User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2012 2

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parachromis managuensis (Jaguar cichlid).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:19, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slavnoe water tower 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:54, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Please, check fish identification

Hi, Citron!
Please, check fish identification with my pictures here Category:Parachanna obscura. Parachanna obscura - identification by fish owner. But, probably this is Channa diplogramma or other snakehead fish. I am not sure.
With best regards, George -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:17, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Ho, a lovely specimen. For me, this isn't Parachanna obscura 1. But it's difficult to say if it's Channa diplogramma, the dresses may vary by variety, by subspecies, the environment ...In any case, it is a Channa. I'll get search, but I promise you nothing. Regards--Citron (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks You! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:53, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Identification Parachanna obscura re-confirmed by owner. This is an very old fish, so very dark. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:58, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

See this: You did a big mistake!

I just wonder how you closed Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Joe Sandi without deleting the last one; which is a copyvio. On further research, I got this image in this website, under the heading "THE 39th IVU WORLD VEGETARIAN CONGRESS 2010 SAVE OUR LIFE, SAVE OUR PLANET". Please delete this; this is a copyvio. Thanks. :-) Dipankan001 (talk) 14:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Very impressive message. Really SO BIG mistake? . OK, deleted -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. Thanks.... Dipankan001 (talk) 03:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

All OK -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Boletus luridus 2011 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boletus luridus 2011 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birchwood Slavnoe 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 22:44, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Channa micropeltes 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 16:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Channa micropeltes 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice & good Quality. --NorbertNagel 20:04, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Channa micropeltes (Giant snakehead).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of Arms of Donetsk Oblast.png

Hello George, could you please have a look at that RfD? Unfortunately I don't speak Ukrainian ... :-) -- Blackcat (talk) 00:37, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Unclear situation. Probably copyvio as unofficial version, but I am not sure. More information is necessary. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks :-) -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Can you close this?

Hi. Can you please take a moment to promote the alternative to featured quality? COM:Featured picture candidates/File:Filigree and Shadow.jpg. The crop is File:Ultraviolet image of the Cygnus Loop Nebula crop.jpg. Dipankan001 (talk) 02:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:13, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

В продолжение

Что же мне делать дальше?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:17, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Продолжать своё участие в проекте, загружать интересные и полезные фотографии. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:46, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

А потом будет ещё блокировка. Собственно, главная причина в свободе панорамы: A.Savin признаёт её в России, а гражданский кодекс не признаёт. Поэтому он ко мне так придирчив, увы. Не надо быть пророком, чтобы ожидать следующей блокировки за расстановку шаблонов или похожую выдумку. Причём добавочным основанием будет то, что я получил предыдущую блокировку: ведь того, кто был однажды блокирован, сам бог велел блокировать снова и снова...--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:04, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Это утверждение, с позволения сказать, не менее глупо чем в целом ваше юродство на страницах обсуждения половины всех участников Викисклада; только сегодня успел явное копивио на удаление выставить [1]. Между прочим, клевета является не только поводом для блокировки, но и для уголовного преследования (в том числе - к сведению законопослушнейшего из законопослушных граждан РФ - и в последней (статья 129 УК)). - A.Savin 21:23, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Мне казалось, что главное противоречие в том, что я принимаю российское законодательство об авторском праве, а вы склонны отбирать у архитекторов право на их творческие произведения. Получается, я перепутал и дело не в охране архитектурных работ? Если так, пожалуйста, примите мои извинения.

Но если клевета является поводом для блокировки, тогда, должно быть, надо оценить клевету, которую вы указали в обосновании по ссылке и в журнале блокировок? Ведь я не делал faking (не говоря уже про всё остальное): я зачеркнул ответ, потому что он был связан с другим изображением, и сделал это, когда изображение, о котором вы писали, полностью изменилось. При новой обработке я изменил яркость, контрастность, чёткость, цветовую тональность, размер, заново сделал ретуширование, то есть учёл все названные вами проблемы. Чтобы вы могли проверить новую фотографию, я специально доложил на вашей странице обсуждения. На страницах голосования (типа QIC) принято расставлять шаблоны в чужих репликах, и если вам не понравилось зачёркивание устаревшей рецензии, вы могли написать об этом в моей странице обсуждения.

Напомню о клевете, когда в других обсуждениях вы меняли мой пол. О клевете, когда вы писали, что я желаю быть администратором и делаю карьеру на Commons. О клевете, которую вы только что написали, называя мои правки «юродством». На странице COM:TALK говорится, что запрещено «label or personally attack» участников викисклада. Пожалуйста, будьте добры, посмотрите эту страницу.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:50, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Из википедии: «Клевета — порочащая информация или распространение заведомо ложных сведений, порочащих честь и достоинство другого лица или подрывающих его репутацию» (выделено мной) - не знал, что вы, оказывается, еще и сексист, спасибо за признание. Никогда не мешает знать, с кем в действительности имеешь дело. ... A.Savin 10:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Искажение пола — это заведомо ложные сведения. Вы могли спросить об этом или внимательно читать мои фразы. Я не считаю, что один пол лучше другого. Дело в другом: посмотрите на вашу реплику, этична ли она? Понравится ли вам, если вас будут называть А.Савиной?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Моя настоящая фамилия известна всем, имя нетрудно отыскать, немалому кругу википедистов известны также место проживания, возраст, рост, цвет глаз и тому подобные признаки. А.Савина - это уже на ваш счет, каждый срамится как сам считает для себя нужным. - A.Savin 17:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Значит, вы считаете, что переделывать пол собеседника — дурной тон, — но себе это разрешаете. С одной стороны, вы обвиняете меня в сексизме, а с другой стороны, в упрекающем тоне отзываетесь обо мне как об участнике, который общается по-женски. Кто же из нас использует пол как ярлык, я или вы? Вы. Кто же из нас обращается к полу, чтобы от сути обсуждения перейти на аргументы личного толка? Снова вы. Прошу вас, пожалуйста, прочитайте страницу COM:TALK и перестаньте нарушать это правило. Ведь правила созданы именно для соблюдения. Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

