User talk:Geom

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Geom!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 20:26, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Scatman john.GIF[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 01:40, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry! I am really sick and tired of wikipedia and all the other things around, the photo I uploaded is of ME, myself, the one in the photo is me, I paid for it and I have to TOTAL RIGHT OF EVERYTHING!!, IF YOU NEED TO TAKE IT OUT, TAKE IT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LilyDahab (talk • contribs) 08:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:The crown logo.png[edit]

File:The crown logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This image is a screenshot from a copyrighted film, television or audio-visual presentation, representing either a production logo, title card, or station ID or related logo/title graphic. See w:File:The Crown Title Card.jpg

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Premeditated (talk) 20:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:The crown logo2.png[edit]

File:The crown logo2.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This image is a screenshot from a copyrighted film, television or audio-visual presentation, representing either a production logo, title card, or station ID or related logo/title graphic. See w:File:The Crown Title Card.jpg

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Premeditated (talk) 20:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RE:[edit]

A la tarde (hora de Argentina) me pongo a analizar tu caso, parece discutible Ezarateesteban 11:52, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:The crown logo.png[edit]

File:The crown logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ezarateesteban 21:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:LOST IN SPACE WIKIMEDIA scc v2.png[edit]

File:LOST IN SPACE WIKIMEDIA scc v2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

AussieLegend (✉) 07:26, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ferrocarril de Riotinto[edit]

Buenas tardes Geom. Como he visto que eres autor de estas fotografías (1, 2), te quería hacer una pregunta. Estoy dando un repaso al ferrocarril de Riotinto, en lo referente a estaciones, puentes, infraestructuras, etc. Como he visto que tomaste varias imágenes por la zona, no sé si quizás hiciste más fotos. Si es así, todas serían bienvenidas. En los últimos tiempos he conseguido mejorar el panorama, aunque sigue habiendo carencia de imágenes que hay de algunos puntos concretos. Saludos. CFA1877 (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Caray, qué bien suena lo que me comentas! De ser así, sería una estupenda noticia, la verdad. De la estación de San Juan del Puerto-Moguer también vendrían bien imágenes actuales, sí. Esperaré pacientemente a tu respuesta. Saludos cordiales. CFA1877 (talk) 23:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hola de nuevo Geom. Sobre este particular, quería preguntarte si lograste encontrar imágenes. Saludos. CFA1877 (talk) 21:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Una duda[edit]

Buenas tardes Geom. Estoy poniendo un poco de orden en las imágenes de Minas de Riotinto. Me he encontrado con algunas subidas por ti (1, 2, 3, 4), que hacen referencia a «Riotinto». ¿Por casualidad son de una exposición de automóviles celebrada allí en 2017? Saludos. CFA1877 (talk) 18:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Estupendo. De momento las dejaré encasilladas en la categoría «Events in Minas de Riotinto» y dentro de unos días ya acotaré. Cualquier otra foto que tengas relacionada con Riotinto (o su antiguo ferrocarril) será bienvenida. Saludos. CFA1877 (talk) 19:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Papeletas 19J[edit]

Hola:

¿Te animarías a subir las papeletas de Huelva? https://wikimedia.es/papeletas —Ismael Olea (talk) 17:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aviso de sabotaje[edit]

Hola, al igual que en Alcalde de Madrid, cuyo caso ya conoces, el mismo tipo de sabotaje se ha llevado a cabo en el Anexo:Alcaldes de Badalona con Aïda Llauradó como objetivo, y tengo serios motivos para pensar que puede ocurrir de nuevo en otros tantos artículos y anexos, por lo que creo que es mi deber poner en conocimiento de ello. Saludos. HermanHn (talk) 22:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vale...[edit]

¿Me puedes explicar qué fue lo que has hecho aquí por favor?, mi bloqueo de la cuenta no tiene nada que ver con la edición hecha de buena fe antes del mismo, la edición fue antes del bloqueo global e incluso local como para que haya sido revertida, por lo que no era (o es) evasión, tampoco vandalismo, además he visto esto, has borrado una página de usuario para luego crearla, pese aunque no se ha "perdido" ninguna edición de esa cuenta (ya que en el mismo registro de la página lo muestra), has ocultado los enlaces permanentes de la página, mínimo lo hubieras borrado para luego restaurar sólo tus ediciones, pero literalmente volviste a crearlo, haciendo crear innecesariamente más enlaces permanentes, pero bueno, al menos eso no tiene nada que ver con mis asuntos, lo que me molesta y ofende, es que, si alguien es bloqueado por cualquier motivo la primera vez (excluyendo títeres, claro), sus ediciones constructivas que no tienen nada que ver con el bloqueo sean revertidas así sin más, tuve que editar bajo IP para restaurar esa reversión sin sentido y errónea, y ¿vuelves a revertirlo e incluso proponer el borrado para ocultar ese capricho?, menos mal que, como has visto, lo he guardado en la Wayback Machine para que los demás se den cuenta de lo humillante que has sido ahí, si me explicas porqué has hecho eso, me calmaría, lo tomaría como una disculpa por ese 'malentendido' si eres sincero para no tener que odiarte y guardar tus caprichos en la Wayback Machine más de lo que ya había hecho y estoy, y además considero que deberías llamarle un poco la atención a Pichu VI por utilizar a veces la herramienta de reversión cuando se le da la gana. Se supone que los bibliotecarios deben hacer cosas para mejorar Wikipedia, bloqueando usuarios disruptivos, borrar páginas que no cumplen criterios específicos y otras cosas, hasta cierto punto, nada de abusar las herramientas, pero literalmente has ocultado ese capricho que va en contra de WP:RV y WP:NOVATO para que nadie más que los biblios te vean lo que realmente eres, sin embargo, si te disculpas por eso, estaremos tranquilos, que me disculpo por hacer vandalismo en aquel anexo, ya que quiero editar tranquilamente y olvidar esa disrupción que he causado, admito que para ese entonces, era un novato, tanto que hasta mi ignorancia no me permitía simplemente ver el historial de las páginas, razón por la que, sin pensarlo 2 veces, vandalicé la página porque no me gustó que quitaran mi edición, pero también había hecho buenas ediciones aunque sean pocas luego de lo ocurrido para tratar de recuperar mi buena imagen/reputación y no ser visto como un retrasado, ya que vandalizar desperdicia el tiempo de otros usuarios, lo admito, fui un novato, sin embargo, ciertamente bloquear a un usuario no significa ni justifica revertir sus ediciones legítimas después de eso, al menos de esa forma, además, espero que valores este mensaje, ya que si fuera otro, ya hubiera editado en la eswiki utilizando esta IP, un saludo 78.135.97.174 07:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC) (edited at 01:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC) by 78.135.97.174)[reply]

User talk:Geom

Contents

File:Scatman john.GIF[edit]

File:The crown logo.png[edit]

File:The crown logo2.png[edit]

RE:[edit]

File:The crown logo.png[edit]

File:LOST IN SPACE WIKIMEDIA scc v2.png[edit]

Ferrocarril de Riotinto[edit]

Una duda[edit]

Papeletas 19J[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Aviso de sabotaje[edit]

Vale...[edit]

Navigation menu

User talk:Geom

File:Scatman john.GIF[edit]

File:The crown logo.png[edit]

File:The crown logo2.png[edit]

RE:[edit]

File:The crown logo.png[edit]

File:LOST IN SPACE WIKIMEDIA scc v2.png[edit]

Ferrocarril de Riotinto[edit]

Una duda[edit]

Papeletas 19J[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Aviso de sabotaje[edit]

Vale...[edit]

Navigation menu

Search