User talk:FakirNL

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kafir!

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Hopefully i won't betray the trust bestowed upon me. - FakirNL (talk) 21:26, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 5ce8ac14c481030e906a14c79e799a12[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token b0d8645adb6a9f544fae26109b9798a9[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Stadsdelen[edit]

Dag fakir, let op dat je de categorieën voorrang geeft, dus niet de individuele foto's van het Valkof in Category:Nijmegen-Centrum, maar de Category:Valkhof, Nijmegen.--Havang(nl) (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, daar moet ik op letten. Dankjewel voor de herinnering. - FakirNL (talk) 17:20, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File dimensions[edit]

Dag Fakir, ik merk dat je je foto's upload in verkleind format, 20-100 kb. Maar het is de bedoeling dat men op Wikipedia het maximale format upload. Vr.gr. --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Daar heb ik echt nog nooit op gelet. Ik ben dan ook geen fotografie-specialist. De volgende keer als ik een foto bewerk voor Commons zal ik eens kijken wat het verschil is. - FakirNL (talk) 10:03, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Je kunt over een reeds geuploade foto de oorspronkelijke versie in groot formaat uploaden. --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ware het niet dat ik meestal alleen een kopie van de file die ik ook naar Commons geüpload heb bewaar. :-/ - FakirNL (talk) 09:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Goffertpark[edit]

Dag Fakir, je hebt onlangs foto's bij het artikel nl:Goffertpark geplaatst. Misschien heb je zin om ze te vervangen door betere foto's, gemaakt tijdens fotoactie Wiki loves Monuments. Ik laat jou de keuze, zie Category:Goffertpark. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:26, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

De nieuwe selectie foto's geeft een veel beter beeld van de veelzijdigheid van het park, en het zijn bovendien mooiere foto's. Voel je niet bezwaard om lelijke en eenzijdige foto's gewoon te vervangen. - FakirNL (talk) 17:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you for continuing to revert the file. Fry1989 eh? 02:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bavarian beer glasses[edit]

Sorry, but I can't accept your revert: [1] Schneider Whitebeer is a Bavarian beer (no "NRW-bottle", because NRW = Northrhine Westfalia) and the glass is marked with "Paulaner" ... also a Bavarian beer glass. The same applies to the Paulaner glass here. It is a Bavarian beer glass with advertising print, also the Cat: "Beer glasses in Germany" is entirely correct. Please correct these things, thx --Geolina163 (talk) 10:37, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the bottle is not an NRW-bottle, that category should be removed in favour of the more general Category:Beer bottles (brown glass), you can do this yourself I you want. About the glass, the picture was taken in the Netherlands, so Category:Beer glasses in Germany‎ is not correct, it would have been if the category was named Category:German beer glasses. - FakirNL (talk) 11:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spaghetti[edit]

Hi FakirNL. Ik zag dat je twee spaghetti foto's heb bijgedragen. Ik ben bezig ze te ordenen. Kan je misschien vertellen waar File:Spaghetti alla Carbonara (2).jpg en File:Spaghetti Aglio Olio Peperoncino.jpg ergens vandaan komen? Nederland, Italië, ergens anders? - Takeaway (talk) 11:49, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 12:06, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasteel Cuvée Chateau.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Banner (talk) 19:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasteel Tripel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Banner (talk) 19:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Birra Moretti.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

. HombreDHojalata.talk 07:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gordon coaster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish 18:54, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Pear cider has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Flag of the Isle of Man[edit]

I readed the same discussion, when I was looking for appropriate flag. I made a mistake when I marked the right file. The names of files are misleading. I think that this "File:Flag of the Isle of Mann.svg" (Fry version) should be called something different, fe. File:Flag of the Isle of Man (alternate).svg or File:Flag of the Isle of Man (rectangular centering).svg. Malarz pl (talk) 12:29, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with this. - FakirNL (talk) 00:26, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Modification in the file Can of Dr Foots.jpg[edit]

Hello FakirNL

I apologize for my ambiguity of interpretation for classifying the "Can of Dr Foots.jpg" file in the category of beer cans of the Netherlands which prompted your revocation.

