User talk:Geraldshields11/archives 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Geraldshields11!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

MathewTownsend (talk) 22:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Geraldshields11!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks. I will do it for the pictures uploaded and alos in the future. Geraldshields11 (talk) 00:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kim Il-sung photo in 538.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kim Il-sung photo in 538.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Psychonaut (talk) 07:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please speedly delete the Kim Il-sung photo. Geraldshields11 (talk) 22:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarks[edit]

Hi Geraldshields11, please understand that there are serious reasons not to upload watermarked images like this one. -- Ies (talk) 16:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ies, The picture you cite is a mural on the outside of a Museum of the Xinle Civilization in the People's Republic of China, which as Right of Panorama under their copyright law. So, I am not understanding the wartermark issues you mention because other than the mural, in socialist realism style, there is no symbol. Please explain. Geraldshields11 (talk) 16:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Ies, I believe you are talking about the timestamp. I am sorry. Geraldshields11 (talk) 16:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I did not relize that my camera was set to that until after the trip. Also, many of the photos are unique. Please tell me how to solve the issue of the timestamp. I am very willing to work with a seasoned veteran such as your self. Please help. Geraldshields11 (talk) 16:30, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Geraldshields11, this has nothing to do with the content of the image, here a museum. I'm referring to the watermarks / timestamps, "09/19/2012" in case of File:Xinle culture 358.JPG, that unfortunately disfigure your images and make them almost unuseable. -- Ies (talk) 16:36, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As I said earlier, "Please tell me how to solve the issue of the timestamp." "I am very willing to work with a seasoned veteran such as your self. Please help."Geraldshields11 (talk) 16:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Ies, I figured out how to use software to crop the date from the pictures. I will upload the new photos. Please would you give me tips or pointers on how to replace the already uploaded photos with new photos without retyping the information or changinging the file name? Geraldshields11 (talk) 12:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Ies, I figured out, by myself, how to use the Commons' upload features to replace an image with a better picture. So, I do not have to retype all of the information. Geraldshields11 (talk) 15:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I got the picture to dispaly without the date stamp when using the photo on en Wikipedia. Geraldshields11 (talk) 23:14, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I see you learned a lot meanwhile. And you learned quick. Congratulations! Still puzzling for you seems that it takes a while for Commons to display the newly uploaded images. Make a refresh (click tab ""purge" or press F5 in case of a Windows system) after the new upload to enforce the current image display. I assume you took your camera and switched OFF the timestamp feature?! ;-) Ies (talk) 08:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Ies, Thank you for the compliment. Yes, the purge tip will come in handy. I kept seeing the date stamp even though I uploaded the cropped picture. It was very surprising and I thought I did something wrong that is why I have multiple uploads. I switched off the timestamp feature. :)
Please would you suggest English language books on photography that you either wrote or recommend? I got a portrait photo book but it is for subjects who pose. I plan to attend seminars or discussions to take photos of VIPs and add to the article. See Sunye and talk page as an example. Also, Ri Sol-ju article's talk page. I plan to take outdoor photos of monuments and corporate signs.
I was thinking about a Sony Alpha NEX5RK digital camera with a E 18-mm f/3-5.6 OSS len and a 55-210 mm zoom len as my next purchase. This should cover low light seminar conditions and also outdoor conditions. Please tell me your suggestions as I am on a budget. My best regards,Geraldshields11 (talk) 18:32, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I can't help you now. I neither know a photography book in English language nor the Sony Alpha NEX5RK camera. But I found some test results regarding this camera published over here that reach from "good" to "excellent". Particularly it's low noise and its high dynamic range is praised. The only bad point worth mentioning concerns its speed: quick snapshots seem difficult... -- Ies (talk) 17:19, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Ies, Thank you for the information. I made contact with two members of a panel, who are willing to give copy-right free photos to me to upload on thier artices. On November 11, 2012, I went to a panel on Red Detachment of Women. Three of the members have artices but no picture. One member of the panel posed for his picture for me. Geraldshields11 (talk) 00:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

White Paper[edit]

Wikipedia Congress Briefing

Rationale:

in light of the blackout, there is a need for follow up briefings of Congress, keeping in mind that they are an older generation. education campaign on general principles, not any specific legislation.

typically small groups could brief staff of members of congress, targeting committees, or volunteers’ member.

