User talk:G.dallorto/Archivio13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 13: messages until May 28 2021.

Category:Hendrik Andersen[edit]

Hai messo un tag che oramai sembra superato (morto 78 anni fa, almeno così sembra). Pingami che ho una scattato un po' di foto al suo museo e pensavo di caricarle. Ciao --Carlomorino (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ubi maior .... OK --Carlomorino (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

High-res version of "Istanbul - Museo archeologico - Mostra sul colore nell'antichità 02 - Foto G. Dall'Orto 28-5-2006.jpg"[edit]

Hi G.dallorto,

My name is Isaiah Mitchell, and I'm writing on behalf of Trinity University Press in San Antonio, Texas. We are in the middle of publishing a book about art in the Western world, and we'd like to use your photo. Unfortunately, we cannot print with JPEG files, so I was wondering whether you happen to have an original RAW or TIFF version of this photograph (not a RAW or TIFF converted from JPEG).

Many thanks, --Isaiah Mitchell (talk) 21:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you remember...[edit]

...your intention when creating Category:Morgan a long time ago? ;-) --Jotzet (talk) 11:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wait.. just got it. --Jotzet (talk) 12:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Sforza castle[edit]

Dear Giovanni,

Just want to let you know that I have used your beautiful photos in my video/ vlog. You can watch in YouTube at 78pAFuUkfig . Thank you for sharing the photos.

Best Regards S. Toha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stef Toha (talk • contribs) 08:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Leonardo da Vinci Statue[edit]

Dear Giovanni,

Just want to inform you that I used your beautiful photo in my video/ vlog. You can watch in YouTube at 7G-Im8pb2i4 Thank you for sharing the photo.

Best Regards S. Toha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stef Toha (talk • contribs) 08:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice[edit]

Hello! I would just like to say that I like your photography and your page as well.

(　＾∇＾) --Wikidickens (talk) 20:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mottos[edit]

Category discussion warning

Mottos has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

67.221.113.224 18:42, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Biraghi/Birago[edit]

Giovanni, ti scrivo in quanto autore di questa foto e altre similari. A me risulta che Daniele Biraghi stia per Daniele Birago e Andrea Fusino per Andrea Fusina. Dalla descrizione della foto si deduce anche che il monumento funebre sia duplice, in onore non solo di Daniele ma anche di Francesco Biraghi/Birago. Anche alla luce della pagina Wiki IT Monumento funebre di Daniele Birago e sue fonti mi puoi dare conferma che Biraghi e Fusino sono dei refusi che andrebbero sostituiti con Birago e Fusina e che esistono fonti a conferma dell'ipotesi del duplice sepolcro? Grazie. Carlotm (talk) 08:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cappella gentilizia della villa Melzi di Bellagio[edit]

Caro Giovanni, sapendo del tuo enorme archivio fotografico, mi chiedevo se tu abbia per caso qualche foto (dritta, magari...) della it:Cappella gentilizia di Villa Melzi di cui ho scritto una interessante voce. Le foto su COmmons sono deficitarie e io non ne ho. Puoi mica dare un occhio al tuyo vasto repertorio? Grazie, a presto, Paolobon140 (talk) 13:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cristoforo_dall'Acqua[edit]

Category discussion warning

Cristoforo dall'Acqua has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

BMacZero (talk) 16:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Moors[edit]

Category discussion warning

Moors has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 02:02, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexuality (non-Western)[edit]

Homosexuality (non-Western) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 15:49, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ancient_Greek_women[edit]

Category discussion warning

Ancient Greek women has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 10:13, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Palaces_in_Parma[edit]

Category discussion warning

Palaces in Parma has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

2601:283:8280:2B2E:999A:43B:8A2F:B18B 23:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Trittico_Lampugnani[edit]

Category discussion warning

Trittico Lampugnani has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Faqscl (talk) 19:24, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Eliseus[edit]

Category discussion warning

Eliseus has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 10:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historical_images[edit]

Category discussion warning

Historical images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Josh (talk) 20:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rosario Guerrero[edit]

Salve, a proposito di questo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gloeden,_Wilhelm_von_(1856-1931)_-_n._0579_B_-_La_Guerrero,_bellissima_ballerina_spagnola_durante_la_sua_tournee_in_Italia_qui_a_Napoli.jpg sinceramente dubito possa trattarsi realmente di Rosario Guerrero: tanto per cominciare non le assomiglia, inoltre la Guerrero debuttò a Madrid nel 1899, quindi non credo proprio fosse già in tournée a Napoli nel 1895 (quando aveva circa 15 anni - nel 1890 ne avrà avuti 10...). Ma soprattutto, dubito che una ballerina famosa si facesse fotografare completamente nuda... E' possibile, invece, che la scritta alluda proprio a lei... nel tentativo di vendere la foto più facilmente, magari proprio nel periodo di massima popolarità della Guerrero (inizio '900). Per quanto riguarda Achille De Marco, dovrebbe essere nato nel 1922, a meno che non sia solo un omonimo del pittore ortese... --JimmyGeminy (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salve, no, in verità non sono affatto un esperto, mi sono solo documentato un po' su Internet! :) Che la scritta possa essere riferita proprio a Rosario Guerrero, è ipotizzabile per il fatto che la Guerrero è stata effettivamente a Napoli nel 1906 e proprio qui fu colta da una crisi di follia (secondo quanto scritto qui https://books.google.it/books?id=ixe7rwRDecAC&pg=PA380&lpg=PA380&dq=%22rosario+guerrero%22+napoli&source=bl&ots=9V0FY9lvoM&sig=ACfU3U0BILU2sIzwm6XzcKIC4CFfZGGhiw&hl=it&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi_7J61gKDoAhUZHcAKHf1cCNYQ6AEwAXoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22rosario%20guerrero%22%20napoli&f=false "1906

