User talk:Foroa/archive 2014
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Orientation tables or toposcopes?
You might be interested in this proposal. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
|
Condensed matter has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Nanite (talk) 12:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Category:General_physics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Nanite (talk) 12:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Coats of arms of Portuguese nobility has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
De-adminship warning
Dear Foroa/archive 2014, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you, odder (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Regrettably, Foroa's last edit on Commons was July 23rd, 2013. --Túrelio (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- I hope he's okay, and that his absence is explained by nothing more serious than he got fed up with the lot of us.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure he got fed up with me. :$ Lotje (talk) 11:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- I hope he's okay, and that his absence is explained by nothing more serious than he got fed up with the lot of us.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
De-adminship
Hi Foroa! This is just to inform you that earlier today, you had your adminship privileges revoked on Meta by a Wikimedia steward; as you are an experienced editor, I added you to the autopatrolled user group (which doesn't affect your editing anyway). Thank you for you service as an administrator, and I hope you will stay active on Commons as a regular contributor. Of course, please do feel free to re-apply for adminship when you get more active :-) Thank you! odder (talk) 14:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
|
|
2012-13 Butler Bulldogs men's basketball has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
--Chrishmt0423 (talk) 21:44, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Phagocytes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
74.177.140.57 21:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Project has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:58, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Thai-NP-Temple has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Takeaway (talk) 20:32, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Tadaram_Maradas has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:36, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Olga_Tolstikova has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
BrightRaven (talk) 11:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Wikimedia "Brighton Museum & Art Gallery" category page
.jpg)
Hello Foroa! I don't think that this category page should have been moved. "Brighton Museum & Art Gallery" is the official name of the attraction, but the category name's now been changed to "Museum and Art Gallery, Brighton, East Sussex", which is descriptive, but not the attraction's actual name. If you look at the picture of the outside of the building, you'll see that its official name is spelled out in metal letters on the side of its wall: ErkDemon (talk) 03:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Could you please explain...
You deleted Category:Cuban refugees at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base with a deletion log entry saying it had been moved to Category:Refugees from Cuba at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. Since it was linked from the wikipedia article Cuban refugees at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, surely deletion was not in order?
If there was a discussion over replacing Category:Cuban refugees at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base with Category:Refugees from Cuba at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base could you please provide a link to that discussion? Geo Swan (talk) 00:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
RE:Buildings and structures in the Azores
Good day Foroa. It seems I made of mess of a categorization system that you developed, which I only came across (luckily) today. I started creating Category:Buildings and structures in the Azores, and specifically Category:Buildings and structures in Vila do Corvo, when I noticed you and your colleagues had determined the irrelevance of the categories, of which I do not contend. Call it "a lack of knowledge of the structure of the WikiCommons categories". I was hoping, in your off-time, if you could find a way to delete these categories? I have re:categorized the images and sub-categories into their appropriate groups, I just need to eliminate the offending categories. Oh, and also, there seems to be a category about a lighthouse that, really, has no images. Is there a way to remove that as well? I am sorry to be a problem. I guess I am still a newbie here. ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 10:25, 20 August 2014 (UTC)~
- Okay...I resolved it. No prob...but thanks for being there. ;) ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 11:07, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Fyi. Geo Swan (talk) 00:21, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Foroa doesn't seem active any more on any of the wiki projects
- Last contribution to Commons: 27 July 2013
- Last contribution to en:wikipedia: 21 August 2013
- Last contribution to fr:wikipedia: 2 September 2013
- Last contribution to nl:wikipedia: 26 November 2013
- Last contribution to vls:wikipedia: 5 April 2013
- Takeaway (talk) 12:02, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- I know, and I feel very, very sad about it. He helped me a lot in the time. :'-( Lotje (talk) 12:31, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hope you're OK, Foroa. We all miss you and your good work. :'( — SMUconlaw (talk) 21:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ditto. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hope you're OK, Foroa. We all miss you and your good work. :'( — SMUconlaw (talk) 21:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Category:НЗМ_Ақтөбе has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
FDMS 4 23:44, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Fleet_Anti-Terrorism_Security_Team_Pacific" has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Avron (talk) 19:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Russian words has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Derbeth talk 16:55, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
|
File:St. Peter, Straubing has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Geagea (talk) 22:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Non-free logos has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Animalparty (talk) 07:57, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Could you please explain...
I'm confused. I am trying to figure out why you deleted Category:USS Mitscher (DDG 57). Did it have a meaningful revision history? Geo Swan (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- The category was not deleted. It was only redirected. There is still here. --DenghiùComm (talk) 06:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, as the log indicates, User:DenghiùComm is incorrect. You deleted the redirect about four days after it was created. I recreated it. Geo Swan (talk) 14:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Are you back?
Fingers crossed. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:59, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Foroa, man, ben ikke blij dat je terug bent. Ik had nog zoveel vragen en stond er helemaal alleen voor. Hoera! Lotje (talk) 07:07, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Why have you been moving such odd unconnected images into this category?--P.g.champion (talk) 20:54, 19 December 2014 (UTC)