User talk:Granpar

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Granpar!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Willkommen!

[edit]

Willkommen! Schön, dass du beim Projekt mitmachst und Danke für deine bisherigen, tollen Bildbeiträge zu Kulturdenkmalen aus der Umgebung. Viele Grüße aus dem Taubertal wünscht Triplec85 (talk) 17:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke schön. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Granpar (talk • contribs) 13:36, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

date={{Taken on|xxxx-xx-xx|location=Germany}}

[edit]

Kannnst Du Bitte bei Deinen Bildern in Zukunft in dieser Zeile "Germany" durch "Baden-Württemberg" ersetzen? bzw wenn es woanderst aufgenommen ist "Bavaria" usw.? Und wenn die Seite noch nicht existiert, dann durch {{Bundesland photographs taken on navbox|Jahr|Monat|Tag}} erstellen

--anro (talk) 20:24, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@AnRo0002: Ich habe das noch nie bewusst gesetzt und denke das geht automatisch indem die EXIF-Daten ausgelesen werden. Beispiel: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gedenktafel_Hanka_Szendzielarz.jpg Da war ich nur mit der Android-App dran. Unter https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Gedenktafel_Hanka_Szendzielarz.jpg&action=edit wurde aber ... |date={{According to EXIF data|08.12.2019|location=Germany ... eingefügt. meinst Du das?

Koordinaten gesucht

[edit]

@Granpar: Ist es dir noch möglich, für dein Bild File:1866 Württemberger Offiziere Friedhof Großrinderfeld Rückseite.jpg (näherungsweise) Koordinaten anzugeben? Siehe dazu auch de:Liste_der_Kriegerdenkmale_im_Main-Tauber-Kreis#Großrinderfeld. Gruß Triplec85 (talk) 11:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Triplec85: Bei der Vorderseite ist eine Koordinate dabei, Friedhof Großrinderfeld, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1866_W%C3%BCrttemberger_Offiziere_Friedhof_Gro%C3%9Frinderfeld.jpg --Granpar (talk) 14:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@Granpar: Danke. Ich habe das Bild der Vorderseite mit den Koordinaten eingefügt. Dir mal ein ganz großes Dankeschön für die vielen Bilder. Eine Liste zu Kriegerdenkmalen ist schon einmalig in der Wikipedia. Eine bald nahezu vollständig bebilderte Liste ist echt Wahnsinn. In vielen anderen Regionen gibt es leider nur ganz wenige Bilder zu Kriegerdenkmalen. Du hast schon mehrere Hundert Bilder in der Region dazu beigetragen. Ein großen Dankeschön dafür :-)

Danke auch für die vielen Gemarkungskarten zu Orten. Ich bin dabei, diese in Ortsartikel einzubinden. Über diese Auflistung von neuen Bildern werde ich immer darauf aufmerksam. Diese Auflistung zeigt neue Artikel und siehe auch de:Benutzer:Wartungsstube/Main-Tauber-Kreis sowie de:Benutzer:Wartungsstube/Neckar-Odenwald-Kreis.

Viele Grüße Triplec85 (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spielplatz im Marsbachtal während der COVID-19-Pandemie 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 15:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67: Both files are

Germany

The photographical reproduction of this work is covered under the article § 59 of the German copyright law, which states that "It shall be permissible to reproduce, by painting, drawing, photography or cinematography, works which are permanently located on public ways, streets or places and to distribute and publicly communicate such copies. For works of architecture, this provision shall be applicable only to the external appearance."

As with all other “limits of copyright by legally permitted uses”, no changes to the actual work are permitted under § 62 of the German copyright law (UrhG).

See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Freedom of panorama for more information.

Deutsch  English  español  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  Esperanto  македонски  русский  العربية  한국어  português do Brasil  français  português  українська  +/−

File:Beuchertsmühle 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67: Both files are

Germany

The photographical reproduction of this work is covered under the article § 59 of the German copyright law, which states that "It shall be permissible to reproduce, by painting, drawing, photography or cinematography, works which are permanently located on public ways, streets or places and to distribute and publicly communicate such copies. For works of architecture, this provision shall be applicable only to the external appearance."

As with all other “limits of copyright by legally permitted uses”, no changes to the actual work are permitted under § 62 of the German copyright law (UrhG).

See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Freedom of panorama for more information.

Deutsch  English  español  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  Esperanto  македонски  русский  العربية  한국어  português do Brasil  français  português  українська  +/−


Palosirkka (talk) 09:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ːYes, was created accidentally, please delete it. --Granpar (talk) 13:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ein paar Commons-Anregungen für den "Dezember"

[edit]

@Granpar: Ich wünsche dir einen schönen und gesegneten 3. Advent und möchte dir ein paar Commons-Anregungen für den "Dezember" in deiner Umgebung geben. Mögliche Bilder im Dezember ...

~Zeit vor Weihnachten; speziell die drei Sonntage im Dezember vor Weihnachten = 2., 3., und 4. Advent
1. - 21./22. Dezember
21./22. - 31. Dezember (20./21. März)
24.-26. Dezember; Weihnachten; und teilweise schon die "Weihnachtszeit" davor im Dezember
31. Dezember

Viele Grüße -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 13:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: Bei den aktuellen Temperaturen (-12/13° C):

Gruß -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 08:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Mörschenhard_(Mudau) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Matthias Nonnenmacher (talk) 22:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dolinenpfad Infoboard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Perfectnews (talk) 21:18, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plakat Odenwald Klassik 2022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Odenwald Klassik 2023 Training 17.06. 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nakna06 (talk) 17:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biodiversitätspfad 2023 11 Streuobstwiese Wartturn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ALASÜLEYMAN (talk) 00:30, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Infoboard Aktivplatz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fugefe (talk) 19:52, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smart Pfad Odenwald - Wasser erforschen 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JacobTheRox (talk) 16:50, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sendemast (Pülfringen) 2023 00.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HubiB (talk) 20:59, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Du erhältst einen Orden!

[edit]
Der Fleißorden
Für deine tollen Bilder und deine Arbeiten im Kategoriesystem. -- Triple C 85 | User talk | 11:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Trigonometrischer Punkt und Granzstein auf dem Katzenbuckel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Unnerving duck (talk) 13:44, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plakat Circus Henry Walldürn 2023.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Belbury (talk) 16:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

[edit]

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Kreisstraße K 3900 (Neckar-Odenwald-Kreis). ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 03:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]