My reasoning was justified by the presence of this object placed in the category Bavaria (beer brand) which belongs to the category of beers of the Netherlands. The categorization among the cans of soft drinks that may indicate that the latter is a non-alcoholic beer (I admit not having looked at the composition of the product) justifying the categorization among beer cans of the Netherlands.

The purpose of a revocation action is to be able to learn from our mistakes in order to improve ourselves from our contributions and to prevent other contributors from making the same mistake.

I suggest, to clarify the description of the file, that it be classified in the category related with the article of the soft drink company Nederlands "3ES". The internet address being indicated on the can, we find the description of the product Dr Foots (dizzyfrinks.com). The link indicated on this site: http://www.3esfrisdranken.nl/plain.html it redirects to the site https://swinkelsfamilybrewers.com who is domiciled in the Netherlands (link) (Living in Montpellier (France), I have to check some location details to avoid errors ). The archiving of the site for the year 2007, indicates the existence of the brand's products (link). The web cache of the link indicates the presence of the product in the Royal Swinkels or Bavaria (beer brand) (link).

Thus, the possible doubt of error will no longer be possible because the product will be categorized among the soft drink cans owned by "3ES" company, of which the latter is part of the beverages from the Netherlands in connection with Bavaria (beer brand).

By combining our talents, do you think that my approach is sufficiently well-argued so that I can modify the categorization of the product to avoid any ambiguity about the product?

Cordially, —— DePlusJean (Talk) 02:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3ES was formerly the soft drink brand of Bavaria/Swinckels. Nowadays Dr. Foots is just one of the brands made by the Swinkels Company who make Bavaria beers, other beers, soft drinks and other drinks. I'll try to change the categories and descriptions accordingly. - FakirNL (talk) 08:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your attention and your initiative to modify the ambiguity of this image —— DePlusJean (Talk) 11:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Bord met politieke posters (kieskring 6), Tweede Kamerverkiezingen 2021, Plein 1944, Nijmegen.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Bord met politieke posters (kieskring 6), Tweede Kamerverkiezingen 2021, Bisschop Hamerstraat, Nijmegen.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Vera (talk) 13:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry voor deze uploads. Ik ging er van uit dat het in principe onder Commons:De minimis viel omdat elke individuele partijposter maar een klein onderdeel van de foto vormde. Misschien is het verstandig om File:Dutch election posters 2021, Oude Noorden, Rotterdam (2021).jpg ook snel te verwijderen dan. En zijn posters als File:2010 election poster Poster PvdA2.jpg dan door de PvdA wel vrijgegeven onder Creative Commons? - FakirNL (talk) 14:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi FakirNL, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

CptViraj (talk) 03:33, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

'Chaos' e.a.[edit]

