User talk:FunkMonk/Archives/2014

File:Haifa Exodus 1.png

File:Haifa Exodus 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 01:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Jianchangosaurus teeth.png

Hi, your revert is not very helpful. The image ha so extracted into single images anyway. So why additional tags only promting unecessary edits? And why yo do not remove it yourself? Any image editor, even the simple one delivered with windows would do... -Andy king50 (talk) 18:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Because the compilation image will be used as it is in most cases, and it has a border, which needs removal. FunkMonk (talk) 18:51, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Kem Kem carcharodontosaurid.jpg

I realized that this image, which I just uploaded, is a duplicate of File:Sauroniops holotype.png. Could you redirect my image to it? Thanks. Reid,iain james (talk) 15:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Yup, will do. FunkMonk (talk) 15:51, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

File:John Denver at PMRC Senate Hearing.ogv

File:John Denver at PMRC Senate Hearing.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arbor to SJ (talk) 22:13, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Opisthocoelicaudia skeleton restoration.jpg

This message is shown from Commons:Undeletion requests

I uploaded this image, and I find it was deleted unfairly. User:Fastily deleted it even after the deletion discussion ended with it being kept. I have gone to the trouble to show want it would be like if someone could undelete it (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpUploadDescription=%7B%7Bsubst%3AUpload%20marker%20added%20by%20en.wp%20UW%7D%7D%0A%7B%7BInformation%0A%7CDescription%20%3D%20%7B%7Ben%7CSkeleton%20of%20Opisthocoelicaudia%7D%7D%0A%7CSource%20%3D%20http%3A%2F%2Fqilong.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F03%2F09%2Fskeletal-posture%2F%0A%7CDate%20%3D%20March%209%2C%202011%0A%7CAuthor%20%3D%20Jaime%20A.%20Headden%0A%7CPermission%20%3D%20Evidence%3A%20The%20license%20statement%20can%20be%20found%20online%20at%3A%20http%3A%2F%2Fqilong.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F03%2F09%2Fskeletal-posture%2F%20page%20bottom%0A%7D%7D%0A%0A%0A%7B%7Bcc-by%7D%7D&wpDestFile=Opisthocoelicaudia%20skeleton.jpg). The permission is right there at the bottom of the page, and the author says it is licensed under a CC-BY license. Could someone please consider undeleting it for me? Thanks. Reid,iain james (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

The image is still there? FunkMonk (talk) 16:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Moldovan0731

Have a look at this. I noticed the unblock request, and the activity looked familiar, as I'd recently blocked his other account indef. If you see any other likely socks, let me know. I only see these 2 on the range right now. INeverCry 01:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, now he's disrupting English Wikipedia with pointless edits[1] as well. FunkMonk (talk) 23:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

I've mentioned him to an admin there. INeverCry 00:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Phorusrhacid size comparison.png & Mesembriornis milneedwardsi.png

• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mesembriornis milneedwardsi.png
• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Phorusrhacid size comparison.png

I haven't looked at my commons account for a while, so i was to late when these were proposed for deletion. Both times you wrote that you couldn't find any proof for the license i listed (cc-by). These images come from this article. At the bottom of the page you will find "All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License". Since it was not "otherwise noted", i consider these images to have a cc-by license. Amphicoelias (talk) 11:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Hmm, but which CC attribution license? It doesn't seem to specify, there are non commercial ones as well. FunkMonk (talk) 12:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

I checked: It's cc-by-nc. Too bad :(. Amphicoelias (talk) 12:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Ah, there ya go, sadly... FunkMonk (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

About Elephant Jpg and the Asian Structures

The Image was a Constructed collage about the timeline of the Elephants i choose an image to be cut to be no Authors no Copy right violations so whats the point of Deletion and why ?

It is also what goes to the Asian Face, It is no Specific Author so No Copy Right violations ..

& if you want to talk, pleas put it in Philipandrew talk page OK? Thank you.\

You can not compile random images into a picture, if they are not freely licensed. FunkMonk (talk) 19:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Marsupialia

Hello,
I don't understand what you did arround Category:Marsupialia and Category:Metatheria.
They are both almost synonyms.
Also now the Taxonavigation are incorrect.
What was your thought?
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 07:12, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Do you want to put Category:Marsupialia in Category:Metatheria, like en:Metatheria ?

The problem is that en still gives them both Infraclass rank.

Regards Liné1 (talk) 07:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Sparassodonta was incorrectly categorised as marsupials. Metatheria is a taxon that includes both sparassodonta and marsupialia (and many other extinct groups), therefore both belong under that category. The previous configuration was factually wrong. FunkMonk (talk) 07:36, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

So you want to follow en:Metatheria classification.

Do you know any online website that recognize that classification?

What about the problem that Category:Marsupialia in Category:Metatheria have the same rank 'Infraclass'?

