User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2015 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Turul Uzhhorod Castle 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Turul Uzhhorod Castle 2015 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Locomotive M41 418 188 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Récipient céramique (slave?) : qu'est-ce qu'un schanik?
Bonjour George Chernilevsky, User:Jebulon me dit ici que tu connaîtrais peut-être la réponse à cette question:
Qu'est-ce qu'un schanik et à quoi sert ce pot gémelle à anse? Un panier-repas? Une marmite? Est-ce bien la désignation anglaise correcte? Existe-t-il une traduction française? D'avance merci pour ta peine, --Bohème (talk) 14:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Bonjour! C'est la vaisselle pour livrer la nourriture prête chaude pour le travailleur (paysan) sur le champ. Une section pour la soupe, la deuxième section pour la bouillie. Il y a aussi une variante avec trois sections. C'est la vaisselle historique ethnique, qui maintenant n'est pas utilisée déjà. On utilise maintenant les thermos.
Très amical, Georges -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup et pensées amicales vers l'Ukraine. --Bohème (talk) 01:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Magnolia liliiflora 2015 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Magnolia liliiflora 2015 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DR1A-292 diesel trainset 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chamerion angustifolium 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Tiasa basa Sunda?
Anjeun tiasa basa Sunda?--Uchup19 (talk) 00:21, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Series of copyvios
Hi, could you please nuke this user's contributions? All copyvios from Getty. Thanks. Lukasz Lukomski (talk) 16:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, Lukasz! Thank you for notification.
Done -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Armillaria mellea 2014 G3.jpg
JuTa 21:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- My mistake. Fixed, this photo is my own work, PD-self -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Armillaria mellea 2014 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piptoporus betulinus 2014 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fomitopsis pinicola 2014 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ganoderma applanatum 2014 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Armillaria mellea 2014 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sunflower head 2015 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sunflower head 2015 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sunflower head 2015 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sunflower head 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Armillaria mellea 2014 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Voronovytsia 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
QI
Hello,
Thank you for your comment on the three photos that i'd nominate as candidate for QI. I’ll try to make better photos.
Good day. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 09:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Bonjour!
- EN: You have an ability of the Artist. You are able to see and show beauty. However too simple camera spoiled result.
- FR: Tu as une capacité du peintre. Tu sais voir et montrer la beauté. Cependant l'appareil photographique trop simple a abîmé le résultat.
- Très amical, Georges -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi
Thank you for your message. Have you a camera to suggest to me? (while knowing i've a little budget for a new camera)
Good evening. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 18:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)- Hi
The ideal option for you is a DSLR camera of beginner level like Canon EOS 1100 or 1200 or Nikon d3100. You can look for a second-hand (used goods) without defects for the small budget. -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)- Hi,
Sorry, i just saw your answer. Thank you for your suggestions. I'll try to change my camera soon.
Good day. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 21:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hi,
- Hi
- Hi
Your keeps
Hello.
You recently closed:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pregnant graffiti.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Graffiti sobre portón - Florencio Varela.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abstract graffiti in Piazzale Pino Pascali 03.JPG
I disagree with ths close of these. Other DRs of similar nature was recently closed as delete by A.Savin and Natuur12 since we do not have any evidence by some credible source that the graffiti is illegal.[1][2][3][4][5] Per the precautionary principle these files should be deleted. Despite this, you chose to keep them, without making any real rationale to why {{Non-free graffiti}} would apply.
I ask of you to either reconsider, and/or reopen these DRs and let another admin decide. Thank you. Josve05a (talk) 21:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- ↑ Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abstract graffiti in Piazzale Pino Pascali 11.JPG
- ↑ Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abstract graffiti in Piazzale Pino Pascali 08.JPG
- ↑ Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abstract graffiti in Piazzale Pino Pascali 04.JPG
- ↑ Commons:Deletion requests/File:LG graffiti 1.jpg
- ↑ Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abstract graffiti in Piazzale Pino Pascali 01.JPG
- Hello.