Hoi FakirNL, dank voor je toevoegingen hier en op nl.Wikipedia m.b.t. kunst in Nijmegen en Arnhem! Qua onderwerp mijn interessegebied en dankzij mijn schoonfamilie ook een beetje 'mijn' regio, vandaar dat ik je bewerkingen geregeld langs zie komen. Ik zag dat je in Arnhem een aantal werken door elkaar hebt gehaald en foto's aan de verkeerde omschrijving hebt gekoppeld. Ik denk dat het het handigst is de foto's opnieuw bij de juiste omschrijving te uploaden. Zou jij -als fotograaf & uploader- dat willen doen? Vriendelijke groet, Ronn (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Ronn, dankjewel voor je oplettende werk! Nou ben ik toch wel benieuwd hoe ik dit had kunnen weten. Ik heb meerdere dagen zitten nadenken en ben uiteindelijk uitgegaan van het kaartje van de Beeldende Kunst Arnhem-website. Hoe had ik kunnen weten dat de foto's niet in de goede volgorde op het kaartje stonden? Was er een goede bron die ik over het hoofd heb gezien? - FakirNL (talk) 08:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ik kwam het tegen omdat ik de nog niet beschreven beeldhouwers in de lijst afging en in het werk van Teulings ben gedoken. Onder de lijst heb ik een aantal Arnhemse beeldengidsen neergezet, ik heb zelf die van Hans Middel (2011) in de kast staan. De vier reliëfs zijn daarin met foto en beschrijving opgenomen. Middel dateert het werk in 1954, Henk Scheerder deed hetzelfde in zijn monografie over Gijs Jacobs van den Hof (1995). De nieuwe bedrijfsruimte van CAMIZ, waarop de reliëfs zijn aangebracht, werd echter pas geopend in 1957 (bron). Als klopt dat de reliëfs het scheppingsverhaal verbeelden (volgens Middel, Scheerbeek noemt dat niet), dan vind ik de volgorde aan de gevel (Ordening - Zonnekracht - Chaos - Voltooiing) niet logisch. Gr. Ronn (talk) 21:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Daarom leek mij de volgorde "Chaos, Ordening, Zonnekracht, Voltooing" an sich, na enige tijd denken niet ondenkbaar. Die van Teulings is vrij chaotisch, die van Diekerhof vrij geordend en in die van Grosman kan je een plant zien die groeit vanwege de zonnekracht. Maar een echte bron als een boek gaat natuurlijk altijd voor speculatie! - FakirNL (talk) 08:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

beelden in Beuningen[edit]

Hoi FakirNL, hartelijk dank voor al je foto's in de lijst beelden in Beuningen. Groet --Agaath (talk) 22:29, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ben er zelf ook wel blij mee, in principe is Beuningen nu compleet, behalve de eerder gestolen beelden meetelt en mogelijk nog dit beeld: "Ontluiking van Nur Tarim via beuningeninbeeld.nl. Als jij bekend bent in Beuningen weet je dan misschien waar die staat? De combinatie van de titel 'ontluiking' en het hek zou kunnen wijzen op een schoolplein? - FakirNL (talk) 06:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nee, helaas ben ik niet bekend in Beuningen. Ik heb meerdere lijsten van beelden in Gelderland die nog ontbraken aangemaakt. Een lijst die ook nog veel foto's mist is Lijst van beelden in Zevenaar. Als jij in deze omgeving woont, nodig ik je uit om hier ook foto's voor te maken. groet --Agaath (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Struikelsteen in Nijmegen[edit]

Hallo FakirNL, ich habe gesehen, dass du Fotos von Stolpersteinen in Nijmegen aufgenommen hast. Ich habe gestern in der Wikipedia.de einen Artikel über Lotte-Lore Loebenstein geschrieben, für die ein Stolperstein vor dem Haus Molenstraat 66 liegen soll laut Namenlijst voor 'Stolpersteine' (struikelstenen) in Nijmegen. Kannst du ein neues Foto vom Haus und Fotos der Stolpersteine von Herbert Löbenstein, Gertrud Blumenthal und Lotte-Lore Loebenstein aufnehmen? --AxelHH (talk) 10:26, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Die Website der Stolpersteine ​​​​in den Niederlanden (https://map.stolpersteine.app/nl/nijmegen/locaties) sagt dass es dort (noch) keine Steine gibt? Wenn ich das nächste Mal in der Nähe bin, werde ich ein Foto von Molenstraat 66 machen und nach Stolpersteine suchen! - FakirNL (talk) 10:35, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for short reaction und die Bereitschaft Fotos aufzunehmen. Der Stolperstein in Hannover wird am 25. Mai 2022 gelegt, was ich fotografieren werde. Auf der Namenlijst werden die Löbensteins für die Molenstraat 66 (laut Commons früher Molenstraat 68) genannt. Nach translation habe ich verstanden, dass dass "nur" eine Namenlijst der Verfolgten in Nijmegen ist, keine Liste von Stolpersteinen. In einer deutschen Zeitung habe ich gelesen, das in Nijmegen ein Stolperstein für Lotte-Lore Loebenstein liegt. Heute erinnert lediglich ihr Name auf dem Shoah-Mahnmal am Opernplatz und ein Stolperstein in Nijmegen an sie. Das ist wohl falsch. Aber vielleicht kannst du ein (better) Foto vom Haus Molenstraat 66 aufnehmen. --AxelHH (talk) 11:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fotos haben keine Eile und brauchen nicht vor dem 25. Mai fertig sein. Vielleicht gibt es von der Stadt Hannover für die Stolperstein-Verlegung ein Schriftstück mit weiteren Informationen, evtl. auch zu Nijmegen zur Molenstraat 66 oder 68. --AxelHH (talk) 15:57, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Der Name von Lotte Lore Lobenstein steht auch auf dem Denkmal mit der Liste der jüdischen Opfer in Nijmegen, siehe Category:Namenmonument_Joodse_slachtoffers_(Nijmegen). Die Familie Lobenstein steht ganz unten in Spalte (Kolom) 4. - FakirNL (talk) 16:47, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I saw your notice just now and put your foto in the article. Thanks. --AxelHH (talk) 09:23, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ich bin durch die Molenstraat gegangen und kann jetzt bestätigen, dass es noch keinen Stolperstein gibt. - FakirNL (talk) 08:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank für die Mitteilung. Der Artikel hat einen Löschantrag bekommen.--AxelHH (talk) 11:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

