User talk:Gonzosft/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Karl-Albrecht Mensching (1914).jpg was uncategorized on 3 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Robert Strey.jpg was uncategorized on 4 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Bsi Karte 2.jpg was uncategorized on 10 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Image:SM UC 97 Untersee-Minenleger.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Bosnet-Oberbayern.jpg was uncategorized on 20 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Leffe-beer.jpg was uncategorized on 21 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Ladungsverschiebung.jpg was uncategorized on 13 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:26, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Galabovo TPS AES.jpg was uncategorized on 30 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Genauere Quellenangaben
Zum Beispiel bei diesem Bild: Bitte nicht http://www.buddecke.de angeben, das reicht nämlich nicht aus. Gib bitte den genauen Link auf die Unterseite an, wo du das Bild genommen hast. Hinsichtlich der Quellenvalidität von Commons ist dies von zentraler Wichtigkeit. --High Contrast (talk) 09:57, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Fieseler_Fi-103_Reichenberg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
93.196.41.33 12:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
File:U47_+_Scharnhorst.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Denniss (talk) 09:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Blanking
Hi Gonzosft,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Austin-Putilov armoured car on Commons. I asume you meant for the page to be deleted, but blanking the page is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use {{speedy|reason here}} and add it on top of the page; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regulary for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed. Thanks again. –Krinkletalk 20:15, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
there two stubs articels within that category. i tried to join them because i dont ee a reason to have 2 little articles who dont differ i dont know other method to join, so i edited both files. if you know and better to do, please make it so--Gonzosft (talk) 20:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Hallo Gonzosft!
Bitte verwende zum Suchen von Bilder diese Seite, statt dieser. http://www.defenseimagery.mil/ ist das zentrale Bildarchiv der US-Streitkräfte und umfasst insgesamt mehr Bilder und zudem ist die Quelle besser zitierbar. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 20:32, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Danke --Gonzosft (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Georg_Klein.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
High Contrast (talk) 16:48, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Bilder der Presseagentur AP sind nicht gemeinfrei im sinne dieses Bausteins: {{PD-Afghanistan}}. Das Bild wurde wegen eklatanter Urheberrechtsverletzung gelöscht. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 16:52, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Der Upload ist immer nur so gut, wie der Baustein. Und in dem steht für mich klar verständlich drin, " because it is a work of Afghanistan". Wenn diese amerikanische Sichtweise nur für USA gilt, so sollte im Kleingedruckten die Ausnahmen für deutsche User drinstehen.--Gonzosft (talk) 11:17, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hier geht es nicht um Sichtweisen. Dieses Foto ist eben kein "work of Afghanistan", sondern eines Fotographen, der im Auftrag von AP dieses Foto gemacht hat, bzw. AP hat dieses Foto gekauft und ist somit Rechtsinhaber dieses Bildes. --High Contrast (talk) 07:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Das das Foto in Afghanistan aufgenommen wurde, sollte ausser Frage stehen. Also nach meinem Schulenglisch durchaus ein "work of Afghanistan". Wo sind deinen Quellen für diese "angebliche" Einschränkung ?--Gonzosft (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Horten_Ho9_airfield_2.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Horten_Ho9_airfield_2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Horten_Ho9_airfield_2.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Horten_Ho9_chassis_1.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Horten_Ho9_chassis_1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 23:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Horten_Ho9_airfield.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Horten_Ho9_airfield.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 23:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Als Quelle nur "US Gov" anzugeben reicht hinten und vorne nicht. Das muss wesentlich genauer erfolgen. --High Contrast (talk) 23:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ich habe ledigliche von einem anderen Bild derselben Serie die Infofmationen übernommen. Willst du das nicht auch noch gleich löschen ? Das ist schon 2 Jahre hier in Wiki drin, ohne Beanstandung. Vielleicht vor deiner aktiven Zeit. Guckst du hier : File:Ho9-4.jpg, File:Cgo229.jpg
- Klassischerweise wurden diese Dateien übersehen. Danke für den Hinweis. --High Contrast (talk) 08:16, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Horten_Ho9-hangar-2.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Horten_Ho9-hangar-2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Horten_Ho9-hangar-2.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 09:22, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Bitte keine Quellenangaben auf das Bild direkt, denn das beweist erstmal nichts, da nicht überprüfbar. Bitte die html-Seite. --High Contrast (talk) 09:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Horten_Ho9-hangar-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 09:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Fieseler_Fi_103_sound.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.103.94 20:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
File:FW190-Granatwerfer1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
93.196.48.249 10:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
File:FW190-Granatwerfer2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
93.196.48.249 10:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Revi_C12-A.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
93.196.48.249 10:40, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Neptun_FuG_217.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
93.196.48.249 10:42, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Bordpeilgerät_Peil_G_6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
93.196.48.249 10:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Flugabwehr-004 640.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
- Derartige Uploads tätigst du bitte nicht mehr. --High Contrast (talk) 14:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
File:Würzburg_Hanstholm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
High Contrast (talk) 14:44, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Gonzosft, at File:U-3003.jpg you uploaded the original version of this image over my cropped version, which removed the caption bar at the top. It is conventional that images at Commons are not supposed to contain captions in the image (these should be included in the image description page instead, and used as captions in the article if desired). This aids internationalization, readability, and machine processing. Please be careful not to do this in the future. Thank you! Dcoetzee (talk) 19:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- the text is written in en:American English. if you want to say, that it is less understandable then Oxford English, i fully agree you.
