet a video of someone perhaps dropping their trousers to masturbate almost publicly with no reason is left on the site altogether!]

But as with all democracies it will not make any difference whatever is put down here; because the decision was already made back in September 2021..

We are sorry again if you were offended by the images, however found the experience of being on Wikimedia Commons very rewarding initially, but also dissapointing now that we have been singled out for being truthful unto the human bodies form and abilities, in displaying as it is scenarios that merely show how a body functions in a genuine, new and refreshing way, be careful that the site does not eventually become like a strict old fashioned parent that cannot accept its off-springs more truthful ways as you will eventually possibly lose custom altogether. You may or may not wish to comment [particularly about a twitchy Dunnock bird, and a normal male human being dancing artistically in a field [without being sexualised]. As to How these have been deleted when one of your own admin mentioned the fact!

Or at the end of the day we have to say perhaps... its just that NO ONE LIKES MY WILLy..! comment would you like to? Dissappointed GREYMANBY USER signing out. 17 October [4.55pm]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greymanby (talk • contribs) 15:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Everything you posted was deleted

I didn't had time to save them, sad — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.169.138.197 (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the rather sarcastic message 'everything you deleted you didn't have tine to save them - sad'. It is the word SAD WHICH LOOKS A BIT ODD ON ITS OWN; They say that sarcasm is the LOWEST FORM OF WIT. Oh, by the way those mages were only copies anyway! And some were deleted in a way which was uneccessary and in our opinion an ABUSE OF THE ADMINS ROLE! By this we mean an innocent video of a bird was even deleted ! EVEN, A POPPY FLOWER PHOTO. Apparently you can find a flower, and a bird offensive but not most of the now still existent pictures of male appendage still on the site; by the way many are much more offensive than previous stuff put on there; and I am not bothered by them going anyhow! We did notice strangely enough after a comment made by us the other day as to a possibly illegal age related caption [in the rudley named Penis] category; it has being removed or renamed at least! So someone listened to our opinions! So 'Sad' unsigned IP2/19:02 sent to me on 20 October 2021/ 88.169.138.197 WE ARE NOT IN THE LEAST BIT BOTHERED! BUT WE SHALL POSSIBLY MENTION THIS COMMENT SO SWIFTLY APPLIED; TO ADMIN IF REQUIRED! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greymanby (talk • contribs) 11:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

You sound deranged 2A01:E0A:A62:B140:9D7E:6EF6:42B:A3F0 00:40, 4 May 2023 (UTC)