beelden in Druten[edit]

Hallo FakirNL, hartelijk dank voor alle foto's van beelden in Druten. groet Agaath (talk) 09:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Graag gedaan, het is een hele aardige plaats (en er gaat een bus heen vanuit Nijmegen). - FakirNL (talk) 10:40, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified brand[edit]

Can you explain this edit? The file is still directly under Category:Brands and needs better categorization than that, so it belongs in Category:Unidentified brands until that is done. Josh (talk) 09:33, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is Category:Brands of the Netherlands good enough? - FakirNL (talk) 14:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo FakirNL, bij nader inzien: dit zal wel niet deze Jan Knoef (Q19766255) zijn vrees ik. Of toch? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 04:45, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kan er zo weinig van vinden op Google, maar aangezien er ook een muzikant Jan Knoef is,[1] is de kans aanwezig dat het iemand anders is. - FakirNL (talk) 09:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Toch? Fijn, bedankt hoor! Lotje (talk) 10:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Jan Knoef (in en). Desperate Blues Band. Retrieved on 2023-07-07.

License of SVG Cycling Jerseys[edit]

Dear FakirNL,

You uploaded a series of cycling jersey SVG icons to Wikimedia Commons. Great work, thanks for that! See the list below for the items it concerns.

However, the shape is exactly the same as the file:Jersey yellow.svg or file:Jersey polkadot.svg that I created, and uploaded under CC-BY-SA. This means that if you create derivative works, you must

  1. credit the original creator(s), and
  2. share it under the same license

You did not credit me as the original author of the work you made a derivative of.


Could you make changes to the images you uploaded? You can do this very simply by adding the following line to the icons you originally created (and removing the current license template line)

{{Self |1= cc-by-sa-4.0|author=FakirNL |attribution= Shape based upon [[:file:Jersey yellow.svg]] by [[User:IIVQ]]}}

and if there is a summary table, change the line that reads |source={{own}} with a line that reads something like

|source={{own}} Shape based upon [[:file:Jersey Yellow.svg]] by [[User:IIVQ]]

If you based this icon on another icon than File:Jersey yellow.svg, you can substitute that and credit the creator thereof as well as the authors of the work they based their work on.

See also: User:IIVQ/Cycling Jerseys and Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Cycling Jersey Icons

With regards, IIVQ (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File Looks like a derivative Date of first upload License User Properly references my work References which work Remarks
Jersey blue polkadot.svg Yes 2011-9-12 CC-By-Sa 3 FakirNL (talk) No
Jersey brown.svg Yes 2011-9-12 CC-By-Sa 3 FakirNL (talk) No

IIVQ (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. - FakirNL (talk) 13:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! IIVQ (talk) 14:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]