- OK, thanks you for notification. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, but that's not an answer. Will you, or will you not reconsider or reopen these DRs ? Pleclown (talk) 20:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello
All of us are engaged in Commons here - we collect information and images for free knowledge and education. Concerning closing of DR of graffiti there is no clearly unambiguous decision.
Isn't present absolutely white (graffiti = well) and isn't present absolutely black (graffiti = deletion everything). Any decision will be "gray" in my opinion. Graffiti is a subculture illustration, and also originals are quickly destroyed. We even have one image of graffiti by user ComputerHotline awarded as FP. Rather legal opportunity to preserve graffiti, apparently discussions were earlier. As a result we received template Non-free graffiti for use. I believe that non-FoP isn't applicable for graffiti as the author prefers to be anonymous, that is doesn't try to protect self copyright. Useful graffiti could be kept for articles.
Example:
- File:Pregnant graffiti.jpg - taken in 2005, original rather not exist now. This image used in article. Author is unknown. So, keep this image is useful for education (the main goal of Wiki) and correct by law IMO.
- Deletion by A.Savin: added "out of scope" reason. I partially agreed for unused images. So, we have "gray" result IMO.
From time to time the similar DR nominations happen to a porno images. Why one penis deleted, but another kept?
We have two opinions: "Wikipedia not sensored" and "nopenis" template. So in this case we have not clearly simple DR closure. Small number of new good images of penis could be kept, but some amateur porno must be quickly deleted.
You can nominate kept images again for DR (not reopen old DR, but renominate), if you believe, it is needed.
Very friendly and with best regards --George Chernilevsky talk 20:29, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding. It is true that the template {{Non-free graffiti}} was created. It was also nominated for deletion, in which the result became to keep it, under a few restrictions. It would only be used if we had evidence that the graffiti was illegal, or if FOP in a country allowed 2D-works.
- You list multiple arguments above which would be summarized as "fair use" and "not following COM:PRP". I have no doubt they are valuble to free knowledge, that much we agree upon. I would like to see everything be free of copyright, bt there are rles and law dictating the playing field.
- I will take some time to reconsider and possibly renominate the files for deelton since I've got your "NPASR". Josve05a (talk) 21:05, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- My 2C. If it is impossible to upheald a copyright because placing the graffiti is illegal we might be able to hoste it. However, it is not always illegal. In my home town it has been perfectly legal to place grafity on the walls of a certain tunnel/bridge. It was a really good move to legalise it since it reduced vandalisme. So, not all grafity placed in public places is illegal. How do we know if it is legal or not? Most of the time we can't know. Only people who have a deep understanding about local law and the local situation are cabaple of taking away any significant doubt. Graffity is also a form of art so it can be copyrightable. The non free grafity template states the following: Complex understanding of the law may be required to determine whether the graffiti in this work would actually be eligible for copyright enforcement. I do believe that this is true but as long as we don't have this critical information com:PCP leaves us with no other option than to delete the file. Natuur12 (talk) 22:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello both!
In my opinion, graffiti have to be deleted quickly if:
- to us the Author is known and we not have permission
- the Author (even not confirmed) imposed the requirements
- we name confirmation that graffiti not illegal.
In all other cases it is necessary to consider actually photo of drawing: he is useful for education or not.
Probably, i am mistaken and then it is necessary to discuss it with professional lawyers (however it was made earlier for creation of the template).
Very friendly, George Chernilevsky talk 05:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- (In school, so will write more later) The outcome of the graffiti-template was that it is the other way around for "to us the Author is known and we not have permission". It should only be kept if we have evidence if the athor can't be found or if it is illegal graffiti. BUt that's my interpertation of Fastly's clear close-comment of it. Josve05a (talk) 10:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Comment George is right. {{Non-free graffiti}} apply, no reason to delete these files. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:39, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- This template is not an evidence of freedom from copyright. --A.Savin 11:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cucurbita pepo 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edible fungi in basket 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi George, happy to read for you again !
Thanks for your support for this picture, but I've withdrawn the nomination, my mistake, it was already a QI ! Sorry !