Regards Liné1 (talk) 07:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Looking at Google scholar, it seems all recent papers identify sparassodonts as metatherians, not marsupials, which are also metatherians. As for ranks, these are very arbitrary (compared to just clades), so the problem is pretty much the system. We cannot let arbitrary ranks obstruct scientific accuracy. FunkMonk (talk) 07:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Oryx heads.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Oryx heads.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:41, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Triceratops specimen ID

Hello, FunkMonk! I notice you identified File:Triceratops, Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology (5848860896).jpg as AMNH specimen 5116. I have no reason to dispute it, as the display has evidently appeared at several institutions; I‘m just curious as to how you know it’s the same one.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

It's an extremely distinctive skull, no others really look like it. It has the Torosaurus shaped frill, yet no holes. 07:28, 24 March 2014 (UTC)FunkMonk (talk)

Thanks; I hadn’t noticed that.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 08:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

It is a cast, in any case. Take a look here: http://dinogoss.blogspot.dk/2009/10/toro-toro-toro.html FunkMonk (talk) 13:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, FunkMonk/Archives. You have new messages at Reid,iain james's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Reid,iain james (talk) 03:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Ornithomimus for a publi

Hi Funkmonk,

Still haven't dealed with the photos of dinosaurs, sorry about that. I just noticed you have an excellent photo of the skull of Ornithomimus edmontonicus. Can I use it for an article that I'm about to submit? There is no scale but I have lower resolution photos of the same specimen with scales so that this problem can be fixed. Tell me what you think about it. If you agree, it would be great to have your real name to credit you. Up to you though! Cheers, --Christophe Hendrickx (talk) 16:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Ah, if it is one of those from Canada, I just uploaded it from Flickr, I didn't photograph it myself. So the Flickr user should be credited. FunkMonk (talk) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Image to redirect

Yesterday, I uploaded a crop of one of Headden's skeletals, File:Therizinosaurus known material.jpg. It had a very small pixelation, so I decided to modify File:Therizinosaurus skeletal.png to show the known material. I updated the skeletal image, so I would like you to redirect Therizinosaurus known material.jpg to Therizinosaurus skeletal.png if possible. Thanks - Reid,iain james (talk) 14:56, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Hhmm, but they're not the same image, so why? Images need to be duplicates to be redirected. FunkMonk (talk) 15:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Really? I was wanting it redirected because of how small the image is (12 kb) and that there is a larger image already showing the same material. If it shouldn't be redirected, could you at least make the image larger, at least 20 kb? I am not that experienced at making images a larger pixelation, if fact, I have no idea how to do it. Reid,iain james (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Well, I don't think it hurts having it around, but I do think I've seen a higher res version once. And upscaling doesn't really help, because no information is added, it'll just get blurry. FunkMonk (talk) 16:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

User requiring block

Hello FunkMonk. While checking my watchlist, I noticed user had uploaded a random Acheroraptor image off the internet. User:박동찬. I checked his contributions, and all his uploads are pictures that are up for speedy deletion as copyright violations, or lack source and license information. Each and every image (except for maybe two) can be found online, out of the wikis. FunkMonk, I think this user requires a block or they will keep uploading images from google searches. Reid,iain james (talk) 12:57, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure I can only block him if he continues to do this after warnings. But if he does, I'll give him a block. FunkMonk (talk) 16:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Leshyk-Blue Mesa Mural.jpg

File:Leshyk-Blue Mesa Mural.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

§FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:11, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Feeserpeton.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Feeserpeton.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Macroplata

Sorry, my error. Could you remove it? Thanks :) --Ghedoghedo (talk) 13:32, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, no problem, I've made many similar mistakes in the past! FunkMonk (talk) 13:49, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Strange dinos

I am trying to find cause to remove all those old handdrawn COM:DW dino images. I have nominated some, not all; if you'd care to take a look at the rest of his/her uploads and try to find the images from which this person reversed, and used some paint application to change slightly that would be great. If you don't want to file a DR yourself, you can leave me the info on my talk page with links and/ or send me an email, either way is fine. Thank you for your help! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

I'll have a look as I come across them. There's only a handful I think. FunkMonk (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

File:F John Series 2 Epigaulus card 24.jpg

Hi. Few years ago, you have uploaded a file File:F John Series 2 Epigaulus card 24.jpg with description: Tiere der Urwelt (Creatures of the Primitive World) Series 1 and 2 Illustrated by F. John (born/died?) Printed 1902 and 1906(?) Germany Series 2 Card 24 Epigaulus. I am afraid there is a little mistake, because w:William Diller Matthew described new Genus and Species of rodents [2] in 1902 - as Ceratogaulus, and Ceratogaulus rhinocerus. Few years later w:James W. Gidley described another one (as he thought) Genus and Species Epigaulus hatcheri in 1907 ([3]). After years Epigaulus was included into Ceratogaulus. Now, if that picture was published in 1902, as you wrote, It could not be named Epigaulus, because such Genus name did not exist yet then. Or - it was printed later - after 1907 as Epigaulus. Would you mind to check which version is correct? The name of the file including Epigaulus, or date 1902? Greetings from Krakow. Jacek555 (talk) 13:38, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Well, all we have to go by is the source: www.copyrightexpired.com/earlyimage/fjohn/index.html FunkMonk (talk) 15:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Hippotigris isabellinus.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hippotigris isabellinus.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Al-Kaware family Gazaa.jpg