- However, the original counts for me more then your manipulation.
--Gonzosft (talk) 20:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Many Wikipedia projects are not written in English, and wish to provide their own caption in their own language. Additionally, a variety of accessibility tools such as screenreaders and search functionality cannot read captions embedded in images. I did not alter the image at all except to remove this caption. We do the same for thousands of other similar images. Dcoetzee (talk) 08:18, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
File:Wilhelm_Frankl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saibo (Δ) 23:31, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Karl-August Nerger, Nicola Perscheid, Sanke 633.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
File:SMS_Wolf_Kriegsfahrt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
File:SMS_Wolf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:05, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Sanders_Pickelhaube.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 20:12, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Souchon.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Souchon.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 20:13, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Loon_Test_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.103.85 18:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
File:FuMO_15_Scheer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.103.85 18:57, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Your comment "we dont take comments from concealed users" in the DR above is wrong. Anyone can nominate a file for deletion and we "listen" to all comments - even comments from users that is not logged in - so in future it is best to act on all DR's. --MGA73 (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
...Blödsinn wirst du in Zukunft unterlassen. --High Contrast (talk) 20:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Lichtenstein_radar_Do_17.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.102.110 22:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Admiral_v_Usedom.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Admiral_v_Usedom.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Martin H. (talk) 19:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, the above photo was taken on the US Navy escort carrier USS Block Island (CVE-21), and not on CVE-106. The US Navy had three Block Island carriers, CVE-8 (later HMS Hunter), CVE-21 (sunk 1944) and CVE-106. Cheers Cobatfor (talk) 17:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Na dann schreib doch bitte eine Bildbeschreibung in Deutsch. Ich habe hier nur den Text der US Quelle abgetippt --Gonzosft (talk) 21:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
File:L23_kapert_Bark_Royal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84user (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
nice
beautiful picture Decora (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
unfrotunately you have no proof it is out of copyright so i cant use it in any articles. . . .
File:Ju88-FUG220.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.107.24 19:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Lichtenstein_radar_Do_17.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Polarsec2 (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Rosenthaler-Kadarka1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Duplikat
Hallo!
Dieses Bild wurde gelöscht, weil es bereits auf Commons vorhanden war (siehe: File:Victory Day Parade 2008-12.jpg [seit 2008]). Bei Quellen wie kremlin.ru oder defenseimager.mil muss man stets im Vorfeld überprüfen, ob ein bestimmtes Bild bereits vorhanden, da die viele Benutzer aus diesen Seite hochladen und es dadurch zwangsläufig zu Upload-Überschneidungen kommt.
Bitte im Vorfeld abklären, ob ein Bild bereits auf Commons vorliegt. --High Contrast (talk) 08:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Danke--Gonzosft (talk) 10:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Übrigens hast du dich auch bei der Bildbeschreibung vertan: Das Bild wurde nicht während der Maiparade im Jahr 2001 aufgenommen, sondern im Jahr 2008. Wie konnte das passieren? Ist doch die Bildbeschreibung auf kremlin.ru eindeutig. --High Contrast (talk) 10:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- weiß ich nicht mehr, aber jedenfalls 2011 (nicht 2001) nach der Parade gesucht + gefunden. In einem Kremmel-Video, wenn ich mich noch richtig erinnere und dann ausgeschnippelt. Übrigens ein neues Raketensystem, das später ins Bild kam, habe ich nirgends entdecken können. --Gonzosft (talk) 11:21, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Hawk Firing 2.JPEG
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hawk Firing 2.JPEG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 21:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- Wo ist das Problem ?--Gonzosft (talk) 10:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Du hattest keine brauchbare Quelle angegeben. Sei froh, dass ich das für dich erledigt habe. --High Contrast (talk) 20:39, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Sovmusic-katyusha.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
ShinePhantom (talk) 10:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Russian Honour guards.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Russian Honour guards.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 16:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Genauere Quelle wird verlangt. Bei kremlin.ru-Bildern werden auch Direktlinks auf das Bild akzeptiert. --High Contrast (talk) 16
- 34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- wäre chön, wenn der Lizens-Tag {{Kremlin.ru}} beim upload auch akzeptiert wird. im moment muß ich den nachträglich einfügen. --Gonzosft (talk) 17:12, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Gut, dass du die Quelle nachgetragen hast. Spezialtags wie {{Kremlin.ru}} werden nicht im Standard-Upload vorgeschlagen; das Einfügen muss manuell erfolgen, da es sich in diesem Fall um eine OTRS-bestätigte "Spezialerlaubnis" handelt. --High Contrast (talk) 14:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
File:75_let_17_hor_iz_opery_nabuk.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Buddecke
Hi, Gonzosft. Do you know the name of this officer (right of Beddecke) ? Erich Serno ? Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 07:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- no sorry.
