User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/September 2008

Quality Image Promotion

File:Patras Cathedral.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patras Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 18:28, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grand Pic de la Meije.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Not good enough for a QI (artifacts in the sky due to denoising), but maybe for a VI? Eusebius (talk) 08:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Good picture, meets the criteria, the best on Commons at the moment. Try a new one without artifacts in a few time. --B.navez (talk) 17:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

It would need another shooting, or somebody better than me at post-processing! I can provide the psd file if somebody is interested... Eusebius (talk) 18:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 09:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de la Barben.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I created a castle specific category Category:Castle of La Barben on the occasion and associated it with this image. The image gives a slightly less obstructed view of the castle as compared with this competing image. The crop of the tower is a little too tight for my taste, but in conclusion I still have a slight preference for the nominated image. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Patras Cathedral.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral Agios Andreas in Patras, Greece.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Can you see the picture? I have issues with it: sometimes it shows, sometimes it doesn't, depending on the displayed size apparently. --Eusebius (talk) 07:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Yes I (and I think other users as well) see it. Sometimes it takes a little while for the MediaWiki framework to generate images in new sizes. It is done now, you just have to wait a little to get it through the job queue. had the same experience with the VIC I nominated just before yours. I can see that too now. -- Slaunger (talk) 08:57, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
    • OK, I was assuming something like that. --Eusebius (talk) 09:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Info Specific category created for this scope. --Eusebius (talk) 07:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Info It has just been promoted as a QI. --Eusebius (talk) 12:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Satisfies all six criteria. Nice one. -- Slaunger (talk) 06:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 09:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Rio bridge - wave 1.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio bridge - wave 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very beautiful composition and colors --Böhringer 06:19, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ionic order.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  CommentThe legend is on the image page, in several languages. --Eusebius (talk) 11:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - good and clear drawing. I encourage to add horizontal doted grey lines or use a system such as in Image:Chinese calligraphy scheme 02-en.svg to ease the reading. Yug (talk) 14:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

   Done (by yourself) --Eusebius (talk) 11:58, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

  ;) Yug (talk) 12:48, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

•  Support --Foroa (talk) 05:47, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 11:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grande Chartreuse monastery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Satisfies all criteria. I have thought a little about if the scope should be "Monastery of the Grande Chartreuse" instead. Actually we have not stated anywhere, which language should be used when specifying the scope. However, I think English scope names will be the ones understood by most users(?) and therefore a natural first choice just as our category names. I think I will post a thread on this to get some feedback on this question. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

  Actually, I wondered whether the full name was a proper noun (cause they are usually not translated). I think you're right, I change the scope. --Eusebius (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Monastère de la Grande-Chartreuse to Grande Chartreuse monastery --Eusebius (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support confirmed with new scope. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 09:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosace et galerie des rois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp, good composition. Vassil 11:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grande Lance de Domène.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support looks ok for me. Mrmariokartguy (talk) 00:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I agree. -- Slaunger (talk) 06:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 2 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 07:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)