User talk:GrandCelinien

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
es-2

en-3

fr




Vous voulez utiliser une de mes photos ? N'hésitez-pas. Vous pouvez m'informer ici, mais ce n'est pas obligatoire (j'aime bien savoir où se trouvent mes contributions !) Cordialement GrandCelinien (talk) 15:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour!
Je voulais juste vous dire que la personne qui tient la pancarte "Proud to bi myself" sur la photo de la Pride de Paris 2021 que vous avez pris et qui illustre l'article "Bisexualité" sur Wikipédia : c'est moi :')
La photo y est depuis un an, je ne l'avais jamais vue, c'est un ami à moi qui vient de tomber dessus et de me l'envoyer! Elle est très réussie, bravo à vous ; et je suis très fière d'illustrer la page Wiki d'une si noble cause que la lutte pour les droits des LGBT+ !
Bonne continuation dans vos photos, vous êtes très doué! Detilma17 (talk) 22:26, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, merci beaucoup ! C'est toujours un plaisir d'avoir ce type de retour, surtout quand le récit de la découverte est aussi fortuit ! On se recroisera peut-être cette année alors :P GrandCelinien (talk) 10:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You wanna use one of my picture ? Do not hesitate. You can also prevent me, but it's not an obligation. :). GrandCelinien (talk) 15:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reugny - Mairie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mhhossein talk 06:45, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No deletion → old building, typical in that aera GrandCelinien (talk) 15:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:2eme chargeDreux.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2eme chargeDreux.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:58, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tours - Foire à l'ail et au basilic - 26 juillet 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Slightly posterized but sharp enough for QI imo. --GerifalteDelSabana 22:13, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tours - Université François Rabelais - Jardin participatif Tanneurs 2017 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Weak support, residual chromatic aberration but still QI imo. --GerifalteDelSabana 11:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sumène - Croix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vieux cadenas et chaine rouillée (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The DoF could be deeper but OK for QI. --Peulle 13:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chat domestique dormant sur un banc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments While I'd prefer you to move to the left to avoid the iron handle, I guess we need some shots from this kind of angle too. --Peulle 20:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autrèche - Bottes de paille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The light is a bit bright but generally OK for QI. --Peulle 14:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wikipédia en français sur mobile android (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tours - Manifestation pour les droits des femmes NousToutes - 24 novembre (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Good quality, in my opinion. I don't think it's important to correct the perspective of the building to the right, because the focus is on that nice placard. -- Ikan Kekek 00:21, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear GrandCelinien,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tours - Manifestation des Gilets Jaunes - 02 février 2019 (07) (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:36, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guerre de téléchargement[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Graphics village pump#Should_a_poor_JPEG_be_upscaled?. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ji

Utilisation de votre image pour un article de presse en Espagne[edit]

Bonjour,

Je vous écris pour communiquer que nous avons utilisé votre photo comme illustration de la traduction a l'espagnol de cet article de Geoffroy de Lagasnerie: https://blogs.mediapart.fr/geoffroy-de-lagasnerie/blog/310719/la-mort-de-steve-comme-revelatrice-de-la-verite-de-la-police

Ici vous pouvez voir notre traduction avec votre photo: https://ctxt.es/es/20190807/Firmas/27723/steven-maia-cani%C3%A7o-policia-francesa-macronismo-adama-traore-geoffroy-de-lagasnerie.htm

J'espere que ça ne pose aucun probleme. Merci bcp.

Elena, Revista Contexto. elena@ctxt.es

@83.33.50.110: aucun problème, c'est très gentil de m'avoir prévenu ! N'hésitez-pas, les photos sur Wikimedia Commons sont faites pour ça :) --GrandCelinien (talk) 21:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 22:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:52, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manifestation à Paris du 21 novembre 2020 – 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit distracting that the background is out of focus, but front has good quality and nicely sharp. --Tomer T 13:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voix métallique[edit]

Bonjour,

Il serait trop long de te dire comment j'arrive ici à te faire une remarque, sache seulement que je ne t'en veux pas . J'ai signalé à une autre des bruits parasites dans plusieurs fichiers. Non, toi c'est juste où je trouve que certaines de tes cordes vocales se sont percutées... C'est un peu râpeux, tu ne trouves pas, tandis que alliage au contraire est un délice, c'est pas normal !

Si ton micro n'est pas trop loin, je t'invite à remettre le fer au feu...

Bonne continuation (je découvre le projet Lingua Libre ; et pourquoi in Wikimedia France ?)

Hervé Tigier (talk) 21:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Coudray-Montceaux - janvier 2021 - Sous la neige (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good quality under the conditions, but we need a category for that species of tree. -- Ikan Kekek 19:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC) Comment @Ikan Kekek: ✓ Done, sorry ! --GrandCelinien 11:00, 31 January 2021[reply]
 Support Not a problem, thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 09:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

falier[edit]

raphael — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.245.241.184 (talk) 09:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mikhail Kalatozov PSE Russia 2003 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 12:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Composite images[edit]

You may wish to upload a new version of File:Les Sans Pages - Extrait galerie.jpg - one that doesn't contain five images that were deleted for various copyright reasons. DS (talk) 17:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you may delete this image, that's too risky to make a screenshot with so many new pictures from commons in it. --GrandCelinien (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]