Rosario Guerrero, la bella donna cantante nei caffè concerto, a Napoli improvvisamente è colta da alienazione mentale, ed è rinchiusa in una Casa di salute."). La cosa dovette avere parecchia risonanza in città (anche fuori!) Ma nei primi anni 1880 la Guerrero era appena nata, il che esclude di per sé che possa trattarsi di lei! Il fatto che le scritte non fossero destinate alla pubblicazione non le rende più attendibili.


A proposito dell'altra foto da lei caricata, questa qui https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gloeden,_Wilhelm_von_(1856-1931)_-_n._0389_recto.jpg , la somiglianza c'è (e forte mi sembra, soprattutto per quanto riguarda il naso, anche se il seno sembra più sviluppato) con la modella della foto di questo articolo http://www.napoli.com/viewarticolo.php?articolo=35965 Checché ne dica Achille della ragione, la foto, che lui ritiene di una "prostituta di un bordello sito in via Santa Lucia negli anni '30", è molto famosa e in un libro della Taschen risulta riferita all'ultimo decennio del 1890, anche se credo la indichino come foto di origine francese. --JimmyGeminy (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie a lei per il suo lavoro di ricerca, mi tenga aggiornato. A proposito della foto di cui sopra, ho trovato anche una versione seppia, qui datata (?) 1920 https://serpentlillith.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/neopolitan-prostitute-1920.jpg https://www.pinterest.it/pin/206250857908058435/ , che ne pensa? --JimmyGeminy (talk) 23:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Segnalo anche che il cognome del pittore non è De Marco ma Di Marco (la virgoletta in cima è il puntino sulla i, confrontare con le righe superiori) --JimmyGeminy (talk) 23:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A new Von Gloeden image[edit]

Hello,

I have found this image

https://www.bukowskis.com/en/auctions/564/305-wilhelm-von-gloeden-untitled

On the reverse there is number 248 & 611. Could you advise as to where in the Catalogue it should go?

Cheers,

Callagar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callagar (talk • contribs) 10:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sergej_Diaghilev[edit]

Category discussion warning

Sergej Diaghilev has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

CrazyBoy826 (talk) 03:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pluschow, Wilhelm von (1852-1930) - n. 8441 - da - Sicilia mitica Arcadia - p. 14.jpg[edit]

File:Pluschow, Wilhelm von (1852-1930) - n. 8441 - da - Sicilia mitica Arcadia - p. 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

116.240.159.164 03:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plüschow, Wilhelm von (1852-1930) - n. 7270 - Timbrato.jpg[edit]

File:Plüschow, Wilhelm von (1852-1930) - n. 7270 - Timbrato.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

116.240.159.164 05:15, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lesbiche - 1928 - D- Die freundin 1928.jpg[edit]

File:Lesbiche - 1928 - D- Die freundin 1928.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2A01:598:D001:3583:8917:2A99:53BB:5315 09:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:0087 - Taormina - Palazzo dei Duchi di Santo Stefano - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 19-May-2008.jpg licence is confusing[edit]

You have stated that you want attribution, however, you then chosen one of the few CC licences which was designed specifically because it doesn't require attribution. Did you mean BY-SA and not just SA? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 08:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Swimmers_in_art[edit]

Category discussion warning

Swimmers in art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 10:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Help with a Von Gloeden Image

Hello,

I have found this image https://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/wilhelm-von-gloeden-1856-1931-vintage-photo-print-702-c-94c4e669c0 it has number 33 on the back and is sized 37 x 26 cm. I jsut want to confirm if it sould be in the large listings or normal?

And this one stamped 154 (according to the listing) but I am not sure if it Gloeden's number or added later. https://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/wilhelm-von-gloeden-1856-1931-vintage-albumen-pho-706-c-2e5487d9a9

Cheers, Callagar

Category:Slave_trade[edit]

Category discussion warning

Slave trade has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JRennocks (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gloeden's model for Nero[edit]

Category:Gloeden's model for Nero is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion, otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which P. Cornelius Dolabella?[edit]

You added Publius Cornelius Dolabella as the subject of this image. I can find no futher information on this image, do you know which P. Cornelius Dolabella it is meant to depict?*Treker (talk) 22:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Hi G.dallorto. I noticed that you've made a malformed rename request. When you want to rename a file with the {{Rename}} template, you must follow the instructions in the template, including "a value between 1 and 6 which corresponds to the file renaming criteria!" Otherwise, you create more work for other people.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate policy[edit]

Hi, the duplicate policy does not allow for the speedy deletion of the same image where there are clear differences. The policy is set to remove exact duplicates, and then allow the user to choose their variation of the image that exists for their desired usage.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fake rename request[edit]

Hi, I have seen that you have requested renaming for a file with the reason Criterion 1 (At the original uploader’s request, but the actual uploader was User:WolfD59. I don't know if it was on purpose, but please don't do that in the future. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 22:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:G.dallorto/Archivio13&oldid=565436473"