Suggested brief:

What is wikipedia?[edit]

Wikipedia is a multilingual, web-based, free-content encyclopedia project based on an openly editable model. Wikipedia is written collaboratively by largely anonymous Internet volunteers who write without pay. Anyone with Internet access can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles Users can contribute anonymously, under a pseudonym, or with their real identity, if they choose.

The Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. is an American non-profit charitable organization headquartered in San Francisco, California, United States, and organized under the laws of the state of Florida, where it was initially based. It operates several online collaborative wiki projects including Wikipedia, Wikisource, Wikimedia Commons, Meta-Wiki [1]

What is open source?[edit]

In the late 20th century, cultural practitioners began to adopt the intellectual property licensing techniques of free software and open-source software to make their work more freely available to others, including the Creative Commons.

In contrast to free culture, proponents of open-source culture (OSC) maintain that some intellectual property law needs to exist to protect cultural producers. Yet they propose a more nuanced position than corporations have traditionally sought. Instead of seeing intellectual property law as an expression of instrumental rules intended to uphold either natural rights or desirable outcomes, an argument for OSC takes into account diverse goods and ends.

One way of achieving the goal of making cultural work generally available is to maximally utilize technology and digital media. In keeping with Moore's law's prediction about processors, the cost of digital media and storage plummeted in the late 20th Century. Consequently, the marginal cost of digitally duplicating anything capable of being transmitted via digital media dropped to near zero. Combined with an explosive growth in personal computer and technology ownership, the result is an increase in general population's access to digital media. This phenomenon facilitated growth in open-source culture because it allowed for rapid and inexpensive duplication and distribution of culture. [2]

What is copyright, and how does this interact with public domain?[edit]

Copyright initially was conceived as a way for government to restrict printing; the contemporary intent of copyright is to promote the creation of new works by giving authors control of and profit from them.

Most jurisdictions recognize copyright limitations, allowing "fair" exceptions to the creator's exclusivity of copyright, and giving users certain rights.

The development of digital media and computer network technologies have prompted reinterpretation of these exceptions, introduced new difficulties in enforcing copyright, and inspired additional challenges to copyright law's philosophic basis. Simultaneously, businesses with great economic dependence upon copyright have advocated the extension and expansion of their copy rights, and sought additional legal and technological enforcement. [3]

What is DNS?[edit]

The Domain Name System (DNS) is a hierarchical distributed naming system for computers, services, or any resource connected to the Internet or a private network.

By design, all domain name servers world-wide should contain identical lists; with the blocking changes proposed, servers inside the United States would have records different from their global counterparts, making URLs less universal.

One concern expressed by network experts is that hackers would offer workarounds to private users to allow access to government-seized sites, but these workarounds might also jeopardize security by redirecting unsuspecting users to scam websites. Supporters of the bill, such as the MPAA, have argued that widespread circumvention of the filtering would be unlikely.

Users might go to unregulated alternative DNS systems, and hindering the government from conducting legitimate Internet regulation. MAFIAAFire Redirector, a software extension for the Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome web browsers, redirects links from domains that have been seized by governments to backup sites, in order to bypass the blocking. The software is open source. [4]

2013 Wikimedia DC Annual Meeting[edit]

I am in the process of uploading 900 MB of photos. If you do not like a photo of the meeting that you are in, just add a speedy delete tag and cite this talk page as the reason, such as "per Geraldshields11 Wiki Commons talk page discussion". I will not contest and will second the request. Geraldshields11 (talk) 17:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photos[edit]

Nice photos of #WikiConUSA though I was surprised to see all of the ones with me. The ones from across table with the "Mona Lisa smile" aren't too bad. ;-) Thanks for all of your work during the conference. Liz (talk) 21:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Liz, Thank you for the compliment on my capturing the Mona Lisa smile. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:11, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:2014 WikiConference USA 28.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Another Believer (talk) 13:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I requested this delete. Thank you for deleting this photograph. I requested this delete. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:09, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:2014 WikiConference USA 10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amitie 10g (talk) 22:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I requested this delete. Thank you for deleting this photograph. I requested this delete. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:09, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:2014 WikiConference USA (Group N) 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amitie 10g (talk) 22:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I requested this delete. Thank you for deleting this photograph. I requested this delete. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:2014 WikiConference USA (Group C) 10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amitie 10g (talk) 22:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I requested this delete. Thank you for deleting this photograph. I requested this delete. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

none