User talk:Florstein/Archive/2020-23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line3 Begovaya Station Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and interesting -- Spurzem 12:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line3 Begovaya Vestibule (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line3 Begovaya Vestibule (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AKSM-32100D in SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Coordinates would be welcome and the category, where exactly is the location, would be welcome too. --A.Savin 21:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AKSM-32100D in SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Coordinates would be welcome. --A.Savin 21:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AKSM-321 in SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgabus-6271 in SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LM-68M2 in SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milepost in SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sennaya Square SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Znamenka Manor SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Novoizmailovsky Prospekt SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senate & Sinod Building view from Neva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line1 Ploschad Vosstaniya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Efimova Street SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Florstein/Archive! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexander Popov's Monument SPB.jpg[edit]

File:Alexander Popov's Monument SPB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

rubin16 (talk) 16:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Gostiny Dvor Gallery SPB 3.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gostiny Dvor Gallery SPB 3.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon Z 5 Rear View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 11:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2021/2022![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Florstein/Archive! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@George Chernilevsky: спасибо, Георгий! Вас тоже с праздниками и всех благ! --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mikhaylovskaya Station LO (img3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:34, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mikhaylovskaya Station LO (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:34, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mikhaylovskaya Station LO (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:34, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trolleybusny Passage SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 08:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leninsky Prospekt SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stoykosti Street SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Verticals should be checked. Is the bus shelter really that crooked? --Ermell 08:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ermell: yep! Vertical is my second name. --Florstein 09:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You can also overdo it if you look at the car on the right. --Steindy 12:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veteranov Prospekt SPB (img7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--Pi bot (talk) 07:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PAZ-320412-05-7773 in SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Generala Symonyaka Street (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 21:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Cool! Good quality. --Ximonic 12:36, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, impressive view -- Spurzem 09:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 12:36, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:15, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Prospekt Slavy (img13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Dunayskaya (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Shushary (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:49, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Shushary (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Shushary (img5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 07:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Shushary (img4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metro SPB Line5 Shushary (img3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:05, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Internationalists Park SPB (img7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Internationalists Park SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Internationalists Park SPB (img6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Internationalists Park SPB (img5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A lot of uninteresting grass at the bottom, but ok --Poco a poco 07:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bucharestskaya Street SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon Z 5 w Nikkor 50mm f1.8S.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lycoperdon Perlatum LO (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 15:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armillaria gallica LO (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 15:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paxillus Involutus LO (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 15:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amanita Muscaria LO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 15:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open studio monitor.JPG[edit]

File:Open studio monitor.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

rubin16 (talk) 18:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1st Elagin Bridge Reconstruction (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1st Elagin Bridge Reconstruction (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2nd Elagin Bridge SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2nd Elagin Bridge SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amanita Fulva LO (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and very nice. --Tournasol7 09:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coprinellus Micaceus LO (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mycena Galericulata LO (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middle Nevka River (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middle Nevka River (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yelagin Palace SPB (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kitchen House on Yelagin Island SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kemskaya Street SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yelagin Palace SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buttery Meadow on Yelagin Island SPB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The foreground should be cropped IMO --Ermell 16:24, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ermell: no it should not. This is the photo of the meadow - much important part of this place. --Florstein 18:31, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done @Ermell: i changed my mind, the new version uploaded. --Florstein 17:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Much better. --Ermell 19:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South Road SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Country Shower in LO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2nd Elagin Bridge SPB Signboard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Internationalists Park SPB (img3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Internationalists Park SPB (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Set Promoted to FP[edit]
★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Nikon Z 5 with Nikkor 50mm f1.8S, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Nikon Z 5 with Nikkor 50mm f1.8S has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another set, please do so !

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgabus-5270.G2 in Saint Petersburg (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI, but it would be better if you get rid of a bunch of uninteresting foreground --Poco a poco 09:14, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgabus-5270.G2 in Saint Petersburg (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pervomaiskaya CHPP in Saint Petersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MAZ-203.945 in Saint Petersburg (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:11, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LVS-86K in Saint Petersburg (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:12, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 71-931М in Saint Petersburg (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:12, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 71-931М in Saint Petersburg (img2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:41, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volgabus-5270 in Saint Petersburg (img1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

С наступающими праздниками![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 03:00, 23 December 2022 (UTC)  [reply]

w:ru:Категория:Файлы:CC-BY-SA-2.5,2.0,1.0[edit]

Добрый день. Вы бы не перенесли все файлы из этой папки на Викисклад? --MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 11:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день. Нет, все файлы из этой папки точно не смогу. Потому как некоторые на Викискладе и так присутствуют, а некоторые были специально изъяты отсюда из-за «свободы панорамы». Свое старые фотки я перекину сюда когда-нибудь. Возможно. Хотя, не вижу особого смысла переносить фото такого качества сюда. --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Я вообще считаю, что необходимо ускорить процессы переноса файлов с РуВики на Викисклад, если для них нет препятствий в лице свободы панорамы (поправки в ГК РФ с 1 октября 2014 года позволяют это сделать). MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 08:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Florstein/Archive/2020-23&oldid=751202970"