User talk:Fritz Fehling

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Fritz Fehling!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:46, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magnus (talk) 09:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Daphne Lantier 06:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "Please unblock for following reason: I am currently participating constructively in "Talk: Constitutional Democracy - Wikipedia" (that is most obviously accepted; please visit it), directly accessible from internet search result "Constitutional-Democracy", presenting a detailed preparation for a complete English-Wikipedia Constitutional-Democracy entry for public discussion/constructive criticism, and need an improved version of my previously uploaded (Universal) Democracy Constitution.pdf for public discussion/constructive criticism. The (even unjustifiably indefinite) block was initiated by German-Wikipedia mentor on seemingly fabricated grounds, instead of the much-needed constructive support in this high-public-interest work that is also available on Scribd; Further details can be provided"
Unblock reason: "Unable to contact the blocking admin for foreseeable reasons; assume good faith unblock on the grounds the requester reviews COM:SCOPE. ~riley (talk) 03:15, 2 March 2018 (UTC)"[reply]
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  हिन्दी  македонски  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

{{Thank you for us all; One further reason would have been the access by Wiki talk: philosophy participants to details that would have unsuitably filled that site; I am currently communicating with that administrator regarding my edits... I will do my best not to breach your trust intentionally, but administrators' lack of detailed reasoning make perfect behaviour difficult, esp. when many issues are not black-or-white and depend purely on their arbitrary personal judgment! Greetings, --Fritz Fehling (talk) 21:51, 2 March 2018 (UTC)}}[reply]

File:Democracy Constitution.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion Request[edit]

I reply here, because I cannot find another way, as you can find in the following text that I tried to enter into undeletion request:

Reason: This file is currently used in Talk:Constitutional Democracy/Draft Proposal for a complete draft "Constitutional-Democracy" article which I just uploaded, and I intend to use it also in Project Philosophy, as it deals with fundamental philosophy (love of wisdom) issues on pages 2,3 (It is too long and contains also other related aspects to directly put it on the talk page)! This draft article is a detailed explanation for the file's content.

In addition, according to Wikimedia-Commons policy, Commons also contains educational material, and neutral constitutional-democracy matters as contained in this file is exactly this, for general fundamental public education -- the file's sub-headline starts with "Example of a (Universal) Democracy Constitution for the General Public's Information/Education"!

I have also applied for a Semi-/Pending protection (not for the --/Draft-Proposal page where it has been moved, possibly to prevent sabotage editing) that does not prevent constructive contributors' editing for the talk site, but should prevent such easy optimisation/discussion-damaging deletion, and this should be extended to this file, too! Can you please arrange this? It cannot be expected that authors are permanently logged-in to check possible deletion every minute.

It is counterproductive and meanwhile all-too-common on WP to indiscriminately delete whole articles and files instead of concentrating on those details that raise objections with some users, leaving the authors guessing; this file contains 10 pages with different content... Such behaviour could indicate disruptive bad-faith actions. It looks like political activism/censorship to require several uses within a few days [I used it for necessary previews of the draft article], when activity (incl. WP-article visits) is of unpredictable random nature. Such argument begs belief!

Please re-install this file at least temporarily, but preferably also medium/long term to allow the continuous development of articles using this file.

I just got the confusing reply that it has never been deleted as .pdf but requires .png etc. instead of .pdf as extension. According to Commons, .pdf can be uploaded for e.g. educational and other reasons -- I used .pdf format, because it is of better resolution than .png, which I have also on my memory card... Apparently an earlier .png version still exists in Commons. Greetings, --Fritz Fehling (talk) 03:21, 16/17 March 2018 (UTC)


This is the previous almost identical edit:

I reply here, because I cannot find another way, as you can find in the following text that I tried to enter into undeletion request:

Reason: This file is currently used in Talk:Constitutional Democracy for a complete draft "Constitutional-Democracy" article which I just uploaded, and I intend to use it also in Project Philosophy, as it deals with fundamental philosophy (love of wisdom) issues on pages 2,3 (It is too long and contains also other related aspects to directly put it on the talk page)! This draft article is a detailed explanation for the file's content.

In addition, according to Wikimedia-Commons policy, Commons also contains educational material, and neutral constitutional-democracy matters as contained in this file is exactly this, for general fundamental public education -- the file's sub-headline starts with "Example: (Universal) Democracy Constitution"!

I have also applied for a Semi-/Pending Security that does not prevent constructive contributors' editing for the talk site, but should prevent such easy optimisation/discussion-damaging deletion, and this should be extended to this file, too! Can you please arrange this? It cannot be expected that authors are permanently logged-in to check possible deletion every minute.

It is counterproductive and meanwhile all-too-common on WP to indiscriminately delete whole articles and files instead of concentrating on those details that raise objections with some users, leaving the authors guessing; this file contains 10 pages with different content... Such behaviour could indicate disruptive bad-faith actions. It looks like political activism/censorship to require several uses within a few days [I used it for necessary previews of the draft article], when activity (incl. WP-article visits) is of unpredictable random nature. Such argument begs belief!

Please re-install this file at least temporarily, but preferably also medium/long term to allow the continuous development of articles using this file.

I just got the confusing reply that it has never been deleted as .pdf but requires .png etc. instead of .pdf as extension. According to Commons, .pdf can be uploaded for e.g. educational and other reasons -- I used .pdf format, because it is of better resolution than .png, which I have also on my memory card... Apparently an earlier .png version still exists in Commons. Greetings, --Fritz Fehling (talk) 03:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]