User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/April 2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trompette piccolo - pavillon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me and useful --Herbythyme 11:20, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Malo - Surcouf et le Fort National.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Also a definitive and irrefutable proof that weather is always great in Brittany. --Eusebius 12:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC). Qui OSE dire le contraire ?? QI for me.--Jebulon 12:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stirling - Robert the Bruce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wish the sky were blue! --Jovianeye 00:45, 5 April 2010 (UTC)  Support It's Scotland. We are not known for our cloudless skies. Anyway, I know that statue well, and that's quite a good reproduction of it, at least for that angle (I think it looks better from a slight tilt) It's maybe a teeny bit blurred around the shield, but Bruce himself is good. Of course, it's a fairly modern sculpture - I think 19th century - but I don't think there are many better, as Sterling is the site of the Battle of Stirling Bridge, one of his more important battles. Adam Cuerden 18:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)  Comment This statue is more related to Bannockburn than to Stirling bridge... --Eusebius 21:32, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eilean Donan pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great atmosphere --Mbdortmund 21:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Blair castle - coat of arms.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blair castle - coat of arms.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bréhec - pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbotot (talk) 16:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anjar - chapiteau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and useful. And your sky looks perfect for me (no noise).--Jebulon 22:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citadelle d'Alep - motif hexagonal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good lighting, excellent sharpness, good composition - no doubt: it's a QI. -- MJJR 19:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Malo - plage du Môle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anjar - Cardo vu du nord 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anjar - Cardo vu du nord 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 15:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anjar - decumanus vue de l'est.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 15:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anjar vu du palais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 15:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citadelle d'Alep.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and very descriptive.QI for me.---Jebulon 17:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HP M407 fermé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 12:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleppo citadel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

imho the best one in scope --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:46, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yashica mat 124G - WLF ouvert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments for me, front is too dark, and side has too much light. Maybe the part above a little unsharp too. Not so good as it should be. Other review needed.--Jebulon 20:40, 30 April 2010 (UTC) Personnally, I think it well exposed, the details are perfect and this is a useful picture.--Letartean 12:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)