User talk:GeeTeeBee/Archive 1

Image Tagging Image:Picture_needed.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Picture_needed.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Adambro 22:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Category:Hovercrafts

In 2007 you noted that Category:Hovercrafts should be at Category:Hovercraft. I have just proposed this at CfD - see Commons:Categories for discussion/2009/10/Category:Hovercrafts. Thryduulf (talk) 19:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

File:2005.08.18 - Et gammelt vrak ved anleggsplassen.jpg

Hallo!
Just for the record, I moved the file 2005.08.18 - Et gammelt vrak ved anleggsplassen.jpg to the D60 category. You said that

Source believes this to be a 1½-ton rated model TG-41.

But I think that the "source" (a comment, not a description given by the author, in fact) was wrong when trying to identify it as a civilian trucks: the RHD, the grille protection and the "cross" on the grille without the civilian cowl park lamps indicate without a doubt a Canadian made military D60S (with the 136" wheelbase). I should have created the corresponding category in 2016, when I categorized the file in the D15 category, but I acknowledge that I wasn't sure of the exact model, at that time. 2 years and some searches later, I have have far less doubts
Regards -- BarnCas (talk) 01:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank You for this correction !

Would you add your analysis of determination details, given above, to the "Description" field of the file ? I would appreciate it. Thanks ! --GeeTeeBee (talk) 20:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:PICTURE WANTED (transparent; main window color).png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PICTURE WANTED (transparent; main window color).png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

BevinKacon (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:PICTURE WANTED (transparent; main window color).png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PICTURE WANTED (transparent; main window color).png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

BevinKacon (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:PICTURE WANTED (non transparent).png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PICTURE WANTED (non transparent).png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

BevinKacon (talk) 21:54, 1 August 2019 (UTC)