Eutropius of Saintes is a bishop and a martyr of the beginning of the christianism under the imperial roman law, so he is a saint both for orthodox and catholic Churches. You can see his tomb in this extraordinary romanesque crypt, built around the tenth century. He is a saint of my native region, Charente-Maritime, the country of the "real" cognac !!!
How are you and family in Vinnitsa ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:31, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Salut, mon ami!
- Je t'écrirai la nouvelle un peu plus tard.
- La photo bon. C'est peu important, il y a une récompense ou non.
- Très amical, Georges --George Chernilevsky talk 20:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
I think that this image may have value given that the subject has his own article on two wikis: w:Alessandro Kokocinski. Would you consider undeleting? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hello!
- Done Undeleted / Kept now.
- With best regards, --George Chernilevsky talk 17:13, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piptoporus betulinus 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edible fungi in bucket 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fomitopsis pinicola 2015 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fomitopsis pinicola 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amphilophus citrinellus 2015 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amphilophus citrinellus 2015 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paraneetroplus synspilus 2015 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paraneetroplus synspilus 2015 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paraneetroplus synspilus 2015 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amphilophus citrinellus 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amphilophus citrinellus 2015 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
European Science Photo Competition in Ukraine
Hi, George Chernilevsky/Archive!
Thank you for participating in European Science Photo Competition in Ukraine 2015.
If you have questions, please see our FAQ page. If you didn't find the answers to your questions there, you can contact the organizers or visit this page to ask your question.
Please remember that a good scientific image should have a detailed explanation (example) so maybe you should consider editing the description of your image and adding more details? (just a hint
)--Helixitta (t.) 22:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fomitopsis pinicola 2015 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fomitopsis pinicola 2015 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edible fungi in bucket 2015 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Human gallstones 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lasiodora parahybana 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Gallstones
Just wanted you to know that I thought the WOW factor of that image alone was worthy of FP. Atsme😊Consult 22:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Test image for ESPC-HU.jpg
Please left it up to 03.11.2015, after this date should be deleted! Thank in advance. --WLS-HU (talk) 20:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- OK, You can also add this info on deletion request page. With best regards, --George Chernilevsky talk 20:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cucurbita pepo 2015 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Osphronemus goramy albino 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Запрошення на нагородження української частини Європейського конкурсу наукових фотографій 2015
Вітаємо, George Chernilevsky/Archive!
Дякуємо, що Ви взяли участь у Європейському конкурсі наукових фотографій 2015.
Церемонія нагородження переможців української частини конкурсу відбудеться 10 листопада в Інституті Фізіології ім. О. О. Богомольця о 19:00 (вул. Богомольця 4, Київ. Координати на мапі: 50°26′25.7″N 30°31′51.21″E / 50.440472°N 30.5308917°E)
Детальніше про подію можна почитати тут: Анонс. У День науки оголосять переможців конкурсу наукових фотографій.
Будь ласка, завітайте на подію!--21:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Lasiodora parahybana 2015 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lasiodora parahybana 2015 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Osphronemus goramy (Giant gourami), albino.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Categorizing godfathers
Hey George, as you already have a broad experience in QI and categorizing, I would like to point out the search for QI godfathers. Perhaps you can take care over a small share of uncategorized images? Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:27, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Great photo with perfect background, how?
Hello, I was wondering how you created this perfectly black background in from what I can gather to be an untouched photo shot with pretty basic settings, including a lot of auto mode. Also, great image for a average point-and-shoot camera. Very impressive. B137 (talk) 05:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hello! Background was a matt black ORACAL film. -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Wash Cath Surviors 1.jpg
May I ask why you deleted this photo that I took? I only received a notice on Nov 11th. There was no explanation in the notice. --Susan Macafee (talk) 04:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Susan!
- Wikimedia Commons is created as storage of useful for education files. Not categorized images, files without good descritions, private photos and artworks are not useful and could be deleted as well.
- Wikimedia Commons is not a Facebook and not a private file hosting.
- Please read careful this: Our project scope.
- Wery friendly, George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Macrolepiota procera 2013 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wolves vs Slavs 2015 G26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|