«В упрекающем тоне», это, опять-таки, плод вашего не совсем здорового воображения, на этот счет у меня совесть абсолютно чиста, потому что я отлично знаю, что никаких диффов вы не найдете, сколько бы ни искали. Как говорит немчура - у лжи короткие ноги. - A.Savin 19:52, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Поиск по интернету: [2] Вы приписали мне чужие поступки и заменили пол. Вы намеренно изменили факты, назвав мою ошибку [3] (я взял соседнюю строчку и не заметил там promotion) — «фальсифицированием». Посмотрите, участник User:Taxiarchos228 понял это и исправил шаблон с комментарием: «I guess this was a lapse» [4]. Потом вы подчеркнули своё отношение ко мне, да и вообще к женщинам в неэтичных словах: «Ну пусть участник, вообще-то по общему поведению и манере общения для меня больше смахивает на бабёнку».--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:30, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

А между прочим, ваш однофамилец Сила Савин расписал фресками наш Троицкий собор в 1668 году. Сотни лет назад Савины тянулись к изобразительному искусству, как и теперь, но к переславцам относились лучше .--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:30, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Ну, когда вы теперь уже тысячу раз сочли нужным это повторить, всему сообществу уже ваша половая принадлежность известна, ну а насчет «к женщинам в неэтичных словах» - опять-таки наглая ложь совсем в вашем стиле. Когда-нибудь вы здесь на этой вашей повседневной лжи очень больно споткнетесь, это я вам гарантирую. - A.Savin 20:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Простите, для меня слово «бабёнка» неэтичное. А для вас это нейтральное слово, без суффикса «ёнк»? Учебники называют его суффиксом «с пренебрежительным значением». Не могу согласиться с тем, что этот суффикс нейтральный, потому что принимаю сторону учебников. Однако вы снова вернулись к аргументам ad hominem, которые на WikiCommons принято считать «improper behaviour».--PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:11, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Путаница с категориями

Приветствую. Помогите исправить ситуацию с категориями Category:Botanical Garden of Moscow State University и Category:Aptekarsky Ogorod. Дело в следующем. Ботанический сад МГУ в Москве имеет несколько территорий. Основной считается та, что расположена непосредственно около здания МГУ на Воробьёвых горах (ссылка на официальный сайт). Однако есть ещё Аптекарский огород, старая территория, которая с 1950-х годов считается филиалом Ботанического сада МГУ (официальный сайт). Поэтому категория Category:Botanical Garden of Moscow State University не должна быть пустой и её содержимое не должно перекатегоризироваться, а Category:Aptekarsky Ogorod должна быть подкатегорией первой. --Kor!An (talk) 19:17, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done. Исправил -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Спасибо! --Kor!An (talk) 20:58, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Магазин "Минск" на Славянском бульваре.jpg

Hello George, pardon me for bothering you again, but I have no clue of what the Russian friend said in the above RfD. Could you please take a look there? Thanks :-) -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 14:29, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done. Deleted -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:20, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Bread truck GAZ 3302 2006 G1.jpg

File:Bread truck GAZ 3302 2006 G1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

91.57.77.252 00:13, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Vinnytsya prison image

Hi,
I guess this discussion may be interesting for you since it is related to one of the images you've uploaded to the Ukrainian Wikipedia. As a Commons administrator you probably will be able to decide fast on this issue and delete either one or both copies from Commons. Sincerely, --Deinocheirus (talk) 22:36, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Deleted both -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slavnoe water tower 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2012 G01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2012 G04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 21:36, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2012 G05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good for me--Lmbuga 21:45, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2012 G06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 21:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2012 G07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 21:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

question

Hello! You deleted most of the images here except for two. Are they keepers or do you want me to tag them again? Thanks! :) --Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 08:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi! This files was deleted too. This is just a temporary server cache error. All OK -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:22, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

I should have known! Our Admins don't make mistakes. We only have happy accidents here. :-)) Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 08:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2012 G02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2012 G03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion Request

Hello, can you delete this file please? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Worldmap_browsers.svg Your help is appreciated.--Camoka4 (talk) 15:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

no reason for deletion -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:39, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Монета

Здравствуйте, дело в том, что файл File:Монета номиналом в 10 российских рублей. 2011 год.jpg прегрозили удалить через семь дней, если не будет найдена лицензия. Помогите мне, пожалуйста, с лицензией. D5A (talk) 11:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done На изображения монет, купюр и наград России и СССР авторское право не распространяется -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Integrating a template and its translation.

Hi George. Hope you're fine. I've translate the blocked indefinitely on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis template into its Hindi version. I am surprised to see that language-toggling options are not there into the templates. Can you please help me in integrating this template and its translation. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 18:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC).

Hi Hindustanilanguage!

I have asked User:Butko about this problem. Butko did translations of templates earlier.

With best regards, George -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2012 G09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 09:03, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2012 G11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:51, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rapeseed field 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Bgag 11:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rapeseed field 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:26, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2012 G08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 12:42, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T-40A tractor 2012 G10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 12:42, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helix pomatia copulation 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helix pomatia 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oryctes nasicornis male 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)