File:L59_Besatzung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84user (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
File:L59_Rueckkehr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84user (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
File:L59_Start.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84user (talk) 09:48, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
File:L59-Gedenkstein-Jambol.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84user (talk) 09:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
File:L59-Gondel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84user (talk) 09:50, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Wassermann-radar.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wassermann-radar.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Wassermann-radar.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 10:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Biaf logo.gif
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Biaf logo.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Martin H. (talk) 22:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Biaf_logo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84user (talk) 20:20, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
File:GOEBEN-Malta.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 11:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Ju88-14.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 11:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
I believe you may have uploaded the picture. I need your help with respect to the source of this image. The source for the Blakeley photo is problematic; the ship does not have an entry in the US Navy's online collection (see here). Can please help me resolve the copyright status? I want to use the image in the en:Werner Hartenstein article. Thanks MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- what do you think ? i invented that name ? not my fault, if the us navy forgot one ship in their lists.
what else do you anticipate ? a german spy plane shoot that foto in us territory waters ? be realistic ! there can be no other source then a us-plane with a us-airman shoot the foto. no i dont remember the soucre after that time--Gonzosft (talk) 11:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- well a Germany plane is unlikely :-) The issue is that you claimed that the image source is http://www.history.navy.mil/. You can search all you want and you will not find this picture there. I found the same image here. My only interest is to use this image on en:Werner Hartenstein article. I therefore have to establish the correct source, providing sound rationale. MisterBee1966 (talk) 20:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hello. The problem is, to use the image on en.wiki (and to host it on Commons), we need to have definitive proof that the photo is a US Navy photo (or otherwise out of copyright) - we can't assume or guess that it is. Without that proof, it will have to be deleted from Commons. Parsecboy (talk) 22:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you continue this idea, there will be lots of work for you. i estimate 50% have to be deleted. You will get a lot of new "friends".--Gonzosft (talk) 11:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hello. The problem is, to use the image on en.wiki (and to host it on Commons), we need to have definitive proof that the photo is a US Navy photo (or otherwise out of copyright) - we can't assume or guess that it is. Without that proof, it will have to be deleted from Commons. Parsecboy (talk) 22:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- well a Germany plane is unlikely :-) The issue is that you claimed that the image source is http://www.history.navy.mil/. You can search all you want and you will not find this picture there. I found the same image here. My only interest is to use this image on en:Werner Hartenstein article. I therefore have to establish the correct source, providing sound rationale. MisterBee1966 (talk) 20:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
File:USS_Blakeley_ohne_Bug.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Parsecboy (talk) 23:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Nusret
Rica etsem, File:Ottoman minelayer Nusret.jpg'nin yenisini ayrı bir dosya olarak yükler misin ? Önceki görüntüde mühür yok ama yenisinde var. İki ayrı versiyonun bulunması zararlı değildir. Takabeg (talk) 13:38, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Probably the story of Seyit Onbaşı was created for the purpose of war propaganda. They need heros of the Ottoman, not German. DZ. KUR. ALB. = Deniz Kurmay Albay. Takabeg (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
i allradey translated DZ.ALB. as "Kapitän zur See" or Oberst or Captain (naval) is DZ.ALB. the same as DZ.KUR.ALB ? does Kurmay mean something extra, like reserve or gerneral staff officer ? --Gonzosft (talk) 13:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
kurmay = Stabsoffizier. Takabeg (talk) 13:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Yavuz_Schwimmdock.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
79.221.106.111 15:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Louis_Barthou.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin H. (talk) 17:08, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Ansambl aleksandrova-podmoskovnyie vechera.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dpmuk (talk) 00:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Arado AR234.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Arado AR234.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 23:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Russkaja armija v vatikane 12 ej uhnem.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Истребитель Heinkel He-51B.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Истребитель Heinkel He-51B.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Art-top (talk) 17:40, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Russkaja armija v vatikane 06 kalinka.ogg
- File:Russkaja armija v vatikane 07 kamarinskaja.ogg
- File:Russkaja armija v vatikane 09 prazdnichnyj marsh.ogg
- File:Russkaja armija v vatikane 13 hor slavsja iz opery ivan susanin.ogg
Yours sincerely, AVRS (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Denar-50MKD.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
KTo288 (talk) 11:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Template:Idw/layout Clarissy. 18:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
File:FuMO 15 Scheer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
heb [T C E] 08:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Template:Idw/layout heb [T C E] 08:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, heb [T C E] 11:50, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
I may have some. e-mail me my foto as a referene, so i remember what you are looking for
1995 photos from the National Museum of Military History in Sofia
Hello.
Although the AA director actually seems to be a Soviet PUAZO-4, the photos are very interesting as far as 20 years ago the museum exhibits were in much better condition. Do you have any other photos from that time?
Thanks in advance!
Yours sincerely, Ain92 (talk) 20:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Lev. Anthony (talk) 19:36, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate High Contrast (talk) 14:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)