User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2012 3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive 2M62-0400 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! -- MJJR 21:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Locomotive ChS4-109 2012 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Locomotive ChS4-109 2012 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rail service vehicle ADM-1 901 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 05:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemerocallis fulva 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamerion angustifolium 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 17:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamerion angustifolium 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamerion angustifolium 2012 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible fungi in basket 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 21:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-149 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. --NorbertNagel 21:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive 2M62-0400 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. -- JLPC 21:42, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemerocallis fulva 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your tireless work at the deletion requests and for your friendly messages

No need for lots of words, I think. Just keep it up.

RE rillke questions? 21:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:27, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dawn Patrol.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dawn Patrol.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

George, thank you so much for nominating my photo as a featured picture candidate. And, as you indicated that you are somewhat fluent in German, allow me to continue in my native language… Nochmals vielen herzlichen Dank für die Nominierung, über die ich mich sehr gefreut habe. Ich bin ja noch relativ neu bei Commons, wenn es darum geht, eigene Fotos hochzuladen. Meinen ersten Beitrag hier habe ich im Jahr 2005 geleistet. Die meisten der von mir hochgeladenen Werke waren bis zum Jahr 2011 aber gemeinfreie Abbildungen, die ich für meine Artikel in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia benötigte. Nachdem ich meine alte analoge Kamera Anfang dieses Jahres auf eBay verkauft habe, habe ich mich wieder mehr für die Fotografie begeistert. Seitdem sind eine Reihe von Aufnahmen entstanden, von denen ich eine kleine Auswahl regelmäßig hier und auf Flickr hochlade. Seit Beginn dieses Jahres habe ich dann auch angefangen, meine Fotos bei den Qualitätsbildern zu nominieren, um durch das Feedback meine eigenen Fähigkeiten weiter zu verbessern. Dass nun einige der Fotos auch als „Featured pictures“ ausgezeichnet wurden, ist mir eine besondere Ehre und ich freue mich umso mehr über die obige Auszeichnung, als sie durch deine Nominierung zustande gekommen ist. Das bedeutet mir sehr viel und deshalb darf ich dir noch einmal meinen ganz herzlichen Dank aussprechen. Du hast mir eine große Freude bereitet. Viel Erfolg weiterhin mit deinen eigenen Fotos! Herzliche Grüße --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 10:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, Franc!

Du ist sehr gute Fotograf. Deine Arbeiten sind die Belohnungen würdig. Setze fort, vorwärts zu gehen. Ich wünsche dir die schöpferischen Erfolge.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:54, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, George. By the way: very nice blog! I liked the story a lot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS8-078 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- MJJR 20:49, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive TGM4A-2332 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The background is rather disturbing, but QI though -- MJJR 20:49, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-207 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- MJJR 20:49, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible fungi in basket 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Deletion requests/File:AaatestSonnepalmenstrand-portrait new.jpg

note: Commons:Deletion requests/File:AaatestSonnepalmenstrand-portrait new.jpg --Saibo (Δ∇) 20:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

OK, if You really needed this test, let it kept. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. If you need some work: User_talk:Saibo#google_is_everywhere. But please just let the test uploads be test uploads. Either their uploaders will take care of them or we delete them in five years (then they are not needed anymore with a higher probability). Cheers --Saibo (Δ∇) 20:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

I am awarding you the small cleanup master barnstar: ☆. I just was annoyed by the several messages and notification mails for that DR since I really think there are better ways to deal with the test uploads and that there are much more important things to do.  :-) --Saibo (Δ∇) 20:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! All OK, my friend -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:56, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Regarding Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hemerocallis fulva 2012 G1.jpg

Hello,

Even though it's correct that the image in question got the required votes and ratio, perhaps it's best if you recurs yourself from promoting images you yourself have nominated in the first place? _→AzaToth 20:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hemerocallis fulva 2012 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hemerocallis fulva 2012 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive DS3-012 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 20:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electric locomotive DS3.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Help with Supersede

George, I was attempting to supersede: File:Karen Stollznow 1.jpg, since the photo is orphaned, and the subject feels the existing in-use alternate version, containing basically the same content, is better quality: File:Karen Stollznow.jpg.

When I went to do that (I've never done it before), it popped a box up saying a deletion request was denied a couple months back, and I should contact the admin, which I gather is you. How should I proceed here? And thank you for any help.

Hi Rjmail!

File:Karen Stollznow.jpg already exist. Therefore you should be use other filename. For example, Karen Stollznow 2012.jpg or something similar.

Don't overwrite uploads of other users.