File:Al-Kaware family Gazaa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:36, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:Paleoart

Dear FunkMonk,

as a non-native speaker the term paleoart was fully unknown to me. I'm sorry.--Kopiersperre (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

No problem! FunkMonk (talk) 10:31, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Coronation of Prince Faisal as King of Iraq, 1921.jpg

Dear FunkMonk,

Have you seen any free images for Percy Cox other than this image? I mean any free images from say 1914-1921 at the latest in case there are any URAA problems. URAA says that an image is not copyright free until 95 years after publication. Iraq doesn't have any URAA issues but I was just wondering if there were any other free images say from the Arab Bureau. Just curious, Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:10, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

No, but there seem to be a lot of images of him on Google, perhaps check their sources? FunkMonk (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

• OK. Thank You. I just thought it was strange there was an image for Gertrude Bell but none for Cox and both of them created the middle East after WWI. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Extension names of images

I have a dilema. I have created a larger, slightly different version of File:Adasaurus mongoliensis2 copia.jpg, but the extension of the image new image is apparently .gif. This means the only way I can upload the better image is as its own file, which I would prefer not to do. Is it possible to change the "Mime" of an image, or should I just upload the better image as its own file and then have the older image redirected. What should I do? Reid,iain james (talk) 21:16, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

You can just open the file in Photoshop and save as jpg. FunkMonk (talk) 21:33, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) There’s a template for linking the old file to the improved version, so you don’t need to overwrite it. At any rate PNG is a better format than JPEG, when converting a GIF or other indexed-colour original; it preserves transparency (if any) and avoids introducing compression artifacts. (AFAIK the GIF format is accepted here but deprecated; I’ve seen such images being converted to PNG by bots.)—Odysseus1479 (talk) 04:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Titanotylopus.JPG

File:Titanotylopus.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

–⁠moogsi (talk) 01:17, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Monolophosaurus in garden.jpg

File:Monolophosaurus in garden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Nominating File:Dino_tracks_01.png

FunkMonk (talk) 15:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, FunkMonk/Archives. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FunkMonk (talk) 15:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Re: Nobu Tamura/Arthur Weasley images

Hello, FunkMonk/Archives. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FunkMonk (talk) 15:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

LOST LOVE,MARRIAGE,BINDING,DIVORCE SPELLS AND MONEY CHARMS +27730066655

WELL COME TO PROF AAFA THE NO 1 SPIRITUAL HEALER SPECIALIZING IN THE FIELDS OF LOVE\ MONEY\ POWER\ LUCK \SUCCESS AND WITCHCRAFT NO PROBLEM WITHOUT A SOLUTION TO ME CALL+27730066655 Negative Energy, African Witchcraft, Healer, Healing, Hex Removal, Spiritual, Spell, Wicca Witchcraft, Voodoo, Spells, Voodoo Dolls, Luck Charm, Love Spells, Lucky Charms, Good Luck, Wicca Spells, Voodoo Dolls, Powerful Love Spells, Break Up Spell, Magic Love Spells, Sangoma, Traditional Medicine, Love Spells, That Work, Gay Love Spells, Magic Spells, Real Magic Spells, Brea up Spells, The Spell To Defeat Your Rival, Fertility Spell s, Divorce Spells, Marriage Spells, Bind Us Together, Change Your Lover’s Mind Spell, Break up Spell, Weight Loss Spell, Luck Spells, Get Your Lost Lover In 2Days, Native Healer, Traditional Healer Herbalist For Tune Teller, Phone +27730066655 patients. Lost Love Spells Caster, Get Rich Spell, Job Spell.CALL+27730066655 PROF AAFA profaafa@yahoo.co.za» www.profaafa.webs.com

I'm a magician too. I just blocked you forever. FunkMonk (talk) 15:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Backgrounds of Flickr images

Hey FunkMonk. I have been going through Allosaurus skeletons, and have come across a few from Flickr. These might pose copyright problems, not because of the skeleton but because of where the image was taken and what is in the background. The main image with these problems is File:Allosaurus atrox.jpg. The image was taken in Australia, but as is stated in Freedom of Panorama, 2D artwork and Text are not free in Australia. This might mean that the background must be painted out, as it includes partial stamps (2D artwork) and a fair amount of Text in the photograph. Does the background require painting out, or is it okay to keep? IJReid (talk) 16:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I think this rule applies in most such cases: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:De_minimis FunkMonk (talk) 21:33, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

So it shouldn't be necessary to paint stuff out unless it is a main focus of the image, or if it brought up during a deletion nomination. FunkMonk (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination

Hiya, please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Christina1969. Thank you ! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Lexovisaurus2.jpg

I believe that User:Levi bernardo intended to redirect File:Lexovisaurus2.jpg to File:Lexovisaurus1.jpg, but not having user rights, incorrectly redirected it. Could you fix this? Thanks, IJReid (talk) 18:21, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

• That's not possible, just tag it as a duplicate next time. FunkMonk (talk) 20:19, 27 December 2014 (UTC)