User talk:Grand-Duc/Archiv/2011/April
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File tagging File:Steamship Morro Castle on fire.jpg
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Steamship Morro Castle on fire.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Diannaa (talk) 13:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Steamship Morro Castle Burned out hulk.jpg
|
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Steamship Morro Castle Burned out hulk.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portalkran im Stadthafen Rostock reworked GD-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Neptunwerft crane and hall 2010-10-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leicaflex SL2.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Auch so ein Fall..
Abend Grand-Duc, das hier wollte ich dir zeigen. Dagegen ist unser Toilettenbenutzer noch harmlos. Mann,mann,mann...--Yikrazuul (talk) 19:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Dass die Porzellanschüssel harmloser sei, würde ich so nicht sagen, Menschen mit einem Sendungsbewusstsein können gefährlich sein. Ich habe mir mal ein paar Bilder angeschaut, ROFL. Allerdings könnte so ein generalisierter LA gegen alles so wirken wie DDT in der Landwirtschaft, nämlich Kollateralschäden hervorrufen / den MDR erfolglos werden lassen. In der Summe haben wir es klar mit einem Menschen mit exhibitionistischen Trieben zu tun, doch finde ich nicht alle Bilder sicher out of scope. Ein Katheterbild und ein Windelbild könnten, wenn es keine Alternativen gibt und bei sparsamerer und akkuraterer Kategorisierung durchaus eine hiesige Daseinsberechtigung haben. Grüße, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:07, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Findest du? Ich denke, Leute mit so einem eindeutigen Benutzernamen (kleines Baby), die zig Varianten ihrer - wie soll ich sagen - Neigung darstellen, natürlich nicht zu einer anderen Mitarbeit sich bemüßigt fühlen, und demonstrativ "no dick" auf ihre Platikwindel schreiben, doch sehr fehl am Platze hier. Da kommt's auf eine Windel auch nicht an. Toilette hat immerhin noch "normale" Landschaftsbilder und brauchbare Artikelbilder geliefert.
- Eines der Hauptrprobleme hier bei commons ist sicherlich, dass hier alles kostenlos ist, und ne gewisse Fernwirkung hat. Was ich immer bemerkt habe: Je seltsamer der Name (Bild, Uploader) im Bereich Sexualität/Körper, desto löschfähiger seine Uploads.
- Viele Grüße, --Yikrazuul (talk) 09:58, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Stitchinggesuch
Hi,
du scheinst ganz gut mit Hugin umgehen zu können. Kannst Du mal probieren, ob Du diesen beiden Dateien [1] fehlerfrei zusammengefügt bekommst? Bei mir ist im Ergebnis der linke Pfeiler nie ganz zusammen zu kriegen. Vielleicht hast Du mehr Erfolg als ich. Danke und Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Taxi, hui, das ist eine ganz nette Knacknuss. Ich versuche mich mal dran. Kann ich aber noch ein Bild mit heilen EXIF bekommen? Das erleichtert/ermöglicht die automatisierte Übernahme von Bildwinkel, Brennweite und Crop in Hugin. Selbst wenn das eine HDR-Montage ist, kann ich mir mit EXIFTool die EXIF aus einem der Ausgangsbilder in das Stitchingmaterial reinschreiben. Grüße, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Anbei die gewünschten Daten. EXIF kopiere ich grundsätzlich nicht beim HDR, wenn dann schreibe ich sie von Hand rein, da es sich ja um Belichtungsreihen handelt. Gruß --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Reminder
Please refrain from editing other users signed comments. -- Docu at 19:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- I won't do it unless there is a good reason, like an appearance of a double vote. I did not modify the content of your contribution, only the formatting. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Even if you have the possibility to edit any users comment on a Wiki, it's not something you may do. Especially when you have been asked not to and reverted.
- BTW, it would help if you would respond to the proposal at hand rather than voting based on some "I believe" assumption. -- Docu at 20:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- I was never asked not to do it. As for the revert, I assume that you refer to [2], well, I talked with Tryphon about this very subject without getting an opposing opinion, I am not alone with the assumption of a double vote. Regards, Grand-Duc 20:44, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Good point, you are ask not to edit signed comments now. You must have noticed though that your previous edit was restored. Rehman is known to do inappropriate edits to discussion pages, thus they are hardly a sample to follow.
- Personally, I think it's a bit insulting to others to assume that they can't assess discussions. Besides that, you should still try to express an opinion in regards to the proposal instead of purely voting based on an idea that is not being proposed. Consider revising or removing your own comment. -- Docu at 04:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- I was never asked not to do it. As for the revert, I assume that you refer to [2], well, I talked with Tryphon about this very subject without getting an opposing opinion, I am not alone with the assumption of a double vote. Regards, Grand-Duc 20:44, 28 April 2011 (UTC)