User talk:Gab.pr

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rossi Pietro.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jacopo 13:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Devi specificare l'autore della foto, non è sufficiente che il soggetto rappresentato nella foto ti autorizzi genericamente. Deve essere l'autore della foto ad autorizzarti specificando la licenza. Una volta che hai l'autorizzazione dell'autore inoltrala a permissions@wikimedia.org Jacopo 13:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Pietro Rossi.[edit]

That photo is a personal photo of Pietro Rossi, which he sent me just to be used for wikipedia. He doesn't have an email, so I can't give it to you to check what I say. Anyway it's a poor-quality image, I'm trying to get a better one from him to be uploaded. --Gab.pr 15:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ribadisco quanto detto sopra, anche se è di bassa qualità va segnalato l'autore e la licenza. Non puoi caricare una foto di cui non sei l'autore e scegliere la licenza. Non se preferisci che ti scriva in italiano o in inglese quindi scrivo in tutte e due le lingue. È consuetudine rispondere nella pagina di discussione del mittente in modo che possa essere avvisato del messaggio. --Jacopo 20:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As i wrote above, even if it is poor quality it is mandatory to erite the name of the author. You cannot upload a photo that it is not yours and choos a license. I don't know if is better to write in english or italian so i write in both language. Please answer on my talk page. --Jacopo 20:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also - in future please use the discussion page for asking questions. I've put the response there (on the bottom) but I see someone has already answered your question here. --Botev 23:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, "for wikipedia use" is not sufficient. The permission must be for anyone and any use (even commercial use). That's why the photo may be deleted soon. Please follow Commons:OTRS instructions and, preferably, use / adapt one of those Commons:Email templates. — Xavier, 10:54, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Rossi_Pietro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Jacopo 21:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 82c93d97fc06abe11e42efb1f7910b34[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Gab.pr!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token b0fcb7839499581c9c77a0f447f2bd4d[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 4da01c13451fe99a3d4225e53bdba296[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Sources[edit]

There are 1000thds of "Chess books" for File:Josef Plachutta.jpg and even more "Chess magazines" for File:Morphy-De Rivière, Paris 1858.jpg. What book, books name, author of the book, publisher, date of publication, location, page. --- just a simple reference to the book. Improve your sources please. --Martin H. (talk) 13:31, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Francesco Simonini‎[edit]

For that you would need to click on Creator:Francesco Simonini‎ and edit it, but I could only give very limited advice about that (there are others who would know more than I would...). -- AnonMoos (talk) 22:41, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palazzo ducale.jpg[edit]

je rétablie la photo telle qu'à l'origine, si vous souhaitez un recadrage merci de créer un autre fichier (please create a new file). Se vuoi ridurre l'immagine, crea una nuova file colla tua immagine perché voglio conservare quel panorama. Cordialement. Pramzan (talk) 04:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload[edit]

I renamed the upload. For future reference, you can use the template {{Rename}} on the description page of a file to Suggest alternate names, and someone will execute the rename after review. Please make sure the description page is up to date with the new information as well. TheDJ (talk) 11:55, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francis Hauksbee the Elder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 07:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paciaudi Paolo Maria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marcus Cyron (talk) 11:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Marcus Cyron: No problem for deleting the file, the new one is much better. Thank you. Gab.pr (talk) 12:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I go as always for a second opinion, it it is not (and here it is not) a copyvio. I was thankfull for the image, better than no image and in 2010 I belive, there were not a better one. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Vidotto 2017.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vidotto 2017.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Vidotto 2017.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Herby talk thyme 11:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Herbythyme: I did not upload the file; the uploader and author is the user SpiralSource, as stated in the first upload. Please refer to him for any issue. Thank you, Gab.pr
Apologies - automated script problem. Regards Herby talk thyme 16:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Giuseppina Allegri Tassoni, Italian art historian from Parma.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francis Hauksbee (1660-1713).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IGE (talk) 22:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]