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:14, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:PD-Russia

Уважаемый администратор, помогите, пожалуйста, разобрать данную категорию (практически все файлы вынесены на удаление). См. также User talk:Russavia#Template:PD-Russia. Alex Spade (talk) 14:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for your great photos! Loki 66 (talk) 14:29, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:31, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eublepharis macularius 2009 G6.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eublepharis macularius 2009 G6.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive VL8M-1090 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Haneburger 06:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS7-174 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS7-173 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:20, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive DS3-016 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:20, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChS4-108 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive 2M62-0400 2012 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

oops

I accidentally double-nominated a couple images you had already nominated for deletion while doing a mass delete request. The files were File:Graduación Magdiel.jpg and File:Magdu.jpg. Sorry about that. INeverCry 05:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi! It is a small mistake, all OK -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KIL-158 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 20:30, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KIL-158 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 20:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo July 2012-2.jpg

Hi George, could you please go back to the nomination page and explain your criteria? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:47, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Alvesgaspar!

A mistake of FPCbot not give chance for promotion. All is correct by rules now, and it not reason for debate. 11-6 is clear result, sorry. "Weak" is only emotional comment for voting. Voting time is over, so any vote cannot be changed. I closed similar result many times.

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

• Sorry, George but I don't agree that everything is correct by the rules and that there is no reason for debate. As I said before, if we are to apply the rules strictly, no weak supports or opposes should be considered. Changing them to valid votes is an arbitrary procedure. We can agree with such procedure, of course, but that should be discussed first. I'm starting a discussion at FPC talk. Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry, dear George, but I agree with Alvesgaspar. According to the rules and guidelines of FPC, using {weak} support/oppose templates makes the vote invalid, and therefore it cannot count, even if the intention of the reviewer was in fact to oppose...--Jebulon (talk) 12:17, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
    •  Done. Some info about "weak" templates added to FPC talk page. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-15 Termit missile 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice item to have in the backyard:) --Poco a poco 09:11, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Una mandoca for you

A Mandoca for you, from Maracaibo :)

-- George Miquilena · talk 15:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:51, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boat U170 Skadovsk 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 20:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BG57 Patrol boat 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 20:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BG57 Patrol boat 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 20:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P-15 Termit missile 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting.--Jebulon 20:40, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PZS-50 Project 633RV 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 22:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:French marigold garden 2009 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:French marigold garden 2009 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graffiti Vinnitsa 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:26, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
AK-234 class project 205-P patrol boat (Stenka class).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope, and very nice furthermore--Jebulon (talk) 23:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:31, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
KIL-926 class mooring/buoy tender.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 08:11, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Oryctes nasicornis male 2012 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oryctes nasicornis male 2012 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tugboat Mayak 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good overall quality. Maybe, you can adjust shadows (part of the hull is very dark, with few details). Nevertheless QI imo.-ArildV 21:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PZS-50 Project 633RV 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:11, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oryctes nasicornis (European Rhinoceros Beetle), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Day Sevastopol 2012 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and good composition. --ArildV 20:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Day Sevastopol 2012 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:25, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Day Sevastopol 2012 G03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Day Sevastopol 2012 G06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Day Sevastopol 2012 G14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Day Sevastopol 2012 G15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Day Sevastopol 2012 G04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Jebulon 14:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Day Sevastopol 2012 G05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skadovs'k (artillery boat, 1990).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:42, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inkerman Crane 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:23, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inkerman Crane 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:23, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navy Day Sevastopol 2012 G07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 17:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cucurbita moschata Butternut 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.From your own garden? --ArildV 06:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cucurbita moschata Butternut 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:23, 19 September 2012 (UTC)  Comment In my opinion the fruits are over-exposed. The contrast must be better. -- Lothar Spurzem 01.00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Wrong species on you series "Brachypelma auratum"

Hi, I have noticed that in your photo series "Brachypelma auratum 2009" appear not the brachypelma auratum, but brachypelma smithi species!.

Comparison: B. auratum - B. smithi. --R. K. Alvarado (talk) 23:53, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for notification. This error could be corrected.

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:09, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done Fixed now -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:23, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Remplacement photo sur article ukrainien Карлюкс

Bonjour George Chernilevsky. Je te contacte de la part de Jebulon. Peux-tu regarder Commons:Bistro#Besoin compétences en catalan, en basque et en ukrainien pour réparer mon erreur et rectifier l'article ukrainien en remplaçant la photo en erreur par la photo correctement nommée. Merci d'avance. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 08:43, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

 Done -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:29, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup. Père Igor (talk) 19:52, 24 September 2012 (UTC)